Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Bibliometric Study on Academic Dishonesty Research

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Educational policy and social sciences researchers have been studying dishonest behaviors among students for a long time. In this bibliometric study we examine the extant literature on academic dishonesty until 2017. We also analyze the specific case of the literature on plagiarism (as a specific type of academic dishonesty) since it is arguably one of the most common academic dishonest behavior. We aim at identifying the intellectual structure of the field of academic dishonesty and plagiarism. Results show that Donald L. McCabe (academic dishonesty) and Richard L. Marsh (plagiarism) appear as the most productive authors. Furthermore, Whitley (Research in Higher Education, 39(3), 235–274, 1998) “Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review”, and Pennycook (TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 201–230, 1996), entitled “Borrowing others’ words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism” are the most cited publications on academic dishonesty and on plagiarism, respectively. Additionally, a strong connection between the McCabe and Treviño articles emerged from the co-citation analysis on academic dishonesty, and also a strong relationship between Pennycook (TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 201–230, 1996) and Pecorari (Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(4), 317–345, 2003), suggesting that these articles are strongly connected. Results suggest that these are the most influential authors and articles of the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abusafia, A. H., Roslan, N. S., Yusoff, D. M., & Nor, M. Z. M. (2018). The prevalence of academic dishonesty among Malaysian nursing students. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 13(4), 370–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albort-Morant, G., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of international impact of business incubators. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1775–1779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderman, E. M., Griesinger, T., & Westerfield, G. (1998). Motivation and cheating during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelil-Carter, S. (2000). Stolen words? Plagiarism in writing. Harlow, UK: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, P., Bannister, P., Thorne, P., & Students on the Qualitative Research Methods Course Unit. (1997). Guilty in whose eyes? University students’ perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 187–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. S. (1980). Current trends in college cheating. Psychology in the Schools, 17(4), 515–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnhardt, B. (2016). The “epidemic” of cheating depends on its definition: a critique of inferring the moral quality of “cheating in any form”. Ethics & Behavior, 26(4), 330–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beets, S. D., Lewis, B. R., & Brower, H. H. (2013). The quality of business ethics journals: an assessment based on application. Business & Society, 0007650313478974.

  • Bjork, S., Offer, A., & Soderberg, G. (2014). Time series citation data: the Nobel prize in economics. Scientometrics, 98(1), 185–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla, C. A., Merigó, J. M., & Torres-Abad, C. (2015). Economics in Latin America: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 105(2), 1239–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing social networks. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Bowers, W. J. (1964). Student dishonesty and its control in college. New York: Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. S., & Murphy, D. R. (1989). Cryptomnesia: delineating inadvertent plagiarism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(3), 432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canning, R. (1956). Does an honor system reduce classroom cheating? An experimental answer. Journal of Experimental Education, 24, 291–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasoma, R., Thompson, C., & Pennycook, A. (2004). Beyond plagiarism: transgressive and nontransgressive intertextuality. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 3(3), 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, J. K. (2016). Moral propensity, setting, and choice: a partial test of situational action theory. Deviant Behavior, 37(7), 811–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crown, D. F., & Spiller, M. S. (1998). Learning from the literature on collegiate cheating: a review of empirical research. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(6), 683–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, J. G. (2017). Educating business students about sustainability: a bibliometric review of current trends and research needs. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 429–439.

  • Currie, P. (1998). Staying out of trouble: apparent plagiarism and academic survival. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19(1), 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deckert, G. D. (1993). Perspectives on plagiarism from ESL students in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2(2), 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, M., Sheard, J., Bareiss, C., Carter, J., Joyce, D., Harding, T., & Laxer, C. (2003). Addressing student cheating: definitions and solutions. ACD SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(2), 172–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., Clark, R. E., Williams, L. E., Francis, B., & Haines, V. J. (1996). College cheating: ten years later. Research in Higher Education, 37(4), 487–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diodato, V. (1994). Dictionary of Bibliometrics. Binghamton: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, M. (2011). A bibliometric study on Ghoshal’s managing across borders. Multinational Business Review, 19(4), 357–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, M. P., Reis, N. R., Almeida, M., & Serra, F. R. (2013). International business research: Understanding past paths to design future research directions. In T. Devinney, T. Pedersen, & L. Tihanyi (Eds.), Philosophy of science and meta-knowledge in international business and management (Advances in international management, volume 26) (pp. 299–330). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, M., Santos, J., Almeida, M., & Reis, N. (2014). Mergers & acquisitions research: a bibliometric study of top strategy and international business journals, 1980-2010. Journal of Business Research, 67, 2550–2558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Newstead, S. E. (1995). Undergraduate cheating: who does what and why? Studies in Higher Education, 20(2), 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genereux, R. L., & McLeod, B. A. (1995). Circumstances surrounding cheating: a questionnaire study of college students. Research in Higher Education, 36(6), 687–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldie, D., Linick, M., Jabbar, H., & Lubienski, C. (2014). Using bibliometric and social media analyses to explore the “echo chamber” hypothesis. Educational Policy, 28(2), 281–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, M. A., Monday, J., O’Brien, K., & Steffen, S. (1994). Cheating at small colleges: an examination of student and faculty attitudes and behaviors. Journal of College Student Development, 35(4), 255–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundolf, K., & Filser, M. (2013). Management research and religion: a citation analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 177–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurzki, H., & Woisetschläger, D. M. (2017). Mapping the luxury research landscape: a bibliometric citation analysis. Journal of Business Research, 77, 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, V. J., Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., & Clark, R. E. (1986). College cheating: immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude. Research in Higher Education, 25(4), 342–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P. (2018). Surfacing a hidden literature: a systematic review of research on educational leadership and management in Africa. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(3), 362–384.

  • Harding, T. S., Carpenter, D. D., Finelli, C. J., & Passow, H. J. (2004). Does academic dishonesty relate to unethical behavior in professional practice? An exploratory study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10, 311–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harp, J., & Taietz, P. (1966). Academic integrity and social structure: a study of cheating among college students. Social Problems, 13(4), 365–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, H., & May, M. A. (1928). Studies in Deceit. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, E. M., & Feldman, S. E. (1964). College cheating as a function of subject and situational variables. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55(4), 212–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. M. (1995). Plagiarisms, authorships, and the academic death penalty. College English, 57(7), 788–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, L. A., Arnett, J. J., Feldman, S. S., & Cauffman, E. (2002). It’s wrong, but everybody does it: academic dishonesty among high school and college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 209–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88(1), 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A. E. (2001). College student cheating: the role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes, and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koul, R., Clariana, R. B., Jitgarun, K., & Songsriwittaya, A. (2009). The influence of achievement goal orientation on plagiarism. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 506–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuntz, J. R., & Butler, C. (2014). Exploring individual and contextual antecedents of attitudes toward the acceptability of cheating and plagiarism. Ethics & Behavior, 24(6), 478–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, E. G., Hogan, N. L., & Barton, S. M. (2003). Collegiate academic dishonesty revisited: what have they done, how often have they done it, who does it, and why did they do it. Electronic Journal of Sociology, 7(4), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Z. (2009). The status of contemporary business ethics research: present and future. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, T., Reis, N., & Gomes, J. F. (2018). Responsible leadership research: a bibliometric review. Brazilian Administration Review, 15(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, R. L., & Bower, G. H. (1993). Eliciting cryptomnesia: unconscious plagiarism in a puzzle task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(3), 673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, J. D., & Campion, J. (2018). Academic integrity and referencing: whose responsibility is it? Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 12(1), A213–A226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, R. L., & Landau, J. D. (1995). Item availability in cryptomnesia: assessing its role in two paradigms of unconscious plagiarism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(6), 1568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, R. L., Landau, J. D., & Hicks, J. L. (1997). Contributions of inadequate source monitoring to unconscious plagiarism during idea generation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(4), 886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & De Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435(7043), 737–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. (1992). The influence of situational ethics on cheating among college students. Sociological Inquiry, 62(3), 365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., & Treviño, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: honor codes and other contextual influences. The Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 522–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., & Treviño, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: a multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38(3), 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: a decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2002). Honor codes and other contextual influences on academic integrity: a replication and extension to modified honor code settings. Research in Higher Education, 43(3), 357–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 294–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, J. W., & Miethe, T. D. (1989). Applying theories of deviance to academic cheating. Social Science Quarterly, 70(4), 870–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, S. A., White, B., & Lee, J. (2018). A systematic review into the psychological causes and correlates of plagiarism. Ethics & Behavior, 28(4), 261–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, T. B., & Anderman, E. M. (2006). Motivational perspectives on student cheating: toward an integrated model of academic dishonesty. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 129–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, T. B., Hale, N. M., & Weber, M. J. (2001). Predictors of cheating among early adolescents: academic and social motivations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 96–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtonen, M., Gruber, H., & Lehtinen, E. (2017). The return of behaviourist epistemology: a review of learning outcomes studies. Educational Research Review, 22, 114–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustaine, E. E., & Tewksbury, R. (2005). Southern college students’ cheating behaviors: an examination of problem behavior correlates. Deviant Behavior, 26(5), 439–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newstead, S. E., Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Armstead, P. (1996). Individual differences in student cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonis, S., & Swift, C. O. (2001). Personal value profiles and ethical business decisions. Journal of Education for Business, 76(5), 251–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orosz, G., Dombi, E., Tóth-Király, I., Bőthe, B., Jagodics, B., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2016). Academic cheating and time perspective: cheaters live in the present instead of the future. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 39–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Rourke, J., Barnes, J., Deaton, A., Fulks, K., Ryan, K., & Rettinger, D. A. (2010). Imitation is the sincerest form of cheating: the influence of direct knowledge and attitudes on academic dishonesty. Ethics & Behavior, 20(1), 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswick, C. (2009). Burgeoning workplace spirituality? A textual analysis of momentum and directions. Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 6(1), 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: plagiarism by university students-literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pecorari, D. (2003). Good and original: plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(4), 317–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others’ words: text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 201–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, O., Danell, R., & Wiborg, S. J. (2009). How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. In F. Åström, R. Danell, B. Larsen, & J. Schneider (Eds.), Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th birthday (pp. 9–24). Leuven: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P., & Bachrach, D. G. (2008). Scholarly influence in the field of management: a bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. Journal of Management, 34(4), 641–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Rodríguez, A., & Ruíz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: a bibliometric study of the strategic management journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, N. R., Carvalho, F., & Ferreira, J. V. (2015). An overview of three decades of mergers and acquisitions research. Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management, 14(2), 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettinger, D. A., & Kramer, Y. (2009). Situational and personal causes of student cheating. Research in Higher Education, 50(3), 293–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roig, M. (1997). Can undergraduate students determine whether text has been plagiarized? The Psychological Record, 47(1), 113–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roig, M. (2001). Plagiarism and paraphrasing criteria of college and university professors. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 307–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2008). ‘Not necessarily a bad thing…’: a study of online plagiarism amongst undergraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 465–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, L. (2004). Textual borrowing in second-language writing. Written Communication, 21(2), 171–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. L. (1993). The relationship between academic dishonesty and unethical business practices. Journal of Education for Business, 68(4), 207–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, J. M., Young, M. F., & Calabrese, T. (2007). Does moral judgment go offline when students are online? A comparative analysis of undergraduates’ beliefs and behaviors related to conventional and digital cheating. Ethics & Behavior, 17(3), 233–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talukdar, D. (2011). Patterns of research productivity in the business ethics literature: Insights from analyses of bibliometric distributions. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 137–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts, S. G. (1997). Gender differences in students’ rational decisions to cheat. Deviant Behavior, 18(4), 393–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uysal, Ö. (2010). Business ethics research with an accounting focus: a bibliometric analysis from 1988 to 2007. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 137–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Dran, G. M., Callahan, E. S., & Taylor, H. V. (2001). Can students’ academic integrity be improved? Attitudes and behaviours before and after implementation of an academic integrity policy. Teaching Business Ethics, 5, 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G. G., Gilley, J. W., & Sun, Y. S. (2012). The “science of HRD research”: reshaping HRD research through scientometrics. Human Resource Development Review, 11(4), 500–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, D., & McCain, K. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H., Wellman, B., & Nazer, N. (2004). Does citation reflect social structure? Longitudinal evidence from the “Globenet” Interdisciplinary Research Group. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2), 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: a review. Research in Higher Education, 39(3), 235–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J. (2009). Staff and student perceptions of plagiarism and cheating. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 98–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazici, A., Yazici, S., & Erdem, M. S. (2011). Faculty and student perceptions on college cheating: evidence from Turkey. Educational Studies, 37, 221–231.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Technology and Management, CARME – Centre of Applied Research in Management and Economics, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Morro do Lena - Alto Vieiro, 2411-901, Leiria, Portugal

    Tânia Marques & Nuno Reis

  2. Lisbon School of Economics and Management (ISEG)/Advance, University of Lisbon, Rua do Quelhas, 6, 1249-078, Lisbon, Portugal

    Jorge Gomes

Authors
  1. Tânia Marques
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nuno Reis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jorge Gomes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tânia Marques.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 75 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 41 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marques, T., Reis, N. & Gomes, J. A Bibliometric Study on Academic Dishonesty Research. J Acad Ethics 17, 169–191 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09328-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09328-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation