Skip to main content
Log in

Landscape, Experience and GIS: Exploring the Potential for Methodological Dialogue

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Armit, I. (1997). Cultural landscapes and identities: A case study in the Scottish Iron Age. In C. Hasselgrove & A. Gwilt (Eds.), Reconstructing Iron Age societies (Monograph 71) (pp. 248–254). Oxford: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armit, I. (2003). Towers in the North: The brochs of Scotland. Stroud: Tempus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armit, I. (2006). Anatomy of an Iron Age Roundhouse: The Cnip Wheelhouse Excavations, Lewis. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland.

  • Bender, B. (1993). Introduction: Landscape meaning and action. In B. Bender (Ed.), Landscapes, Politics and Perception (pp. 1–18). Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, B., Hamilton, S., & Tilley, C. (1997). Leskernick: Stone worlds; alternative narratives; nested landscapes. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 63, 147–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, B., Hamilton, S., & Tilley, C. (2007). Stone worlds: Narrative and reflexivity in Landscape Archaeology. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, J. (1998). In the footsteps of the ancestors: A review of Christopher Tilley’s phenomenology of landscape: Places, paths and monuments. Cambridge Archaeological Review, 15(1), 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, J. (2005). Experiencing the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory. Archaeological Dialogues, 12(1), 45–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childe, V. G. (1935). The prehistory of Scotland. London: Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, V., & Whittle, A. (2004). Places of special virtue: Megaliths in the Neolithic landscapes of Wales. Oxford: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, A. (1999). Phenomenology and the Megaliths of Wales: A dreaming too far? Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 18(2), 119–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, A. (2006). Post-processual landscape archaeology: A critique. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, l6(3), 267–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, A. (2008). Island Stories, in Noble, G., Poller, T., Raven, J., and Verrill, L.(eds.)Scottish Odysseys: The Archaeology of Islands. Tempus: Stroud, 24–36.

  • Fojut, N. (1982). Towards a geography of Shetland Brochs. Glasgow Archaeological Journal, 9, 38–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, S. (1989). Analysis of spatial patterns in buildings as an insight into social structure. Antiquity, 63, 40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney, V. and Leusen, V. (1995). Postscript—GIS, environmental determinism and archaeology: a parallel text. In G. R. Lock & Z. Stancic (Eds.), Archaeology and geographic information systems: A European perspective (pp. 367–382). New Yor: Taylor and Francis.

  • Gaffney, V., Stancic, Z., & Watson, H. (1996). Moving from Catchement to Cognition: Tentative steps towards a larger archaeological context for GIS. In M. Aldenderfer & H. D. G. Maschner (Eds.), Anthropology, space and geographic information systems (pp. 132–154). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, M., & Parker Pearson, M. (1999). Learning to live in the Iron Age: Dwelling and praxis. In B. Bevan (Ed.), Northern exposure: Interpretive devolution and the Iron Ages in Britain (pp. 217–232). Leicester: Leicester Archaeology Monographs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, S., & Whitehouse, R. (2006a). Three senses of dwelling: Beginning to socialise the Neolithic ditched villages of the Tavoliere, southeast Italy. Iberian Archaeology, 8, 159–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, S., & Whitehouse, R. (2006b). Phenomenology in practice: Towards a methodology for a ‘subjective’ approach. European Journal of Archaeology, 9(1), 37–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, T. M., & Lock, G. R. (1995). Towards an evaluation of GIS in European Archaeology: The past, present and future of theory and applications. In G. Lock & Z. Stancic (Eds.), Archaeology and Geographic Information Systems: A European Perspective (pp. 349–365). London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hingley, R. (1984). The archaeology of settlement and the social significance of space. Scottish Archaeological Review, 1, 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (1993). The temporality of landscape. World Archaeology, 25, 152–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, W. J. And, & Sebastian, L. (1988). Quantifying the present and predicting the past: Theory, method and application of archaeological predictive modelling. Denver: US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Denver, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, M. P. (2002a). Feminist visualisation: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92, 645–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, M. P. (2002b). Is GIS for Women? Reflections on the critical discourse of the 1990. Gender, Place and Culture, 9(3), 271–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake, M., & Woodman, P. (2003). Visibility studies in archaeology: A review and case study. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, 369–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake, M., Woodman, P., & Mithen, S. (1998). Tailoring GIS software for archaeological applications: an example concerning viewshed analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science, 25, 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llobera, M. (2001). Building past landscape perception with GIS: Understanding topographic prominence. Journal of Archaeological Science, 28, 1005–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llobera, M. (2003). Extending GIS based analysis: The concept of visualscape. International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 1(17), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llobera, M. (2007). Reconstructing visual landscapes. World Archaeology, 39(1), 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lock, G. R. (2000). Session 1 discussion: a particular view. In G. R. Lock (Ed.), Beyond the map: Archaeology and spatial technologies (pp. 60–64). Amsterdam: IOS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mlekuz, D. (2004). "Listening to landscapes: Modelling past soundscapes in GIS. Internet Archaeology, 16. http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue16/mlekuz_toc.html. Accessed 12 Oct 2008.

  • Noble, G., & Stevens, F. (2008). An island of fluctuating perceptions: The landscape and archaeology of Bute. In G. Noble, T. Poller, J. Raven, & L. Verrill (Eds.), Scottish Odysseys: The archaeology of islands. Tempus: Stroud.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker Pearson, M., & Sharples, N. (1999). Between land and sea: Excavations at Dun Vulan. Sheffield: Sheffield University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker Pearson, M., Sharples, N., & Symonds, J. (2004). South Uist: Archaeology and history of a Hebridean island. Stroud: Tempus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajala, U. (2004). Sense and Sensibility: Reflections on the epistemology and ontology of GIS studies. Internet Archaeology, 16, http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue16. Accessed 12 Oct 2008.

  • Rennell, R. (2008). Exploring ‘everyday’ places in the Iron Age landscapes of the Outer Hebrides. In O. Davis, N. Sharples, & K. Waddington (Eds.), Changing perspectives on the First Millennium BC: Proceedings of the Iron Age Research Student Seminar 2006 (pp. 43–60). Oxford: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennell, R. (2009). Exploring places and landscapes of everyday experience in the Outer Hebridean Iron Age: A study of theory, method and application in experiential landscape archaeology. PhD Thesis, University College London.

  • Rennnell, R. (2010). Islands, islets, experience and identity in the Outer Hebridean Iron Age, in: Shima: The International Journal of Research into Island. Cultures, 4(1), 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sui, D. Z. (1994). GIS and urban studies: Positivism, post-positivism and beyond. Urban Geography, 15, 258–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (1993a). The politics of vision and the archaeologies of landscape. In B. Bender (Ed.), Landscape, politics and perspective (pp. 19–48). Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (1993b). The hermeneutics of megalithic space. In C. Tilley (Ed.), Interpretive archaeology. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (2001). Archaeologies of place and landscape. In I. Hooder (Ed.), Archaeological theory today (pp. 165–186). Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (2004). Archaeology and modernity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (2008). On the ocularcentrism of archaeology. In: J. Thomas and V. O. Jorge (Eds.). Archaeology and the politics of vision in a post-modern context (pp. 1–12). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.

  • Tilley, C. (1994). Phenomenology of landscape: Places, paths and movement. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, C. (2004). The materiality of stone: Explorations in landscape phenomenology. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hove, D. (2004). Time and experience: Taskscapes within GIS. Internet Archaeology, 16. http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue16. Accessed 12 Oct 2008.

  • Watson, A. (2006). (Un)intentional sound? Acoustics and Neolithic monuments. In C. Scarre & G. Lawson (Eds.), Archaeoacoustics. Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monograph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, D. (1995). Cumulative viewshed analysis: A GIS-based method for investigating intervisibility, and its archaeological application. In G. R. Lock & Z. Stancic (Eds.), Archaeology and geographical information systems: A European perspective (pp. 171–186). London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, D. (1996). The use of GIS to understand regional variation in Neolithic Wessex. In H. D. G. Maschner (Ed.), New methods, old problems: Geographic information systems in modern archaeological research (pp. 75–103). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Centre for Archaeological Investigations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, D. (2000). Spatial Technology and archaeologial theory revisited. In K. Lockyear, J. T. Sly, & Mihailescu-Birliba (Eds.), CAA '96—computer applications and quantitative methods in archaeology (pp. 123–132). Oxford: Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, D., & Gillings, M. (2000). Vision, Perception and GIS: developing enriched approaches to the study of archaeological visibility. In G. R. Lock (Ed.), Beyond the map: Archaeology and spatial technologies (pp. 1–27). Amsterdam: IOS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, P. (2000). Beyond significant patterning, towards past intentions: The location of Orcadian chambered tombs. In C. Buck, V. Cummings, C. Henley, C. Mills, & S. Trick (Eds.), Proceedings of the UK Chapter of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1999 (pp. 91–105). Oxford: Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Rennell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rennell, R. Landscape, Experience and GIS: Exploring the Potential for Methodological Dialogue. J Archaeol Method Theory 19, 510–525 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-012-9144-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-012-9144-5

Keywords

Navigation