Abstract
The challenge that we address concerns teachers’ shifts toward student-centered instruction. We report on a yearlong professional development study in which two United States elementary school teachers engaged in a teaching experiment, as described by Steffe and Thompson (in: Lesh and Kelly (eds) Research on design in mathematics and science education, 2000). The teaching experiment involved close mathematical interactions with a pair of students after school, in the context of solving fractions tasks. By conducting a teaching experiment, we anticipated that each teacher would have more opportunity to develop insight into students’ mathematics. We also anticipated that these insights would influence the teachers’ classroom practice, even without explicit support for such a shift. Indeed, the teachers found that they began asking more probing questions of their students and spending more time listening to students’ explanations, but shifts to classroom practice were limited by constraining factors such an inflexible curriculum.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arbaugh, F. (2003). Study groups as a form of professional development for secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 139–163.
Ball, D. L., & Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988). Using textbooks and teacher’s guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum Inquiry, 18(4), 401–423.
Ball, D. L., & Wilson, S. M. (1990). Knowing the subject and learning to teach it: Examining assumptions about becoming a mathematics teacher. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.
Chamberlain, M. T. (2005). Teachers’ discussions of students’ thinking: Meeting the challenge of attending to students’ thinking. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 141–170.
Cobb, P. (2000). Conducting teaching experiments in collaboration with teachers. In A. E. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 307–333). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1990). Classrooms as learning environments for teachers and researchers. In R. Davis, C. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph No.4 (pp. 125–146). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Cooney, T. J. (2001). Considering the paradoxes, perils, and purposes of conceptualizing teacher development. In F. L. Lin & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 9–31). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Farmer, J. D., Gerretson, H., & Lassak, M. (2003). What teachers take from professional development: Cases and implications. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 331–360.
Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V. R., & Empson, S. B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children’s thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 403–434.
Fraivillig, J. L., Murphy, L. A., & Fuson, K. C. (1999). Advancing children’s mathematical thinking in Everyday Mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 148–170.
Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., Lubienski, S. T., & Id-Deen, L. (2006). Reconsidering the study of mathematical instructional practices: The importance of curricular context in understanding local and global teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 313–345.
Olive, J. (1999). From fractions to rational numbers of arithmetic: A reorganization hypothesis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(4), 279–314.
Schifter, D., & Fosnot, C. (1993). Reconstructing mathematics education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Sherin, M. G. (2002). When teaching becomes learning. Cognition and Instruction, 20(2), 119–150.
Simon, M. A., & Schifter, D. (1991). Towards a constructivist perspective: An intervention study of mathematics teacher development. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(4), 309–331.
Steffe, L. P. (2002). A new hypothesis concerning children’s fractional knowledge. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20, 267–307.
Steffe, L. P., & D’Ambrosio, B. S. (1995). Toward a working model of constructivist teaching: A reaction to Simon. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 146–159.
Steffe, L. P., & Olive, J. (1996). Symbolizing as a constructive activity in a computer microworld. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(2), 103–128.
Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In R. Lesh, & A. E. Kelly (Eds.), Research on design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267–307). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Steffe, L. P., & Wiegel, H. G. (1996). On the nature of a model of mathematical learning. In L. P. Steffe (Ed.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 477–498). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Vace, N. N., & Bright, G. W. (1999). Elementary preservice teachers’ changing beliefs and instructional use of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 89–110.
von Glasersfeld, E., & Steffe, L. P. (1991). Conceptual models in educational research and practice. The Journal of Educational Thought, 25(2), 91–103.
Wright, R. J. (2000). Professional development in recovery education. In L. P. Steffe & P. W. Thompson (Eds.), Radical constructivism in action (Vol. 15, pp. 134–149). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Acknowledgments
A Maris M. Proffitt and Mary Higgins Proffitt Endowment Grant and Summer Faculty Fellowship funded the research reported here. We thank Amy Hackenberg and Signe Kastberg for their responses to earlier drafts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Norton, A.H., McCloskey, A. Teaching experiments and professional development. J Math Teacher Educ 11, 285–305 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9076-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9076-x