Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Integrated Behavioral Model of Land Use and Transport System: A Hyper-network Equilibrium Approach

  • Published:
Networks and Spatial Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interaction between the land use and transport in the urban context is a relevant issue in policy making. The connection between both systems arises since the former is causal of urban development while the latter is a consequence of it and significant contributor at the same time. One difficulty to unmask such interactions is to understand and determine the global system equilibrium, which is the matter of this paper. The households’ decisions, from their residential location to their travel and route choices, are described as a process of interdependent discrete choices that reflect the long term equilibrium. Consumers are assumed to optimize their combined residence and transport options, which are represented as a set of paths in an extended network that includes the transport system together with fictitious additional links that represents land use and location market. At equilibrium no household is better off by choosing a different option for residential location or by choosing a different set of trips’ destinations and routes. We study several alternative models starting from a simple case with fixed real estate supply and exogenous travel demand, to more complex situations with a real estate market, trip destination choices and variable trip frequencies. The equilibrium is characterized by an equivalent optimization problem which is strictly convex coercive and unconstrained. The optimality conditions for this optimization problem reproduce the transport equilibrium conditions as much as the land use equilibrium conditions. The approach provides a comprehensive characterization of the solution regarding existence and uniqueness, together with an algorithm to obtain the solution with well-defined convergence properties. The model is applicable to real size problems, with heterogeneous population and locations, as well as multiple trip purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akamatsu T (1997) Decomposition of path choice entropy in general transportation networks. Transp Sci 31:349–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Anas A (1981) Discrete choice theory, information theory and the multinomial logit and gravity models. Transp Res 17B:13–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso W (1964) Location and land use: towards a general theory of land rent. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillon JB, Cominetti R (2006) Markovian traffic equilibrium. Math Prog 111:33–56 DOI 10.1007/s10107-006-0076-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann M, McGuire CB, Winstein CB (1956) Studies in the economics of transportation. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva M, Lerman S (1985) Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachussetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce D, Mattsson L-G (1999) Models residential location choice in relation to housing location and road tolls on congested urban highway networks. Transp Res 33B:581–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briceño L (2006) Modelo integrado de transporte y uso de suelo: un enfoque de optimización en redes. Master’s Thesis, Universidad de Chile

  • Cepeda M, Cominetti R, Florian M (2006) A frequency-based assignment model for congested transit networks with strict capacity constraints: characterization and computation of equilibria. Transp Res B 40(6):437–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang JS (2006) Models of the relationship between transport and land-use: a review. Transp Rev 26–23:325–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang JS, Mackett R (2005) A bi-level model of the relationship between transport and residential location. Transp Res B 40:123–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cominetti R, Correa J (2001) Common-lines and passenger assignment in congested transit networks. Transp Sci 35(3):250–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daganzo CF (1982) Unconstrained extremal formulation of some transportation equilibrium problems. Transp Sci 16:332–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daganzo C, Sheffi Y (1977) On stochastic models of traffic assignment. Transp Sci 11:253–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Dial RB (1971) A probabilistic multipath traffic assignment model which obviates path enumeration. Transp Res 5:83–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cea J, Fernández JE (1993) Transit assignment for congested public transport systems: an equilibrium model. Transp Sci 27(2):133–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson B (1981) An alternative test of the hedonic theory of housing markets. J Urban Econ 9:56–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisk C (1980) Some developments in equilibrium traffic assignment. Transp Res 14B:243–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florian M, Hearn D (1999) Network equilibrium and pricing. In: Hall RW (ed) Handbook of transportation science. Kluwer, Norwell, pp 361–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukushima M (1984) On the dual approach to the traffic assignment problem. Transp Res B 18:235–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc LJ, Morlok EK, Pierskalla WP (1975) An efficient approach to solving the road network equilibrium traffic assignment problem. Transp Res 9:309–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry I (1964) A model of Metropolis, Rand Corporation. Santa Monica, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Macgill SM (1977) Theoretical properties of biproportional matrix adjustments. Environ Plann A 9:687–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez F (1992) The Bid-Choice land use model: an integrated economic framework. Environ Plann A 15:871–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez F, Donoso P (2001) Modeling land use planning effects: zone regulations and subsidies. In: Hensher D (ed) Travel behaviour research, the leading edge. Pergamon, Elsevier, pp 647–658

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez F, Hurtubia F (2006) Dynamic model for the simulation of equilibrium states in the land use market. Networks and Spatial Economics 6:55–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez F, Henríquez R (2007) A random bidding and supply land use model. Transp Res B (in press)

  • Nagurney A, Dong J (2002) Urban location and transportation in the information age: a multiclass, multicriteria network equilibrium perspective. Environ Plann 29B:53–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortúzar JD, Willumsen LG (1994) Modelling transport, Second edition. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy J (2004) Spatial interaction modelling. a regional science context. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardrop J (1952) Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proc Inst Civ Eng 1:325–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson A (1970) Entropy in urban and regional modelling. Pion, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Martínez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Briceño, L., Cominetti, R., Cortés, C.E. et al. An Integrated Behavioral Model of Land Use and Transport System: A Hyper-network Equilibrium Approach. Netw Spat Econ 8, 201–224 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-007-9052-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-007-9052-5

Keywords

Navigation