Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of biomethane potential of waste algal biomass collected from eutrophied lake: effect of source of inocula, co-substrate, and VS loading

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Phycology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Present study used sequential optimization of inoculum, co-substrate, and volatile solid (VS) loading rate to enhance biomethanation of waste algal biomass (HL) collected from eutrophied Hauz Khas lake, India. The mixed algal biomass was rich in lipids (45% TS) with a C/N ratio of 10.08 and 88% VS. Higher methane yield (279 mL g−1 VSfed) was observed using inoculum from algae-cattle dung based biogas plant compared to 170–200 mL g−1 VSfed using other inocula (from sewage sludge, Jatropha/ Karanja cake and cattle dung based plant). Biomethane yield was further enhanced (312 mL g−1 VSfed) by co-digestion with cattle dung (HL + CD) as compared to 282 mL g−1 VSfed for HL + WAS (waste activated sludge). Further, VS loading of 5 g VS L−1 gave highest methane yield of 315 mL g−1 VSfed, while a decrease (240 and 224 mL g−1 VSfed) was observed at 10 and 15 g VS L−1, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angelidaki I, Alves M, Bolzonella D, Borzacconi L, Campos JL, Guwy AJ, Van Lier JB (2009) Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Sci Technol 59:927–934

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aramrueang N, Rapport J, Zhang R (2016) Effects of hydraulic retention time and organic loading rate on performance and stability of anaerobic digestion of Spirulina platensis. Biosyst Eng 147:174–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beltrán C, Jeison D, Fermoso FG, Borja R (2016) Batch anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and microalgae (Chlorella sorokiniana) at mesophilic temperature. J Environ Sci Health A 51:847–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamy R, Ramos C (2011) Factors in the determination of methanogenic potential of manure. Bioresour Technol 102:7673–7677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra R, Vijay VK, Subbarao PMV, Khura TK (2012) Production of methane from anaerobic digestion of jatropha and pongamia oil cakes. Appl Energy 93:148–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary P, Prajapati SK, Malik A (2016) Screening native microalgal consortia for biomass production and nutrient removal from rural wastewaters for bioenergy applications. Ecol Eng 91:221–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vrieze J, Gildemyn S, Vilchez-Vargas R, Jáuregui R, Pieper DH, Verstraete W, Boon N (2015a) Inoculum selection is crucial to ensure operational stability in anaerobic digestion. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vrieze J, Raport L, Willems B, Verbrugge S, Volcke E, Meers E, Boon N (2015b) Inoculum selection influences the biochemical methane potential of agro-industrial substrates. Microb Biotechnol 8:776–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debowski M, Zieliński M, Grala A, Dudek M (2013) Algae biomass as an alternative substrate in biogas production technologies—review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 27:596–604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dhup S (2016) Isolation, characterization and large scale cultivation of algae for lipid production. PhD thesis. TERI University, New Delhi, India. http://hdl.handle.net/10603/139526

  • Ding MA, Zhiyong Q, Zhengbo Y, Chen T, Wang J (2017) Effect of goethite on anaerobic co-digestion process of corn straw and algae biomass. Acta Geol Sin 91:166–167

  • Dubois M, Gilles K, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1951) A colorimetric method for the determination of sugars. Nature 168:167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Franson MH (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water & wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbeshbishy E, Nakhla G, Hafez H (2012) Biochemical methane potential (BMP) of food waste and primary sludge: influence of inoculum pre-incubation and inoculum source. Bioresour Technol 110:18–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Romero J, Gonzalez-Garcia A, Chairez I, Torres L, Garcia-Peña EI (2014) Selective adaptation of an anaerobic microbial community: biohydrogen production by co-digestion of cheese whey and vegetables fruit waste. Int J Hydrog Energy 39:12541–12550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gou C, Yang Z, Huang J, Wang H, Xu H, Wang L (2014) Effects of temperature and organic loading rate on the performance and microbial community of anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and food waste. Chemosphere 105:146–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greses S, Gaby JC, Aguado D, Ferrer J, Seco A, Horn SJ (2017) Microbial community characterization during anaerobic digestion of Scenedesmus spp. under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Algal Res 27:121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu Y, Chen X, Liu Z, Zhou X, Zhang Y (2014) Effect of inoculum sources on the anaerobic digestion of rice straw. Bioresour Technol 158:149–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta KK, Aneja KR, Rana D (2016) Current status of cow dung as a bioresource for sustainable development. Bioresour Bioprocess 3:28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills DJ (1979) Effects of carbon: nitrogen ratio on anaerobic digestion of dairy manure. Agric Wastes 1:267–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Inglesby AE, Griffiths MJ, Harrison STL, Hille RP (2015) Anaerobic digestion of Spirulina sp. and Scenedesmus sp.: a comparison and investigation of the impact of mechanical pre-treatment. J Appl Phycol 27:1891–1900

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kang A (2014) Protection and management of urban lakes in India. (Technical Report); URL:http://www.cseindia.org/userfiles/Lake Protection and Management of Urban Lakes in India.pdf

  • Karray R, Karray F, Loukil S, Mhiri N, Sayadi S (2017) Anaerobic co-digestion of Tunisian green macroalgae Ulva rigida with sugar industry wastewater for biogas and methane production enhancement. Waste Manag 61:171–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Kang C-M (2015) Increased anaerobic production of methane by co-digestion of sludge with microalgal biomass and food waste leachate. Bioresour Technol 189:409–412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P (2018) Process optimization and pilot scale testing of algal biomethanation integrated with wastewater treatment. PhD Thesis. Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India

  • Kumar P, Prajapati SK, Malik A, Vijay VK (2017) Cultivation of native algal consortium in semi-continuous pilot scale raceway pond for wastewater treatment coupled with methane production. J Environ Chem Eng 5:5581–5587

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kundu K, Sharma S, Sreekrishnan TR (2012) Effect of operating temperatures on the microbial community profiles in a high cell density hybrid anaerobic bioreactor. Bioresour Technol 118:502–511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Labatut RA., Gooch CA. (2012) Monitoring of anaerobic digestion process to optimize performance and prevent system failure. In: Proceedings of got manure? Enhancing environmental and economic sustainability pp 209–225

  • Lay J-J, Li Y-Y, Noike T (1996) Effect of moisture content and chemical nature on methane fermentation characteristics of municipal solid wastes. J Environ Systs Eng 552:101–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JY, Yoo C, Jun SY, Ahn CY, Oh HM (2010) Comparison of several methods for effective lipid extraction from microalgae. Bioresour Technol 101:S75–S77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li R, Duan N, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Li B, Zhang D, Dong T (2017) Anaerobic co-digestion of chicken manure and microalgae Chlorella sp.: methane potential, microbial diversity and synergistic impact evaluation. Waste Manag 68:120–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Markou G, Angelidaki I, Georgakakis D (2013) Carbohydrate-enriched cyanobacterial biomass as feedstock for bio-methane production through anaerobic digestion. Fuel 111:872–879

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mendez L, Mahdy A, Demuez M, Ballesteros M, González-Fernández C (2014) Effect of high pressure thermal pretreatment on Chlorella vulgaris biomass: organic matter solubilisation and biochemical methane potential. Fuel 117:674–679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meneses-Reyes JC, Hernández-Eugenio G, Huber DH, Balagurusamy N, Espinosa-Solares T (2017) Biochemical methane potential of oil-extracted microalgae and glycerol in co-digestion with chicken litter. Bioresour Technol 224:373–379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montingelli ME, Tedesco S, Olabi AG (2015) Biogas production from algal biomass: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 43:961–972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Motte J-C, Escudi R, Bernet N, Delgenes JP, Steyer JP, Dumas C (2013) Dynamic effect of total solid content, low substrate/inoculum ratio and particle size on solid-state anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 144:141–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mussgnug JH, Klassen V, Schlüter A, Kruse O (2010) Microalgae as substrates for fermentative biogas production in a combined biorefinery concept. J Biotechnol 150:51–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naik SN (2011) Use of CO2 in micro-algal biomass production enhancement. In: Borgvang SA (ed) International workshop on algae technology, hydrogen production and use of algae biomass. Kolkata, India, p 16

    Google Scholar 

  • Passos F, Ferrer I (2015) Influence of hydrothermal pretreatment on microalgal biomass anaerobic digestion and bioenergy production. Water Res 68:364–373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patil SS, Kumar MS, Ball AS (2010) Microbial community dynamics in anaerobic bioreactors and algal tanks treating piggery wastewater. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87:353–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prajapati SK, Kaushik P, Malik A, Vijay VK (2013) Phycoremediation and biogas potential of native algal isolates from soil and wastewater. Bioresour Technol 135:232–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prajapati SK, Choudhary P, Malik A, Vijay VK (2014a) Algae mediated treatment and bioenergy generation process for handling liquid and solid waste from dairy cattle farm. Bioresour Technol 167:260–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prajapati SK, Malik A, Vijay VK (2014b) Comparative evaluation of biomass production and bioenergy generation potential of Chlorella spp. through anaerobic digestion. Appl Energy 114:790–797

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rétfalvi T, Szabó P, Hájos AT, Albert L, Kovács A, Milics G, Ördög V (2016) Effect of co-substrate feeding on methane yield of anaerobic digestion of Chlorella vulgaris. J Appl Phycol 28:2741–2752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rincón B, Borja R, González JM, Portillo MC, Sáiz-Jiménez C (2008) Influence of organic loading rate and hydraulic retention time on the performance, stability and microbial communities of one-stage anaerobic digestion of two-phase olive mill solid residue. Biochem Eng J 40:253–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy D (2016) Revival of Hauz Khas lake in Delhi: approaches to urban water resource management in India. J Manag Sustain 6:73

    Google Scholar 

  • Salminen EA, Rintala JA (2002) Semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of solid poultry slaughterhouse waste: effect of hydraulic retention time and loading. Water Res 36:3175–3182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sialve B, Bernet N, Bernard O (2009) Anaerobic digestion of microalgae as a necessary step to make microalgal biodiesel sustainable. Biotechnol Adv 27:409–416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siedlecka EME, Kumirska J, Ossowski T, Glamowski P, Gołębiowski M, Gajdus J, Stepnowski P (2008) Determination of volatile fatty acids in environmental aqueous samples. Orig Res Polish J Environ Stud 17:351–356

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha N (2009) Algae choke Hauz Khas lake. In: The Indian express. http://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/algae-choke-hauz-khas-lake/. Accessed 14 Jul 2017

  • Solé-Bundó M, Eskicioglu C, Garfí M, Carrère H, Ferrer I (2017) Anaerobic co-digestion of microalgal biomass and wheat straw with and without thermo-alkaline pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 237:89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symons GE, Buswell AM (1933) The methane fermentation of carbohydrates. J Am Chem Soc 55:2028–2036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thawani M, Hans N, Samuchiwal S, Prajapati SK (2018) Improved methane yield from wastewater grown algal biomass. Water Sci Technol wst2018029. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2018.02

  • Thorin E, Olsson J, Schwede S, Nehrenheim E (2017) Biogas from co-digestion of sewage sludge and microalgae. Energy Procedia 105:1037–1042

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tran KC, Mendoza Martin JL, Heaven S, Banks CJ, Fernandez FA, Grima EM (2014) Cultivation and anaerobic digestion of Scenedesmus spp. grown in a pilot-scale open raceway. Algal Res 5:95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah K, Ahmad M, Sofia SVK, Lu P, Harvey A, Zafar M, Sultana S (2015) Assessing the potential of algal biomass opportunities for bioenergy industry: a review. Fuel 143:414–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vassilev SV, Vassileva CG (2016) Composition, properties and challenges of algae biomass for biofuel application: an overview. Fuel 181:1–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward A, Lewis D (2015) Pre-treatment options for halophytic microalgae and associated methane production. Bioresour Technol 177:410–413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward AJ, Lewis DM, Green FB (2014) Anaerobic digestion of algae biomass: a review. Algal Res 5:204–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward A, Ball A, Lewis D (2015) Halophytic microalgae as a feedstock for anaerobic digestion. Algal Res 7:16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu F, Shi J, Lv W, Yu Z, Li Y (2013) Comparison of different liquid anaerobic digestion effluents as inocula and nitrogen sources for solid-state batch anaerobic digestion of corn stover. Waste Manag 33:26–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng S, Yuan X, Shi X, Qiu Y (2010) Effect of inoculum/substrate ratio on methane yield and orthophosphate release from anaerobic digestion of Microcystis spp. J Hazard Mater 178:89–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao MX, Ruan WQ (2013) Biogas performance from co-digestion of Taihu algae and kitchen wastes. Energy Convers Manag 75:21–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhen G, Lu X, Kobayashi T, Kumar G, Xu K (2016) Anaerobic co-digestion on improving methane production from mixed microalgae (Scenedesmus sp., Chlorella sp.) and food waste: kinetic modeling and synergistic impact evaluation. Chem Eng J 299:332–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou L, Boyd CE (2016) Comparison of Nessler, phenate, salicylate and ion selective electrode procedures for determination of total ammonia nitrogen in aquaculture. Aquaculture 450:187–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Department of Biotechnology (Grant no. DBT/IC-2/Indo-Brazil/2016-19/06), Govt. of India for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Applied Microbiology Lab (AML), Centre for Rural Development and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India

    Pushpendar Kumar & Anushree Malik

  2. Biogas Laboratory, Centre for Rural Development and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India

    Pushpendar Kumar & Virendra Kumar Vijay

  3. BioResource Engineering Lab (BREL), Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Patna, Bihta, Patna, Bihar, 801103, India

    Sanjeev Kumar Prajapati

Authors
  1. Pushpendar Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sanjeev Kumar Prajapati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anushree Malik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Virendra Kumar Vijay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sanjeev Kumar Prajapati or Anushree Malik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, P., Prajapati, S.K., Malik, A. et al. Evaluation of biomethane potential of waste algal biomass collected from eutrophied lake: effect of source of inocula, co-substrate, and VS loading. J Appl Phycol 31, 533–545 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-018-1585-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-018-1585-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation