Abstract
Subseismic faults are small faults or fractures that may be difficult to determine but can have large consequences for fluid flow and pressure communication in the subsurface. Thus, knowing their distributions may be important in several subsurface applications, such as hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation, geothermal energy production, and subsurface CO2 injection. The aim of this work is to use a stochastic model to populate a three-dimensional structural model of the subsurface with subseismic faults. The novelty of the proposed method is the conditioning of the stochastic model to input maps describing displacement and stress orientation along subsurface horizons. Hence, the resulting structural model will be consistent with these maps. The maps can originate from a variety of sources, for example, predictions of a geomechanical model or (indirect) measurements of subsurface displacements and stresses. The model uses simulated annealing as the optimization algorithm, where the residual between the displacement of the modeled subseismic faults and the input displacement map is minimized through an iterative process. Each subseismic fault is modeled with a three-dimensional displacement field around the fault slip plane, enabling comparisons with the input displacement map along a horizon. An example of how the model distributes the subseismic faults around larger known faults, using a synthetically created displacement map, is provided. The result shows that the model quickly converges towards a set of subseismic faults, giving total displacement and strike orientation close to the input maps.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bond CE (2015) Uncertainty in structural interpretation: lessons to be learnt. J Struct Geol 74:185–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2015.03.003
Cherpeau N, Caumon G, Lévy B (2010) Stochastic simulations of fault networks in 3D structural modelling. Comp Rend Geosci 342:687–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2010.04.008
Damsleth E, Sangolt V, Aamodt G (1998) Sub-seismic Faults Can Seriously Affect Fluid Flow in the Njord Field off Western Norway—A Stochastic Fault Modeling Case Study. SPE Paper 49024, p 10. https://doi.org/10.2118/49024-MS
Georgsen F, Røe P, Syversveen AR, Lia O (2012) Fault displacement modelling using 3D vector fields. Comput Geosci 16:247–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-011-9257-z
Gibson JR, Walsh J, Watterson J (1989) Modelling of bed contours and cross-sections adjacent to planar normal faults. Struct Geol 11:317–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(89)90071-0
Gillespie P, Casini G, Iben H, O’Brien JF (2017) Simulation of subseismic joint and fault networks using a heuristic mechanical model. In: Ashton M, Dee SJ, Wennberg OP (eds) Subseismic-scale reservoir deformation, vol 459. The Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ., pp 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP459.6
Godefroy G, Caumon G, Laurent G, Bonneau F (2019) Structural interpretation of sparse fault data using graph theory and geological rules. Math Geosci 51:1091–1107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-019-09800-0
Gong L, Liu B, Fu X, Jabbari H, Gao S, Yue W, Yuan H, Fu R, Wang Z (2019) Quantitative prediction of sub-seismic faults and their impact on waterflood performance: Bozhong 34 oilfield case study. J Petr Sci Eng 172:60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.09.049
Hollund K, Mostad P, Nielsen BF, Holden L, Gjerde J, Contursi MG, McCann AJ, Townsend C, Sverdrup E (2002) Havana—a fault modeling tool. In: Hydrocarbon seal quantification, Norwegian petroleum society conference. Vol 11, NPF Spec Pub, Elsevier, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-8937(02)80013-3
Kim Y, Sanderson DJ (2005) The relationship between displacement and length of faults: a review. Earth-Sci 68:317–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2004.06.003
Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD Jr, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671–680. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4598.671
Kolyukhin D, Torabi A (2012) Statistical analysis of the relationships between faults attributes. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008880
Kolyukhin D, Torabi A, Libak A, Alaei B, Khachkova T (2018) Statistical analysis of displacement and length relation for normal faults in the Barents Sea. Geosciences 8(11):421. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8110421
Maerten L, Gillespie P, Daniel J-M (2006) Three-dimensional geomechanical modeling for constraint of subseismic fault simulation. AAPG Bull 90:1337–1358. https://doi.org/10.1306/03130605148
Mahmoodpour S, Masihi M (2016) An improved simulated annealing algorithm in fracture network modeling. J Natural Gas Sci Eng 33:358–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.05.056
Masihi M, Sobhani M, Al-Ajm A, Al-Wahaib Y, Al Wahaibi T (2012) A physically-based three dimensional fracture network modeling technique. Scientia Iranica 19:594–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2012.01.008
Munthe K, Holden L, Mostad P, Townsend C (1994) Modelling Sub-seismic Fault Patterns using a Marked Point Process. In: ECMOR IV, 4th European Conference on Mathematics of Oil Recovery, Røros, Norway, SPE 49024, pp.295–304. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201411151
Ponting DK (1989) Corner point geometry in reservoir simulation. In: ECMOR I—1st European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, Cambridge, UK. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201411305
Qu D, Røe P, Tveranger J (2015) A method for generating volumetric fault zone grids for pillar gridded reservoir models. Comput Geosci 81:28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2015.04.009
Roche V, Camanni G, Childs C, Manzocchi T, Walsh J, Conneally J, Saqab MM, Delogkos E (2021) Variability in the three-dimensional geometry of segmented normal fault surfaces. Earth Sci Rev 216:103523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103523
Roxar (2018) RMS 11.0.1 User Guide. Roxar Software Solutions, Stavanger
Torabi A, Alaei B, Libak A (2019a) Normal fault 3D geometry and displacement revisited: insights from faults in the Norwegian Barents Sea. Mar Pet Geol 99:135–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.09.032
Torabi A, Berg SS (2011) Scaling of fault attributes: a review. Marine and Petr Geol 28:1444–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2011.04.003
Torabi A, Ellingsen TSS, Johannessen MU, Alaei B, Rotevatn A, Chiarella D (2019b) Fault zone architecture and its scaling laws: where does the damage zone start and stop? Geol. Soc. London. Spec Publ 496:99–124. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP496-2018-151
Tran N (2007) Simulated annealing technique in discrete fracture network inversion: optimizing the optimization. Comput Geosci 11:249–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-007-9049-7
Tran N, Chen Z, Rahman S (2006) Integrated conditional global optimisation for discrete fracture network modelling. Comput Geosci 32:17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2005.03.019
Walsh JJ, Watterson J (1988) Analysis of the relationship between displacements and dimensions of faults. J Struct Geol 10:239–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(88)90057-0
Yielding G, Walsh J, Watterson J (1992) The prediction of small-scale faulting in reservoirs. First Break 10:449–460. https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.1992023
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Equinor for valuable discussions and for funding the development of the algorithm.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goodwin, H., Aker, E. & Røe, P. Stochastic Modeling of Subseismic Faults Conditioned on Displacement and Orientation Maps. Math Geosci 54, 207–224 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-021-09965-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-021-09965-7