Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamical Interference of Shannon Information Entropy: Identification of Wave-Packet Fractional Revivals

  • Published:
Journal of Russian Laser Research Aims and scope

Abstract

Wave packet fractional revivals appear as manifestation of a multiple interference of various components of a wave packet during its long-time evolution in a bounded system. We study the phenomenon of fractional revivals by means of the time-dependent interference of information entropy density associated with a bound-state wave packet, which exhibits the formation of self-similar structures – quantum carpets woven by information entropy. The recurrences of self-similarity in the design of entropic carpet mimic the phenomena of quantum revivals and fractional revivals. We show that information theoretic measures are more sensitive to identify the wave-packet fractional revivals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Shannon, Bell Syst. Tech. J., 27, 623 (1948) [reprinted in: Claude Elwood Shannon, Collected Papers, IEEE Press, New York (1993)].

  2. R. J. Yáñez, W. Van Assche, and J. S. Dehesa, Phys. Rev. A, 50, 3065 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. W. Van Assche, R. J. Yáñez, and J. S. Dehesa, J. Math. Phys., 36, 4106 (1995).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. A. I. Aptekarev, J. S. Dehesa, and R. J. Yáñez, J. Math. Phys., 35, 4423 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Everett, The Many World Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press (1973).

  6. I. I. Hirschmann Jr., Am. J. Math., 79, 152 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. I. Bialynicki-Birula and J. Mycielski, Commun. Math. Phys., 44, 129 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. I. Bialynicki-Birula and L. Rudnicki, “Entropic uncertainty relations in quantum physics,” arXiv:1001.4668 [quant-ph].

  9. W. Beckner, Ann. Math. 102, 159 (1975).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Orlowski, Phys. Rev. A, 56, 2545 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Atre, A. Kumar, C. N. Kumar, and P. Panigrahi, Phys. Rev. A, 69, 052107 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Galindo and P. Pascual, Quantum Mechanics, Springer, Berlin (1978).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. J. C. Angulo, J. Antolin, A. Zarzo, and J. C. Cuchi, Eur. Phys. J. D, 7, 479 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. R. J. Yáñez, W. Van Assche, and J. S. Dehesa, Phys. Rev. A, 50, 3065 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. V. Majernik and T. Opatrny, J. Phys. A, 29, 2187 (1996).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. J. S. Dehesa, A. Martínez-Finkelshtein, and V. N. Sorokin, Mol. Phys., 104, 613 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. M. W. Coffey, Can. J. Phys., 85, 733 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. E. Aydiner, C. Orta, and R. Sever, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 22, 231 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. J. S. Dehesa, W. van Assche, and R. J. Yáñez, Meth. Appl. Math., 4, 91 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Katriel and K. D. Sen, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 233, 1399 (2010).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. S. H. Patil and K. D. Sen, Int. J. Quantum Chem., 107, 1864 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. K. D. Sen, J. Chem. Phys., 123, 074110 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. G. H. Sun and S. H. Dong, Phys. Scr., 87, 045003 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. G. H. Sun, S. H. Dong, and S. Naad, Ann. Phys. (Berlin), 525, 934 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. G. H. Sun, M. Avila Aoki, and S. H. Dong, Chin. Phys. B, 22, 050302 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. S. Dong, G. H. Sun, S. H. Dong, and J. P. Draayer, Phys. Lett. A, 378, 124 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. G. Yáñez-Navarro, G. H. Sun, T. Dytrich, et al., Ann. Phys. (Berlin), 348, 153 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. R. Valencia-Torres, G. H. Sun, and S. H. Dong, Phys. Scr., 90, 035205 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. M. A. Man’ko and V. I. Man’ko, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 538, 012016 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. A. Man’ko and V. I. Man’ko, Entropy, 20, 692 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. S. De Nicola, R. Fedele, M. A. Man’ko, and V.I. Man’ko, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 70, 012007 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  32. S. De Nicola, R. Fedele, M. A. Man’ko, and V. I. Man’ko, Eur. Phys. J. B, 52, 191 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. M. A. Man’ko, Phys. Scr., 87, 038113 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. M. A. Man’ko and V. I. Man’ko, Phys. Scr., T147, 014020 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. R. W. Robinett, Phys. Rep., 392, 1 (2004).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. G. Alber, H. Ritsch, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. A, 34, 1058 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. J. Parker and C. R. Stroud Jr., Phys. Rev. Lett., 56, 716 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. G. Rempe, H. Walther, and N. Klein, Phys. Rev. Lett., 58, 353 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. J. A. Yeazell, M. Mallalieu and C. R. Stroud Jr., Phys. Rev. Lett., 64, 2007 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. S. Iqbal, Qurat-ul-Ann, and F. Saif, Phys. Lett. A, 356, 231 (2006).

  41. F. Saif, Phys. Rep., 419, 207 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. M. Ayub and F. Saif, Phys. Rev. A, 85, 023634 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. P. Riviére, S. Iqbal, and J.-M. Rost, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 47, 124039 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. P. Riviére, S. Iqbal, and J.-M. Rost, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 194, 022015 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  45. H. Katsuki, H. Chiba, C. Meier, et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 12, 5189 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. J. Keeling and V. Gurarie, Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, 033001 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. I. L. Garanovich, S. Longhi, A. A. Sukhorukov et al., Phys. Rep., 518, 1 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. V. Krueckl and T. Kramer, New J. Phys., 11, 093010 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. R. Ali and F. Saif, Mater. Res. Express, 2, 095602 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  50. C. O. Reinhold, S. Yoshida, J. Burgdörfer, et al., J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 42, 091003 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. S. Iqbal, P. Riviére, and F. Saif, Int. J. Theor. Phys., 49, 2540 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. S. Iqbal and F. Saif, J. Russ. Laser Res., 34, 77 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. N. Amir and S. Iqbal, J. Math. Phys., 56, 062108 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. N. Amir and S. Iqbal, Commun. Theor. Phys., 68, 181 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. N. Amir and S. Iqbal, J. Math. Phys. (2020, in press).

  56. Z. D. Gaeta and C. R. Stroud Jr., Phys. Rev. A, 42, 6308 (1990).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  57. C. Leichtle, I. S. Averbukh, and W. P. Schleich, Phys. Rev. A, 54, 5299 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. D. L. Aronstein and C. R. Stroud Jr., Laser Phys., 15, 1496 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  59. I. S. Averbukh and N. F. Perelman, Phys. Lett. A, 139, 449 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. R. Veilande and I. Bersons, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 40, 2111 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. J. A. Yeazell and C. R. Stroud Jr., Phys. Rev. A, 43, 5153 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. G. D. Valle, M. Savoini, M. Ornigotti, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 102, 180402 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. S. Ghosh and J. Banerji, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 40, 3545 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. A. Schubert, K. Renziehausen, and V. Engel, Phys. Rev. A, 82, 013419 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. W. Merkel, S. I. Averbukh, B. Girard, et al., Fortschr. Phys., 54, 856 (2006).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  66. E. Romera and F. de los Santos, Phys. Rev. Lett., 99, 263601 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  67. E. Romera and F. de los Santos, Phys. Rev. A, 78, 013837 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  68. I. Yousaf and S. Iqbal, J. Russ. Laser Res., 37, 328 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. P. Kazemi, S. Chaturvedi, I. Marzoli, R. F. O’Connell, et al., New J. Phys., 15, 013052 (2013).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  70. F. Saif, Laser Phys., 22, 1874 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  71. F. Grossmann, J.-M. Rost, and W. P. Schleich, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 30, L277 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. I. Marzoli, F. Saif, I. Bialynicki-Birula, et al., Acta Physica Slovaca, 48, 323 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  73. O. M. Friesch, I. Marzoli, and W. P. Schleich, New J. Phys., 2, 4 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  74. E. H. Kennard, Z. Phys., 44, 326 (1927).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shahid Iqbal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iqbal, S. Dynamical Interference of Shannon Information Entropy: Identification of Wave-Packet Fractional Revivals. J Russ Laser Res 41, 451–458 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10946-020-09898-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10946-020-09898-2

Keywords

Navigation