Abstract
The present study demonstrates the importance of actual agglomerated particle size in the nanofluid and its effect on the fluid properties. The current work deals with 5 to 100 nm nanoparticles dispersed in fluids that resulted in 200 to 800 nm agglomerates. Particle size distributions for a range of nanofluids are measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS). Wet scanning electron microscopy method is used to visualize agglomerated particles in the dispersed state and to confirm particle size measurements by DLS. Our results show that a combination of base fluid chemistry and nanoparticle type is very important to create stable nanofluids. Several nanofluids resulted in stable state without any stabilizers, but in the long term had agglomerations of 250 % over a 2 month period. The effects of agglomeration on the thermal and rheological properties are presented for several types of nanoparticle and base fluid chemistries. Despite using nanodiamond particles with high thermal conductivity and a very sensitive laser flash thermal conductivity measurement technique, no anomalous increases of thermal conductivity was measured. The thermal conductivity increases of nanofluid with the particle concentration are as those predicted by Maxwell and Bruggeman models. The level of agglomeration of nanoparticles hardly influenced the thermal conductivity of the nanofluid. The viscosity of nanofluids increased strongly as the concentration of particle is increased; it displays shear thinning and is a strong function of the level of agglomeration. The viscosity increase is significantly above of that predicted by the Einstein model even for very small concentration of nanoparticles.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- k e (W m−1 K−1):
-
Thermal conductivity of nanofluid
- k f (W m−1 K−1):
-
Thermal conductivity of base fluid
- k p (W m−1 K−1):
-
Thermal conductivity of nanoparticle
- ϕ (%):
-
Volume percentage of nanoparticle
- γ (s−1):
-
Shear rate
- ρ (kg m−3):
-
Density of the fluid
- μ nf (Pa s):
-
Dynamic viscosity of nanofluid
- μ f (Pa s):
-
Dynamic viscosity of base fluid
References
Abdulagatov IM, Azizov ND (2006) Experimental study of the effect of temperature, pressure and concentration on the viscosity of aqueous NaBr solutions. J Solut Chem 35:705–738. doi:10.1021/je0604481
Anoop KB, Kabelac S, Sundararajan T and Das SK (2009) Rheological and flow characteristics of nanofluids: influence of electroviscous effects and particle agglomeration. J Appl Phys 106. doi:10.1063/1.3182807
Bartnikos R (1994) Electrical insulating liquids, vol 3. ASTM publication 31-00209093-21
Bruggeman DAG (1935) Berechnung verschiedener physikalischer konstanten von heterogenen substanzen, I-dielektrizitatskonstanten und leitfahigkeiten der mischkorper aus isotropen substanzen. Ann Phys (Leipzig) 24:636–679
Buongiorno J et al (2009) A benchmark study on the thermal conductivity of nanofluids. J Appl Phys 106:094312. doi:10.1063/1.3245330
Chang C, Powell R (1994) Effect of particle size distribution on the rheological properties of concentrated bimodal suspensions. J Rheol 38:85–98. doi:10.1122/1.550497
Chen H, Ding Y, Tan C (2007a) Rheological behavior of nanofluids. New J Phys 9:367. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/910/367
Chen H, Ding Y, He Y, Tan C (2007b) Rheological behavior of ethylene glycol based Titania nanofluids. Chem Phys Lett 444:333–337. doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2007.07.046
Chen H, Yang W, Ding Y, Zhang L (2008) Heat transfer and flow behavior of aqueous suspensions of titanate nanotubes (nanofluids). Power Technol 183:63–72. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2007.11.014
Choi SUS, Eastman JA (1995) Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, San Francisco (Nov12–17)
Clark R III, Taylor L (1975) Radiation heat loss in the flash method for thermal diffusivity. J Appl Phys 46:714–719. doi:10.1063/1.321635
Cowan R (1963) Pulse method of measuring thermal conductivity at high temperature. J Appl Phys 34:926–927. doi:10.1063/1.1729564
Das S, Putra N, Thiesen P, Roetzel W (2003) Temperature dependence of thermal conductivity enhancement for nanofluids. J Heat Transf 125:567–574. doi:10.1115/1.1571080
Das S, Choi SS, Yu W (2008) Nanofluids science and technology. Wiley, New York
Ding Y, Chen H, Wang L, Yang CY, He Y, Yang W, Lee WP, Zhang L, Huo R (2007) Heat transfer intensification using nanofluids. KONA No. 25
Eastman JA, Choi SUS, Li S, Yu W, Thompson LJ (2001) Anomalously increased effective thermal conductivities of ethylene glycol-based nanofluids containing copper nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett 78:718–720. doi:10.1063/1.1341218
Einstein A (1911) Berichtigung zu meiner arbeit: eine neue bestimmung der molekul-dimension (correction of my work: a new determination of the molecular dimensions). Ann Phys 34:591–592
Heris SZ, Etemad SG, Esfanhany MN (2006) Experimental investigation of oxide nanofluids laminar flow convective heat transfer. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 33:529–535. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2006.01.005
Koski J (1981) Improved data reduction methods for laser pulse diffusivity determination with the use of minicomputer. International joint conference on thermophysical properties, Gaithersburg
Kwak K, Kim C (2005) Viscosity and thermal conductivity of copper oxide nanofluid dispersed in ethylene glycol. Korea Aust Rheol J 17(2):35–40
Larson RG (2005) The rheology of dilute solutions of flexible polymers: progress and problems. J Rheol 49:1–70. doi:10.1122/1.1835336
Luckham PF, Ukeje MA (1999) Effect of particle size distribution on the rheology of dispersed system. J Colloid Interface Sci 220:247–356. doi:10.1006/jcis.1999.6515
Maxwell JC (1881) Treatise on electricity and magnetism, 2nd edn, vol 1. Clarendon Press, Oxford, p 435
Olhero SM, Ferreira JFM (2004) Influence of particle size distribution on rheology and particle packing of silica based suspensions. Powder Technol 139:69–75. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2003.10.004
Parker WJ, Jenkins RJ, Butler CP, Abbott GL (1961) A flash method of determining thermal diffusivity, heat capacity, and thermal conductivity. J Appl Phys 32:1679–1684. doi:10.1063/1.1728417
Prasher R, Song D, Wang J, Phelan P (2006) Measurements of nanofluid viscosity and its implication for thermal application. Appl Phys Lett 89:133108. doi:10.1063/1.2356113
Timofeeva EV, Roubort JL, Singh D (2009) Particle shape effect on thermophysical properties of alumina nanofluids. J Appl Phys 106:014304. doi:10.1063/1.3155999
Williams W, Buongiorno J, Hu L (2008) Experimental investigation of turbulent convective heat transfer and pressure loss of alumina/water and zirconia/water nanoparticle colloids (nanofluids) in horizontal tubes. J Heat Transf 130:042412-1. doi:10.1115/1.2818775
Xuan Y, Li Q (2000) Heat transfer enhancement of nanofluids. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 21:58–64. doi:10.1016/S0142-727X(99)00067-3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, Y., Oztekin, A., Neti, S. et al. Particle agglomeration and properties of nanofluids. J Nanopart Res 14, 852 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-0852-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-0852-2