Skip to main content
Log in

Returning home after Superstorm Sandy: phases in the return-entry process

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite current advances in research related to return-entry process following disasters, the need to understand this process from the perspective of the returnees remains. This exploratory study examines the return-entry experience of residents returning home after Superstorm Sandy. Specifically, this study aims to identify patterns in the return experiences of residents following the ending of the evacuation order and gain insight into the temporal dimensions of the activities and decisions made following disasters. A series of six focus groups were conducted with 28 participants from communities in Ocean County and Monmouth County, New Jersey. A qualitative grounded theory approach of focus group transcripts revealed three different phases: (1) initiation and planning, (2) traveling home, and (3) arriving home. Understanding the actions and perspectives of returnees within each phase provides greater insight into the experiences of returnees during this critical time in the early disaster recovery process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Airriess CA, Li W, Leong KJ, Chen ACC, Keith VM (2008) Church-based social capital, networks and geographical scale: Katrina evacuation, relocation, and recovery in a New Orleans Vietnamese American community. Geoforum 39:1333–1346

    Google Scholar 

  • Allenby B, Fink J (2005) Toward inherently secure and resilient societies. Science 309:1034–1036

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery EJ (2010) Contextual and audience moderators of channel selection and message reception of public health information in routine and crisis situations. J Public Relat Res 22:378–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman JM, Edwards B (2002) Gender and evacuation: a closer look at why women are more likely to evacuate for hurricanes. Nat Hazard Rev 3(3):107–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Buldyrev SV, Parshani R, Paul G, Stanley HE, Havlin S (2010) Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks. Nature 464:1025

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi YJ, Choi HB, O’Donnell M (2018) Disaster reintegration model: a qualitative analysis on developing Korean disaster mental health support model. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15(2):362

    Google Scholar 

  • Comes T, Van de Walle B (2014) Measuring disaster resilience: the impact of hurricane sandy on critical infrastructure systems. ISCRAM 11:195–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Cova TJ, Johnson JP (2002) Microsimulation of neighborhood evacuations in the urban–wildland interface. Environ Plan A 34:2211–2229

    Google Scholar 

  • Cova TJ, Drews FA, Siebeneck LK, Musters A (2009) Protective actions in wildfires: evacuate or shelter-in-place? Nat Hazards Rev 10:151–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox RS, Perry KME (2011) Like a fish out of water: reconsidering disaster recovery and the role of place and social capital in community disaster resilience. Am J Community Psychol 48:395–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Dash N, Morrow BH (2000) Return delays and evacuation order compliance: the case of Hurricane Georges and the Florida Keys. Glob Environ Change Part B Environ Hazards 2:119–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek TE (1969) Social processes in disaster: family evacuation. Soc Probl 16:336–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek TE (1999) Understanding disaster warning responses. Soc Sci J 36:515–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenman DP, Cordasco KM, Asch S, Golden JF, Glik D (2007) Disaster planning and risk communication with vulnerable communities: lessons from Hurricane Katrina. Am J Public Health 97:S109–S115

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez LS, Byard D, Lin CC, Benson S, Barbera JA (2002) Frail elderly as disaster victims: emergency management strategies. Prehosp Disaster Med 17:67–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch C, Emrich CT, Cutter SL (2010) Disaster disparities and differential recovery in New Orleans. Popul Environ 31:179–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Fussell E, Sastry N, VanLandingham M (2010) Race, socioeconomic status, and return migration to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Popul Environ 3120:42

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1999) Discovery of grounded theory. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Groen JA, Polivka AE (2010) Going home after Hurricane Katrina: determinants of return migration and changes in affected areas. Demography 47:821–844

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan S, Mesa-Arango R, Ukkusuri SV (2013) A random parameter hazard-based model to understand the temporal dynamics of household evacuation timing behavior. Transp Res Part C 27:108–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang SK, Lindell MK, Prater CS, Wu HC, Siebeneck LK (2012) Household evacuation decision-making in response to Hurricane Ike. Nat Hazards Rev 13:283–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW, Pijawka D (1977) From rubble to monument. In: Haas JE, Kates RW, Bowden MJ (eds) Reconstruction following disaster. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW, Colten CE, Laska S, Leatherman SP (2006) Reconstruction of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina: a research perspective. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:14653–14660

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni PA, Gu H, Tsai S, Passannante M, Kim S, Thomas PA, Tan CG, Davidow AL (2017) Evacuations as a result of hurricane sandy: analysis of the 2014 New Jersey behavioral risk factor survey. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 11(6):720–728

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong KJ, Airriess CA, Li W, Chen ACC, Keith VM (2007) Resilient history and the rebuilding of a community: the Vietnamese American community in New Orleans East. J Am Hist 94:770–779

    Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Airriess CA, Chen ACC, Leong KJ, Keith VM (2010) Katrina and migration: evacuation and return by African Americans and Vietnamese Americans in an Eastern New Orleans suburb. Prof Geogr 62:103–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin CC, Siebeneck LK, Lindell MK, Prater CS, Wu HC, Huang SK (2014) Evacuees’ information sources and reentry decision-making in the aftermath of Hurricane Ike. Nat Hazards 70:865–882

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell MK, Perry RW (2003) Communicating environmental risk in multiethnic communities. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell MK, Perry RW (2012) The protective action decision model: theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Anal 32:616–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell MK, Prater CS (2007a) Critical behavioral assumptions in evacuation time estimate analysis for private vehicles: examples from hurricane research and planning. J Urb Plan Dev 133:18–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell MK, Prater CS (2007b) A hurricane evacuation management decision support system (EMDSS). Nat Hazards 40:627–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell MK, Lu JC, Prater CS (2005) Household decision-making and evacuation in response to Hurricane Lili. Nat Hazards Rev 6:171–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell MK, Kang JE, Prater CS (2011) The logistics of household hurricane evacuation. Nat Hazards 58:1093–1109

    Google Scholar 

  • Litman T (2006) Lessons from Katrina and Rita: what major disasters can teach transportation planners. J Transp Eng 132:11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Manandhar R, Siebeneck LK (2018) Return-entry risk communication challenges: experiences of emergency management organizations following Superstorm Sandy. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 36:120–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Masozera M, Bailey M, Kerchner C (2007) Distribution of impacts of natural disasters across income groups: a case study of New Orleans. Ecol Econ 63:299–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesa-Arango R, Hasan S, Ukkusuri SV, Murray-Tuite P (2013) Household level models for hurricane evacuation destination choice using hurricane Ivan data. Nat Hazards Rev 14:11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrice S (2013) Heartache and Hurricane Katrina: recognizing the influence of emotions in post-disaster return decisions. Area 45:33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Morss RE, Lazo JK, Demuth JL (2010) Examining the use of weather forecasts in decision scenarios: results from a US survey with implications for uncertainty communication. Meteorol Appl 17:149–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser U, Winograd E, Bergman ET, Schreiber CA, Palmer SE, Weldon MS (1996) Remembering the earthquake: direct experience vs. hearing the news. Memory 4(4):337–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelan MM, Schumann RL III (2018) Gathering places in the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey. Disaster Prev Manag 27:508–522

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAA (2013) Tropical cyclone report Hurricane Sandy, 22–29 October 2012. Blake E, Kimberlain T, Berg R, Cangialosi J, Bevin II J. National Hurricane Center. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL182012_Sandy.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2018

  • NOAA (2018) National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) U.S. billion-dollar weather and climate disasters. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions/. Accessed 26 July 2018

  • Peek L, Stough LM (2010) Children with disabilities in the context of disaster: a social vulnerability perspective. Child Dev 81:1260–1270

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips BD (2014) Qualitative disaster research. Understanding qualitative research. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli EL (1995) Patterns of sheltering and housing in US disasters. Disaster Prev Manag 4:43–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson BK (2005) The phases of disaster as a relationship between structure and meaning: a narrative analysis of the 1947 Texas City explosion. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 23(3):27–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadri AM, Ukkusuri SV, Murray-Tuite P, Gladwin H (2013) How to evacuate? A behavioral model to understand the routing strategies during hurricane evacuation. J Transp Eng 140:61–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadri AM, Ukkusuri SV, Gladwin H (2017) The role of social networks and information sources on hurricane evacuation decision-making. Nat Hazards Rev 18:04017005

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeger MW, Sellnow TL, Ulmer RR (2003) Communication and organizational crisis. Praeger, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebeneck LK, Cova TJ (2008) An assessment of the return-entry process of Hurricane Rita. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 26:91–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebeneck LK, Cova TJ (2012) Spatial and temporal variation in evacuee risk perception throughout the evacuation and return-entry process. Risk Anal 32:1468–1480

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebeneck LK, Cova TJ (2014) Risk communication after disaster: return-entry following the 2008 Cedar River flood. Nat Hazards Rev 15:158–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebeneck LK, Lindell MK, Prater CS, Wu HC, Huang SK (2013) Evacuees’ reentry concerns and experiences in the aftermath of Hurricane Ike. Nat Hazards 65:2267–2286

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerfeldt EJ (2015) Disasters and information source repertoires: information seeking and information sufficiency in postearthquake Haiti. J Appl Commun Res 43:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings RA (1991) Ending evacuations. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 9(2):183–200

    Google Scholar 

  • State of New Jersey (2017) Assembly Resolution No. 257. Introduced June 1, 2017, 217th Legislature. Trenton, NJ. http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2016/Bills/AR/257_I1.HTM. Accessed 26 July 26 2018

  • Urbanik T, Desrosiers A, Lindell MK, Schuller CR (1980) Analysis of techniques for estimating evacuation times for emergency planning zones (No. NUREG/CR–1745). Texas Transportation Institute

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2016a) American Community Survey 1-year estimates. Census Reporter Profile page for Ocean County, NJ. https://censusreporter.org/profiles/05000US34029-ocean-county-nj/. Accessed 26 July 2018

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2016b) American Community Survey 1-year estimates. Census Reporter Profile page for Monmouth County, NJ. https://censusreporter.org/profiles/05000US34025-monmouth-county-nj/. Accessed 26 July 2018

  • Xiao Y, Van Zandt S (2012) Building community resiliency: spatial links between household and business post-disaster return. Urb Stud 49:2523–2542

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Science Foundation Award #1638311 CRISP Type 2/Collaborative Research: Critical Transitions in the Resilience and Recovery of Interdependent Social and Physical Networks. The authors would like to extend sincere gratitude to the Salvation Army and the Ocean County Long-Term Recovery Group for graciously helping us recruit participants for this study and securing locations to conduct the focus groups. We thank the 28 participants who openly shared their experiences with us, and we admire their tenacity and resilience throughout the recovery process. Finally, we thank Jackie “Grandmom” Sahrhage for her hospitality as we prepared for the focus group interviews.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Siebeneck.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siebeneck, L., Schumann, R., Kuenanz, BJ. et al. Returning home after Superstorm Sandy: phases in the return-entry process. Nat Hazards 101, 195–215 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03869-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03869-1

Keywords

Navigation