Abstract
Children from 5 to 12 years of age (N=779) were shown a videotape where a preschool teacher has money stolen from her wallet. Children were shown a lineup, and for children in the bystander condition, the lineup contained a familiar bystander without the thief. Children in the control condition viewed the same lineup but they had not seen the bystander in the videotape. Among the 11–12-year olds, participants in the bystander condition were significantly more likely than control participants to misidentify the familiar bystander. This effect was not found in children from 5 to 10 years of age. When children in the control condition were shown a lineup that contained the thief without the bystander, the 11–12-year olds were significantly more likely than the younger children to correctly identify the thief. These findings demonstrate that age can both increase and decrease the accuracy of children’s lineup identification accuracy depending on the task at hand and the content of a lineup.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman, B. P. (1984). Storage and processing constraints on integrating story information in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 64–92.
Ackerman, B. P. (1992). The sources of children’s source errors in judging causal inferences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, 90–119.
Beal, C. R., Schmitt, K. L., & Dekle, D. J. (1995). Eyewitness identification of children. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 197–216.
Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F. & Forrest, T. J. (2002). Are young children susceptible to the False-Memory Illusion? Child Development, 73, 1363–1377.
Brown, E., Deffenbacher, K., & Sturgill, W. (1977). Memory for faces and the circumstances of encounter. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 311–318.
Buckhout, R. (1974). Eyewitness testimony. Scientific American, 231, 23–31.
Collins, A. W., Wellman, H., Keniston, A. H., & Westhy, S. D. (1978). Age-related aspects of comprehension and inference from a televised dramatic narrative. Child Development, 49, 389–399.
Dekle, D. J., Beal, C. R., Elliott, R., & Huneycutt, D. (1996). Children as witnesses: A comparison of lineup versus showup identification methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 1–12.
Dysart, J. E., Lindsay, R. C. L., Hammond, R. & Dupuis, P. (2001). Mug shot exposure prior to lineup identification: Interference, transference, and commitment effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1280–1284.
Geiselman, E. R., Haghighi, D., & Stown, R. (1996). Unconscious transference and characteristics of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses. Psychology, Crime and Law, 2, 197–209.
Geiselman, E. R., MacArthur, A., & Meerovitch, S. (1993). Transference of perpetrator roles in eyewitness identifications from photoarrays. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 11, 5–15.
Goodman, G., & Reed, R. S. (1986). Age differences in eyewitness testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 317–332.
Gorenstein, G. W., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1980). Effect of choosing an incorrect photograph on a later identification by an eyewitness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 616–622.
Gross, J., & Hayne, H. (1996). Eyewitness identifications by 5- to 6-year-old children. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 359–373.
Houts, M. (1956). From evidence to guilt. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Johnson, H. & Smith, L. B. (1981). Children’s inferential abilities in the context of reading to understand. Child Development, 52, 1216–1223.
Lindsay, R. C. L., Pozzulo, J. D., & Craig, W., Lee, K., & Corber, S. (1997). Simultaneous lineups, sequential lineups, and showups: Eyewitness identification decisions of adults and children. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 391–404.
Loftus, E. F. (1976). Unconscious transference. Law and Psychology Review, 2, 93–98.
Paris, S. G., & Lindauer, B. K. (1976). The role of inference in children’s comprehension and memory for sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 217–227.
Paris, S. G., Lindauer, B. K. & Cox, G. L. (1977). The development of inferential comprehension. Child Development, 48, 1728–1733.
Parker, J. F. (1995). Age differences in source monitoring of performed and imagined actions on immediate and delayed tests. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 84–101.
Parker, J. F., & Carranza, L. E. (1989). Eyewitness testimony of children in target present and target absent lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 133–149.
Parker, J. F., & Myers, A. (2001). Attempts to improve children’s identifications from sequential lineups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 796–815.
Parker, J. F., & Ryan, V. (1993). An attempt to reduce guessing behavior in children’s and adults’ eyewitness identifications. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 11–26.
Perfect, T. J. & Harris, L. J. (2003). Adult age differences in unconscious transference: Source confusion or identity blending? Memory and Cognition, 31, 570–580.
Pezdek, K. (1980). Life-span differences in semantic integration of pictures and sentences in memory. Child Development, 51, 720–729.
Phillips, M., Geiselman, R., Haghighi, D., & Lin, C. (1997). Some boundary conditions for bystander misidentification. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 370–390.
Pozzulo, J. D. & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1997). Increasing correct identifications by children. Expert Evidence, 5, 126–132.
Pozzulo, J. D. & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1998). Identification accuracy of children versus adults: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 549–570.
Pozzulo, J. D. & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1999). Elimination lineups: An improved identification procedure for child eyewitnesses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 167–176.
Read, J. D., Tollestrup, P., Hammersley, R., McFadzen, E., & Christensen, A. (1990). The unconscious transference effect: Are innocent bystanders ever misidentified? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 3–31.
Ross, D. F., Ceci, S. J., Dunning, D., & Toglia, M. P. (1994). Unconscious transference and mistaken identity: When a witness misidentifies a familiar but innocent person. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 918–930.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Ross, D.F., Marsil, D.F., Benton, T.R. et al. Children’s Susceptibility to Misidentifying a Familiar Bystander From a Lineup: When Younger is Better. Law Hum Behav 30, 249–257 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9034-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9034-z