Skip to main content
Log in

Host Selection by the Herbivorous Mite Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Acari: Tarsonemidae)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the host-selection ability of the broad mite Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks) (Acari: Tarsonemidae). To make long-distance-shifts from one host plant patch to another, broad mites largely depend on phoretic association with whiteflies. However, the host plants of whiteflies and broad mites are not necessarily the same. We determined the host-preference and acceptance of free-moving and phoretic broad mites using two behavioral bioassays. We used a choice test to monitor host selection by free-moving mites. In the case of phoretic mites, we compared their rate of detachment from the phoretic vector Bemisia tabaci placed on leaves taken from various host plants. The suitability of the plant was further determined by monitoring mite’s fecundity and its offspring development. We compared the mites’ responses to young and old cucumber (Cucumis sativus cv. ‘Kfir’) leaves (3rd and 8–9th leaf from the apex, respectively), and two tomato (Solanum lycopersicum cvs. ‘M82’ and ‘Moneymaker). Free-moving mites of all stages and both sexes preferred young cucumber leaves to old cucumber leaves and preferred young cucumber rather than young tomato leaves, demonstrating for the first time that broad mites are able to choose their host actively. As for phoretic mated females, although eventually most of the mites abandoned the phoretic vector, the rate of detachment from the whitefly vector was host dependent and correlated with the mites’ fitness on the particular host. In general, host preference of phoretic female mites resembled that of the free-moving female. Cues used by mites for host selection remain to be explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal AA (2000) Host-range evolution: adaptation and trade-offs in fitness of mites on alternative hosts. Ecology 81:500–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA, Vala F, Sabelis MW (2002) Induction of preferente and performance alter acclimation to novel hosts in aphytophagous spider mite: Adaptive plasticity? Am Nat 159:553–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berlinger MJ (1986) Host plant resistance to Bemisia tabaci. Agri Ecosyst Environ 17:69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernays EA (1999) When host choice is a problem for a generalist herbivore: experiments with the whitefly, Bemisia tabaci. Ecol Entomol 24:260–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne DN, Bellows TS (1991) Whitefly biology. Annu Rev Entomol 36:431–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross JV, Bassett P (1982) Damage to tomato and aubergine by broad mite, Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks). Plant Pathol 31:391–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry JD (2003) Multilocus models of sympatric speciation: Bush versus Rice versus Felsensestein. Evolution 57:1735–1746

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gadd CH (1946) Observations on the yellow tea mite Hemitarsonemus latus (Banks) Ewing. Bull Entomol Res 37:157–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerson U (1992) Biology and control of the broad mite, Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks) (Acai: Tarsonemidae). Exp Appl Acarol 13:163–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotoh T, Bruin J, Sabelis MW, Menken SBJ (1993) Host race formation in Tetranychus urticae: genetic differentiation , host plant preference and mate choice in a tomato and cucumber strain. Entomol Exp Appl 68:171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinberg M, Perl-Treves R, Palevsky E, Shomer I, Soroker V (2005) Interaction between cucumber plants and the broad mite, Polyphagotarsonemus latus : from damage to defense gene expression. Entomol Exp Appl 115:134–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang X, Renwick JAA (1993) Differential selection of host plants by two Pieris species: the role of oviposition stimulants and deterrents. Entomol Exp Appl 68:59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krokos FD, Konstantopoulou AM, Mazomenos EB (2002) Chemical characterization of corn plant compounds by different extraction techniques and the role of potent chemicals in the reproductive behaviour of the corn stalk borer Sesamia nonagrioides. Use of pheromones and semiochemicals in integrated production. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin 25:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Magalhães S, Forbes MR, Skoracka A, Osakabe M, Chevillon C, McCoy KD (2007) Host race formation in the Acari. Exp Appl Acarol 42:225–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew PJ (1997) Adaptive patterns of host -plant selection by phytophagous insects. Oikos 79:417–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nomikou M, Janssen A, Sabelis MW (2003) Herbivore host plant selection: whitefly learns to avoid host plants that harbour predators of her offspring. Oecologia 136:484–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palevsky E, Soroker V, Weintraup P, Mansour F, Abo-Moch F, Gerson U (2001) How species-specific is the phoretic relationship between the broad mite, Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks) (Acai: Tarsonemidae), and its insect hosts? Exp Appl Acarol 25:217–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Renwick JAA, Chew FS (1994) Oviposition behaviour in Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 39:377–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonhoven LM, Jermy T, van Loon JJA (1998) Insect-Plant Biology. From physiology to Evolution. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Skoracka A, Kuczynski L (2006) Is the cereal rust mite, Abacarus hystrix really a generalist?- Testing colonization performance on novel hosts. Exp Appl Acarol 38:1–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith FF (1935) Control experiments on certain Tarsonemus mites on ornamentals. J Eco Entomol 28:91–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soroker V, Nelson RD, Bahar O, Reneh S, Yablonski S, Palevsky E (2003) Whitefly wax as a cue for phoresy in the broad mite, (Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks) (Acai: Tarsonemidae). Chemoecology 13:163–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JN (1988) Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects. Entomol Exp Appl 47:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yano S, Wakabayashi M, Takabayashi J, Takafuji A (1998) Factors determining the host plant range of the phytophagous mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae): a method for quantifying host plant acceptance. Exp Appl Acarol 22:595–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarate SI, Kempema LA, Walling LL (2007) Silverleaf whitefly induces salicylic acid defenses and suppresses effectual jasmonic acid defenses. Plant Physiol 143:866–875

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Prof. Uri Gerson and Dr. Eric Palevsky for providing helpful discussion, Dr. Hillary Voet and Mrs. Miri Zarhi for help with statistic analysis. We also thank Mrs. Svetlana Kontsedalov for providing the Bemisia tabaci used in our studies, Mr. Saadia Reneh for plant cultivation and our three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.

This manuscript is contribution no. 503/07 of the Institute of Plant Protection, Volcani Center, ARO, Israel.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victoria Soroker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alagarmalai, J., Grinberg, M., Perl-Treves, R. et al. Host Selection by the Herbivorous Mite Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Acari: Tarsonemidae). J Insect Behav 22, 375–387 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-009-9179-y

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-009-9179-y

Keywords

Navigation