Abstract
Despite nearly a century of knowledge indicating a significant number of women engaging in sexual activities with children, the phenomenon has not yet been fully acknowledged. Recently, however, there has been a marked increase in research in this area. However, due to the relatively small numbers of detections or convictions there remains a lack of data regarding: (1) the specific clinical characteristics of female sex offenders; and (2) how these clinical factors link to re-offending and treatment need. The following study examines potential risk, protective, and treatment factors that are highlighted through the process of clinical intervention, using an adapted version of the Beech and Ward (2004) risk framework. We describe how female sex offenders typically display clinical deficits in the same risk domains as their male counterparts, while noting the ways in which these deficits manifest in this population. In addition, we compare these vulnerability factors in four established types of female sex offender.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Based on a version adapted for adult male sexual offenders by James Bickley for the LFF.
References
Allen, C. M. (1991). Women and men who sexually abuse children: A comparative analysis. Orwell: Safer Society.
Beech, A. R., Parrett, N., Ward, T., & Fisher, D. (2009). Assessing female sexual offenders’ motivations and cognitions: an exploratory study. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 15, 201–216.
Beech, A. R., & Ward, T. (2004). The integration of etiology and risk in sex offenders: a theoretical framework. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 31–63.
Carr, A. (1999). The handbook of child and adolescent clinical psychology: a contextual approach. London: Routledge.
Christiansen, A., & Thyer, B. (2003). Female sexual offenders: a review of empirical research. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 6, 1–16.
Cortoni, F. & Hanson, R. K. (2007). A review of the recidivism rates of adult female sexual offenders (R-169), Ottawa: Research Branch, Correction Service of Canada. Retrieved July 21, 2009, from http://www.cscscc.gc.ca/text/rsrch/reports/r169/r169_e.pdf.
Denov, M. S. (2001). A culture of denial: exploring professional perspectives on female sex offending. Canadian Journal of Criminology:, 43, 303–329.
Denov, M. S. (2003). The myth of innocence: sexual scripts and the recognition of child sexual abuse by female perpetrators. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 303–314.
Eldridge, H. E., & Saradjian, J. (2000). Replacing the function of abusive behaviors for the offender: Remaking relapse prevention in working with women who sexually abuse children. In D. R. Laws, S. M. Hudson, & T. Ward (Eds.), Remaking relapse prevention with sex offenders: A sourcebook (pp. 402–426). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Ford, H. (2006). Women who sexually abuse children. Chichester: Wiley.
Fromuth, M. E., & Conn, V. E. (1997). Hidden perpetrators: sexual molestation in a nonclinical sample of college women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 456–465.
Gannon, T. A., & Rose, M. R. (2008). Female child sexual offenders: towards integrating theory and practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 442–461.
Gannon, T. A., & Rose, M. R. (2009). Offense-related interpretative bias in female child molesters: A preliminary study. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment, 21, 194–207.
Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. R. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offence recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 6–35.
Hanson, R. K. & Harris, A. J. R. (2001). The Sex Offender Need Assessment Rating (SONAR): A method for measuring change in risk levels. Retrieved, July 21, 2009, from http://www.sgc.gc.ca/epub/corr/e200001a/e200001b/e200001b.htm. [NB: Please note this is an older version of SONAR and should not be used.]
Lewis, C. F., & Stanley, C. R. (2000). Women accused of sexual offenses. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 73–81.
Marshall, W. L., & Serran, G. A. (2000). Improving the effectiveness of sexual offender treatment. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 1, 203–222.
Mathews, R., Hunter, J. A., & Vuz, J. (1997). Juvenile female sexual offenders: clinical characteristics and treatment issues. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 9, 187–199.
Matthews, J. K. (1993). Working with female sexual abusers. In M. Elliott (Ed.), Female sexual abuse of children: The ultimate taboo (pp. 61–78). Chichester: Wiley.
Matthews, J. K., Mathews, R., & Speltz, K. (1991). Female sexual offenders: a typology. In M. Q. Patton (Ed.), Family sexual abuse: Frontline research and evaluation (pp. 199–219). Newbury Park London: Sage.
Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2000). Adult and adolescent female sex offenders: experiences compared to other female and male sex offenders. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 11, 75–88.
Nathan, P., & Ward, T. (2002). Female sex offenders: clinical and demographic features. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 8, 5–21.
Pothast, H. L., & Allen, C. M. (1994). Masculinity and femininity in male and female perpetrators of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 18, 763–767.
Rallings, M. & Webster, S. D. (2001). The NOTA Intake Protocol: Characteristics of a Large Sample of Sexual Offenders. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Organization for the Treatment of Abusers (NOTA U.K.), Cardiff, U.K, October 2007.
Russell, B. L., & Oswald, D. L. (2001). Strategies and dispositional correlates of sexual coercion perpetrated by women: an exploratory investigation. Sex Roles, 45, 103–115.
Russell, B. L., & Oswald, D. L. (2002). Sexual coercion and victimization of college men: the role of love styles. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 273–285.
Saradjian, J. (1996). Women who sexually abuse children: From research to clinical practice. Chichester: Wiley.
Sorbello, L., Eccleston, L., Ward, T., & Jones, R. (2002). Treatment needs of female offenders: a review. Australian Psychologist, 37, 198–205.
Struckman-Johnson, C. (1988). Forced sex on dates: it happens to men, too. The Journal of Sex Research, 24, 234–241.
Struckman-Johnson, C., & Struckman-Johnson, D. (1998). The dynamics and impact of sexual coercion of men by women. In P. Anderson & C. Struckman-Johnson (Eds.), Sexually aggressive women: Current perspectives and controversies (pp. 121–143). New York: Guilford.
Thornton, D. (2002). Constructing and testing a framework for dynamic risk assessment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 139–154.
Vandiver, D. M., Dial, K. C., & Worley, R. M. (2008). A qualitative assessment of Registered female sex offenders: Judicial processing experiences and perceived effects of a public registry. Criminal Justice Review, 33, 177–198.
Ward, T., & Keenan, T. (1999). Child molesters’ implicit theories. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 821–838.
Ward, T., & Stewart, C. A. (2003). The treatment of sex offenders: risk management and good lives. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 34, 353–360.
Ward, T., Mann, R. E., & Gannon, T. A. (2007). The good lives model of offender rehabilitation: clinical implications. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 87–107.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elliott, I.A., Eldridge, H.J., Ashfield, S. et al. Exploring Risk: Potential Static, Dynamic, Protective and Treatment Factors in the Clinical Histories of Female Sex Offenders. J Fam Viol 25, 595–602 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-010-9322-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-010-9322-8