Abstract
Despite its ubiquity, little is known about the impact of exposure to conflicting health information on cognitive efficiency. We hypothesized that it would reduce attentional capacity, as evidenced by (1) increased response errors during the Attention Network Test (ANT), (2) decreased efficiency of each ANT system (alerting, orienting, execute control), and (3) increased self-reported workload, (4) nutritional confusion and (5) nutritional backlash. A sample of 184 online participants were assigned randomly to read an article containing either congruent or conflicting health information. Subsequently, they completed the ANT and self-report measures of workload, nutritional confusion, and backlash at nutritional recommendations and research. Participants in the conflicting health information condition made more errors, had overall slower reaction times, and reported greater workload, nutritional confusion, and backlash. No differences were found for individual ANT systems. These findings suggest that exposure to conflicting health information can degrade attentional mechanisms responsible for accurate and prompt responding to incoming information.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data available on request from the corresponding author. Stimuli used in this study are provided in the Supplemental Materials.
Notes
For ease of interpretation, means and standard deviations reported here are in untransformed units.
References
Aghayan, M., Hosseinpour-Niazi, S., Bakhshi, B., Mirmiran, P., & Azizi, F. (2021). Trends in dietary food groups and dietary approach to stop hypertension (DASH) score among adults: A longitudinal study from the Tehran lipid and glucose study, 2006–2017. Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2021.111284
American Dietetic Association. (2008). Nutrition and you: Trends 2008. Report and results. Retrieved from http://www.eatrightpro.org/~/media/eatrightpro%20files/media/trends%20and%20reviews/nutrition%20and%20you/trends_2008_presentation.ashx.
Backes, V., Kellermann, T., Voss, B., Krämer, J., Depner, C., Schneider, F., & Habel, U. (2011). Neural correlates of the attention network test in schizophrenia. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 261, 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-011-0264-9
Battiste, V., & Bortolussi, M. (1988). Transport pilot workload: A comparison of two subjective techniques. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 32, 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193128803200232
Berkman, N. D., & Donahue, K. (2011). Low health literacy and health outcomes: An updated systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine, 155, 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1059/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005
Blumenthal-Barby, J. S., & Krieger, H. (2015). Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: A critical review using a systematic search strategy. Medical Decision Making, 35, 539–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X14547740
Brewer, N. T., & Rimer, B. K. (2008). Perspectives on health behavior theories that focus on individuals. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 149–165). Jossey-Bass.
Carpenter, D. M., Geryk, L. L., Chen, A. T., Nagler, R. H., Dieckmann, N. F., & Han, P. K. J. (2016). Conflicting health information: A critical research need. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy, 19, 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12438
Champely, S. (2018). pwr: Basic functions for power analysis. R package version 1.2–2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pwr.
Chandler, J., & Shapiro, D. (2016). Conducting clinical research using crowdsourced convenience samples. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12, 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093623
Chang, C. (2013). Men’s and women’s responses to two-sided health news coverage: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Health Communication, 18, 1326–1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.778363
Chang, C. (2015). Motivated processing: How people perceive news covering novel or contradictory health research findings. Science Communication, 37, 602–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015597914
DeSimone, J. A., Harms, P. D., & DeSimone, A. J. (2015). Best practice recommendations for data screening: DATA SCREENING. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1962
DeWalt, D. A., Berkman, N. D., Sheridan, S., Lohr, K. N., & Pignone, M. P. (2004). Literacy and health outcomes: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19, 1228–1239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40153.x
Dixon, G. N., & Clarke, C. E. (2013). Heightening uncertainty around certain science: Media coverage, false balance, and the autism-vaccine controversy. Science Communication, 35, 358–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012458290
Do, D., & Schnittker, J. (2020). Utilization of medications with cognitive impairment side effects and the implications for older adults’ cognitive function. Journal of Aging and Health, 32, 1165–1177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264319895842
Ebaid, D., Crewther, S. G., MacCalman, K., Brown, A., & Crewther, D. P. (2017). Cognitive processing speed across the lifespan: Beyond the influence of motor speed. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00062
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203267
Fan, J. (2014). An information theory account of cognitive control. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00680
Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892902317361886
Fisher, J. D., & Fisher, W. A. (1992). Changing AIDS-risk behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 455–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.455
Fossella, J., Sommer, T., Fan, J., Wu, Y., Swanson, J. M., Pfaff, D. W., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Assessing the molecular genetics of attention networks. BMC Neuroscience, 3, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-3-14
Frosch, D. L., Moulton, B. W., Wexler, R. M., Holmes-Rovner, M., Volk, R. J., & Levin, C. A. (2011). Shared decision making in the United States: Policy and implementation activity on multiple fronts. Zeitschrift Für Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualität Im Gesundheitswesen, 105, 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.004
Furnham, A., & Henderson, M. (1982). The good, the bad and the mad: Response bias in self-report measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(82)90051-4
Garrison, K. E., Finley, A. J., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2019). Ego depletion reduces attention control: evidence from two high-powered preregistered experiments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 728–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218796473
Hart, S. G. (2006). Nasa-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50, 904–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909
Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 139–183). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
HHS (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services). (2000). Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/healthy_people/hp2010.htm
Hibbard, J. H., Slovic, P., & Jewett, J. J. (1997). Informing consumer decisions in health care: Implications from decision-making research. The Milbank Quarterly, 75, 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.00061
Hill, S. G., Iavecchia, H. P., Byers, J. C., Bittner, A. C., Zaklade, A. L., & Christ, R. E. (1992). Comparison of four subjective workload rating scales. Human Factors: THe Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 34, 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089203400405
Inquisit 5 [Computer software]. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.millisecond.com.
Isaacowitz, D. M., & Choi, Y. (2012). Looking, feeling, and doing: Are there age differences in attention, mood, and behavioral responses to skin cancer information? Health Psychology, 31, 650–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026666
Jensen, J. D., Giorgi, E. A., Jackson, J. R., Berger, J., Katz, R. A., & Mobley, A. R. (2020). Revisiting nutrition backlash: Psychometric properties and discriminant validity of the nutrition backlash scale. Nutrition, 78, 110949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2020.110949
Jung, E. H., Walsh-Childers, K., & Kim, H.-S. (2016). Factors influencing the perceived credibility of diet-nutrition information web sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.044
Keith, M. G., Tay, L., & Harms, P. D. (2017). Systems perspective of amazon mechanical turk for organizational research: Review and recommendations. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01359
Keselman, A., Browne, A. C., & Kaufman, D. R. (2008). Consumer health information seeking as hypothesis testing. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 15, 484–495. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2449
Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, Jr., Robert P., R., Richard L., C., & Brad S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel: Defense technical information center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA006655
Kittur, A., Chi, E. H., & Suh, B. (2008). Crowdsourcing user studies with mechanical turk. In Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual CHI conference on human factors in computing systems - CHI ’08, 453. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357127
Lee, C., Nagler, R. H., & Wang, N. (2018). Source-specific exposure to contradictory nutrition information: Documenting prevalence and effects on adverse cognitive and behavioral outcomes. Health Communication, 33, 453–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1278495
Longo, D. R., Schubert, S. L., Wright, B. A., LeMaster, J., Williams, C. D., & Clore, J. N. (2010). Health information seeking, receipt, and use in diabetes self-management. The Annals of Family Medicine, 8, 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1115
Manganello, J. A. (2007). Health literacy and adolescents: A framework and agenda for future research. Health Education Research, 23, 840–847. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cym069
Mann, T., & Ward, A. (2007). Attention, self-control, and health behaviors. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 280–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00520.x
Marshall, L. H., & Comello, M. L. (2019). Stymied by a wealth of health information: How viewing conflicting information online diminishes efficacy. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 12, 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2019.1580064
Mashiach, R., Seidman, G. I., & Seidman, D. S. (2002). Use of mifepristone as an example of conflicting and misleading medical information on the internet. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 109, 437–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.t01-1-01124.x
McConnell, M. M., & Shore, D. I. (2011). Mixing measures: Testing an assumption of the attention network test. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 1096–1107. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-010-0085-3
McDonald, J. H. (2014). Handbook of biological statistics (3rd ed.). Sparky House Publishing.
McIntosh, G. H., Noakes, M., Royle, P. J., & Foster, P. R. (2003). Whole-grain rye and wheat foods and markers of bowel health in overweight middle-aged men. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 77, 967–974. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/77.4.967
McRae, M. P. (2017). Health benefits of dietary whole grains: An umbrella review of meta-analyses. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 16, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.08.008
Metzger, M. J., & Flanagin, A. J. (2013). Credibility and trust of information in online environments: The use of cognitive heuristics. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.012
Nagler, R. H. (2014). Adverse outcomes associated with media exposure to contradictory nutrition messages. Journal of Health Communication, 19, 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.798384
Nagler, R. H., Fowler, E. F., & Gollust, S. E. (2015). Covering controversy: What are the implications for women’s health? Women’s Health Issues: Official Publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women’s Health, 25, 318–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2015.04.011
Nagler, R. H., Yzer, M. C., & Rothman, A. J. (2019). Effects of media exposure to conflicting information about mammography: Results from a population-based survey experiment. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 53, 896–908. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kay098
Nan, X., & Daily, K. (2015). Biased assimilation and need for closure: Examining the effects of mixed blogs on vaccine-related beliefs. Journal of Health Communication, 20, 462–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2014.989343
Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the turk: Understanding mechanical turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414531598
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414531598
Patterson, R. E., Satia, J. A., Kristal, A. R., Neuhouser, M. L., & Drewnowski, A. (2001). Is there a consumer backlash against the diet and health message? Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 101, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00010-4
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173933
Pinet, S., Zielinski, C., Mathôt, S., Dufau, S., Alario, F.-X., & Longcamp, M. (2017). Measuring sequences of keystrokes with jsPsych: Reliability of response times and interkeystroke intervals. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 1163–1176. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0776-3
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention: Then and now. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.937446
Posner, M. I. (2008). Measuring alertness. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1129, 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1417.011
Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325
Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Research on attention networks as a model for the integration of psychological science. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085516
Rueda, M. R., Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Halparin, J. D., Gruber, D. B., Lercari, L. P., & Posner, M. I. (2004). Development of attentional networks in childhood. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1029–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.012
Sanchez Hoffmann, S., Winkler, A., Weimar, C., Müller-Gerards, D., Abramowski, J., Moebus, S., Jöckel, K.-H., Erbel, R., & Jokisch, M. (2020). Blood pressure and cognitive decline: The impact of hypertension over one decade. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2020.1792403
Teixeira Lopes, C., & Ramos, E. (2020). Studying how health literacy influences attention during online information seeking. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on human information interaction and retrieval, pp. 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1145/3343413.3377966
Togo, F., Lange, G., Natelson, B. H., & Quigley, K. S. (2015). Attention network test: Assessment of cognitive function in chronic fatigue syndrome. Journal of Neuropsychology, 9, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12030
Wang, Y.-F., Jing, X.-J., Liu, F., Li, M.-L., Long, Z.-L., Yan, J. H., & Chen, H.-F. (2015). reliable attention network scores and mutually inhibited inter-network relationships revealed by mixed design and non-orthogonal method. Scientific Reports, 5, 10251. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10251
Worden, M. S. (2011). Attention network test (ANT). In J. S. Kreutzer, J. DeLuca, & B. Caplan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of clinical neuropsychology (pp. 296–297). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_1268
Xiao, M., Ge, H., Khundrakpam, B. S., Xu, J., Bezgin, G., Leng, Y., Zhao, L., Tang, Y., Ge, X., Jeon, S., Xu, W., Evans, A. C., & Liu, S. (2016). Attention performance measured by attention network test is correlated with global and regional efficiency of structural brain networks. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00194
Yoon, H., Sohn, M., Choi, M., & Jung, M. (2017). Conflicting online health information and rational decision making: implication for cancer survivors. The Health Care Manager, 36, 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1097/HCM.0000000000000159
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Drs. Shana Cole and David A. Wilder for their thoughtful feedback during the development of this study.
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
PVB and RJC contributed to the study formulation and design. PVB conducted the data collection and statistical analyses, contributed to the manuscript writing, and created figures. EJF contributed to the manuscript writing and created figures. RJC provided statistical and methodological oversight, and contributed to the manuscript writing. All authors contributed to the literature review and interpretation of the findings, and have read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Institutional Review Board (No. Pro2019001164).
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent for publication
The authors affirm that research participants provided informed consent for publication of aggregated results.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barnwell, P.V., Fedorenko, E.J. & Contrada, R.J. Healthy or not? The impact of conflicting health-related information on attentional resources. J Behav Med 45, 306–317 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-021-00256-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-021-00256-4