Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Drought indicators-based integrated assessment of drought vulnerability: a case study of Bundelkhand droughts in central India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Decision makers face multifaceted challenge in characterizing drought climatology for appropriate water resources-related drought management strategies. This paper focuses on understanding and quantifying the drought vulnerability of Bearma basin in the Bundelkhand region of central India, which is one of the prominent climate extremes that the region is affected by frequently. Regular drought conditions have been prevailing in the region in the last decade with continuous drought from 2004 to 2007. An integrated approach using multiple indicators has been developed to spatially identify the vulnerable regions. The Bearma basin has been selected as a pilot basin to develop a methodology for integrated drought vulnerability assessment adopting spatially and temporally varying drought characteristics represented by drought indicators. The temporally varying indicators include standardized precipitation index (SPI), surface water drought index and groundwater drought index. The spatial information of the indicators was categorized in layers prepared in the spatial domain using a geographic information system, and integrated values of weights of various indicators have been computed on a 50 × 50 m grid scale. The SPI has been applied to quantify monthly precipitation deficit anomalies on multiple time scales (1, 3, 6 and 12 months). The drought characteristics including frequency, duration and intensity and magnitude have been calculated with the estimated SPI. The multiple indicator approach has been used for arriving at the drought vulnerable zones. The highly vulnerable areas are located in the southern and northern regions of the Bearma basin. It has been observed that more than 26 % of the basin lies in the highly and critically vulnerable classes and consequently has greater drought-related negative impacts. Results show that the proposed method is highly effective in representing assessments of drought vulnerability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Global Environ Change 16(3):268–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Huq S, Brown K, Conway D, Hulme M (2002) Adaptation to climate change: setting the agenda for development policy and research. Tyndall centre for climate change, research working paper 16

  • Appa Rao G (1986) Drought climatology, Jal Vigyan Samiksha, Publication of high level technical committee on hydrology, National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee

  • Babaei H, Araghinejad S, Hoorfar A (2013) Developing a new method for spatial assessment of drought vulnerability (case study): zayandeh-Rood river basin in Iran). Water Environ J 27:50–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baethgen WE (1997) Vulnerability of the agricultural sector of Latin America to climate change. Climate Research 9(1–2):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein L et al (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 104

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton I, Huq S, Lim B, Pilifosova O, Schipper EL (2002) From impacts assessment to adaptation priorities: the shaping of adaptation policies. Clim Policy 2:145–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Prog Hum Geogr 20(4):529–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Sci Q 84(2):242–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai A, Trenberth KE, Qian T (2004) A global data set of palmer drought severity index for 1870–2002: relationship with soil moisture and effects of surface warming. J Hydrometeorol 5:1117–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Descroix L, Vauclin M, Viramontes D, Esteves M, Barrios JLG, Anaya E (2003) Water management in Northern Mexico: sharing resources affected by drought. Houille Blanche-Revue Internationale De L Eau 6:46–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougil AJ, Fraser EDG, Reed MS (2010) Anticipating vulnerability to climate change in dryland pastoral systems: using dynamic systems models for the Kalahari. Ecol Soc 15(2):17

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing TE, Bakker K (2000) Drought discourse and vulnerability, Chapter 45. In: Wilhite DA (ed) Drought: a global assessment, natural hazards and disaster series. Routledge publishers, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing TE, Butterfield R, Cohen S, Huq S, Moss R, Rahman A, Sokona Y, Stephen L (2001a) Vulnerability indices: climate change impacts and adaptation, UNEP Policy Series, UNEP, Nairobi

  • Downing TE, Butterfield R, Cohen S, Huq S, Moss R, Rahman A, Sokona Y, Stephen L (2001b) Climate change vulnerability: linking impacts and adaptation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Eakin H, Conley J (2002) Climate variability and the vulnerability of ranching in southeastern Arizona: a pilot study. Clim Res 21(3):271–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edward EC, Mckee TB (1997) Characteristics of 20th century drought in the United State at multiple time scales, Paper No. 634, Climatology Report No. 97-2 Colorado state university, 155

  • Fraser EDG, Dougill AJ, Hubacek K, Quinn CH, Sendzimir J, Termansen M (2011) Assessing vulnerability to climate change in dryland livelihood systems: conceptual challenges and interdisciplinary solutions. Ecol Soc 16(3):3

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogu RC, Dassargues A (2000) Current trends and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment using overlay and index methods. Environ Geol 39(6):549–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes M, Svoboda M, Wall N, Widhalm M (2010) The Lincoln declaration on drought indices: universal meteorological drought index recommended. Am Meteorol Soc 92(4):485–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt K (1997) Regions at risk. A geographical introduction to disasters. Addison Wesley Longman Limited, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Ionescu C, Klein RJT, Hinkel J, Kumar KSK, Klein R (2005) Towards a formal framework of vulnerability to climate change. Environ Model Assess 14(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, summary for policymakers, WMO

  • Keenan SP, Krannich RS (1997) The social context of perceived drought vulnerability. Rural Sociol. 62(1):69–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyantash J, Dracup JA (2002) The quantification of drought: an evaluation of drought indices. B Am Meteorol Soc 83(8):1167–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoshnodifar Z, Sookhtanlo M, Gholami H (2012) Identification and measurement of indicators of drought vulnerability among wheat farmers in Mashhad County, Iran. Ann Biol Res 3(9):4593–4600

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan FN (1997) Global drought watch from space. Bull Am Meteor Soc 78(4):621–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogan FN (2000) Global drought detection and impact assessment from space. Drought Glob Asses 1:196–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilibeth A, Eierdanz F, Alcamo J, Krömker D, Galli F, Klein RJT, Kavi Kumar KS, Campe S, Carius A, Tänzler D (2006) An empirical application of the security diagram to assess the vulnerability of india to climatic stress. Clim Change Human Sec 137(3):199–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Luers AL, Lobell DB, Sklar LS, Addams CL, Matson PA (2003) A method for quantifying vulnerability, applied to the agricultural system of the Yaqui Valley, Mexico. Global Environ Change 13(4):255–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee TB, Doesken NJ, Kleist J (1993) The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In Proceedings eighth conferences on applied climatology, Anaheim, CA, Am Meteor Soc, 179–186

  • McKee TB, Doesken NJ, Kleist J (1995) Drought monitoring with multiple time scales, Preprints, 9th conference on applied climatology, January 15–20, Dallas, Texas, pp 233–236

  • Nalbantis Ι (2008) Drought and stream flow. Eur Water 23(24):65–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalbantis Ι, Tsakiris G (2009) Assessment of hydrological drought revisited. Water Resour Manage 23(5):881–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naumann G, Barbosa P, Garrote L, Iglesias A, Vogt J (2014) Exploring drought vulnerability in Africa: an indicator based analysis to be used in early warning systems. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:1591–1604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey RP, Pandey A, Galkate RV, Byun H, Mal BC (2010) Integrating hydro-meteorological and physiographic factors for assessment of vulnerability to drought. Water Resour Manage 24:4199–4217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla S, Wood AW (2008) Use of a standardized runoff index for characterizing hydrologic drought. Geophys Res Lett L02405(35):1–7. doi:10.1029/2007GL032487

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims AP, Niyogi DDS, Raman S (2002) Adopting drought indices for estimating soil moisture: a North Carolina case study, Geophys Res Lett 29(10):241–244

  • Tabari H, Nikbakht J, Hosseinzadeh Talaee P (2013) Hydrological drought assessment in northwestern Iran based on streamflow drought index (SDI). Water Resour Manage 27(1):137–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas T, Nayak PC, Ghosh N (2015a) Spatiotemporal analysis of drought characteristics in the Bundelkhand region of Central India using the Standardised Precipitation Index, ASCE J Hydrologic Engineering, 10.1061(ASCE)HE, 1943-5584.0001189

  • Thomas T, Gunthe SS, Ghosh NC, Sudheer KP (2015b) Analysis of monsoon rainfall variability over Narmada basin in Central India: implication of climate change. J Water Clim Change 06(3):615–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Luers A, Martello ML, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8074–8079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa F, McLeod H (2002) Environmental vulnerability indicators for environmental planning and decision-making: guidelines and applications. Environ Manage 29(3):335–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelmi OV, Wilhite DA (2002) Assessing vulnerability to agricultural drought: a Nebraska case study. Nat Hazards 25(1):37–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelmi OV, Hubbard KG, Wilhite DA (2002) Spatial representation of agro-climatology in a study of agricultural drought. Int J Climatol 22:1399–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite DA (1993) The enigma of drought, Chapter 1. In: Wilhite DA (ed) Drought assessment, management, and planning: theory and case studies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 3–17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite DA (2000) Drought as a natural hazard: concept and definition. In: Wilhite Donalt A (ed) Drought: a global assessment, natural hazards and disaster series, vol 1. Routledge Publisher, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamani R, Tabari H, Willems P (2015) Extreme stream flow drought in the Karkheh river basin (Iran): probabilistic and regional analyses. Nat Hazards 76:327–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarafshani KK, Sharafi L, Azadi H, Hosseininia G, Maeyer PD, Witlox F (2012) Drought vulnerability assessment: the case of wheat farmers in Western Iran. Global Planet Change 98–99:122–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ganga Plains South Regional Centre, National Institute of Hydrology, Bhopal, 462 016, MP, India

    T. Thomas, R. K. Jaiswal & Ravi Galkate

  2. Deltaic Regional Centre, National Institute of Hydrology, Kakinada, AP, India

    P. C. Nayak

  3. National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee, 247667, Uttarakhand, India

    N. C. Ghosh

Authors
  1. T. Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. K. Jaiswal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ravi Galkate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. C. Nayak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. N. C. Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. C. Nayak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thomas, T., Jaiswal, R.K., Galkate, R. et al. Drought indicators-based integrated assessment of drought vulnerability: a case study of Bundelkhand droughts in central India. Nat Hazards 81, 1627–1652 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2149-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2149-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation