Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect Evaluation of a Self-Management Program for Dutch Workers with a Chronic Somatic Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of a Self-Management Program for workers with a chronic disease. This program is based on the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program of Stanford University, modified for workers with a chronic somatic disease. Methods In a randomized controlled trial, the effectiveness of a Self-Management Program was evaluated. Participants were randomly assigned to the experimental group (n = 57) and the control group (n = 47). The experimental group received an intervention, the control group received care as usual. Primary outcome measures were self-efficacy at work and the attitude towards self-management at work. Secondary outcomes were the SF-12 health survey questionnaire, job satisfaction and intention to change job. The results were measured at baseline, after the intervention and 8 months after the intervention. Results The attitude towards self-management at work (enjoyment) improved after 8 months for the intervention group (p = 0.030). No other outcome variable differed significantly. As an interaction effect, it was found that low educated workers developed a better physical health quality (SF-12) in the intervention group compared with the control group. The attitude towards self-management at work (importance) improved in the intervention group for older and female workers and the attitude toward enjoying self-management at work improved for female workers only. Conclusion The results show that low educated workers, older workers and women benefit significantly more from the training than higher educated workers, younger workers and men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tu HT, Cohen GR. Financial and health burdens of chronic conditions grow. Results from the community tracking study. Santa Monica: Center for Studying Health System Change; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bhattacharya J, Choudhry K, Lakdawalla D. Chronic disease and severe disability among working-age populations. Med Care. 2008;46(1):92–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blokstra A, Baan CA, Boshuizen HC, Feenstra TL, Hoogenveen RT, Picavet HS. Impact of the ageing population on burden of disease: projections of chronic disease prevalence for 2005–2025 [in Dutch]. Bilthoven: National Institute for Public Health and Environment/RIVM; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Freudenberg N, Olden K. Getting serious about the prevention of chronic diseases. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8(4):A90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chorus AM, Miedema HS, Boonen A, van der Linden S. Quality of life and work in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis of working age. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62(12):1178–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Verstappen SMM, Boonen A, Bijlsma JWJ, Buskens E, Verkleij H, Schenk Y, et al. Working status among Dutch patients with rheumatoid arthritis: work disability and working conditions. Rheumatology. 2005;44:202–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Blanc PD, Yen IH, Chen H, Katz PP, Earnest G, Balmes J. Area-level socio-economic status and health status among adults with asthma and rhinitis. Eur Respir J. 2006;27(1):85–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Young A, Dixey J, Kulinskaya E, Cox N, Davies P, Devlin J. Which patients stop working because of rheumatoid arthritis?: results of five years’ follow up in 732 patients from the Early RA Study (ERAS). Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61(4):335–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. van den Brink-Muinen A, Spreeuwenberg P, Rijken PM. National Panel of the chronically ill and Disabled (NPCG). Utrecht: Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research/Nivel; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rijken M, van Kerkhof M, Dekker J, Schellevis FG. Comorbidity of chronic diseases: effects of disease pairs on physical and mental functioning. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:45–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. TNO. The Netherlands Working Conditions Survey. Hoofddorp: TNO Work and Employment; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kosciulek JF. Empowering people with disabilities through vocational rehabilitation counseling. Am Rehab. 2004;9:40–7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Barlow J, Wright C, Sheasby J, Turner A, Hainsworth J. Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48:177–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. de Vos K. Financial incentives for retaining or taking workers: a literature review. Tilburg: CentER Applied Research; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Verbeek J, Husman K, van Dijk F, Jauhiainen M, Pasternack I, Vainio H. Building an evidence base for occupational health interventions. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2004;30(2):164–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tompa E, de Oliveira C, Dolinschi R, Irvin E. A systematic review of disability management interventions with economic evaluations. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(1):16–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Varekamp I, Verbeek JH, de Boer A, van Dijk FJ. Effect of job maintenance training program for employees with chronic disease: a randomized controlled trial on self-efficacy, job satisfaction, and fatigue. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011;37(4):288–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shaw WS, Tveito TH, Geehern-Lavoie M, Huang YH, Nicholas MK, Reme SE, et al. Adapting principles of chronic pain self-management to the workplace. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(8):694–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Varekamp I, Verbeek JH, van Dijk FJ. How can we help employees with chronic diseases to stay at work? A review of interventions aimed at job retention and based on an empowerment perspective. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006;80(2):87–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lorig K, Holman HR, Sobel D, Laurent D, González V, Minor M. Living a healthy life with chronic conditions. Boulder: Bull Publishing; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lorig KR, Holman H. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26(1):1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Foster G, Taylor SJ, Eldridge SE, Ramsay J, Griffiths CJ. Self-management education programmes by lay leaders for people with chronic conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(4). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005108.pub2.

  24. Detaille SI, Heerkens YF, Engels JA, Gulden JW van der, Dijk FJ van. Working with a chronic disease manual course [in Dutch]. HAN University of Applied Sciences; Stanford University, 2006.

  25. van Dijk FJ, van Dormolen M, Kompier MA, Meyman T. Revaluation of the model of work load and work capacity [in Dutch]. Tijdschr Soc Gezondheidsz. 1990;68(1):3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mols F, Pelle AJ, Kupper N. Normative data of the SF-12 health survey with validation using postmyocardial infarction patients in the Dutch population. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(4):403–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Stulemeijer M, de Jong LW, Fiselier TJ, Hoogveld SW, Bleijenberg G. Cognitive behaviour therapy for adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2005;330(7494):789–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Ritter PL, Laurent D, Hobbs M. Effect of a Self-Management Program on patients with chronic disease. Eff Clin Pract. 2001;6:256–62.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Smeulders ES, van Haastregt JC, Ambergen T, Stoffers HE, Janssen-Boyne JJ, Uszko-Lencer NH, et al. Heart failure patients with a lower educational level and better cognitive status benefit most from a self-management group programme. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;81(2):214–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Detaille SI, van der Gulden JW, Engels JA, Heerkens YF, van Dijk FJ. Using intervention mapping (IM) to develop a Self-Management Programme for employees with a chronic disease in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Detaille SI, Haafkens JA, van Dijk FJ. What employees with rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus and hearing loss need to cope at work. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2003;29(2):134–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Detaille SI, Haafkens JA, Hoekstra JB, van Dijk FJ. What employees with diabetes mellitus need to cope at work: views of employees and health professionals. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;64(1–3):183–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. van Veldhoven M, Meijman T, Broersen S, Fortuin R. Manual VBBA 2002 (2nd edition) [in Dutch]. Amsterdam: Stichting Kwaliteitsbevordering Bedrijfsgezondheidszorg; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Bjorner JB, Brazier JE, et al. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1171–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health promotion planning: an educational and environmental approach. 2nd ed. Palo Alto: Mayfield Publishing Co.; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Brug J, Schaalma H, Kok G, Meertens RM, van der Molen HT. Health promotion and behaviour change: a systematic approach [in Dutch]. Assen: Van Gorcum; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sniehotta FF, Scholz U, Schwarzer R, Fuhrmann B, Kiwus U, Völler H. Long-term effects of two psychological interventions on physical exercise and self-regulation following coronary rehabilitation. Int J Behav Med. 2005;12(4):244–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lippke S, Ziegelmann JP, Schwarzer R. Behavioral intentions and action plans promote physical exercise: a longitudinal study with orthopedic rehabilitation patients. J Sport Exercise Psy. 2004;26:470–83.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA. 2002;288(19):2469–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Swerissen H, Belfrage J, Weeks A, Jordan L, Walker C, Furler J, et al. A randomised control trial of a Self-Management Program for people with a chronic illness from Vietnamese, Chinese, Italian and Greek backgrounds. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;64(1–3):360–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Reeves D, Kennedy A, Fullwood C, Bower P, Gardner C, Gately C, et al. Predicting who will benefit from an Expert Patients Programme self-management course. Br J Gen Pract. 2008;58(548):198–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ritter PL, Lee J, Lorig K. Moderators of chronic disease self-management programs: who benefits? Chronic Illn. 2011;7(2):162–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bosma H, Lamers F, Jonkers CC, van Eijk JT. Disparities by education level in outcomes of a self-management intervention: the DELTA trial in The Netherlands. Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62(7):793–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gibbs L, Reidpath D. What about the men? Gender differences in utilisation of arthritis self-management services. Aust J Prim Health. 2005;11(1):63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Gibbs L. Identifying Work as a Barrier to Men’s Access to Chronic Illness (Arthritis) self-management programs. Int J Men’s Health. 2007;6(2):143–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Banks I. No man’s land: men, illness, and the NHS. BMJ. 2001;322:1058–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. van der Bijl JJ, Grypdonck MHF, de Jong CC. Adequate or inadequate self-management by chronically ill ethnic minorities and chronically ill people with a low socioeconomic status: determining factors and processes [in Dutch]. Utrecht: University Medical Center Utrecht; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Barker Bausell R, Li Y-F. Power analysis for experimental research: a practical guide for the biological, medical and social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Weel AN, Broersen JP, van Dijk FJ. Questionnaire surveys on health and working conditions: development of an instrument for risk assessment in companies. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2000;73(1):47–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Toward a comprehensive model of change. Treating addictive behaviors: Processes of change. Treating addictive behaviours: Processes of change. Applied clinical psychology. New York: Plenum PressMiller; 1986.

  52. Sprangers MAG, Schwartz CE. Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(11):1507–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the employees who participated in the training and this study. We thank the occupational health services and general health practitioners who helped to recruit participants for the intervention. We thank the trainers Heleen van der Wilt and Sue-Anne for offering the intervention. We also gratefully acknowledge the statistical assistance of Hans Bor (Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre). This study was financially supported by the HAN University of Applied Sciences in the Netherlands. The authors wish to acknowledge the contribution of Tjeerd de Jong and Frank Stöteler, HAN University of Applied Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. HAN Seneca, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Professor Molkenboerstraat 3, PO Box 6960, 6503 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    S. I. Detaille

  2. HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Y. F. Heerkens & J. A. Engels

  3. Department of Primary and Community Care, The Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    J. W. J. van der Gulden

  4. Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    F. J. H. van Dijk

Authors
  1. S. I. Detaille
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Y. F. Heerkens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. A. Engels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. W. J. van der Gulden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F. J. H. van Dijk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. I. Detaille.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Detaille, S.I., Heerkens, Y.F., Engels, J.A. et al. Effect Evaluation of a Self-Management Program for Dutch Workers with a Chronic Somatic Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Occup Rehabil 23, 189–199 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-013-9450-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-013-9450-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation