Skip to main content
Log in

Brief Report: Assessment of the Social-Emotional Profile in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders using a Novel Comic Strip Task

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated whether the novel Comic Strip Task (CST) could be used to detect Theory-of-Mind impairments (ToM) in 4- to 8-year-old children with high functioning Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). Twelve children with either high-functioning autism or Asperger’s Disorder and 12 typically-developing children completed the 21-item measure. The overall CST demonstrated moderate internal consistency but the Belief-understanding subscale was excluded from the test due to poor reliability. As predicted, the ASD group performed significantly more poorly than controls on the overall 2-subscale CST and on the intention-understanding subscale. No group differences were found in emotion-understanding subscale performance. Controlling for age, verbal ability was positively correlated with overall CST performance across groups. CST performance in the ASD group positively correlated with parent-reports of communication difficulties. Despite some limitations with the belief-understanding subscale, the CST has promising psychometric features warranting further development of this measure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Adolphs, R. (2003). Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 165–178. doi:10.1038/nrn1056.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Astington, J. W. (2001). The future of theory-of-mind research: Understanding motivational states, the role of language, and real-world consequences. Child Development, 72, 685–687. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Astington, J. W., & Jenkins, J. M. (1999). A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory of mind development. Developmental Psychology, 35(5), 1311–1320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (2001). Theory of mind and autism: A review. International Review of Mental Retardation, 23, 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Spitz, A., & Cross, P. (1993). Can children with autism recognize surprise? Cognition and Emotion, 7, 507–516. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blijd-Hoogewys, E. M., van Geert, P. L., Serra, M., & Minderaa, R. B. (2008). Measuring theory of mind in children: Psychometric properties of the ToM Storybooks. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1907–1930. doi:10.1007/s10803-008-0585-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boria, S., Fabbri-Destro, M., Cattaneo, L., Sparaci, L., Sinigaglia, C., Santelli, E., et al. (2009). Intention understanding in autism. PLoS ONE, 4, e5596. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colle, L., Baron-Cohen, S., & Hill, J. (2007). Do children with autism have a Theory of Mind? A non-verbal test of autism vs. specific language impairment. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 716–723. doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0198-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, K., Rinehart, N., Gray, K., & Howlin, P. (2010). Comic strip task. Melbourne: Monash University Developmental Neuroscience and Genetic Disorders Laboratory and Monash University Centre for Developmental Psychiatry and Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Martino, A., Ross, K., Uddin, L. Q., Sklar, A. B., Castellanos, F. X., & Milham, M. P. (2009). Functional brain correlates of social and nonsocial processes in autism spectrum disorders: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Biological Psychiatry, 65, 63–74. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.09.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dziobek, I., Fleck, S., Kalbe, E., Rogers, K., Hassenstab, J., Brand, M., et al. (2006). Introducing MASC: A movie for the assessment of social cognition. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 623–636. doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0107-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1999). Cognitive development: Children’s knowledge about the mind. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 21–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frye, D., Zelazo, P. D., & Palfai, T. (1995). Theory of mind and rule-based reasoning. Cognitive Development, 10, 483–528. doi:10.1016/0885-2014(95)90024-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golan, O., Baron-Cohen, S., & Golan, Y. (2008). The ‘Reading the Mind in Films’ Task [child version]: Complex emotion and mental state recognition in children with and without autism spectrum conditions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1534–1541. doi:10.1007/s10803-007-0533-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, J. B., Klin, A., Carter, A. S., & Volkmar, F. R. (2000). Verbal bias in recognition of facial emotions in children with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 369–379. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Happe, F. (1995). The role of age and verbal ability in the theory of mind task performance of subjects with autism. Child Development, 66, 843–855. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00909.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, C., & Leekam, S. (2002). What are the links between Theory of Mind and social relations? Review, reflections and new directions for studies of typical and atypical development. Social Development, 13, 29. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2004.00285.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, K., Astington, J. W., & Dack, L. A. (2007). Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development, 78, 622–646. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01018.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, W., Baron-Cohen, S., & Rutter, M. (1998). Understanding intention in normal development and in autism. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 337–348. Retrieved from: http://www.autismresearchcentre.com/docs/papers/1.

  • Prior, M. R., Dahlstrom, B., & Squires, T. (1990). Autistic children’s knowledge of thinking and feeling states in other people. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 587–601. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1990.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, V. (1996). Theory of mind and central coherence in schizophrenia and autism. Unpublished PhD thesis, Institute of Psychiatry, University of London.

  • Ronald, A., Happe, F., Bolton, P., Butcher, L. M., Price, T. S., Wheelwright, S., et al. (2006). Genetic heterogeneity between the three components of the autism spectrum: A twin study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 45, 691–699. doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000215325.13058.9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rump, K. M., Giovannelli, J. L., Minshew, N. J., & Strauss, M. S. (2009). The development of emotion recognition in individuals with autism. Child Development, 80, 1434–1447. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01343.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J., & Hill, E. L. (2001). Action-monitoring and intention reporting in children with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 317–328. doi:10.1002/icd.303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J., Hill, E. L., & Franco, F. (2001). The role of belief veracity in understanding intentions-in-action: Preschool children’s performance on the transparent intentions task. Cognitive Development, 16, 775–792. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(01)00057-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uekermann, J., Channon, S., Winkel, K., Schlebusch, P., & Daum, I. (2007). Theory of mind, humour processing and executive functioning in alcoholism. Addiction, 102, 232–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence (WASI) manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2002). Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence (WPPSI-III) (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2003a). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2003b). WISC-IV technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2004). Scaling of theory-of-mind tasks. Child Development, 75, 523–541. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00691.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D., & Happe, F. (2010). Representing intentions in self and other: Studies of autism and typical development. Developmental Science, 13, 307–319. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00885.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128. doi:0010-0277(83)90004-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the participants and their families for their generous participation in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole J. Rinehart.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Control Emotion-Recognition Images

 

figure a

Appendix 2: Instructions for CST administration

Today I am going to show you some pictures (these are the control emotion images to be administered prior to the comic strips in the following order:)

  • Happy

  • Angry

  • Sad

  • Surprised

  • Worried/Scared

  • Confused

First, I am going to show you some pictures of children, one at a time, and I would like you to tell me how you think each child is feeling.

Example 1: Look at this picture. This child is smiling and is feeling happy (point to picture).

Example 2: Now look at this picture. How do you think this child feels?

Feedback: No feedback about whether response was right or wrong. Move on to the next image after reinforcing the response. e.g. Well done!

Continue for the other 5 emotions.

Now we are going to do something different. I am going to show you some pictures that tell a story about some children. I will show you three pictures for each story, one at a time, and I want you to decide what is happening in the story. I will show you two more pictures and I would like you to pick which picture should be the ending of the story.

Would you like to ask me anything?

Example 1: Now look at this story (show first 3 pictures). In this story, the child is picking shells on the beach. He sees something in the sand and runs to see what it is. He picks it up and finds out that it’s just an old shoe (point to each picture as described). Now look at these two pictures (show two endings). In this ending, the child throws the shoe into the water (point to picture). In this ending, the child throws the shoe into the bin (point to picture). I want you choose one of these two pictures to tell me what happens next in this story.

Feedback: Well done.

Example 2: Now look at this story (show first 3 pictures of another control scenario). What do you think happens next? (Show the 2 options)

Feedback: Good job!

Would you like to ask me anything before we look at the next story?

Scenarios 3–21(begin with Emotions, followed by Beliefs and lastly Intentions): Now look at this story (show first 3 pictures). What do you think happens next? (show two options)

Feedback: Good!

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sivaratnam, C.S., Cornish, K., Gray, K.M. et al. Brief Report: Assessment of the Social-Emotional Profile in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders using a Novel Comic Strip Task. J Autism Dev Disord 42, 2505–2512 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1498-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1498-8

Keywords

Navigation