Abstract
In four experiments, participants made a purchase decision about a counterfeit product under either constrained or unconstrained cognitive resource conditions. Participants were less likely to purchase the counterfeit when their cognitive resources were constrained than when they were not. However, this difference was evident only when individuals had strong (vs. weak) moral beliefs, or when they had low (vs. high) accountability for their decisions. These and other results suggest that the effect of cognitive resource availability on counterfeit purchase was mediated by participants’ perceptions of justification about the purchase.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Counterfeit purchases can occur in two different ways. First, consumers may be deceived to believe that the counterfeit products they purchase are genuine ones. This is termed a ‘deceptive’ counterfeiting (Grossman and Shapiro 1998). Second, consumers may purchase counterfeits even if they know that the products are counterfeits. This is termed a “non-deceptive” counterfeiting (Grossman and Shapiro 1998). The focus of the present research is the latter.
Note that justification questions were asked always after participants indicated their purchase intentions. To this extent, participants’ justifications might have been answered to be consistent with their purchase intentions and did not actually drive the decision of purchasing the counterfeit. To evaluate this possibility, we performed a reverse mediation analysis in which justification rating was a dependent variable while purchase intention served as a mediator. This analysis indicated that including purchase intentions as additional predictor in the model did not eliminate the effect of resource availability on justification ratings to nonsignificant (β = 0.85, t = 1.65, p < 0.10), thus calling the validity of the alternative possibility into questions.
A reverse mediation analysis indicated that including purchase intention as additional predictor in the regression model did not eliminate the effect of resource availability on justification rations to nonsignificance (β = 0.57; t = 1.77; p < 0.10), as consistent with results in experiment 1.
References
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (pp. 3–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cordell, V. V., Wongtada, N., & Kieschnick, R. L., Jr. (1996). Counterfeit purchase intentions: Role of lawfulness attribute and product traits as determinants. Journal of Business Research, 35(1), 41–53.
Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgments: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1082–1089.
Fitzsimons, G. J. (2008). Death to dichotomizing. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(1), 5–8.
Fullerton, R. A., & Punj, G. (2004). Repercussions of promoting an ideology of consumption: Consumer misbehavior. Journal of Business Research, 57(11), 1239–1249.
Gino, F., Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2010). The counterfeit self: The deceptive costs of faking it. Psychological Science, 21(5), 712–720.
Greene, J. D., & Paxton, J. M. (2009). Patterns of neural activity associated with honest and dishonest moral decisions. PNAS, 106(30), 12506–12511.
Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107(1), 1144–1154.
Grossman, G., & Shapiro, C. (1998). Foreign counterfeiting of status goods. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103(412), 79–100.
Guttierez, C., Verheugen, G., Mandelson, P., & Schwab, S. (2006). Countering counterfeits. Wall Street Journal (June 20). A20
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.
Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998–1002.
Han, Y. J., Nunes, J. C., & Drèze, X. (2010). Signaling status with luxury goods: The role of brand prominence. Journal of Marketing Research, 74(4), 15–30.
International Anticounterfeiting Coalition. About counterfeiting. Retrieved from http://iacc.org/about-counterfeiting. Accessed 7 June 2011
Kohlberg, L. (1984). The philosophy of moral development: Essays on moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Lalwani, A. K. (2009). The distinct influence of cognitive busyness and need for closure on cultural differences in socially desirable responding. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(August), 305–316.
Logsdon, J. M., Thompson, J. K., & Reid, R. A. (1994). Software piracy: I it related to level of moral judgment? Journal of Business Ethics, 13(11), 849–857.
Mazar, N., & Aggarwal, P. (2011). Greasing the palm: Can collectivism promote bribery? Psychological Science, 22(7), 843–848.
Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A self-concept maintenance theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 633–644.
Moores, T. T., & Chang, J. C.-J. (2006). Ethical decision making in software piracy: Initial development and test of a four-component model. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 167–180.
Muncy, J., & Vitell, S. (1992). Consumer ethics: An investigation of the ethical beliefs of the final consumer. Journal of Business Research, 24(4), 297–311.
Muraven, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126(March), 247–259.
Muraven, M. R., Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Self-control as limited resource: Regulatory depletion patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 774–789.
Schweitzer, M., & Hsee, C. K. (2002). Stretching the truth: Elastic justification and motivated communication of uncertain information. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 25(2), 185–201.
Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (1999). Heart and mind in conflict: The interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(December), 278–292.
Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (2002). Spontaneous versus controlled influences of stimulus-based affect on choice behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87(March), 342–370.
Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Accountability and complexity of thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 74–83.
Tetlock, P. E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), 819–827.
Tice, D. M., Baumeister, R. F., Shmueli, D., & Muraven, M. (2007). Restoring the self: Positive affect helps improve self-regulation following ego depletion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 379–384.
Tom, G., Garibaldi, B., & Pilcher, J. (1998). Consumer demand for counterfeit goods. Psychology and Marketing, 15(5), 405–421.
Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17(6), 476–477.
Vitell, S., & Muncy, J. (2005). The Muncy-Vitell consumer ethics scale: A modification and application. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(2), 267–275.
Vohs, K., & Faber, R. (2007). Spent resources: Self-regulatory resource availability affects impulse buying. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(March), 537–547.
Wee, C.-H., Tan, S.-J., & Cheok, K.-H. (1995). Non-price determinants of intention to purchase counterfeit goods. International Marketing Review, 12(6), 19–46.
Wilcox, K., Kim, H. M., & Sen, S. (2009). Why do consumers buy counterfeit luxury brands? Journal of Marketing Research, 46(2), 247–259.
Zhang, Y., & Mittal, V. (2005). Decision difficulty: Effects of procedural and outcome accountability. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(December), 465–472.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the editor and the reviewers for their constructive comments on earlier drafts. This research was supported by the Hyundai-Kia Research Fellow Fund to Jongwon Park.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, J., Kim, JE. & Park, J. Effects of cognitive resource availability on consumer decisions involving counterfeit products: The role of perceived justification. Mark Lett 23, 869–881 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9194-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9194-1