This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Notes
One example of an audience being roused to indignation is a lecture of his on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsGYUB3nF6w.
References
Fanelli, Daniele. 2013. Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign. PLoS Med 10 (12): e1001563.
Jamieson, K 2018. Crisis or Self-correction: rethinking the well-being of science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (115):2620–27.
Kitcher, Philip. 2019. Review of Naomi Oreskes’ Why Trust Science?, Boston Review, Nov. 2019 at: http://bostonreview.net/science-nature-philosophy-religion/philip-kitcher-what-makes-science-trustworthy.
Mirowski, Philip 2018. The future(s) of open science. Social Studies of Science 48 (2): 171–203.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mirowski, P. Can’t see the forest for the sleaze. Metascience 30, 31–35 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-020-00598-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-020-00598-w