Abstract
Grelling’s Paradox is the paradox which results from considering whether heterologicality, the word-property which a designator has when and only when the designator does not bear the word-property it designates, is had by ‘ ȁ8heterologicality’. Although there has been some philosophical debate over its solution, Grelling’s Paradox is nearly uniformly treated as a variant of either the Liar Paradox or Russell’s Paradox, a paradox which does not present any philosophical challenges not already presented by the two better known paradoxes. The aims of this paper are, first, to offer a precise formulation of Grelling’s Paradox which is clearly distinguished from both the Liar Paradox and Russell’s Paradox; second, to offer a solution to Grelling’s Paradox which both resolves the paradoxical reasoning and accounts for unproblematic predications of heterologicality; and, third, to argue that there are two lessons to be drawn from Grelling’s Paradox which have not yet been drawn from the Liar or Russell’s Paradox. The first lesson is that it is possible for the semantic content of a predicate to be sensitive to the semantic context; i.e., it is possible for a predicate to be an indexical expression. The second lesson is that the semantic content of an indexical predicate, though unproblematic for many cases, can nevertheless be problematic in some cases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Cargile (2002) ‘Logical Paradoxes’ D. Jacquette (Eds) A Companion to Philosophical Logic Blackwell Publishers Oxford 105–114
A. Church (1960) ‘Paradoxes, Logical’ D. Runes (Eds) Dictionary of Philosophy Littlefield Adams Totowa NJ 224–225
P. Geach (1961) ArticleTitle‘Ryle on Namely Riders’ Analysis 21 64–67
K. Gödel (1951) ‘Russell’s Mathematical Logic’ P.A. Schilpp (Eds) The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell EditionNumber3 Tudor Publishing Company New York 125–153
L. Goldstein (2003) ArticleTitle‘Farewell to Grelling’ Analysis 63 31–32 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.0003-2638.2003.00390.x
K. Grelling L. Nelson (1908) ArticleTitle‘Bemerkungen zu den Paradoxieen von Russell und Burali-Forti’ Abhandlungen der Fries’schen Schule, neue Folge 2 301–334
K. Grelling (1936) ArticleTitle‘The Logical Paradoxes’ Mind 45 481–486
D. Kaplan (1989a) ‘Afterthoughts’ J. Almog J. Perry H. Wettstein (Eds) Themes from Kaplan Oxford University Press New York 565–614
D. Kaplan (1989b) ‘Demonstratives’ J. Almog J. Perry H. Wettstein (Eds) Themes from Kaplan Oxford University Press New York 481–563
S. Kripke (1975) ArticleTitle‘Outline of a Theory of Truth’ Journal of Philosophy 72 690–716
N. Lawrence (1950) ArticleTitle‘Heterology and Hierarchy’ Analysis 16 77–84
R. Martin (1968) ArticleTitle‘On Grelling’s Paradox’ Philosophical Review 77 321–331
G.E. Moore (1903) Principia Ethica Cambridge University Press Cambridge
W.V. Quine (1970) Philosophy of Logic Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, NJ
W.V. Quine (1987) Quiddities Harvard University Press Cambridge MA
W.V. Quine (1990) The Pursuit of Truth Harvard University Press Cambridge MA
W.V. Quine (1995) From Stimulus to Science Harvard University Press Cambridge MA
F.P. Ramsey (1925) ArticleTitle‘The Foundations of Mathematics’ Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 25 338–384
B. Russell (1940) An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth George Allen and Unwin Ltd London
G. Ryle (1952) ArticleTitle‘Heterologicality’ Analysis 11 61–69
U. Saarnio (1974) ArticleTitle‘Die Grellingsche Paradoxie und ihre exakte Lösung’ Dialectica 28 243–261
N. Salmon (1998) ArticleTitle‘Nonexistence’ Nous 32 277–319 Occurrence Handle10.1111/0029-4624.00101
B.H. Slater (1973) ArticleTitle‘ ȁ8Is ‘Heterological’ Heterological’ Mind 82 439–440
P. Sullivan (2003) ArticleTitle‘A note on incompleteness and heterologicality’ Analysis 63 32–38 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.0003-2638.2003.00391.x Occurrence HandleMR1952881
von Wright G. H. (1983): ‘The Heterological Paradox’ in Philosophical Logic: Philosophical Papers, vol. II, Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 1–24.
J.E. Wiredu (1976) ArticleTitle‘Paradoxes’ Second Order 5 3–26
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Newhard, J. Grelling’s Paradox. Philos Stud 126, 1–27 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-7808-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-7808-z