Skip to main content
Log in

Frequency Domain Multiplexing for Microwave Kinetic Inductance Detectors: Comparing the Xilinx ZCU111 RFSoC with the New 2x2 RFSoC Board

  • Published:
Journal of Low Temperature Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Xilinx ZCU111 Radio Frequency System on Chip (RFSoC) is a promising solution for reading out large arrays of microwave kinetic inductance detectors (MKIDs). The board boasts eight on-chip 12-bit / 4.096 giga samples-per-second (GSPS) analogue-to-digital converters (ADCs) and eight 14-bit / 6.554 GSPS digital-to-analogue converters (DACs), as well as field programmable gate array (FPGA) resources of 930,000 logic cells and 4,272 digital signal processing (DSP) slices. While this is sufficient data converter bandwidth for the readout of 8,000 MKIDs, with a 2 MHz channel-spacing and a 1 MHz sampling rate (per channel), additional FPGA resources are required to perform the DSP needed to process this large number of MKIDs, due to a mismatch between the data converter bandwidth relative to the FPGA resources of the ZCU111. A solution to this problem is the new Xilinx RFSoC 2x2 board. This board costs only one fifth of the ZCU111 while still providing the same logic resources, albeit with only a quarter of the data converter resources. Thus, using multiple RFSoC 2x2 boards would provide a better balance between FPGA resources and data converters, allowing the full utilization of the RF bandwidth provided by the data converters, while also lowering the cost per pixel value of the readout system; from approximately €2.50 per pixel with the ZCU111 to €1 per pixel with the 2x2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. P. Day, H. Leduc, B. Mazin, A. Vayonakis, J. Zmuidzinas, Nature 425, 817 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02037

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. G. Ulbricht, M. De Lucia, E. Baldwin, Appl. Sci. 11, (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062671

  3. K. Irwin, G. Hilton, Cryogen. Particle Detect. 99, 81 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Fleischmann, M. Linck, A. Burck, C. Domescle, S. Kempf, A. Pabinger, C. Pies, J. Porst, H. Rotzinger, S. Schafer, R. Weldle, A. Fleischmann, C. Enss, G. Seidel, IEEE Trans. Appl Supercond. 19, 63 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2009.2012724

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Mates, PhD Thesis (2011)

  6. K. Irwin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, (1995). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.113674

  7. M. Strader, PhD Thesis (2016)

  8. S. McHugh, B. Mazin, B. Serfass, S. Meeker, K. O’Brien, R. Duan, R. Raffanti, D. Werthimer, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3700812

  9. J. Hickish, Z. Abdurashidova, Z. Ali, K. Buch, S. Chaudhari, H. Chen, M. Dexter, R. Simone Domagalski, J. Ford, G. Foster, D. George, J. Greenberg, L. Greenhill, A. Isaacson, H. Jiang, G. Jones, F. Kapp, H. Kriel, R. Lacasse, D. Werthimer, J. Astron. Instrum. 05, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1142/S2251171716410014

  10. N. Fruitwala, P. Strader, G. Cancelo, T. Zmuda, K. Treptow, N. Wilcer, C. Stoughton, A. Walter, N. Zobrist, G. Collura, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91, 124705 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0029457

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Xilinx Datasheet (2018)

  12. Hitech Global Datasheet (2021)

  13. B. Mazin, S. Meeker, M. Strader, B. Bumble, K. O’Brien, P. Szypryt, D. Marsden, J. Eyken, G. Duggan, G. Ulbricht, C. Stoughton, M. Johnson, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 125, (2013). https://doi.org/10.1086/674013

  14. S. Meeker, PhD Thesis (2017)

  15. S. Meeker, B. Mazin, A. Walter, P. Strader, N. Fruitwala, C. Bockstiegel, P. Szypryt, G. Ulbricht, G. Coiffard, B. Bumble, G. Cancelo, T. Zmuda, K. Treptow, N. Wilcer, G. Collura, R. Dodkins, I. Lipartito, N. Zobrist, M. Bottom, J. Chris Shelton, D. Mawet, J. van Eyken, G. Vasisht, E. Serabyn, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 130, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/aab5e7

  16. Xilinx, FIR Compiler v7.2 LogiCORE IP Product Guide (2021)

  17. Xilinx, Fast Fourier Transform v9.1 LogiCORE IP Product Guide (2021)

  18. J.W. Cooley, J.W. Tuckey, Math. Comput. 19, (1965). https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-1965-0178586-1

  19. R. Martin, Bit by Bit Signal Processing, Bit-by-Bit’s “BxBFFT” Fast Fourier Transform

  20. H. Okean, A. Kelly, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 25, (1977). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.1977.1129089

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon works supported by the Science Foundation Ireland under Grant No. grant 15/IA/2880. The authors would also like to thank Dr Deli Geng from Durham University for providing the mixer board which was used to help generate the data for Figs. 3 and  4. Furthermore, the authors would like to thank Cathal McCabe of Xilinx for providing the Vivado licenses used in the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Baldwin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baldwin, E., De Lucia, M., Bracken, C. et al. Frequency Domain Multiplexing for Microwave Kinetic Inductance Detectors: Comparing the Xilinx ZCU111 RFSoC with the New 2x2 RFSoC Board. J Low Temp Phys 209, 640–648 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-022-02785-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-022-02785-x

Keywords

Navigation