Abstract
Recent reform efforts and the next generation science standards emphasize the importance of incorporating authentic scientific practices into science instruction. Modeling can be a particularly challenging practice to address because modeling occurs within a socially structured system of representation that is specific to a domain. Further, in the process of modeling, experts interact deeply with domain-specific content knowledge and integrate modeling with other scientific practices in service of a larger investigation. It can be difficult to create learning experiences enabling students to engage in modeling practices that both honor the position of the novice along a spectrum toward more expert understanding and align well with the practices and reasoning used by experts in the domain. In this paper, we outline the challenges in teaching modeling practices specific to the domain of ecosystem science, and we present a description of a curriculum built around an immersive virtual environment that offers unique affordances for supporting student engagement in modeling practices. Illustrative examples derived from pilot studies suggest that the tools and context provided within the immersive virtual environment helped support student engagement in modeling practices that are epistemologically grounded in the field of ecosystem science.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barab SA, Hay KE, Barnett M, Keating T (2000) Virtual solar system project: building understanding through model building. J Res Sci Teach 37(7):719–756
Barnett M, Yamagata-Lynch L, Keating T, Barab SA, Hay KE (2005) Using virtual reality computer models to support student understanding of astronomical concepts. J Comput Math Sci Teach 24(4):812–856
Berland LK, McNeill KL (2009). Using a learning progression to inform scientific argumentation in talk and writing. Learning Progressions in Science Conference, Iowa City, IA
Berland LK, Reiser BJ (2010) Classroom communities’ adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation. Sci Educ 95(2):191–216
Brizuela BM, Gravel BE (2013) Introduction. In: Brizuela BM, Gravel BE (eds) Show me what you know: exploring student representations across stem disciplines. Teachers College Press
Canham CDW, Cole J, Lauenroth WK (eds) (2003) Models in ecosystem science. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Capon N, Kuhn D (2004) What’s so good about problem-based learning? Cognit Instr 22(1):61–79
Chaiklin S, Lave (eds) (1993) Understanding practice: perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Chinn C, Hmelo-Silver C (2002) Authentic inquiry: introduction to the special section. Sci Educ 86(2):171–174
Chinn C, Malhotra B (2002) Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: a theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Sci Educ 86(2):175–218. doi:10.1002/sce.10001
Clement J (2000) Model based learning as a key research area for science education. Int J Sci Educ 22(9):1041–1053. doi:10.1080/095006900416901
Coll RK, France B, Taylor I (2005) The role of models/and analogies in science education: implications from research. Int J Sci Educ 27(2):183–198. doi:10.1080/0950069042000276712
Dede C (1999) The multiple-media difference. Technos 8(1):16–18
Duschl R (2008) Science education in three-part harmony: balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Rev Res Educ 32(1):268–291. doi:10.3102/0091732X07309371
Fishman B, Dede C, Means B (in press) Teaching and technology: new tools for new times. In: Handbook of research on teaching, 5th ed. American Educational Research Association, Washington
Gilbert JK (2004) Models and modelling: routes to more authentic science education. Int J Sci Math Educ 2(2):115–130. doi:10.1007/s10763-004-3186-4
Goldin GA (2013) Forward. In: Brizuela BM, Gravel BE (eds) Show me what you know: exploring student representations across stem disciplines. Teachers College Press
Goodwin C (1994) Professional vision. Am Anthropol 96(3):606–633
Greca IM, Moreira MA (2001) Mental, physical, and mathematical models in the teaching and learning of physics. Sci Educ 86(1):106–121. doi:10.1002/sce.10013
Greeno JG (1998) The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. Am Psychol 53(1):5–26. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.53.1.5
Griesemer JR (1990, January). Material models in biology. In PSA: proceedings of the biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association. Philosophy of Science Association, pp 79–93
Grosslight L, Unger C, Jay E, Smith CL (1991) Understanding models and their use in science: conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. J Res Sci Teach 28(9):799–822. doi:10.1002/tea.3660280907
Grotzer TA, Tutwiler MS, Dede C, Kamarainen A, Metcalf S (2011, April). Helping students learn more expert framing of complex causal dynamics in ecosystems using EcoMUVE. Presented at the national association of research in science teaching (NARST) conference, Orlando, April 4, 2011
Grotzer TA, Kamarainen AM, Tutwiler MS, Metcalf S, Dede C (2013) Learning to reason about ecosystems dynamics over time: the challenges of an event-based causal focus. Bioscience 63(4):288–296
Harrison AG, Treagust DF (2000) A typology of school science models. Int J Sci 37–41. doi:10.1080/095006900416884
Hmelo CE, Holton DL, Kolodner JL (2000) Designing to learn about complex systems. J Learn Sci 9(3):247–298
Hofstein A, Lunetta VN (2004) The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Sci Educ 88(1):28–54
Kelly RA, Jakeman AJ, Barreteau O, Borsuk ME, Elsawah S, Hamilton SH, Voinov AA (2013) Environmental modelling & software selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management. Environ Model Softw 47:159–181. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.005
Kuhn D, Pearsall S (2000) Developmental origins of scientific thinking. J Cognit Dev 1(1):113–129. doi:10.1207/S15327647JCD0101N_11
Lauenroth WK, Burke IC, Berry JK (2003) The status of dynamic quantitative modeling in ecology. In: Canham CDW, Cole J, Lauenroth WK (eds) Models in ecosystem science. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 32–48
Lehrer R, Schauble L (2000) Developing model-based reasoning in mathematics and science. J Appl Dev Psychol 21(1):39–48
Lehrer R, Horvath J, Schauble L (1994) Developing model-based reasoning. Interact Learn Environ 4(3):218–232. doi:10.1080/1049482940040304
Lehrer R, Schauble L, Lucas D (2008) Supporting development of the epistemology of inquiry. Cognit Dev 23(4):512–529. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.001
Lesh R, Lehrer R (2003) Models and modeling perspectives on the development of students and teachers. Math Think Learn 5(2–3):109–129. doi:10.1080/10986065.2003.9679996
Manz EVE (2012) Understanding the codevelopment of modeling practice and ecological. Sci Educ 96(6):1071–1105. doi:10.1002/sce.21030
NGSS Lead States (2013) Next generation science standards: for states, by states. The National Academies Press, Washington
Pace ML, Groffman PM (1998) Successes, limitations, and frontiers in ecosystem science: reflections on the seventh cary conference OR. Ecosystems 1:137–142
Palincsar AS (1998) Keeping the metaphor of scaffolding fresh—a response to C. Addison Stone’s “The metaphor of scaffolding its utility for the field of learning disabilities”. J Lear Disabil 31(4):370–373
Passmore C, Stewart J (2002) A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools. J Res Sci Teach 39(3):185–204. doi:10.1002/tea.10020
Passmore CM, Svoboda J (2012) Exploring opportunities for argumentation in modeling classrooms. Int J Sci Educ 34(10):1535–1554. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.577842
Passmore C, Stewart J, Cartier J (2009) Model-based inquiry and school science: creating connections. Sch Sci Math 109(7):394–402. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2009.tb17870.x
Penner DE, Giles ND, Lehrer R, Schauble L (1997) Building functional models: designing an elbow. J Res Sci Teach 34(2):125–143. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199702)34:2<125:AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-V
Quintana C, Reiser BJ, Davis EA, Krajcik J, Fretz E, Duncan RG, Soloway E (2004) A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. J Learn Sci 13(3):337–386
Reiser B, Tabak I, Sandoval WA, Smith BK, Steinmuller F, Leone AJ (2001) BGuILE: strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In: Carver SM, Klahr D (eds) Cognition and instruction: twenty-five years of progress. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
Salzman M, Dede C, Loftin B (1999) Virtual reality’s frames of reference: a visualization technique for mastering abstract information spaces. In: Proceedings of CHI’99, pp 489–495
Sandoval W (2014) Science education’s need for a theory of epistemological development. Sci Educ 98(3):383–387. doi:10.1002/sce.21107
Sandoval WA, Reiser BJ (2004) Explanation-driven inquiry: integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Sci Educ 88(3):345–372
Schwarz CV, Meyer J, Sharma A (2007) Technology, pedagogy, and epistemology: opportunities and challenges of using computer modeling and simulation tools in elementary science methods. 243–269. doi:10.1007/s10972-007-9039-6
Singer SR, Hilton ML, Schweingruber HA (eds) (2005) America’s lab report: investigations in high school science. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Squire K (2010) From information to experience: place-based augmented reality games as a model for learning in a globally networked society. Teach Coll Rec 112(10):2565–2602
Stratford SJ (1997) A review of computer-based model research in precollege science classrooms. J Comput Math Sci Teach 16:3–23
Tairab HH, Khalaf Al-Naqbi AK (2004) How do secondary school science students interpret and construct scientific graphs? J Biol Educ 38(3):127–132. doi:10.1080/00219266.2004.9655920
Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge university press, Cambridge
Windschitl M, Thompson J, Braaten M (2008) Beyond the scientific method: model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Sci Educ 92(5):941–967
Acknowledgments
The EcoMUVE project was supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Education Insitute of Education Sciences under award number (R305A080141).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kamarainen, A.M., Metcalf, S., Grotzer, T. et al. Exploring Ecosystems from the Inside: How Immersive Multi-user Virtual Environments Can Support Development of Epistemologically Grounded Modeling Practices in Ecosystem Science Instruction. J Sci Educ Technol 24, 148–167 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9531-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9531-7