Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Positive Personality Traits as Predictors of Psychotherapy Progress

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objectives of this paper were to study if the traits of the Positive Personality Model (PPM; de la Iglesia and Castro Solano, in Front Psychol 9:2025, 2018) were stable throughout time, if patients perceived change in psychotherapy process, and if positive traits at the beginning of the treatment (Time 1) predicted psychotherapy progress after 3 (Time 2) and 6 (Time 3) months of psychological treatment. The sample was composed of 38 subjects, with a mean age of 38.82 (SD = 12.76; 63.2% female; 36.8% male), who had just initiated psychotherapy treatment (Time 1). Results of a repeated measures ANOVA indicated that there were no statistically significant differences in the positive traits within the three moments that were measured. On the contrary, the level of perceived (lack of) psychotherapy progress diminished significantly in each assessment. Since the measure is reversed, this indicates an increment in the self-perception of the patients regarding the progress in psychotherapy. Moreover, a model in which the positive traits in Time 1 were predictors of psychotherapy progress in Time 2 and in Time 3 resulted statistically significant. Of all the positive traits, sprightliness was the only significant predictor. It is concluded that positive traits are characterized by stability throughout time and that, once again, sprightliness stands out as the main predictor of desirable outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, G., Cuijpers, P., Carlbring, P., Riper, H., & Hedman, E. (2014). Guided Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry, 13(3), 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20151.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Arratia, M. (2007). La efectividad del proceso terapéutico en relación a la retroalimentación y la alianza terapéutica. Ciencia Psicológica, 1(2), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2008). The prediction of honesty-humility-related criteria by the HEXACO and Five-Factor models of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1216–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A. W., Gunderson, J., & Mulder, R. (2016). Tratamiento del trastorno de la personalidad. RET: Revista de Toxicomanías, 78, 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benítez, Á. P. R., Bastidas, I. L. O., & Camargo, Y. S. (2009). Factores que influyen en la deserción terapéutica de los consultantes de un centro universitario de atención psicológica. International Journal of Psychological Research, 2(2), 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bestard Bizet, R., Escobar De La Torre, J. C., & Bestard Silva, D. D. C. (2017). Efectividad del metamodelo meditativo en el tratamiento de los trastornos neuróticos. Revista Electrónica de Psicología Iztacala, 19(2), 516–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruijniks, S. J., Lemmens, L. H., Hollon, S. D., Peeters, F. P., Cuijpers, P., Arntz, A., et al. (2020). The effects of once-versus twice-weekly sessions on psychotherapy outcomes in depressed patients. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 216(4), 222–230. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2019.265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castro Solano, A., & Casullo, M. M. (2005). Estilos de personalidad, afrontamiento e inteligencia como predictores de las trayectorias académicas de cadetes en una institución militar. Anuario de Psicología, 36(2), 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cawley, M. J., Martin, J. E., & Johnson, J. A. (2000). A virtues approach to personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 997–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00207-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. https://doi.org/10.1037/t07564-000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cuijpers, P., Donker, T., van Straten, A., Li, J., & Andersson, G. (2010). Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. Psychological Medicine, 40(12), 1943–1957. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291710000772.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Fruyt, F., Van Leeuwen, K., Bagby, R. M., Rolland, J. P., & Rouillon, F. (2006). Assessing and interpreting personality change and continuity in patients treated for major depression. Psychological Assessment, 18(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.1.71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de la Iglesia, G., & Castro Solano, A. (2018). The Positive Personality Model (PPM): A new conceptual framework for personality assessment. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Iglesia, G., Lupano Perugini, M. L., & Castro Solano, A. (2019). Modelo de Personalidad Positiva: Su asociación al funcionamiento óptimo en trabajadores activos [Positive Personality Model: Its relation to optimal functioning in active workers]. Revista de Psicología (PUCP), 37(2), 425–449. https://doi.org/10.18800/10.18800/psico.201902.003.

  • de la Iglesia, G., & Solano, A. C. (2019a). Academic achievement in college students: What role does the Positive Personality Model play? Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 77(5), 572–583. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/19.77.572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Iglesia, G., & Solano, A. C. (2019b). Positive Personality Model: Which traits relate to complete mental health as conceived by the Dual Factor Model? Psychological Thought, 12(2), 202–213. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v12i2.377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drozd, F., Mork, L., Nielsen, B., Raeder, S., & Bjørkli, C. A. (2014). Better days—A randomized controlled trial of an internet-based positive psychology intervention. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(5), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.910822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, W., Ho, S. M. Y., Yu, B., Tang, X., Zhang, Y., Li, T., & Yuen, T. (2012). Factor structure of the Chinese virtues questionnaire. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 680–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731512450074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eidman, L. (2019). Rasgos Positivos de la Personalidad en Población Clínica: Su Relación con la Autopercepción de Progreso Psicoterapéutico. [Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Palermo]. Repositorio de la Universidad de Palermo. http://hdl.handle.net/10226/2125.

  • Elston, F., & Boniwell, I. (2011). A grounded theory study of the value derived by women in financial services through a coaching intervention to help them identify their strengths and practice using them in the workplace. International Coaching Psychology Review, 6, 16–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feixas, G., & Miró, M. T. (1993). Aproximaciones a la psicoterapia: Una introducción a los tratamientos psicológicos. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, S. L., & Hull, D. M. (2018). Personality profiles: Using latent profile analysis to model personality typologies. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, M. Á. R., García, M. I. D., & Crespo, A. V. (2012). Manual de técnicas de intervención cognitivo conductuales. Madrid: Desclée de Brouwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gander, F., Proyer, R. T., Hentz, E., & Ruch, W. (2020). Working mechanisms in positive interventions: A study using daily assessment of positive emotions. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15(5), 633–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gander, F., Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., & Wyss, T. (2012). Strength-based positive interventions: Further evidence for their potential in enhancing well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1241–1259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9380-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghielen, S. T. S., van Woerkom, M., & Christina Meyers, M. (2018). Promoting positive outcomes through strengths interventions: A literature review. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(6), 573–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2015). The relationships of character strengths with coping, work-related stress, and job satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 165. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00165.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Heinonen, E., & Nissen-Lie, H. A. (2020). The professional and personal characteristics of effective psychotherapists: A systematic review. Psychotherapy Research, 30(4), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2019.1620366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huppert, F. A., & So, T. T. C. (2013). Flourishing across Europe: Application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Social Indicators Research, 110, 837–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9966-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. J., Thoemmes, F., Jonkmann, K., Lüdtke, O., & Trautwein, U. (2012). Military training and personality trait development: Does the military make the man, or does the man make the military? Psychological Science, 23(3), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611423545.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jans-Beken, L., Jacobs, N., Janssens, M., Peeters, S., Reijnders, J., Lechner, L., et al. (2019). Gratitude and health: An updated review. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15(6), 743–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. M., Vernon, P. A., & Feiler, A. R. (2008). Behavioral genetic studies of personality: An introduction and review of the results of 50 years of research. Personality theories and models. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The Sage handbook of personality theory and assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 145–173). London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200462.n7.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (2015). Treatment as usual and routine care in research and clinical practice. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.08.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kivlighan, D. M., Jr., Gelso, C. J., Ain, S., Hummel, A. M., & Markin, R. D. (2015). The therapist, the client, and the real relationship: An actor–partner interdependence analysis of treatment outcome. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(2), 314. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2013). The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5)-Adult. Massachusetts: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M., & Barley, D. (2001). Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy: Theory Research, Practice, Training, 38, 357–361. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.38.4.357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J. (1989). The individual therapist’s contribution to psychotherapy process and outcome. Clinical Psychology Review, 9(4), 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(89)90004-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J. (2013). Outcome in psychotherapy: The past and important advances. Psychotherapy, 50(1), 42–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J., Burlingame, G. M., Umphress, V., Hansen, N. B., Vermeersch, D. A., Clouse, G. C., et al. (1996). The reliability and validity of the Outcome Questionnaire. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy: An International Journal of Theory and Practice, 3(4), 249–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavy, S., & Littman-Ovadia, H. (2017). My better self: Using strengths at work and work productivity, organizational citizenship behavior and satisfaction. Journal of Career Development, 44, 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845316634056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leising, D., Rogers, K., & Ostner, J. (2009). The undisordered personality: Normative assumptions underlying personality disorder diagnoses. Review of General Psychology, 13, 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüdtke, O., Roberts, B. W., Trautwein, U., & Nagy, G. (2011). A random walk down university avenue: Life paths, life events, and personality trait change at the transition to university life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 620. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023743.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez Martí, M. L., & Ruch, W. (2014). Character strengths and well-being across the life span: Data from a representative sample of German-speaking adults living in Switzerland. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1253. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01253.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, M. C., & van Woerkom, M. (2014). Effects of a strengths intervention on work engagement and burnout: Positive affect as a mediator. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014, 15558–15563. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2014.15558abstract.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. D., Hubble, M. A., Chow, D. L., & Seidel, J. A. (2014). The outcome of psychotherapy: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Psychotherapy in Australia, 20(3), 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mongrain, M., & Anselmo-Matthews, T. (2012). Do positive psychology exercises work? A replication of Seligman et al. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(4), 328–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales-Vives, F., De Raad, B., & Vigil-Colet, A. (2014). Psycho-lexically based virtue factors in Spain and their relation with personality traits. The Journal of General Psychology, 141, 297–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2014.938719.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, B. H., O’Shea, D., & Gallagher, S. (2017). Feeling thanks and saying thanks: A randomized controlled trial examining if and how socially oriented gratitude journals work. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 73(10), 1280–1300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Orientations to happiness and 57 RIDEP · Nº 31 · VOL. 1 · 2011 Life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-004-1278-z.

  • Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wellenzohn, S., & Ruch, W. (2015). Strengths-based positive psychology interventions: A randomized placebo-controlled online trial on long-term effects for a signature strength vs. a lesser strengths-intervention. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 456. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00456.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Quiñones, Á., Ceric, F., & Ugarte, C. (2015). Flujos de información en zonas de tiempo subjetivo: Estudio de un proceso psicoterapéutico exitoso. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, 24(3), 255–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riba, M. B., Balon, R., & Roberts, L. W. (2017). Competency in combining pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy: Integrated and split treatment. Arlington: American Psychiatric Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., & Jackson, J. J. (2008). Sociogenomic personality psychology. Journal of Personality Research, 76, 1523–1544. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00530.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., Wood, D., & Caspi, A. (2008). The development of personality traits in adulthood. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (Vol. 3, pp. 375–398). The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. (2002). Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy. Handbook of Positive Psychology, 2(2002), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American psychologist, 60(5), 410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smederevac, S., Mitrović, D., Sadiković, S., Riemann, R., Bratko, D., Prinz, M., et al. (2020). Hereditary and environmental factors of the Five-Factor Model traits: A cross-cultural study. Personality and Individual Differences, 162(1), 109995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, T. Z., DeRubeis, R. J., Hollon, S. D., Amsterdam, J., Shelton, R., & Schalet, B. (2009). Personality change during depression treatment: A placebo-controlled trial. Archives of General Psychiatry, 66(12), 1322–1330. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.166.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • VIA Institute on Character. (2020). What the Research Says About Character Strengths. Available at: http://www.viacharacter.org/www/Research/Character-Research-Findingsnav.

  • Vukasović, T., & Bratko, D. (2015). Heritability of personality: A meta-analysis of behavior genetic studies. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 769–785. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, L., & Ruch, W. (2015). Good character at school: Positive classroom behavior mediates the link between character strengths and school achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 610. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00610.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Matlby, J., Kashdan, T. B., & Hurling, R. (2011). Using personal and psychological strengths leads to increases in well-being over time: A longitudinal study and the development of the strengths use questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, K. C., Kashdan, T. B., & Macatee, R. (2015). Strength balance and implicit strength measurement: New considerations for research on strengths of character. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.920406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Palermo, University of Business and Social Sciences, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Leandro Eidman

  2. National Council of Technical and Scientific Research (CONICET), University of Palermo, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Guadalupe de la Iglesia

Authors
  1. Leandro Eidman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guadalupe de la Iglesia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guadalupe de la Iglesia.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or National Research Committee, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or its comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

An informed consent was obtained from all the individuals who participated in the study.

Research Involving Human and/or Animals Participants

This research was only conducted with human participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eidman, L., de la Iglesia, G. Positive Personality Traits as Predictors of Psychotherapy Progress. J Contemp Psychother 51, 251–258 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-021-09490-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-021-09490-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation