Abstract
Natural disasters have devastating effects on the infrastructure and disrupt every aspect of daily life in the regions they hit. To alleviate problems caused by these disasters, first an impact assessment is needed. As such, this paper focuses on a two-step methodology to identify the impact of Hurricane Hermine on the City of Tallahassee, the capital of Florida. The regional and socioeconomic variations in the Hermine’s impact were studied via spatially and statistically analyzing power outages. First step includes a spatial analysis to illustrate the magnitude of customers affected by power outages together with a clustering analysis. This step aims to determine whether the customers affected from outages are clustered or not. Second step involves a Bayesian spatial autoregressive model in order to identify the effects of several demographic-, socioeconomic-, and transportation-related variables on the magnitude of customers affected by power outages. Results showed that customers affected by outages are spatially clustered at particular regions rather than being dispersed. This indicates the need to pinpoint such vulnerable locations and develop strategies to reduce hurricane-induced disruptions. Furthermore, the increase in the magnitude of affected customers was found to be associated with several variables such as the power network and total generated trips as well as the demographic factors. The information gained from the findings of this study can assist emergency officials in identifying critical and/or less resilient regions, and determining those demographic and socioeconomic groups which were relatively more affected by the consequences of hurricanes than others.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akhtar R, Santos JR (2013) Risk-based input-output analysis of hurricane impacts on interdependent regional workforce systems. Nat Hazards 65:391–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0369-0
Anselin L (1995) Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geogr Anal 27:93–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
Anselin L (2002) Under the hood: issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agric Econ 27:247–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2002.tb00120.x
Berg R (2016) Hurricane Hermine Tropical Cyclone Report. AL092016
Bian R, Wilmot CG (2017) Measuring the vulnerability of disadvantaged populations during hurricane evacuation. Nat Hazards 85:691–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2598-0
Bjarnadottir S, Li Y, Stewart MG (2011) Social vulnerability index for coastal communities at risk to hurricane hazard and a changing climate. Nat Hazards 59:1055–1075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9817-5
Brunsdon C (1995) Estimating probability surfaces for geographical point data: an adaptive kernel algorithm. Comput Geosci 21:877–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-3004(95)00020-9
Citilabs (2016) Cube Software [Computer program]. http://www.citilabs.com/. Accessed 1 Jan 2016
Davidson RA, Liu H, Sarpong IK et al (2003) Electric Power Distribution System Performance in Carolina Hurricanes. Nat Hazards Rev 4:36–45
De Winter JC, Dodou D, Wieringa PA (2009) Exploratory Factor Analysis With Small Sample Sizes. Multivar Behav Res 44:147–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170902794206
Demiroluk S, Ozbay K (2015) Bayesian spatial modeling and risk mapping of downed trees along the roadways using data from Hurricanes Irene and Sandy. In: Transportation research board 94th annual meeting. pp 1–23
DigiTally (2017) DigiTally. City Tallahassee. http://www.talgov.com/Main/digitally.aspx. Accessed 1 Jan 2017
Dunson DB (2001) Commentary: practical advantages of Bayesian analysis of epidemiologic data. Am J Epidemiol 153:1222–1226. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/153.12.1222
ESRI (2014) ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.2 [Computer program]. https://support.esri.com/en/Products/Desktop/arcgis-desktop/arcmap/10-2. Accessed 9 Mar 2018
FSUTMS (2017) Statewide and Regional Models. http://www.fsutmsonline.net/index.php?/model_pages/model_pages/. Accessed 1 Aug 2017
Gabe T, Falk G, McCarty M, Mason VW (2005) Hurricane Katrina: social-demographic characteristics of impacted areas. RL33141 CRS. http://www.tidec.org/sites/default/files/uploads/crsrept.pdf. Accessed 9 Mar 2018
Gatrell AC, Bailey TC, Diggle PJ, Rowlingson BS (1996) Point Spatial application pattern analysis geographical epidemiology. Trans Inst Br Geogr 21:256–274
Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS et al (2003) Bayesian data analysis, 2nd edn. CRC Press, London
Han SR, Guikema SD, Quiring SM (2009) Improving the predictive accuracy of hurricane power outage forecasts using generalized additive models. Risk Anal 29:1443–1453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01280.x
IEEE (2012) Guide for electric power distribution reliability indices. New York. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6895236/. Accessed 9 Mar 2018
Koenig WD (1999) Spatial autocorrelation of ecological phenomena. Trends Ecol Evol 14:22–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01533-X
LeSage JP (1997) Bayesian estimation of spatial autoregressive models. Int Reg Sci Rev 20:113–129
LeSage JP (1999) The theory and practice of spatial econometrics. http://www.rri.wvu.edu/webbook/lesage/spatial/wbook.pdf
Liévanos RS, Horne C (2017) Unequal resilience: the duration of electricity outages. Energy Policy 108:201–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.058
Lindell MK, Prater CS (2003) Assessing community impacts of natural disasters. Nat Hazards Rev. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:4(176)
Liu H, Davidson RA, Rosowsky DV, Stedinger JR (2005) Negative binomial regression of electric power outages in hurricanes. J Infrastruct Syst 11:258–267. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2005)11:4(258)
Liu H, Davidson RA, Apanasovich TV (2008) Spatial generalized linear mixed models of electric power outages due to hurricanes and ice storms. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93:897–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.038
McCullagh M (2006) Detecting hotspots in time and space. In: International symposium and exhibition on geoinformation. Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia, pp 1–18
Mcroberts DB, Quiring SM, Guikema SD (2016) Improving hurricane power outage prediction models through the inclusion of local environmental factors. Risk Anal. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12728
Morris K, Johnson A (2016) Workshop on the Hurricane Hermine after action report. http://www2.leoncountyfl.gov/coadmin/agenda/Workshops/ws120161213.pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2017
Nateghi R, Guikema SD, Quiring SM (2014) Forecasting hurricane-induced power outage durations. Nat Hazards 74:1795–1811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1270-9
Ord JK, Getis A (1995) Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: distributional issues and an application. Geogr Anal 27:286–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00912.x
Quiring SM, Zhu L, Guikema SD (2011) Importance of soil and elevation characteristics for modeling hurricane-induced power outages. Nat Hazards 58:365–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9672-9
SERT (2017) State emergency response team. In: Florida Division of Emergency Management http://www.floridadisaster.org/eoc/hermine2016/. Accessed 7 May 2017
U.S. Census Bureau (2010) 2010 US census blocks in Florida. Website: Florida geographic data library. http://www.fgdl.org/metadataexplorer/explorer.jsp. Accessed 1 Oct 2015
WeatherSTEM (2017) https://www.weatherstem.com/. http://leon.weatherstem.com/. Accessed 1 Jan 2017
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the City of Tallahassee, especially Michael Ohlsen and John Powell, for providing data and valuable insight. The contents of this paper and discussion represent the authors’ opinion and do not reflect the official view of the City of Tallahassee. This research is partly supported by US National Science Foundation award 1640587.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ulak, M.B., Kocatepe, A., Konila Sriram, L.M. et al. Assessment of the hurricane-induced power outages from a demographic, socioeconomic, and transportation perspective. Nat Hazards 92, 1489–1508 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3260-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3260-9