Skip to main content
Log in

Projection of Iron Ore Production

  • Published:
Natural Resources Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 20 November 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

A comprehensive country-by-country projection of world iron ore production is presented along with alternative scenarios and a sensitivity analysis. The supply-driven modelling approach follows Mohr (Projection of world fossil fuel production with supply and demand interactions, PhD Thesis, http://www.theoildrum.com/node/6782, 2010) using an ultimately recoverable resource of 346 Gt of iron ore. Production is estimated to have a choppy plateau starting in 2017 until 2050 after which production rapidly declines. The undulating plateau is due to Chinese iron ore production peaking earlier followed by Australia and Brazil in turn. Alternative scenarios indicate that the model is sensitive to increases in Australian and Brazilian resources, and that African iron ore production can shift the peak date only if the African Ultimately Recoverable Resources (URR) is 5 times larger than the estimate used. Changes to the demand for iron ore driven by substitution or recycling are not modelled. The relatively near-term peak in iron ore supply is likely to create a global challenge to manufacturing and construction and ultimately the world economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 20 November 2019

    The original version of this article unfortunately contained an error in Equation��3.

  • 20 November 2019

    The original version of this article unfortunately contained an error in Equation��3.

Notes

  1. A particular form of the general logistic equation.

  2. If \(n =1 \) then the equation is the Hubbert Curve, and \(t_p\) is the peak year.

  3. USGS reserve base includes USGS reserves as well as marginally economic reserves and sub-economic resources (USGS 2013a).

  4. China produces 44 % world production—see Sect. 2.

  5. British Geological Survey (1922–2012); Mitchell (1981, 1982, 1983); Rothwell (1896–1922); Australian Bureau of Statistics (1908–2012); Natural Resources Canada (1995–2012); Canadian Mineral Industry (1955-2012); Dominion Bureau of Statistics (1957); USGS (1933–2011, 2012, 2013a, b).

  6. Constant for all countries.

  7. Note the USGS has recently stopped including reserve base numbers.

  8. See e.g. Deffeyes (2002) and Sandrea (2006).

  9. that is the asymmetry term \(n\) used for the two cycles appears to be 1 in Eq. 1.

  10. Defined as the Ultimately Recoverable Resources minus cumulative production.

References

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (1908–2012) Year book Australia. Retrieved March 12, 2014. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs.nsf/mf/1301.0.

  • Bardi, U., & Pagani, M. (2007). Peak minerals. The Oil Drum: Europe. Retrieved March 17, 2014 from http://www.theoildrum.com/node/3086.

  • Bowles, N. (2012). Swaziland’s Ngwenya mine extracts its ore and exacts its price. Retrieved March 14, 2014 from http://mg.co.za/article/2012-08-31-00-swazilands-ngwenya-mine-extracts-its-ore-and-exacts-its-price.

  • British Geological Survey (1922–2012). World mineral statistics. Technical report, Minerals UK. Retrieved April 12, 2014 from http://www.bgs.ac.uk/mineralsuk/statistics/worldArchive.html.

  • Canadian Mineral Industry (1955–2012). Canadian minerals yearbooks. Retrieved March 12, 2014 from http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/mining-materials/markets/commodity-reviews/8360.

  • Deffeyes, K. S. (2002). World’s oil production peak reckoned in near future. Oil and Gas Journal, 100(11), 46–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominion Bureau of Statistics. (1957). Canadian mineral statistics 1886–1956. Retrieved March 12, 2014 from http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/webarchives/20061104045222/ and http://nrcan.gc.ca/mms/cmy/info-hist_e.htm.

  • Geoscience Australia. (2013). Australia’s identified mineral resources 2012. Retrieved March 17, 2014 from http://www.ga.gov.au/cedda/publications/1201.

  • Giurco, D., Mclellan, B., Franks, D. M., Nansai, K., & Prior, T. (2014). Responsible mineral and energy futures: views at the nexus. Journal of Cleaner Production, In Press.

  • Graedel, T. E., Allwood, J., Birat, J. P., Buchert, M., Hagelüken, C., & Reck, B. K., et al. (2011). Recycling rates of metals, a status report. Technical report, United Nations Environment Programme.

  • Hatayama, H., Daigo, I., Matsuno, Y., & Adachi, Y. (2010). Outlook of the world steel cycle based on the stock and flow dynamics. Environmental Science and Technology, 44(16), 6457–6463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, L. (2013). West and central african iron ore development and its impact on world prices. Australia Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 57, 521–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iderkhangai, G. (2012). Metallurgy complex needed immediately. The Mongolian Mining Journal, Retrieved March 14, 2014 from http://en.mongolianminingjournal.com/content/22784.shtml.

  • Kakela, P. J. (1981). Iron ore: From depletion to abundance. Science, 212(4491), 132–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lankford, W. T. J. (1985). The making, shaping, and treating of steel (10th ed.). Pittsburgh: Association of Iron and Steel Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepinski, J. A., Myers, J. C., & Geiger, G. H. (2001). Kirk–Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology (Vol. 14). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., Prior, T., Mudd, G., & Giurco, D. (2011). Availability, addiction and alternatives: Three criteria for assessing the impact of peak minerals on society. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(9), 958–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, D., Prior, T., Cordell, D., & Giurco, D. (2012). Peak minerals: Theoretical foundations and practical application. Natural Resources Research, 21(1), 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B. R. (1981). European Historical Statistics: 1750–1975 (2nd ed.). London: The MacMillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B. R. (1982). International Historical Statistics: Africa and Asia. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B. R. (1983). International Historical Statistics: The Americas and Australasia. Detroit, MI: Gale Research Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, S. (2010). Projection of world fossil fuel production with supply and demand interactions. PhD Thesis, University of Newcastle, Australia, http://www.theoildrum.com/node/6782.

  • Mohr, S. (2012). Gers-demo—Or geologic resource supply-demand model. http://cfsites1.uts.edu.au/isf/staff/details.cfm?StaffId=12654.

  • Mohr, S. H., & Evans, G. M. (2013). Projections of future phosphorus production. Philica (380).

  • Mohr, S. H., Mudd, G. M., & Giurco, D. (2012). Lithium resources and production: Critical assessment and global projections. Minerals, 2, 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muwanguzi, A.J.B. (2010). Characterisation of Muko iron ores (Uganda) for the different routes of iron production. Master’s thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, licentiate Thesis.

  • Natural Resources Canada (1995–2012). Mineral production of canada, by province and territory. Retrieved March 12, 2014 from http://sead.nrcan.gc.ca/prod-prod/ann-ann-eng.aspx.

  • News, T. N. (2001). Vietnam loses \({\$}\)168 mln to illegal iron ore exports: industry. Retrieved March 14, 2014 from http://www.thanhniennews.com/business/vietnam-loses-168-mln-to-illegal-iron-ore-exports-industry-1998.html.

  • Northey, S., S, M., Mudd, G. M., Weng, Z., & Giurco, D. (2014). Modelling future copper ore grade decline based on a detailed assessment of copper resources and mining. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 83, 190–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prior, T., Giurco, D., Mudd, G., Mason, L., & Behrisch, J. (2012). Resource depletion, peak minerals and the implications for sustainable resource management. Global Environmental Change, 22(3), 577–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roper, L. D. (2014). Iron-ore depletion including recycling. Retrieved August 6, 2014 from http://www.roperld.com/science/minerals/iron.htm.

  • Rothwell, R. P. (1896–1922). Mineral Industry, its statistics, technology, and trade. Scientific Publishing Company, New York/Engineering Mining Journal.

  • Sada, M. M. (2012). Investment opportunities in Nigeria’s minerals and metals sector. In: Presentation to the Africa down under international Conference, Perth Western Australia, August 2012.

  • Sandrea, R. (2006). Global natural gas reserves—A heuristic viewpoint (part 2 of 2). Middle East Economic Survey, 49(12), 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2001). Mineral resources of Thailand. Bangkok: United Nations Publications.

  • USGS. (1933–2011). Minerals yearbook. Technical report, United States Geological Survey, formerly Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook. www.minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/usbmmyb.html.

  • USGS. (2012). Iron ore statistics, in kelly, t. d., and matos, g. r., comps., historical statistics for mineral and material commodities in the United States. Technical report, United States Geological Survey, data Series 140.

  • USGS. (2013a). Mineral Commodity Summaries. Technical report, United States Geological Survey, and previous years. Retrieved September 15, 2013 from http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/mcs/.

  • USGS. (2013b). State minerals statistics and information. Technical report, United States Geological Survey, http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/state/.

  • Xtracta Pacific Resources. (2011). Mining Projects. Retrieved March 14, 2014 from http://www.xtractapacific.com/index.php?id=13.

  • Yellishetty, M., Ranjith, P. G., & Tharumarajah, A. (2010). Iron ore and steel production trends and material flows in the world: Is this really sustainable? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54, 1084–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yellishetty, M., Mudd, G. M., Ranjith, P. G., & Tharumarajah, A. (2011). Environmental life-cycle comparisons of steel production and recycling: Sustainability issues, problems and prospects. Environmental Science and Policy, 14(6), 650–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yellishetty, M., Mudd, G., Mason, L., Mohr, S., Prior, T., & Giurco, D. (2012). Iron resources and production: technology, sustainability and future prospects. Tech. rep., CSIRO Minerals Down Under Flagship, prepared by the Department of Civil Engineering (Monash University) and the Institute for Sustainable Futures (University of Technology, Sydney).

Download references

Acknowledgments

Part of this research was undertaken as part of the Minerals Futures Collaboration Cluster, a research initiative comprising the Australian CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation); The University of Queensland; The University of Technology, Sydney (UTS); Curtin University; CQUniversity; and The Australian National University. This research was also supported by the Wealth from Waste Cluster, a collaboration between UTS, The University of Queensland, Swinburne University of Technology, Monash University, Yale University and CSIRO. The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of each partner and the CSIRO Flagship Collaboration Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steve Mohr.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (ZIP 41406 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohr, S., Giurco, D., Yellishetty, M. et al. Projection of Iron Ore Production. Nat Resour Res 24, 317–327 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-014-9256-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-014-9256-6

Keywords

Navigation