Skip to main content
Log in

The Processing of Grammatical Gender Agreement in Brazilian Portuguese: ERP Evidence in Favor of a Single Route

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study used event-related potentials to investigate whether the processing of grammatical gender agreement involving gender regular and irregular forms recruit the same or distinct neurocognitive mechanisms and whether different grammatical gender agreement conditions elicit the same or diverse ERP signals. Native speakers of Brazilian Portuguese read sentences containing congruent and incongruent grammatical gender agreement between a determiner and a regular or an irregular form (condition 1) and between a regular or an irregular form and an adjective (condition 2). However, in condition 2, trials with incongruent regular forms elicited more positive ongoing waveforms than trial with incongruent irregular forms. We found a biphasic LAN/P600 effect for gender agreement violation involving regular and irregular forms in both conditions. Our findings suggest that gender agreement between determiner and nouns recruits the same neurocognitive mechanisms regardless of the nouns’ form and that, depending on the grammatical class of the words involved in gender agreement, differences in ERP signals can emerge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Available at linguateca: www.linguateca.pt.

References

  • Afonso, O., Domínguez, A., Álvarez, C. J., & Morales, D. (2014). Sublexical and lexico-syntactic factors in gender access in Spanish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 43, 13–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Banón, J. A., Fiorentino, R., & Grabriele, A. (2012). The processing of number and gender agreement in Spanish: An event-related potential investigation of the effects of structural distance. Brain Research, 1456, 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2005). Gramatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: An ERP comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(1), 137–153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, H., Salillas, E., & Carreiras, M. (2004). Gender or genders agreement? In M. Carreiras & C. Clifton (Eds.), On-line study of sentence comprehension: eyetracking, ERP and beyond (pp. 309–328). London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E. A., & Devescovi, A. (1989). Crosslinguistic studies of sentence production. In B. MacWhinney & E. A. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistics study of sentence processing (pp. 225–253). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Hernandez, A., & Pizzaniglio, L. (1996). Gender priming in Italian. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 992–1004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Pizzamiglio, L., D’Amico, S., & Hernandes, A. (1995). Gender and lexical access in Italian. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 847–862.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, J. L. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 425–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caffarra, S., Syianova-Chanturia, A., Pesciarelli, F., Vespignani, F., & Cacciari, C. (2015). Is the noun ending a cue to grammatical gender processing? An ERP study on sentences in Italian. Psychophysiology, 52(8), 1019–1030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. (1985). The acquisition of romance with special reference to French. In D. Slobin (Ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition. The data (Vol. 1, pp. 687–782). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, G. G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Corrêa, L., & Name, M. C. (2003). The processing of determiner-noun agreement and the identification of the gender of nouns in the early acquisition of Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 2, 19–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers, A., Paivio, A., & Desrochers, S. (1989). L’effet de la frequence d’usage des noms inanimes et de la valeur predictive de leur terminaison sur 1’identification du genre gramatical. Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 43, 62–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez, A., Cuetos, F., & Segui, J. (1999). The processing of grammatical gender and number in Spanish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(5), 485–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucart, A., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2012). Can late L2 learners acquire new gramatical features? Evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 226–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Saddy, D. (2002). Distinct neurophysiological patterns reflecting aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(1), 45–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gollan, T., & Frost, R. (2001). Two routes to gramatical gender: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Psycolinguistic Research, 30(6), 627–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, T. C., Friederici, A. D., & Schriefers, H. (2000). Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(4), 556–568.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hagoort, P. (2003). How the brain solves the binding problem for language: a neurocomputational model of syntactic processing. Neuroimage, 20, 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, A. E., Hofmann, J., & Kotz, S. A. (2007). Age of acquisition modulates neural activity for both regular and irregular syntactic functions. NeuroImage, 36, 912–923.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, A. E., Kortz, A. S., Hofmann, J., Valentin, V. V., Dapretto, M., & Bookheimer, S. (2004). The neural correlates of grammatical gender decisions in Spanish. NeuroReport, 15(5), 863–866.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hohfeld, A. (2006). Accessing gramatical gender in german: The impact of gender-marking regularities. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. B. (1989). On the mutual intelligibility of Spanish and Portuguese. Hispania, 72, 848–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jescheniak, J. D., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 824–843. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. (2003). Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis: An electrophysiological differentiation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 98–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2007). Morphological processes in language comprehension. In G. Gaskell (Ed.), Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 175–193). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, C. (2010). On the nature of phonological cues in the acquisition of French gender categories: Evidence from instance-based learning models. Lingua, 120(4), 879–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molinaro, N., Barber, H. A., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions. Cortex, 47, 908–930.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molinaro, N., Kim, A., Vespignani, F., & Job, R. (2008). Anaphoric agreement violation: An ERP analysis of its interpretation. Cognition, 106(2), 963–974.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, A. J., Ullman, M. T., Pancheva, R., Waligura, D. L., & Neville, H. J. (2007). An ERP study of regular and irregular English past tense inflection. NeuroImage, 34, 435–445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 785–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padovanni, R., Calandra-Buonaura, G., Cacciari, C., Benuzzi, F., & Nichelli, P. (2005). Gramatical gender in the brain: Evidence from an fMRI study on Italian. Brain Research Bulletin, 65, 301–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Pereira, M. (1991). The acquisition of gender: What Spanish children tell us. Journal of Child Language, 18, 571–590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 253, 530–535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1998). Words and rules. Lingua, 106, 219–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodina, Y. (2007). What do asymmetries in children’s performance tell us about the nature of their underlying knowledge? Nordlyd, 34, 230–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Clahsen, H., Lleo, C., Zaake, W., & Muente, T. F. (2001). Event_related brain responses to morphological violations in Catalan. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 47–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seigneuric, A., Zagar, D., Meunier, F., & Spinelli, E. (2007). The relation between language and cognition in 3- to 9-year-olds: The acquisition of grammatical gender in French. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96, 219–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinhauer, K., & Connolly, J. (2008). Event-related potentials in the study of language. In B. Stemmer & H. A. Whitaker (Eds.), Handbook of neuroscience of language (pp. 91–104). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M., & Meunier, F. (1998). Lexical representation of gender: A quasiregular domain. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(1), 23–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, G. R., Lambert, W. E., Rigault, A. A., & Segalowitz, N. (1968). A psychological investigation of French speaker’s skill with gramatical gender. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 312–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, M. T. (2001). The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(1), 37–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92(1–2), 231–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weyerts, H., Penke, M., Dohrn, U., Clahsen, H., & Munte, T. F. (1997). Brain potentials indicate differences between regular and irregular German plurals. NeuroReport, 8, 957–962.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Daniel Acheson, for his valuable support in the analysis of data, and to Peter Hagoort, for generously granting access to equipment and resources at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen.

Funding

This study was funded by CAPES (Program CAPES/NUFFIC Project 051/13 -Grant Number 23038.007129/2013-40, awarded to Mailce Borges Mota, and Program CAPES Doutorado SWE Grant Number 115981/13-1, awarded to Natália Carolina Alencar de Resende.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mailce Borges Mota.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Resende, N.C.A., Mota, M.B. & Seuren, P. The Processing of Grammatical Gender Agreement in Brazilian Portuguese: ERP Evidence in Favor of a Single Route. J Psycholinguist Res 48, 181–198 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9598-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9598-z

Keywords

Navigation