Abstract
The present study used event-related potentials to investigate whether the processing of grammatical gender agreement involving gender regular and irregular forms recruit the same or distinct neurocognitive mechanisms and whether different grammatical gender agreement conditions elicit the same or diverse ERP signals. Native speakers of Brazilian Portuguese read sentences containing congruent and incongruent grammatical gender agreement between a determiner and a regular or an irregular form (condition 1) and between a regular or an irregular form and an adjective (condition 2). However, in condition 2, trials with incongruent regular forms elicited more positive ongoing waveforms than trial with incongruent irregular forms. We found a biphasic LAN/P600 effect for gender agreement violation involving regular and irregular forms in both conditions. Our findings suggest that gender agreement between determiner and nouns recruits the same neurocognitive mechanisms regardless of the nouns’ form and that, depending on the grammatical class of the words involved in gender agreement, differences in ERP signals can emerge.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Available at linguateca: www.linguateca.pt.
References
Afonso, O., Domínguez, A., Álvarez, C. J., & Morales, D. (2014). Sublexical and lexico-syntactic factors in gender access in Spanish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 43, 13–25.
Banón, J. A., Fiorentino, R., & Grabriele, A. (2012). The processing of number and gender agreement in Spanish: An event-related potential investigation of the effects of structural distance. Brain Research, 1456, 49–63.
Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2005). Gramatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: An ERP comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(1), 137–153.
Barber, H., Salillas, E., & Carreiras, M. (2004). Gender or genders agreement? In M. Carreiras & C. Clifton (Eds.), On-line study of sentence comprehension: eyetracking, ERP and beyond (pp. 309–328). London: Psychology Press.
Bates, E. A., & Devescovi, A. (1989). Crosslinguistic studies of sentence production. In B. MacWhinney & E. A. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistics study of sentence processing (pp. 225–253). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Hernandez, A., & Pizzaniglio, L. (1996). Gender priming in Italian. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 992–1004.
Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Pizzamiglio, L., D’Amico, S., & Hernandes, A. (1995). Gender and lexical access in Italian. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 847–862.
Bybee, J. L. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 425–455.
Caffarra, S., Syianova-Chanturia, A., Pesciarelli, F., Vespignani, F., & Cacciari, C. (2015). Is the noun ending a cue to grammatical gender processing? An ERP study on sentences in Italian. Psychophysiology, 52(8), 1019–1030.
Clark, E. (1985). The acquisition of romance with special reference to French. In D. Slobin (Ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition. The data (Vol. 1, pp. 687–782). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Corbett, G. G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corrêa, L., & Name, M. C. (2003). The processing of determiner-noun agreement and the identification of the gender of nouns in the early acquisition of Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 2, 19–43.
Desrochers, A., Paivio, A., & Desrochers, S. (1989). L’effet de la frequence d’usage des noms inanimes et de la valeur predictive de leur terminaison sur 1’identification du genre gramatical. Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 43, 62–73.
Dominguez, A., Cuetos, F., & Segui, J. (1999). The processing of grammatical gender and number in Spanish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(5), 485–497.
Foucart, A., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2012). Can late L2 learners acquire new gramatical features? Evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 226–248.
Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Saddy, D. (2002). Distinct neurophysiological patterns reflecting aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(1), 45–63.
Gollan, T., & Frost, R. (2001). Two routes to gramatical gender: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Psycolinguistic Research, 30(6), 627–651.
Gunter, T. C., Friederici, A. D., & Schriefers, H. (2000). Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(4), 556–568.
Hagoort, P. (2003). How the brain solves the binding problem for language: a neurocomputational model of syntactic processing. Neuroimage, 20, 18–29.
Hernandez, A. E., Hofmann, J., & Kotz, S. A. (2007). Age of acquisition modulates neural activity for both regular and irregular syntactic functions. NeuroImage, 36, 912–923.
Hernandez, A. E., Kortz, A. S., Hofmann, J., Valentin, V. V., Dapretto, M., & Bookheimer, S. (2004). The neural correlates of grammatical gender decisions in Spanish. NeuroReport, 15(5), 863–866.
Hohfeld, A. (2006). Accessing gramatical gender in german: The impact of gender-marking regularities. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 127–142.
Jensen, J. B. (1989). On the mutual intelligibility of Spanish and Portuguese. Hispania, 72, 848–852.
Jescheniak, J. D., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 824–843. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.824.
Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. (2003). Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis: An electrophysiological differentiation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 98–110.
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2007). Morphological processes in language comprehension. In G. Gaskell (Ed.), Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 175–193). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Matthews, C. (2010). On the nature of phonological cues in the acquisition of French gender categories: Evidence from instance-based learning models. Lingua, 120(4), 879–900.
Molinaro, N., Barber, H. A., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions. Cortex, 47, 908–930.
Molinaro, N., Kim, A., Vespignani, F., & Job, R. (2008). Anaphoric agreement violation: An ERP analysis of its interpretation. Cognition, 106(2), 963–974.
Newman, A. J., Ullman, M. T., Pancheva, R., Waligura, D. L., & Neville, H. J. (2007). An ERP study of regular and irregular English past tense inflection. NeuroImage, 34, 435–445.
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 785–806.
Padovanni, R., Calandra-Buonaura, G., Cacciari, C., Benuzzi, F., & Nichelli, P. (2005). Gramatical gender in the brain: Evidence from an fMRI study on Italian. Brain Research Bulletin, 65, 301–308.
Pérez Pereira, M. (1991). The acquisition of gender: What Spanish children tell us. Journal of Child Language, 18, 571–590.
Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 253, 530–535.
Pinker, S. (1998). Words and rules. Lingua, 106, 219–242.
Rodina, Y. (2007). What do asymmetries in children’s performance tell us about the nature of their underlying knowledge? Nordlyd, 34, 230–251.
Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Clahsen, H., Lleo, C., Zaake, W., & Muente, T. F. (2001). Event_related brain responses to morphological violations in Catalan. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 47–58.
Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107–142.
Seigneuric, A., Zagar, D., Meunier, F., & Spinelli, E. (2007). The relation between language and cognition in 3- to 9-year-olds: The acquisition of grammatical gender in French. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96, 219–246.
Steinhauer, K., & Connolly, J. (2008). Event-related potentials in the study of language. In B. Stemmer & H. A. Whitaker (Eds.), Handbook of neuroscience of language (pp. 91–104). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Taft, M., & Meunier, F. (1998). Lexical representation of gender: A quasiregular domain. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(1), 23–45.
Tucker, G. R., Lambert, W. E., Rigault, A. A., & Segalowitz, N. (1968). A psychological investigation of French speaker’s skill with gramatical gender. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 312–316.
Ullman, M. T. (2001). The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(1), 37–69.
Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92(1–2), 231–270.
Weyerts, H., Penke, M., Dohrn, U., Clahsen, H., & Munte, T. F. (1997). Brain potentials indicate differences between regular and irregular German plurals. NeuroReport, 8, 957–962.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Daniel Acheson, for his valuable support in the analysis of data, and to Peter Hagoort, for generously granting access to equipment and resources at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen.
Funding
This study was funded by CAPES (Program CAPES/NUFFIC Project 051/13 -Grant Number 23038.007129/2013-40, awarded to Mailce Borges Mota, and Program CAPES Doutorado SWE Grant Number 115981/13-1, awarded to Natália Carolina Alencar de Resende.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Resende, N.C.A., Mota, M.B. & Seuren, P. The Processing of Grammatical Gender Agreement in Brazilian Portuguese: ERP Evidence in Favor of a Single Route. J Psycholinguist Res 48, 181–198 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9598-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9598-z