Abstract
The paper examines the role of organizational commercial slack (OCS) in mediating the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer (KT) in universities. The paper identifies two types of commercial slack in the university setting: financial and promotional. Four research hypotheses are proposed. Pooled data, that is, a combination of a questionnaire survey of 110 Taiwanese universities with a data set of university KT effectiveness from the Ministry of Education, Taiwan, are collected to test the aforementioned research hypotheses. The empirical results indicate that the EO of a university enables the university to provide appropriate OCS. Furthermore, the commercial slack of a university positively mediates the relationship between EO and KT effectiveness. The paper concludes that developing EO and OCS are crucial for improving the KT effectiveness of a university. Moreover, some managerial and policy implications for promoting EO and OCS in universities are suggested.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baron, Reuben, and David A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 1173–1182.
Belenzon, Sharon, and Mark Schankerman. 2009. University knowledge transfer: Private ownership, incentives, and local development objectives. The Journal of Law and Economics 52: 111–144.
Bourgeois, L. Jay. 1981. On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review 6: 29–39.
Bourgeois, L. Jay, and Jitendra V. Singh. 1983. Organizational slack and political behavior among top management teams. Academy of Management Proceedings 1: 43–47.
Caldera, Aida, and Oliver Debande. 2010. Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: An empirical analysis. Research Policy 39: 1160–1173.
Chang, Yuan-Chieh, Ming-Huei Chen, Mingsu Hua, and Phil Y. Yang. 2006. Managing Academic Innovation in Taiwan: Towards a “Scientific-Economic” Framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73: 199–213.
Chang, Yuan-Chieh, Phil Y. Yang, and Ming-Huei Chen. 2009. The determinants of academic research commercial performance: Towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective. Research Policy 38: 936–946.
Chang, Yuan-Chieh, Phil Y. Yang, Ben R. Martin, Hui-Ru Chi, and Tung-Fei Tsai-Lin. 2016. Entrepreneurial universities and research ambidexterity: A multilevel analysis. Technovation 54: 7–21.
Covin, Jeffrey G., and Dennis P. Slevin. 1989. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal 10: 75–87.
Covin, Jeffrey G., and Dennis P. Slevin. 1991. A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 16: 7–26.
Dabić, Marina. 2019. Entrepreneurial University in the European Union—EU in the EU. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 12: 1–5.
D’Este, Pablo, and Markus Perkmann. 2011. Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. Journal of Technology Transfer 36: 316–339.
Debackere, Koenraad, and Reinhilde Veugelers. 2005. The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research Policy 34: 321–342.
Dess, Gregory G., and G. Tom Lumpkin. 2005. The role of entrepreneurial orientation in stimulating effective corporate entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspective 19: 147–156.
Etzkowitz, Henry. 1983. Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science. Minerva 21: 198–233.
Etzkowitz, Henry. 1998. The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Research Policy 27: 823–833.
Feola, Rosangela, Roberto Parente, and Valentina Cucino. 2020. The Entrepreneurial University: How to Develop the Entrepreneurial Orientation of Academia. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 12: 1–22.
Friedman, Joseph, and Jonathan Silberman. 2003. University technology transfer: Do incentives, management, and location matter? Journal of Technology Transfer 28: 17–30.
Fornell, Claes, and David F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18: 39–50.
Galán-Muros, Victoria, Peter van der Sijde, Peter Groenewegen, and Thomas Baaken. 2017. Nurture over nature: How do European universities support their collaboration with business? Journal of Technology Transfer 42: 184–205.
Giuri, Paola, Federico Munari, Alessandra Scandura, and Laura Toschi. 2019. The strategic orientation of universities in knowledge transfer activities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 138: 261–278.
Geuna, Aldo, and Alessandro Muscio. 2009. The governance of university knowledge transfer: A critical review of the literature. Minerva 47: 93–114.
Hair, Joseph F., Bill Black, Barry Babin, Rolph E. Anderson, and Ronald L. Tatham. 2006. Multivariate data analysis, 6th ed. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hair, Joseph F., Jeffrey J. Risher, Marko Sarstedt, and Christian M. Ringle. 2019. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review 31: 2–24.
Hitt, Michael A., R. Duane Ireland, S. Michael Camp, and Donald L. Sexton. 2001. Strategic entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal 22: 479–491.
Horner, Sam, Dilani Jayawarna, Benito Giordano, and Oswald Jones. 2019. Strategic choice in universities: Managerial agency and effective technology transfer. Research Policy 48: 1297–1309.
Hornsby, Jeffrey S., Douglas W. Naffziger, Donald F. Kuratko, and Ray V. Montagno. 1993. An interactive model of the corporate entrepreneurship process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 17: 29–37.
Hunter, Emily M., Sara Jansen Perry, and Steven C. Currall. 2011. Inside multi-disciplinary science and engineering research centers: The impact of organizational climate on invention disclosures and patents. Research Policy 40: 1226–1239.
Jiang, Xu, Heng Liu, Carl Fey, and Feifei Jiang. 2018. Entrepreneurial orientation, network resource acquisition, and firm performance: A network approach. Journal of Business Research 87: 46–57.
Kalar, Barbara, and Bostjan Antoncic. 2015. The entrepreneurial university, academic activities and technology and knowledge transfer in four European countries. Technovation 36: 1–11.
Keh, Hean Tat, Thi Tuyet Mai Nguyen, and Hwei Ping Ng. 2007. The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing information on the performance of SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing 22: 592–611.
Kirby, David A., Maribel Guerrero, and David Urbano. 2011. Making universities more entrepreneurial: Development of a model. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L’administration 28: 302–316.
Kirby, David A. 2002. Creating entrepreneurial universities: A consideration. School of Management [Working paper]. University of Surrey.
Kollmann, Tobias, and Christoph Stöckmann. 2014. Filling the entrepreneurial orientation–performance gap: The mediating effects of exploratory and exploitative innovations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 38: 1001–1026.
Lach, Saul, and Mark Schankerman. 2008. Incentives and invention in universities. The RAND Journal of Economics 39: 403–433.
Link, Albert N., and Donald S. Siegel. 2005. Generating science-based growth: An econometric analysis of the impact of organizational incentives on university–industry technology transfer. European Journal of Finance 11: 169–181.
Lockett, Andy, and Mike Wright. 2005. Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Research Policy 34: 1043–1057.
Lumpkin, G.T., and G.G. Dess. 1996. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review 21: 135–172.
Lumpkin, G. Thomas, and Gregory G. Dess. 2001. Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing 16: 429–451.
Marlin, Dan, and Scott W. Geiger. 2015. A reexamination of the organizational slack and innovation relationship. Journal of Business Research 68: 2683–2690.
Markman, Gideon D., Peter T. Gianiodis, Philip H. Phan, and David B. Balkin. 2004. Entrepreneurship from the ivory tower: Do incentive systems matter? Journal of Technology Transfer 29: 353–364.
Mishina, Yuri, Timothy G. Pollock, and Joseph F. Porac. 2004. Are more resources always better for growth? Resource stickiness in market and product expansion. Strategic Management Journal 25: 1179–1197.
McClure, Kevin R. 2016. Building the innovative and entrepreneurial university: An institutional case study of administrative academic capitalism. Journal of Higher Education 87: 516–543.
Nohria, Nitin, and Ranjay Gulati. 1996. Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal 39: 1245–1264.
O’Shea, Rory P., Thomas J. Allen, Arnaud Chevalier, and Frank Roche. 2005. Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of US universities. Research Policy 34: 994–1009.
Perkmann, Markus, Valentina Tartari, Maureen McKelvey, et al. 2013. Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy 42: 423–442.
Podsakoff, Philip M., Scott B. MacKenzie, Jeong-Yeon. Lee, and Nathan P. Podsakoff. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88: 879.
Riviezzo, Angelo, Francisco Liñán, and Maria Rosaria Napolitano. 2017. Assessing the entrepreneurial orientation of university departments. A comparative study between Italy and Spain. In Entrepreneurial universities, eds. M. Peris-Ortiz, J. A. Gómez, J. M. Merigo and C. Rueda-Armengot, 35–46. Cham: Springer.
Riviezzo, Angelo, Susana C. Santos, Francisco Liñán, Maria R. Napolitano, and Floriana Fusco. 2019. European universities seeking entrepreneurial paths: The moderating effect of contextual variables on the entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationship. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 141: 232–248.
Siegel, Donald S., David Waldman, and Albert Link. 2003. Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy 32: 27–48.
Siegel, Donald S., and Mike Wright. 2015. Academic entrepreneurship: time for a rethink? British Journal of Management 26: 582–595.
Sobel, Michael E. 1982. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology 13: 290–312.
Schoen, Anja, Bruno V.P. de la Potterie, and Joachim Henkel. 2014. Governance typology of universities’ technology transfer processes. The Journal of Technology Transfer 39: 435–453.
Teng, Bing-Sheng. 2007. Corporate entrepreneurship activities through strategic alliances: A resource-based approach toward competitive advantage. Journal of Management Studies 44: 119–142.
Tijssen, Robert J.W. 2006. Universities and industrially relevant science: Towards measurement models and indicators of entrepreneurial orientation. Research Policy 35: 1569–1585.
Todorovic, Zelimir William, Rod B. McNaughton, and Paul Guild. 2011. ENTRE-U: An entrepreneurial orientation scale for universities. Technovation 31: 128–137.
Urbano, David, and Maribel Guerrero. 2013. Entrepreneurial universities: Socioeconomic impacts of academic entrepreneurship in a European region. Economic Development Quarterly 27: 40–55.
Van de Burgwal, Linda H. M., Ana Dias, and Eric Claassen. 2019. Incentives for knowledge valorisation: A European benchmark. Journal of Technology Transfer 44: 1–20.
Van Looy, Bart, Paolo Landoni, Julie Callaert, Bruno van Pottelsberghe, Eleftherios Sapsalis, and Koenraad Debackere. 2011. Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: An empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs. Research Policy 40: 553–564.
Voss, Glenn B., Deepak Sirdeshmukh, and Zannie Giraud Voss. 2008. The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal 51: 147–164.
Wang, Catherine L. 2008. Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 32: 635–657.
Wales, William J., Jeffrey G. Covin, and Erik Monsen. 2020. Entrepreneurial orientation: The necessity of a multilevel conceptualization. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 14: 639–660.
Wiklund, Johan, and Dean Shepherd. 2005. Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing 20: 71–91.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank the Editor in Chief Peter Weingart and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments on the earlier manuscript. The support of data analysis from Dr. Hui-Ru Chi is greatly appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chang, YC., Tsai-Lin, TF. & Liang, T. Entrepreneurial Orientation and Knowledge Transfer Effectiveness: The Effect of Organizational Commercial Slack. Minerva 60, 441–462 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09463-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09463-y