Abstract
It is widely assumed that guilt leads people to engage into reparatory behaviors. However, the processes underlying this effect are in need for further specification. Four studies tested potential underlying cognitive mechanisms. Results suggest that guilt increases attention toward positive and reparation-oriented cues (Study 1) and makes attitudes toward reparation-oriented primes more positive (Study 3). No effect was found for accessibility of reparation words (Studies 2a, b). Taken together, these results suggest that guilt leads people to pay more attention to reparation means and to develop a more positive attitude toward reparation means, but does not render reparatory means more accessible. Implications for a better knowledge of guilt’s behavioral consequences are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For each study, we planned to run at least 20 participants in each condition (Simmons et al. 2011) , and enrolled as many participants as possible in the time devoted to the experimental sessions.
No moderating effect of gender was found for any of the four studies, Fs < 1.23.
Participants were asked what their mother tongue was and, if not French, at what age did learn French. Only French natives and participants who learnt French during early childhood (before 5 years old) were kept.
Only inverse-transformed data were used for statistical calculation, including bias indexes. Hence confidence intervals for untransformed data are not relevant and not presented here.
We should note that a third experiment was carried out on accessibility, using another progressive demasking paradigm (“PDM”, Feustel et al. 1983, see also; Ferrand et al. 2011). Like in Studies 2a and 2b, no interaction was found between emotion and word type, F = 0.56. It is also worth noticing that including this study in the small scale meta-analysis does not modify the results.
References
Aarts, H., Dijksterhuis, A., & de Vries, P. (2001). On the psychology of drinking: Being thirsty and perceptually ready. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 631–642.
Alexopoulos, T., Fiedler, K., & Freytag, P. (2012). The impact of open and closed mindsets on evaluative priming. Cognition & Emotion, 26, 978–994.
Alexopoulos, T., Muller, D., Ric, F., & Marendaz, C. (2012). I, me, mine: Automatic attentional capture by self-related stimuli. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 770–779.
Asmundson, G. J. G., Carleton, R. N., & Ekong, J. (2005). Dot-probe evaluation of selective attentional processing of pain cues in patients with chronic headaches. Pain, 114(1–2), 250–256.
Ausubel, D. P. (1955). Relationships between shame and guilt in the socializing process. Psychological review, 62, 378.
Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 283–316.
Bargh, J. A. (1999). The cognitive monster. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 361–382). New York: Guilford Press.
Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K., & Trötschel, R. (2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1014–1027.
Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt as interpersonal phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243–267.
Brehm, J. W. (1966). Theory of psychological reactance. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Carlsmith, J. M., & Gross, A. E. (1969). Some effects of guilt on compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 232–239.
Cotte, J., Coulter, R. A., & Moore, M. (2005). Enhancing or disrupting guilt: The role of ad credibility and perceived manipulative intent. Journal of Business Research, 58, 361–368.
Coulter, R. H., Cotte, J., & Moore, M. L. (1997). Guilt appeals in advertising: Are you feeling guilty? In D. T. LeClairet & M. Hartline (Eds.), AMA winter educators’ conference: Marketing theory and applications (pp. 109–115). Chicago: American Marketing Association.
Cryder, E. C., Springer, S., & Morewedge, C. K. (2012). Guilty feelings, targeted actions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 607–618.
Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
De Hooge, I. E., Breugelmans, S. M., & Zeelenberg, M. (2008). Not so ugly after all: When shame acts as a commitment device. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 933.
De Hooge, I. E., Nelissen, R.M.A., Breugelmans, S. M., & Zeelenberg, M. (2011). What is moral about guilt? Acting “prosocially” at the disadvantage of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 462–473.
De Hooge, I. E., Zeelenberg, M., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2007). Moral sentiments and cooperation: Differential influences of shame and guilt. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1025–1042.
DeSteno, D., Petty, R. E., Rucker, D. D., Wegener, D. T., & Braverman, J. (2004). Discrete emotions and persuasion: The role of emotion-induced expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 43–56.
Ferguson, M. J. (2008). On becoming ready to pursue a goal you don’t know you have: Effects of nonconscious goals on evaluative readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1268–1294.
Ferguson, M. J., & Bargh, J. A. (2004). Liking is for doing: The effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 557–572.
Ferrand, L., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., New, B., Bonin, P., Meot, A., & Pallier, C. (2011). Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking: Evidence from chronolex. Frontiers in Psychology, 42, 488–496.
Feustel, T. C., Shiffrin, R. M., & Salasoo, A. (1983). Episodic and lexical contributions to the repetition effect in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 309–346.
Gendolla, G. (2000). On the impact of mood on behavior: An integrative theory and a review. Review of General Psychology, 4, 378–408.
Graton, A., Ric, F., & Gonzalez, E. (2016). Reparation or reactance? The influence of guilt on reaction to persuasive communication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 40–49.
Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition & Emotion, 13, 505–521.
Ketelaar, T., & Au, W. T. (2003). The effects of feelings of guilt on the behaviour of uncooperative individuals in repeated social bargaining games: An affect-as-information interpretation of the role of emotion in social interaction. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 429–453.
Leach, C. W., & Cidam, A. (2015). When is shame linked to constructive approach orientation? A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 983.
Lewis, H. B. (1971). Shame and guilt in neurosis. New York: International Universities Press.
MacLeod, C., Mathews, A. M., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 15–20.
Manstead, A. S. R., Tetlock, P. E., & Manstead, T. (1989). Cognitive appraisals and emotional experience: Further evidence. Cognition and Emotion, 3, 225–239.
Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1994). Cognitive approaches to emotion and emotional disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 25–50.
McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L. Jr., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336.
Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (1999). Orienting of attention to threatening facial expressions presented under conditions of restricted awareness. Cognition & Emotion, 13, 713–740.
Moore, S. G., Ferguson, M. J., & Chartrand, T. L. (2011). Affect in the aftermath: How goal pursuit influences implicit evaluations. Cognition & Emotion, 25, 453–465.
Nabi, R. L. (2002). Discrete emotions and persuasion. In J. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), Handbook of persuasion (pp. 289–308). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Nelissen, R. M. A., Dijker, A. J. M., & deVries, N. K. (2007). How to turn a hawk into a dove and vice versa: Interactions between emotions and goals in a give-some dilemma game. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 280–286.
Niedenthal, P. M., Halberstadt, J. B., & Innes-Ker, A. H. (1999). Emotional response categorization. Psychological Review, 106, 337.
Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1987). Towards a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 29–50.
Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510–532.
Roseman, I. J., Wiest, C., & Swartz, T. S. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 206–221.
Rubenstein, H., Lewis, S., & Rubenstein, M. (1971). Evidence for phoneInic recoding in visual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 10, 645–657.
Schmader, T., & Lickel, B. (2006). The approach and avoidance function of guilt and shame emotions: Comparing reactions to self-caused and other-caused wrongdoing. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 43–56.
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological science, 22, 1359–1366.
Strack, F., Schwarz, N., & Geschneidinger, E. (1985). Happiness and reminiscing: The role of time perspective, affect, and mode of thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1460–1469.
Stuewig, J., Tangney, J. P., Heigel, C., & Harty, L. (2008). Shaming, blaming, and maiming: Links among the moral emotions and aggression. In J. Stuewig (Ed.), Inside the criminal mind: Findings from the GMU Inmate Study. Boston, MA: Symposium conducted at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association.
Tamir, M., & Robinson, M. D. (2007). The happy spotlight: Positive mood and selective attention to rewarding information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1124–1136.
Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. (2002). Shame and Guilt. New York: Guilford.
Tangney, J. P., Miller, R., Flicker, L., & Barlow, D. (1996). Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1256–1269.
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 375–424.
Wicker, F. W., Payne, G. C., & Morgan, R. D. (1983). Participant descriptions of guilt and shame. Motivation and Emotion, 7, 25–39.
Zeelenberg, M., Nelissen, R. M., Breugelmans, S. M., & Pieters, R. (2008). On emotion specificity in decision making: Why feeling is for doing. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 18–27.
Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2006). Feeling is for doing: A pragmatic approach to the study of emotions in economic behavior. In D. DeCremer, M. Zeelenberg & J. K. Murnighan (Eds.), Social psychology and economics (pp. 117–137). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zillmann, D. (1988). Mood management: Using entertainment to full advantages. In L. Donohew & H. E. Sypher (Eds.), Communication, social cognition, and affect (pp. 147–171). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Aurélien Graton declares that he has no conflict of interest. François Ric declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Graton, A., Ric, F. How guilt leads to reparation? Exploring the processes underlying the effects of guilt. Motiv Emot 41, 343–352 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-017-9612-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-017-9612-z