Abstract
Phonological alternations pose challenges for models of spoken word recognition in how surface information is mapped onto stored representations in the lexicon. In the current study, an auditory-auditory priming lexical decision experiment was conducted to investigate the alternating representations of Mandarin Tone 3 in both half-third and third tone sandhi contexts. In Mandarin, a full Tone 3 (213) is reduced to an abridged tone (21) when followed by Tone 1, Tone 2, or Tone 4 (half-third tone sandhi), and Tone 3 is replaced by Tone 2 when followed by another Tone 3 (third tone sandhi). In the half-third sandhi block, disyllabic targets with a half-third (21) or full-third (213) tone FIRST syllable and a Tone 2 (35) or Tone 4 (51) second syllable were preceded by either a half-third prime, a full-third prime, or a control prime. In the third tone sandhi block, third-tone sandhi disyllabic targets with a half-third or full-third SECOND syllable were preceded by either a half-third prime, a full-third prime, or a control prime. Results showed that both half-third and full-third primes elicited significantly faster reaction times relative to the control Tone 1 condition. The size of the facilitation was not influenced by prime condition, target frequency, targets’ first syllable tone or targets’ second syllable tone. These data suggest that Mandarin T3 may be a more abstract tone and stored as the first syllable for both types of sandhi words.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. M., and Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. Journal of Statistical Software. http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5823.
Boersma, P., and Weenink, D. (2020). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer 6.1.16 (computer program). Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/.
Chao, Y.-R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cheng, R. L. (1966). Mandarin phonological structure. Journal of Linguistics, 2, 135–158.
Chen, M. Y. (2000). Tone Sandhi: Patterns across Chinese Dialects. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Chien, Y.-F., Sereno, J. A., & Zhang, J. (2016). Priming the representation of Mandarin tone 3 sandhi words. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31, 179–189.
Chien, Y.-F., Sereno, J. A., & Zhang, J. (2017). What’s in a word: Observing the contribution of both underlyingand surface representations. Language and Speech, 60, 643–657.
Coster, D. C., & Kratochvil, P. (1984). Tone and stress discrimination in normal peking dialect speech. In B. Hong (Ed.), New papers in Chinese linguistics (pp. 119–132). Canberra: Australian National University Press.
Duanmu, S. (1999). Stress and the development of disyllabic words in Chinese. Diachronica XVI, 1, 1–35.
Duanmu, S. (2007). The Phonology of Standard Chinese (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gårding, E., Kratochvil, P., Svantesson, J.-O., & Zhang, J.-L. (1986). Tone 4 and Tone 3 discrimination in modern standard chinese. Language and Speech, 29, 281–293.
Gaskell, G. M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1996). Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 144–158.
Gaskell, G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1998). Mechanisms of phonological inference in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 380–396.
Goldinger, S. D. (1996). Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1166–1183.
Goldinger, S. D. (1997). Perception and production in an episodic lexicon. In K. Johnson & J. W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 33–66). San Diego: Academic Press.
Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? an episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251–279.
Goldinger, S. D., & Azuma, T. (2003). Puzzle-solving science: The quixotic quest for units in speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 305–320.
Goldinger, S. D., Pisoni, D. B., & Logan, J. S. (1991). On the nature of talker variability effects on recall of spoken word lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 152–162.
Gow, D. W., Jr. (2003). Feature parsing: Feature cue mapping in spoken word recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 575–590.
Hallé, P. (1994). Evidence for tone-specific activity of the sternohyoid muscle in modern standard Chinese. Language and Speech, 37, 103–124.
Johnson, K. (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization. In K. Johnson & J. W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 145–165). San Diego: Academic Press.
Johnson, K. (2006). Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 485–499.
Kratochvil, P. (1987). The case of the third tone. In Wang Li Memorial. Volumes & The Chinese (Eds.), Ma (pp. 253–276). Hong Kong: Language Society of Hong Kong.
Lahiri, A., & Reetz, H. (2002). Underspecified recognition. Laboratory. Phonology, 7, 637–675.
Lahiri, A., & Reetz, H. (2010). Distinctive features: phonological underspecification in representation and processing. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 44–59.
Li, A., Xiong, Z., and Wang, X. (2006). Contrastive study on tonal patterns between accented and standard Chinese. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Chinese Spoken Language, 157–168.
Li, X., & Chen, Y. (2015). Representation and processing of lexical tone and tonal variants: Evidence from the mismatch negativity. PLoS ONE, 10(12), e0143097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143097.
McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–86.
McLennan, C. T., Luce, P. A., & Charles-Luce, J. (2003). Representation of lexical form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 539–553.
McQueen, J. M., Culter, A., & Norris, D. (2006). Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 30, 1113–1126.
Mitterer, H., Chen, Y., & Zhou, X. (2011). Phonological abstraction in processing lexical-tone variation: Evidence from a learning paradigm. Cognitive Science, 35, 184–197.
Myers, J., & Tsay, J. (2003). Investigating the phonetics of Mandarin tone sandhi. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 1, 29–68.
Ogasawara, N. (2012). Lexical representation of Japanese vowel devoicing. Language and Speech, 56, 5–22.
Peng, S.-H. (2000). Lexical versus ‘phonological’ representations of Mandarin tones. In M. B. Broe & J. B. Pierrehumbert (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology 5 (pp. 152–167). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pierrehumbert, J. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In J. L. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 137–157). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pierrehumbert, J. (2002). Word-specific phonetics. In C. Gussenhoven & N. Warner (Eds.), Laboratory phonology 7 (pp. 101–139). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pisoni, D. B. (1990). Effects of talker variability on speech perception: Implications for current research and theory. In H. Fujisaki (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1990 International Conference on Spoken Language Processing Kobe, Japan, 1399–1407.
Pisoni, D. B. (1992). Talker normalization in speech perception. In Y. Tohkura, E. Vatikiotis-Bateson, & Y. Sagisaka (Eds.), Speech perception, production, and linguistic structure (pp. 143–151). Tokyo, Japan: Ohmsha Press.
Pisoni, D. B. (1997). Some thoughts on “normalization” in speech perception. In K. Johnson & J. W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 9–32). San Diego: Academic Press.
Pitt, M. A. (2009). How are pronunciation variants of spoken words recognized? A test of generalization to newly learned words. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 19–36.
Politzer-Ahles, S., Schluter, K., Wu, K., & Almeida, D. (2016). Asymmetries in the perception of Mandarin tones: Evidence from mismatch negativity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 1547–1570.
Ranbom, L. J., & Connine, C. M. (2007). Lexical representation of phonological variation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 273–298.
Sanders, R. (2008). Tonetic sound change in Taiwan Mandarin: The case of Tone 2 and Tone 3 citation contours. Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, 1, 87–107.
Shen, X., & Lin, M. (1991). A perceptual study of Mandarin Tones 2 and 3. Language Speech, 34, 145–156.
Shen, X., Lin, M., & Yan, J. (1993). F0 turning point as an F0 cue to tonal contrast: A case study of Mandarin tones 2 and 3. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 2241–2243.
Shi, F., and Dan, D. (2006). 普通話與台灣國語的語音對比. Pǔtōnghuà yǔ Táiwān Guóyǔ de yǔyīn duìbǐ (A phonetic contrast of Mainland Mandarin and Taiwan Mandarin), in D.-A. Ho et al. (eds). Linguistic Studies in Chinese and Neighboring Languages: Festschrift in Honor of Professor Pang-hsin Ting on his 70th Birthday (pp. 371–393). Academia Sinica Language and Linguistics Monograph Series Number W-6.
Snoeren, N. D., Seguí, J., & Hallé, P. A. (2008). Perceptual processing of partially and fully assimilated words in French. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 193–204.
Sumner, M., & Samuel, A. G. (2005). Perception and representation of regular variation: The case of final-/t/. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 322–338.
Tagliaferri, B. (2015). Paradigm. Perception Research Systems, Inc. www.perceptionresearchsystems.com
Wang, W., & Li, K.-P. (1967). Tone 3 in Pekingese. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 10, 629–636.
Weber, A., & Scharenborg, O. (2012). Models of spoken-word recognition. WIREs Cogn Sci, 3, 387–401.
Xu, Y. (2005). ProsodyPro.praat. Retrieved from http://www.homepages.ucl.ac.uk/~uclyyix/ProsodyPro/
Yan, H., Chien, Y.-F., & Zhang, J. (2019). Priming the representation of left-dominant sandhi words: A Shanghai dialect case study. Language and Speech. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830919849081.
Yuan, J. H., & Chen, Y. (2014). 3rd tone sandhi in standard Chinese: A corpus approach. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 42(1), 218–237.
Zhang, J., & Lai, Y.-W. (2010). Testing the role of phonetic knowledge in Mandarin tone sandhi. Phonology, 27(1), 153–201.
Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1997). The abstractness of phonological representation in the Chinese mental lexicon. In H.-C. Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of chinese and other asian languages (pp. 3–26). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
Funding
This study was funded by Ministry of Education, China, under grant [18YJC740075] and Shanghai Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science, China, under grant [2018EYY002].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors, Yu-Fu Chien, Hanbo Yan, Joan A. Sereno, declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee (Drs. Huizhong Chen, Fang Liu, Qinning Lu, Hongliang Shao, Chunxiang Wu, Yanli Zhang, and Jianjun Zhu) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Human Participants
The study was approved by the appropriate ethics committee for research involving human participants.
Informed Consent
Informed consent forms have been signed by the participants before the experiment.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Half-third Sandhi Critical Targets
取得 quT3 deT2, 解決 jieT3 jueT2, 選擇 xuanT3 zeT2, 改革gaiT3 geT2, 舉行 juT3 xingT2, 感情 ganT3 qingT2, 總結 zongT3 jieT2, 檢查 jianT3 chaT2, 轉移 zhuanT3 yiT2, 早晨 zaoT3 chenT2, 主席 zhuT3 xiT2, 典型 dianT3 xingT2, 組合 zuT3 heT2, 保存 baoT3 cunT2, 表情 biaoT3 qingT2, 黨員 dangT3 yuanT2, 可憐 keT3 lianT2, 請求 qingT3 qiuT2.
使用 shiT3 yongT4, 反映 fanT3 yingT4, 討論 taoT3 lunT4, 法律 faT3 luT4, 改造 gaiT3 zaoT4, 掌握 zhangT3 woT4, 鞏固 gongT3 guT4, 土地 tuT3 diT4, 導致 daoT3 zhiT4, 享受 xiangT3 shouT4, 種類 zhongT3 leiT4, 體制 tiT3 zhiT4, 顯示 xianT3 shiT4, 統計 tongT3 jiT4, 訪問 fangT3 wenT4, 鼓勵 guT3 liT4, 寫作 xieT3 zuoT4, 假設 jiaT3 sheT4.
Appendix 2: Third-tone Sandhi Critical Targets
產品 chanT3 pinT3, 演講 yanT3 jiangT3, 輔導 fuT3 daoT3, 以往 yiT3 wangT3, 只有 zhiT3 youT3, 也許 yeT3 xuT3, 領導 lingT3 daoT3, 彼此 biT3 ciT3, 想法 xiangT3 faT3, 處理 chuT3 liT3, 採取 caiT3 quT3, 引起 yinT3 qiT3, 保險 baoT3 xianT3, 主管 zhuT3 guanT3, 選舉 xuanT3 juT3, 顯眼 xianT3 yanT3, 扭轉 niuT3 zhuanT3, 海產 haiT3 chanT3, 雅典 yaT3 dianT3, 可口 keT3 kouT3, 打手 daT3 shouT3, 審理 shenT3 liT3, 賭場 duT3 changT3, 廠長 changT3 zhangT3, 乞討 qiT3 taoT3, 腳本 jiaoT3 benT3, 婉轉 wuanT3 zhuanT3, 體檢 tiT3 jianT3, 養老 yangT3 laoT3, 喜酒 xiT3 jiuT3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chien, YF., Yan, H. & Sereno, J.A. Investigating the Lexical Representation of Mandarin Tone 3 Phonological Alternations. J Psycholinguist Res 50, 777–796 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09745-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09745-0