Abstract
Objective
Police use-of-force continues to be a major source of international concern, inviting interest from academics and practitioners alike. Whether justified or unnecessary/excessive, the exercise of power by the police can potentially tarnish their relationship with the community. Police misconduct can translate into complaints against the police, which carry large economic and social costs. The question we try to answer is: do body-worn-cameras reduce the prevalence of use-of-force and/or citizens’ complaints against the police?
Methods
We empirically tested the use of body-worn-cameras by measuring the effect of videotaping police–public encounters on incidents of police use-of-force and complaints, in randomized-controlled settings. Over 12 months, we randomly-assigned officers to “experimental-shifts” during which they were equipped with body-worn HD cameras that recorded all contacts with the public and to “control-shifts” without the cameras (n = 988). We nominally defined use-of-force, both unnecessary/excessive and reasonable, as a non-desirable response in police–public encounters. We estimate the causal effect of the use of body-worn-videos on the two outcome variables using both between-group differences using a Poisson regression model as well as before-after estimates using interrupted time-series analyses.
Results
We found that the likelihood of force being used in control conditions were roughly twice those in experimental conditions. Similarly, a pre/post analysis of use-of-force and complaints data also support this result: the number of complaints filed against officers dropped from 0.7 complaints per 1,000 contacts to 0.07 per 1,000 contacts. We discuss the findings in terms of theory, research methods, policy and future avenues of research on body-worn-videos.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
17 September 2019
We provide the corrected results table below. Note that this correction does not alter the findings from the analysis, nor the interpretation of results.
Notes
Notably, many agencies are moving away from a use of force continuum, making the force determination even more ambiguous.
For a more systematic account of rates and prevalence, see Adams (1996:85–91), see also Hickman et al. (2009) who estimate, based on three dozen recent publications, that police use or threaten to use force in 1.7 % of all contacts and in 20.0 % of all arrests; but cf. Garner et al (2002) who found that prevalence can increase to more than 58 % of police–public encounters.
Though not without reservations about the utilization of complaint data as a single outcome measure, as complaints produce low substantiation rates—frequently 10 % or less (Liederbach et al. 2008).
It is worth noting recent research that suggests that both internal and external controls are conditionally relevant and depend, in part, on the extent to which individuals deliberate (see Wikström et al. 2012).
Similarly, officers regularly encounter ‘the usual suspects’ on patrol, meaning that there is some dependence between shifts in terms of “interactees”. Other research (e.g. Wikström et al. 2012) would suggest that even with variations in ‘actors’, there may be stable environmental cues that are conducive to specific actions, but the use of force by police still depends on the interaction between individuals and their settings (the situation).
We acknowledge that prior knowledge of shift assignment might give rise to expectation effects—so that we would not know whether changes in behavior arise directly because of the presence of a camera, or anticipation of wearing a camera.
As noted by Adams (1996:65), “although there are many attractive reasons for using official records in research on [use of] force, the strategy is not without limitations…some concerns are based on practical issues of how the data are collected…the quality of data (e.g., accuracy, dependability, and coverage)…can influence counts dramatically…more significant problem is that of missing data or information that should be available in record-keeping systems but is not.”
Poisson is appropriate here because each event has a small probability in each shift, and there are many shifts.
Note that we have reverse coded the treatment conditions so that 1 = control and 0 = treatment, meaning that ratios reflect the incident rate of the outcome occurring for the control condition versus the incident rate of the outcome occurring in the treatment condition.
Results not shown in tabular form, but given here: {B = −0.713; [95 % CI −3.112 to 1.685]; p .560}.
As Aristotle observed: “We are what we repeatedly do”.
One benefit which we have overlooked but should be closely observed in the future is the “training potential” of body-worn-videos. Rialto officers downloaded their own footage in order to view their interactions on a routine basis. Much like surgery, football or acting, the footage recorded by police body-worn-videos can be used to “coach” police officers, about how they conduct themselves. We envisage future police training to incorporate one-on-one sessions in which junior officers train with their own footage, about police conduct and potentially improve their demeanor when dealing with suspects, victims and witnesses. The benefits associated with such an impactful evidence-based approach to training through digital coaching, for procedural justice, distributive justice and police conduct more generally, should be an area of future investigations.
If we assume that all members of public encountered by the police are ‘criminals’ then it might well be justifiable, but this is obviously untrue.
We argue that experiments that allow treatment-providers full discretion about when to give or not to deliver the treatment(s)—and with what dosage levels—are generally poor designs. If the study results in non-significant outcomes, then it would be very difficult to interpret the findings—are they due to fidelity failure or that the treatment ‘actually’ do not work in the hypothesized direction? Moreover, even if the study results in significant results, the magnitude of the treatment compared to control conditions would be either inflated or deflated and therefore misleading, depending on how the treatment-providers decided to contaminate the treatment delivery. These scenarios may have adverse impacts for any attempt of conducting reliable cost-benefit analyses, or at the very least force researchers to dabble in conversions, transformations and statistical corrections which may or may not work—but anyway take away from the ‘cleanliness’ of controlled experimental design. We are cognizant that in real-life, non-experimental settings police officers may end up owning the power of discretion when to use or not use body-worn-videos, yet at this stage of our knowledge on the potential effect of these novel devices, experimentalists should encourage the use of strict protocols with as little discretionary powers as possible, before making policy recommendations.
References
Adams K (1996) Measuring the prevalence of police abuse-of-force. In: Galler W, Toch H (eds) Police violence: understanding and controlling police abuse-of-force. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 52–93
Alpert GP, Dunham RG (1997) The force factor: measuring police use-of-force relative to suspect resistance. Police Executive Research Forum, Washington
Alpert GP, Dunham RG (eds) (2004) Understanding police use-of-force: officers, suspects, and reciprocity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Alpert GP, Smith WC (1994) How reasonable is the reasonable man?: Police and excessive force. J Crim Law Criminol 852:481–501
Alpert GP, Dunham RG, MacDonald JM (2004) Interactive police–citizen encounters that result in force. Police Q 74:475–488
Alvarez RM, Sinclair B (2009) Matching and experiments: causal inferences without full randomization.
Ariel, B (2009) Systematic review of baseline imbalances in randomized controlled trials in criminology. Presented at the communicating complex statistical evidence conference, University of Cambridge, UK, 8 Jan 2009
Ariel B, Farrington DP (2014) Randomized block designs. In Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. Springer, New York, pp 4273–4283
Ariel B, Vila J, Sherman L (2012) Random assignment without tears: how to stop worrying and love the Cambridge randomizer. J Exp Criminol 82:193–208
Atherley LT, Hickman MJ (2014) Controlling use of force: identifying police use of excessive force through analysis of administrative records. Policing. http://policing.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/03/06/police.pau003.short
Baker M (1985) Cops: their lives in their own words. Fawcett, New York
Barclay P (2004) Trustworthiness and competitive altruism can also solve the “tragedy of the commons”. Evol Hum Behav 254:209–220
Bateson M, Nettle D, Roberts G (2006) Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biol Lett 23:412–414
Bayley DH, Garofalo J (1989) The management of violence by police patrol officers. Criminology 271:1–26
BBC (2012) Metropolitan Police spends £9m in six years on compensation. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-18021317. Last updated 11 May 2012
Beccaria C (1995) On crimes and punishment and other writings. (trans: Davies R.) Carnegie Institute, Washington
Berk RA (2005) Randomized experiments as the bronze standard. J Exp Criminol 14:417–433
Bittner E (1970) The functions of the police in modern society. Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain, Cambridge
Black D (1976) The behavior of law. Academic Press, New York
Box S, Russell K (1975) The politics of discreditability: disarming complaints against the police. Sociol Rev 23(2):315–346
Boyd R, Gintis H, Bowles S (2010) Coordinated punishment of defectors sustains cooperation and can proliferate when rare. Science 3285978:617–620
Braga AA (2008) Police enforcement strategies to prevent crime in hot spot areas. Crime prevention research review no. 2
Brey P (2004) Ethical aspects of facial recognition systems in public places. J Inf Commun Ethics Soc 22:97–109
Brown A (1998) Police governance in England and Wales. Cavendish, London
Burke RJ, Mikkelsen A (2005) Burnout, job stress and attitudes towards the use-of-force by Norwegian police officers. Policing 282:269–278
Burnham TC, Johnson DD (2005) The biological and evolutionary logic of human cooperation. Anal Krit 272:113–135
Chartrand TL, Bargh JA (1999) The chameleon effect: the perception–behavior link and social interaction. J Personal Soc Psychol 766:893
Clarke RV, Weisburd D (1994) Diffusion of crime control benefits: observations on the reverse of displacement. Crime Prev Stud 2:165–184
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
Cox DR (1958) Two further applications of a model for binary regression. Biometrika 45:562–565
Crawford C, Burns R (2002) Resisting arrest: predictors of suspect non-compliance and use-of-force against police officers. Police Pract Res 32:105–117
Croft EB (1985) Police use-of-force: an empirical analysis. Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Albany
Croft E, Austin BA (1987) Police use-of-force in Rochester and Syracuse, New York 1984 and 1985. Report to the New York State Commission on Criminal Justice and the Use-of-force 3
Duff RA, Marshall SE (2000) Benefits, burdens and responsibilities: some ethical dimensions of situational crime prevention. Ethical Soc Perspect Situat Crime Prev 1:17
Duval S, Wicklund RA (1972) A theory of objective self-awareness. Academic Press, Oxford, England
Dzieweczynski TL, Eklund AC, Rowland WJ (2006) Male 11-ketotestosterone levels change as a result of being watched in Siamese fighting fish, Betta splendens. Gen Comp Endocrinol 1472:184–189
Engel RS, Sobol JJ, Worden RE (2000) Further exploration of the demeanor hypothesis: the interaction effects of suspects’ characteristics and demeanor on police behavior. Justice Q 172:235–258
Fabricatore J, Azen S, Schoentgen S, Snibbe H (1978) Predicting performance of police officers using the sixteen personality factor questionnaire. Am J Community Psychol 61:63–70
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175–191
Fehr E, Schneider F (2010) Eyes are on us, but nobody cares: are eye cues relevant for strong reciprocity? Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 2771686:1315–1323
Finn P (2001) Citizen review of police: approaches and implementation series. NIJ Issues and Practices, NCJ
Friedrich RJ (1980) Police use-of-force: individuals, situations, and organizations. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 4521:82–97
Fyfe JJ (1988) Police use of deadly force: research and reform. Justice Q 52:165–205
Garner JH, Schade T, Hepburn J, Buchanan J (1995) Measuring the continuum of force used by and against the police. Crim Justice Rev 202:146–168
Garner J, Buchanan J, Schade T, Hepburn J (1996) Understanding the use-of-force by and against the police. National Institute of Justice: Reserach in Brief, Washington
Garner JH, Maxwell CD, Heraux CG (2002) Characteristics associated with the prevalence and severity of force used by the police. Justice Q 194:705–746
Gervais WM, Norenzayan A (2012) Like a camera in the sky? Thinking about God increases public self-awareness and socially desirable responding. J Exp Soc Psychol 481:298–302
Goold B, Loader I, Thumala A (2013) The banality of security: the curious case of surveillance cameras. Br J Criminol 53(6):977–996
Greene JA (1999) Zero tolerance: a case study of police practices and policies in New York City. Crime Delinq 45:171–181
Grossman RL (2009) The case for cloud computing. IT Prof 11(2):23–27
Haley KJ, Fessler DM (2005) Nobody's watching? subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evol Hum Behav 26(3):245−256
Halim S, Stiles BL (2001) Differential support for police use-of-force, the death penalty, and perceived harshness of the courts effects of race, gender, and region. Crim Justice Behav 281:3–23
Henderson H, Wilson F (2008) Judicial interpretation of reasonableness in use-of-force cases: an exploratory analysis. Contemp Issues Criminol Soc Sci 23:91–110
Hinds L (2009) Public satisfaction with police: the influence of general attitudes and police–citizen encounters. Int J Police Sci Manag 11(1):54–66
Hobbes T (1928/1651) Leviathan, or the matter, forme and power of a commonwealth ecclesiasticall and civil. Yale University Press, New York
Holland PW (1986) Statistics and causal inference. J Am Stat Assoc 81(396):945–960
Hunt J (1985) Police accounts of normal force. J Contemp Ethnogr 134:315–341
Jefferis ES, Kaminski RJ, Holmes S, Hanley DE (1997) The effect of a videotaped arrest on public perceptions of police use-of-force. J Crim Justice 255:381–395
Jervis R, Lebow RN, Stein JG (1989) Psychology and deterrence. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Jones EE, Nisbett RE (1971) The actor and the observer: divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. General Learning Press, Morristown, pp 79–94
Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York
King M, Waddington D (2004) Coping with disorder? The changing relationship between police public order strategy and practice—a critical analysis of the Burnley Riot. Polic Soc 142:118–137
Klepper S, Nagin D (2006) The deterrent effect of perceived certainty and severity of punishment revisited*. Criminology 274:721–746
Lester D (1996) Officer attitudes toward police use-of-force. In: Geller W, Toch H (eds) Police violence: understanding and controlling police abuse-of-force. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 180–190
Levenson LL (1993) Future of state and federal civil rights prosecutions: the lessons of the Rodney King Trial, The. UCLA L Rev 41:509
Liederbach J, Boyd L, Taylor R, Kawucha S (2008) Is it an inside job? An examination of internal affairs complaint investigation files and the production of nonsustained findings. Crim Justice Policy Rev 18(4):353–377
Locke J (1952/1689) An essay concerning human understanding (1689)
MacCormick N (2007) Institutions of law: an essay in legal theory. Oxford University Press
Maguire M, Corbett C (1991) A study of the police complaints system. HM Stationery Office, p 59
McCluskey JD, Terrill W (2005) Departmental and citizen complaints as predictors of police coercion. Policing 283:513–529
Milinski M, Semmann D, Krambeck H (2002) Donors to charity gain in both indirect reciprocity and political reputation. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B: Biol Sci 2691494:881–883
Minneapolis Civilian Review Authority (1997) Redesign team report. Minneapolis Civilian, Minneapolis
Munger K, Shelby JH (1989) Effects of an observer on hand washing in a public restroom. Percept Mot Skills 693:733–734
Nagin DS (2013) Deterrence in the twenty-first century. Crime Justice 42(1):199–263
Nambiar R, Chitor R, Joshi A (2014) Data management—a look back and a look ahead. In: Rabl T, Poess M, Baru C, Jacobsen HA (eds) Specifying big data benchmarks. Springer, Berlin, pp 11–19
Paoline P, Terrill W (2011) Listen to me! Police officers’ views of appropriate use-of-force. J Crime Justice 343:178–189
Pate AM, Fridell LA, Hamilton EE (1993) Police use-of-force: official reports, citizen complaints, and legal consequences, volumes I and II. The Police Foundation, Washington
Paulhus DL (1988) Balanced inventory of desirable responding BIDR. Accept Commit Ther Meas Package 41. http://www.mindfulness-extended.nl/content3/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Measures-Package.pdf#page=41
Pettit P (1997) Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government. Oxford University Press, NY
Phillips SW, Sobol JJ (2011) Police attitudes about the use of unnecessary force: an ecological examination. J Police Crim Psychol 26(1):47–57
New York Times. Police Salaries and Pensions Push California City to Brink. Last visited 3/11/2014. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/28/us/police-salaries-and-pensions-push-california-city-to-brink.html
Prenzler TJ, Allard TJ, Curry S, Macintyre S (2010) Complaints against police: the complainants’ experience. J Crim Just Res 1(1):1–18
Ratcliffe J (2007) Video surveillance of public places. Problem-oriented guides for police series. Response guides series No. 4. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, Washington, DC
Reiss AJ (1968) Police brutality-answers to key questions. Society 58:10–19
Rojek J, Alpert GP, Smith HP (2012) Examining officer and citizen accounts of police use-of-force incidents. Crime Delinq 582:301–327
Rosenbaum DP, Schuck AM, Costello SK, Hawkins DF, Ring MK (2005) Attitudes toward the police: the effects of direct and vicarious experience. Police Q 8(3):343–365
Rousseau JJ (1974/1762) Emile/Trans. Barbara Foxley. Dent, London
Rubin DB (1990) Comment: Neyman (1923) and causal inference in experiments and observational studies. Stat Sci 5(4):472–480
Sampson RJ (2010) Gold standard myths: observations on the experimental turn in quantitative criminology. J Quant Criminol 26(4):489–500
Saretsky G (1972) The OEO PC experiment and the John Henry effect. Phi Delta Kappan 539:579–581
Shapiro I (2003) The state of democratic theory. Princeton University Press, Chicago
Sherman LW (1980) Causes of police behavior: the current state of quantitative research. J Res Crime Delinq 171:69–100
Sherman LW (2013) The rise of evidence-based policing: targeting, testing, and tracking. Crime Justice 42(1):377–451
Skogan WG (2006) Police and community in Chicago: a tale of three cities. Oxford University Press
Skolnick JH (2008) Enduring issues of police culture and demographics. Polic Soc 181:35–45
Skolnick JH, Fyfe JJ (1993) Above the law: police and the excessive use-of-force. Free Press, New York
Spinello RA, Tavani HT (eds) (2004) Readings in cyberethics. Jones & Bartlett Learning, Burlington
Sproull L, Subramani M, Kiesler S, Walker JH, Waters K (1996) When the interface is a face. Hum–Comput Interact 112:97–124
Strang H (2012) Coalitions for a common purpose: managing relationships in experiments. J Exp Criminol 8(3):211–225
Surette R (2005) The thinking eye: pros and cons of second generation CCTV surveillance systems. Policing 28(1):152–173
Terrill W (2001) Police coercion: application of the force continuum. LFB Scholarly Pub LLC, New York
Terrill W, Mastrofski SD (2002) Situational and officer-based determinants of police coercion. Justice Q 192:215–248
Terrill W, Paoline EA, Manning PK (2003) Police culture and coercion. Criminology 414:1003–1034
Tilley N (1993) Understanding car parks, crime, and CCTV: evaluation lessons from safer cities. Home Office Police Department, London
Tyler T (2001) Public trust and confidence in legal authorities: what do majority and minority groups members want from the law and legal institutions? Behav Sci Law 19(2001):215–235
Von Hirsch A, Bottoms AE, Burney E, Wikstrom PO (1999) Criminal deterrence and sentence severity: an analysis of recent research. Hart, Oxford
Walker S (1997) Complaints against the police: a focus group study of citizen perceptions, goals, and expectations. Crim Justice Rev 22(2):207–226
Walker S, Archbold C, Herbst L (2002) Mediating citizen complaints against police officers: a guide for police and community leaders. US Department of Justice, Washington
Waters I, Brown K (2000) Police complaints and the complainants’ experience. Br J Criminol 40(4):617–638
Wedekind C, Braithwaite VA (2002) The long-term benefits of human generosity in indirect reciprocity. Curr Biol 1212:1012–1015
Weisburd D, Lum CM, Petrosino A (2001) Does research design affect study outcomes in criminal justice? Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 578(1):50–70
Weitzer R (2000) White, black, or blue cops? Race and citizen assessments of police officers. J Crim Justice 284:313–324
Weitzer R (2002) Incidents of police misconduct and public opinion. J Crim Justice 305:397–408
Welsh BC, Farrington DP (2009) Public area CCTV and crime prevention: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Justice Q 264:716–745
Westley WA (1970) Violence and the police: a sociological study of law, custom, and morality, vol 28. MIT Press, Cambridge
Wicklund RA (1975) Objective self-awareness. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 8:233–275
Wikström P-OH, Oberwittler D, Treiber K, Hardie B (2012) Breaking rules: the social and situational dynamics of young people’s urban crime. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Wilson C, Willis C, Hendrikz JK, Le Brocque R, Bellamy N (2010) Speed cameras for the prevention of road traffic injuries and deaths. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11 Art No CD004607
Worden RE (1996) The causes of police brutality: theory and evidence on police use-of-force. In: Galler W, Toch H (eds) Police violence: understanding and controlling police abuse-of-force. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 23–51
Acknowledgments
We wish to alphabetically thank Badi Hasisi, Daniel Nagin, David Weisburd, Joel Garner, Justice Tankebe, Lawrence Sherman, Neil Wain, Phillip Dawid and the anonymous reviewers of earlier drafts of this manuscript for their tremendously helpful comments. Funding for this research was granted by Rialto Police and the Jerry Lee Centre of Experimental Criminology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ariel, B., Farrar, W.A. & Sutherland, A. The Effect of Police Body-Worn Cameras on Use of Force and Citizens’ Complaints Against the Police: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Quant Criminol 31, 509–535 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-014-9236-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-014-9236-3