Abstract
Disruption of segments of roads can have a significant impact on the vulnerability of the entire network. Natural disasters are frequent causes of disruptions of this kind. This article focuses on determining the risk of road disruptions due to landslides. Our approach is based on methodology widely used in the field of epidemiology. We had available data on the location of the landslides, the road network and a list of the disrupted road segments. With the use of a 2 × 2 table, we determined the relationship between landslide data and road segment disruptions and derived the risk coefficient based on the number of landslides in the vicinity of the road and its length. The result is a disruption risk map with risk coefficients ranging from 0 to 47.94. In order to distinguish the most risky segments, we calculated a threshold of 12.40 with the use of a risk breakdown in a group of segments without damage. Nineteen percentage (402 km) of the road network in the Zlín region (Czech Republic), where the methodology was applied, is located beyond this threshold. The benefits of this approach stem from its speed and potential to define the most risky areas on which a detailed geomorphologic analysis can be focused.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anděl J (1985) Matematická statistika (Mathematical statistics, In Czech). SNTL, Prague, Czech Republic
Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Carrara A, Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P (2002) Impact of mapping errors on the reliability of landslide hazard maps. Nat Hazards Earth Sys Sci 2:3–14
Bíl M, Müller I (2008) The origin of shallow landslides in Moravia (Czech Republic) in the spring of 2006. Geomorphology 99:246–253
Bolboaca SD, Jäntschi L, Sestras AF, Sestras RE, Pamfil DC (2011) Pearson-Fisher Chi square statistic revisited. Information 2:528–545
Bono F, Gutiérrez E (2011) A network-based analysis of the impact of structural damage on urban accessibility following a disaster: the case of the seismically damaged Port Au Prince and Carrefour urban road networks. J Transp Geogr 19:1443–1455
Budetta P (2002) Risk assessment from debris flows in pyroclastic deposits along a motorway, Italy. Bull Eng Geol Environ 61:293–301
Caine N (1980) The rainfall intensity–duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows. Geografiska annaler. Series A. Phys Geogr 62A:23–27
Cardinali M, Reichenbach P, Guzzetti F, Ardizzone F, Antonini G, Galli M, Cacciano M, Castellani M, Salvati P (2002) A geomorphological approach to estimate landslide hazard and risk in urban and rural areas in Umbria, central Italy. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 2:57–72
Guzzetti F (2000) Landslide fatalities and the evaluation of landslide risk in Italy. Eng Geol 58:89–107
Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: an aid to a sustainable development. Geomorphology 31:181–216
Jaiswal P, Van Westen CJ, Jetten V (2011) Quantitative assessment of landslide hazard along transportation lines using historical records. Landslides 8:279–291. doi:10.1007/s10346-011-0252-1
Klimeš J, Blahůt J (2012) Landslide risk analysis and its application in regional planning: an example from the highlands of the Outer Western Carpathians, Czech Republic. Nat Hazards 64:1779–1803
Krejčí O, Baroň I, Bíl M, Hubatka F, Jurová Z, Kirchner K (2002) Slope movements in the Flysch Carpathians of Eastern Czech Rep. Triggered by Extreme Rainfals in 1997: a case study. Phys Chem Earth 27(36):1567–1576
Lydersen S, Fagerland MW, Laake P (2009) Recommended tests for association in 2 × 2 tables. Stat Med 28:1159–1175
Pánek T, Brázdil R, Klimeš J, Smolková V, Hradecký J, Zahradníček P (2011) Rainfall-induced landslide event of May 2010 in the eastern part of the Czech Republic. Landslides 8(4):507–516
Pánek T, Smolková V, Hradecký J, Baroň I, Šilhán K (2013) Holocene reactivations of catastrophic complex flow-like landslides in the Flysch Carpathians (Czech Republic/Slovakia). Quatern Res 80(1):33–46
Schuster RL (1996) Socioeconomic significance of landslides. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides. Investigation and mitigation. Transp. Res. Board, Spec. Rep. 247,Washington, DC, pp 12–35
Scott DM, Novak DC, Aultman-Hall L, Guo F (2006) Network robustness index: a new method for identifying critical links and evaluating the performance of transportation networks. J Transp Geogr 14:215–227
Sohn J (2006) Evaluating the significance of highway network links under the flood damage: an accessibility approach. Transp Res Part A 40:491–506
Sullivan JL, Novak DC, Aultman-Hall L, Scott DM (2010) Identifying critical road segments and measuring system-wide robustness in transportation networks with isolating links: a link-based capacity-reduction approach. Transp Res Part A 44:323–336
Van Den Eeckhaut M, Hervás J (2012) State of the art of national land slide databases in Europe and their potential for assessing landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk. Geomorphology 139–140:545–558
Van Westen CJ, Asch TWJ, Soeters R (2006) Landslide hazard and risk zonation—why is it still so difficult? Bull Eng Geol Environ 65:67–184
Van Westen CJ, Castellanos E, Kuriakose SL (2008) Spatial data for landslide susceptibility, hazard, and vulnerability assessment: an overview. Eng Geol 102:112–131
Vanaut J, Leroueil S (2002) Analysis of post-failure slope movements within the framework of hazard and risk analysis. Nat Hazards 26:83–109
Varnes DJ and International Association of Engineering Geology Commission on Landslides and Other Mass Movements on Slopes (1984) Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice. UNESCO, Paris
Zêzere JL, Trigo R, Trigo I (2005) Shallow and deep landslides induced by rainfall in the Lisbon Region (Portugal): assessment of relationships with the North Atlantic oscillation. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci EGU 5:331–344
Zêzere JL, Oliveira SC, Garcia RAC, Reis E (2007) Landslide risk analysis in the area North of Lisbon (Portugal): evaluation of direct and indirect costs resulting from a motorway disruption by slope movements. Landslides 4:123–136. doi:10.1007/s10346-006-0070-z
Acknowledgments
This paper was prepared with the help of a project undertaken by the Transport Research Centre (OP R&D for Innovation No. CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0064) and the project “Quantification of the risk to the transport infrastructure of the Czech Republic by natural hazards” (No. VG20102015057), supported by the Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic. Our thanks go to Radek Berecka and Karel Kočíb, RMD employees in the Zlín region branch, for processing data on the damaged road segments, and to Jiří Sedoník for his help with the figures. Two anonymous referees are gratefully acknowledged for their valuable comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bíl, M., Kubeček, J. & Andrášik, R. An epidemiological approach to determining the risk of road damage due to landslides. Nat Hazards 73, 1323–1335 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1141-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1141-4