Abstract
Strength interventions at work have been shown to influence workers’ optimal functioning and well-being. To increase the accessibility of these interventions in the workplace, relying on digital platforms would be a realistic idea. Akin to the Character Strengths 360-degree feedback activity, a smartphone (and computer) application allows users to send or receive anonymous strength-oriented descriptive feedback to/from colleagues, hence disseminating the identification and use of each other’s signature strengths associated with their enacted behaviors. Drawing on Self-Determination Theory, an intervention was developed to investigate if the use of the online platform may impact psychological well-being, by increasing psychological need satisfaction and autonomous motivation and decreasing need frustration and controlled motivation. A sample of full-time workers (n = 112) experienced the application, while participants who did not use the platform were assigned to the a posteriori control condition (n = 54). Data were collected before and after the 4-weeks intervention. Results showed (1) that participants from the experimental group reported significantly higher levels of strength use, need satisfaction, autonomous motivation, and psychological well-being compared to the a posteriori control group, and (2) that increases in the levels of need satisfaction reported by participants from the experimental group were related to increases in autonomous motivation, which in turn resulted in higher levels of well-being. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability Statement
The ethical approval obtained to conduct this study forbids any type of data sharing.
References
Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2045–2068. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x
Bakker, A. B., & van Woerkom, M. (2018). Strengths use in organizations: A positive approach of occupational health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 59(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000120
Bolier, L., & Abello, K. M. (2014). Online Positive Psychological Interventions: State of the Art and Future Directions. In A. C. Parks, & M. S. Schueller (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Positive Pscyhological Interventions (pp. 286–309). Hoboken
Botella, C., Riva, G., Gaggioli, A., Wiederhold, B. K., Alcaniz, M., & Banos, R. M. (2012). The present and future of positive technologies. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(2), 78–84. https://. doi
Byrne, B., M (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge
Carpentier, J., & Mageau, G. A. (2013). When change-oriented feedback enhances motivation, well-being and performance: A look at autonomy-supportive feedback in sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(3), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.01.003
Carpentier, J., & Mageau, G. A. (2016). Predicting sport experience during training: The role of change-oriented feedback in athletes’ motivation, self-confidence and needs satisfaction fluctuations. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 38(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2015-0210
Cohen, J. (1988). Set correlation and contingency tables. Applied psychological measurement, 12(4), 425–434.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. NY: Plenum Publishing Co.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The” what” and” why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Dries, N. (2013). The psychology of talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.05.001
Dubreuil, P., Forest, J., Gillet, N., Fernet, C., Thibault-Landry, A., Crevier-Braud, L., & Girouard, S. (2016). Facilitating well-being and performance through the development of strengths at work: Results from an intervention program. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 1(1–3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-016-0001-8
Els, C., Mostert, K., & Van Woerkom, M. (2018). Investigating the impact of a combined approach of perceived organisational support for strengths use and deficit correction on employee outcomes. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v16i0.882
Eriksson, M., & Boman, E. (2018). Short is beautiful: dimensionality and measurement invariance in two length of the basic psychological need satisfaction at work scale. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 965. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00965
Forest, J., Mageau, G. A., Crevier-Braud, L., Bergeron, É., Dubreuil, P., & Lavigne, G. L. (2012). Harmonious passion as an explanation of the relation between signature strengths’ use and well-being at work: Test of an intervention program. Human Relations, 65(9), 1233–1252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711433134
Forest, J., Gradito Dubord, M. A., Olafsen, A., & Carpentier, J. (In press, 2022). Shaping tomorrow’s workplace by integrating self-determination theory: A literature review and recommendations. Chapter to be published in R. Ryan, & E. Deci (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Work Engagement, Motivation, and Self-determination Theory, Oxford University Press: New-York
Fuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., & Babin, B. J. (2016). Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3192–3198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.008
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., Van den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A. K., & Güntert, S. T. (2015). The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892
Gelens, J., Dries, N., Hofmans, J., & Pepermans, R. (2013). The role of perceived organizational justice in shaping the outcomes of talent management: A research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.05.005
Ghielen, S. T. S., van Woerkom, M., & Christina Meyers, M. (2018). Promoting positive outcomes through strengths interventions: A literature review. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(6), 573–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1365164
Handley, M. A., Lyles, C. R., McCulloch, C., & Cattamanchi, A. (2018). Selecting and improving quasi-experimental designs in effectiveness and implementation research. Annual review of public health, 39, 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014128
Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2012). When the job is a calling: The role of applying one’s signature strengths at work. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(5), 362–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2012.702784
Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2016). Your strengths are calling: Preliminary results of a web-based strengths intervention to increase calling. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(6), 2237–2256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9692-y
Kagan, I., Kigli-Shemesh, R., & Tabak, N. (2006). ’Let me tell you what I really think about you’–evaluating nursing managers using anonymous staff feedback. Journal of nursing management, 14(5), 356–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2934.2006.00575.x
Kong, D. T., & Ho, V. T. (2016). A self-determination perspective of strengths use at work: Examining its determinant and performance implications. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1004555
Kuijpers, E., Kooij, D. T., & van Woerkom, M. (2020). Align your job with yourself: The relationship between a job crafting intervention and work engagement, and the role of workload. Journal of occupational health psychology, 25(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000175
Lavy, S., & Littman-Ovadia, H. (2011). All you need is love? Strengths mediate the negative associations between attachment orientations and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(7), 1050–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.023
Lavy, S. (2020). A review of character strengths interventions in twenty-first-century schools: Their importance and how they can be fostered. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 15(2), 573–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-018-9700-6
Linley, P., Joseph, S., Harrington, S., & Wood, A. M. (2006). Positive psychology: Past, present, and (possible) future. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760500372796
Ling, Y. L., & Soon, G. L. H. (2019). Feedback environment in the workplace: Implications for intrinsic motivation. Asian Journal of Social Science Research, 2(1), 1–10. https://ajssr.unitar.my/index.php?id=156
Littman-Ovadia, H., Lavy, S., & Boiman-Meshita, M. (2017). When theory and research collide: Examining correlates of signature strengths use at work. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(2), 527–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9739-8
Littman-Ovadia, H., & Steger, M. (2010). Character strengths and well-being among volunteers and employees: Toward an integrative model. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(6), 419–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2010.516765
Little, R. J. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722
Lyubomirsky, S., & Layous, K. (2013). How do simple positive activities increase well-being? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412469809
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(6), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
Marescaux, E., De Winne, S., & Sels, L. (2013). HR practices and HRM outcomes: The role of basic need satisfaction. Personnel Review, 42(1), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481311285200
Mayo, E. (1930). The Hawthorne experiment. The Human Factor
Meyers, M. C., & van Woerkom, M. (2017). Effects of a strengths intervention on general and work-related well-being: The mediating role of positive affect. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(3), 671–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9745-x
Meyers, M. C., van Woerkom, M., de Reuver, R. S., Bakk, Z., & Oberski, D. L. (2015). Enhancing psychological capital and personal growth initiative: working on strengths or deficiencies. Journal of counseling psychology, 62(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000050
Meyers, M. C., Adams, B. G., Sekaja, L., Buzea, C., Cazan, A. M., Gotea, M. … van Woerkom, M. (2019). Perceived organizational support for the use of employees’ strengths and employee well-being: a cross-country comparison. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(6), 1825–1841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0026-8
Miglianico, M., Dubreuil, P., Miquelon, P., Bakker, A. B., & Martin-Krumm, C. (2019). Strength use in the workplace: A literature review. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00095-w
Miquelon, P., & Vallerand, R. J. (2008). Goal motives, well-being, and physical health: An integrative model. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012759
Morris, M. E., Kathawala, Q., Leen, T. K., Gorenstein, E. E., Guilak, F., Labhard, M., et al. (2010). Mobile therapy: case study evaluations of a cell phone application for emotional self-awareness. Journal of medical Internet research, 12(2), https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1371
Munoz, R. F. (2010). Using evidence-based internet interventions to reduce health disparities worldwide. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 12(5), 60. https://. doi
McGonigal. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. New York: Penguin Books
Niemiec, R. M. (2014). Mindfulness and character strengths: A practical guide to flourishing. Hogrefe
Niemiec, R. M. (2018). Character strengths interventions: A field guide for practitioners. Hogrefe
Niemiec, R. M. (2019). Finding the golden mean: the overuse, underuse, and optimal use of character strengths. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 32, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2019.1617674
O’Connor, E. P., & Crowley-Henry, M. (2019). Exploring the relationship between exclusive talent management, perceived organizational justice and employee engagement: Bridging the literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(4), 903–917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3543-1
Olafsen, A. H., Niemiec, C. P., Halvari, H., Deci, E. L., & Williams, G. C. (2017). On the dark side of work: A longitudinal analysis using self-determination theory. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(2), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1257611
Parks, A. C., Della Porta, M. D., Pierce, R. S., Zilca, R., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2013). Pursuing happiness in everyday life: The characteristics and behaviors of online happiness seekers. Emotion, 12(6), 1222. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028587
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
Plaza, I., Demarzo, M. M. P., Herrera-Mercadal, P., & García-Campayo, J. (2013). MindfulnessBased Mobile Applications: Literature Review and Analysis of Current Features. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(11). https://mhealth.jmir.org/2013/2/e24
Quinlan, D., Swain, N., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2012). Character strengths interventions: Building on what we know for improved outcomes. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(6), 1145–1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9311-5
Riva, G., Serino, S., Chirico, A., & Gaggioli, A. (2019). Positive technology: From communication to positive experience. In J-A Muñiz-Velázquez & C. M. Pulido (Eds)., The Routledge Handbook of Positive Communication (pp. 267–277). Routledge
Riva, G., Baños, R. M., Botella, C., Wiederhold, B. K., & Gaggioli, A. (2012). Positive technology: using interactive technologies to promote positive functioning. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0139
Ruch, W., Niemiec, R., McGrath, R., Fl, G., & Proyer, R. (2020). Character strengths-based interventions: Open questions and ideas for future research. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15(5), 680–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1789700
Runyan, J. D., Steenbergh, T. A., Bainbridge, C., Daugherty, D. A., Oke, L., & Fry, B. N. (2013). A smartphone ecological momentary assessment/intervention “app” for collecting real-time data and promoting self-awareness. PloS one, 8(8), e71325. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071325
Runyan, J. D., & Steinke, E. G. (2014). Virtues, ecological momentary assessment/intervention and smartphone technology. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(481), https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00481/full
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Publications
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2), 1069–1081. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/1990-12288-001
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
Sander, T. (2011). Positive computing. In R. Biswas-Diener (Ed.), Positive psychology as social change (pp. 309–326). New York: Springer
Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2019). The impact of signature character strengths interventions: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(4), 1179–1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9990-2
Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
Sheldon, K. M., & Hilpert, J. C. (2012). The balanced measure of psychological needs (BMPN) scale: An alternative domain general measure of need satisfaction. Motivation and Emotion, 36(4), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9279-4
Sin, N. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2009). Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: a practice-friendly meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20593
Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research. Truth or urban legend?
Steelman, L. A., Levy, P. E., & Snell, A. F. (2004). The feedback environment scale: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Educational and psychological measurement, 64(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403258440
Trépanier, S. G., Forest, J., Fernet, C., & Austin, S. (2015). On the psychological and motivational processes linking job characteristics to employee functioning: Insights from self-determination theory. Work & Stress, 29(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2015.1074957
Vallerand, R. J. (1989). Vers une methodologie de validation transculturelle de questionnaires psychologiques: Implications pour la recherche en langue francaise [Toward a methodology for the transcultural validation of psychological questionnaires: Implications for research in the French language]. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 30(4), 662–680. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079856
van Dorssen-Boog, P., van Vuuren, T., de Jong, J. P., & Veld, M. (2021). Facilitating health care workers’ self‐determination: The impact of a self‐leadership intervention on work engagement, health, and performance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12352
van Woerkom, M., Mostert, K., Els, C., Bakker, A. B., De Beer, L., & Rothmann, S. Jr. (2016). Strengths use and deficit correction in organizations: Development and validation of a questionnaire. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(6), 960–975. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1193010
van Woerkom, M., Bakker, A. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2021). Positive psychology interventions in organizations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94, 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12350
Whitaker, B. G., Dahling, J. J., & Levy, P. (2007). The development of a feedback environment and role clarity model of job performance. Journal of Management, 33, 570–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306297581
Funding
This work was financially supported by a doctoral grant of the Fonds de recherche du Québec—Société et culture (FRQSC) to the first author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors. The authors received no financial compensation for conducting this study. Participation in the study was completely free.
Ethical Declaration
The ethical committee of the Université du Québec à Montréal (CERPE UQAM)has approved the present research (approval number: 4377). All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gradito Dubord, MA., Forest, J., Balčiūnaitė, L.M. et al. The power of strength-oriented feedback enlightened by self-determination theory: a positive technology-based intervention. J Happiness Stud 23, 2827–2848 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00524-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00524-3