Abstract
This project examined the decisions of 2435 mock jurors of whom 984 reported being a victim of some type of crime and 982 reported knowing a close friend or relative who had been a victim. Participants watched a videotape of a trial of a burglary of a habitation and were asked to give individual verdicts. Results indicated that jurors who identified themselves as victims of the same crime convicted significantly more frequently than those who had not been victims. Victims of violent crimes (a type of crime dissimilar to that for which the defendant was on trial) were not more likely to convict than were non-victims. Implications of this research are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amirault v. Fair, 968 F2d 1404 (US Ct App 1st Cir 1992).
Bradley v. State, 960 S.W.2d 791 (Tex 8th Dist Ct App 1997).
Bureau of Justice Statistics (2001, January). Crime victimization in the United States, 1999 statistical tables. Retrieved July 18, 2002; Available from: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cvus99.pdf.
Feldman v. State, 71 S.W.3d 738 (Tex Cr App 2002).
Fox v. State, 602 So 2d 484 (Ala Cr App 1992).
Gobert, J. J., & Jordan, W. E. (1990). Jury selection: The law, art, and science of selecting a jury. Colorado Springs, CO: Shepard’s/McGraw-Hill.
Gonzales v. Thomas, 99 F3d 978 (US Ct App 10th Cir 1996).
Hans, V. P., & Vidmar, N. (1986). Judging the jury. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Hosch, H. M., Tubb, V. A., Taylor, T. S., Shaw, J. S., III., & Ponder, B. J. (2003). Effects of defendant’s ethnicity, language of testimony, jurors’ ethnicity and language dominance on juror’s and juries’ decisions. Manuscript in preparation.
In re, S.P., 9 S.W.3d 304 (Tex 4th Dist Ct App 1999).
Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1983). The construction and validation of a juror bias scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 423–442.
Martinez, v. State 621 S.W.2d 797 (Tex Cr App 1981).
Mize, G. (1999). On better jury selection: Spotting UFO jurors before they enter the jury room. Court Review, 36, 10–15.
Mooney v. State, 817 SW2d 693 (Tex Crim App 1991).
Nailor v. People, 200 Colo 30, 612 P2d 79 (Colo Sup Ct 1980).
Neel v. State, 658 S.W.2d 856 (Tex 5th Dist Ct app 1983).
Olczak, P. V., Kaplan, M. F., & Penrod, S. (1991). Attorney’s lay psychology and its effectiveness in selecting jurors: Three empirical studies. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 431–452.
People v. Manriquez, 59 Cal. App. 3d 426 (Cal 2nd App 1976).
Rose, M. (2000, Fall). No right to remain silent: Privacy and jurors’ views of the voir dire process. Researching Law, 11(4), 6–8.Sadler v. State, 977 S.W.2d 140 (Tex Cr App 1998).
Sadler v. State, 977 S.W.2d 140 (Tex Cr App 1998).
Seltzer, R., Venuti, M., & Lopes, G. (1991). Juror honesty during the voir dire. Journal of Criminal Justice, 19, 451–462.
State v. Anderson, 603 NW 2d 354 (Minn Ct App 1999).
State v. Cheesebrew, 575 SW2d 218 (Mo Ct App 1978).
State v. Jimmie, 2000 WI App 5, 232 Wis 2d 138, 606 NW2d 196 (Wisc Ct App 1999).
State v. Percy, 156 VT 468, 595 A2d 248 (VT Super Ct 1990).
State v. Singletary, 156 NJ Super 303, 383 A2d 1151 (NJ Super Ct 1978).
State v. Woolley, 1991, 810 P2d 440, 158 Utah Adv Rep 35 (Utah Ct App 1991).
State v. Young, 643 SW2d 28 (Mo Ct App 1982).
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Annotated (Lexis-Nexis).
Thomas v. State, 796 S.W.2d 196 (Tex Cr App 1990).
Wiener, R. L., Wiener, A. T., Grisso, T. (1989). Empathy and biased assimilation of testimony of cases of alleged rape. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 343–355.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Culhane, S.E., Hosch, H.M. & Weaver, W.G. Crime Victims Serving as Jurors: Is There Bias Present?. Law Hum Behav 28, 649–659 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-004-0792-1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-004-0792-1