Abstract
The authors analyse epistemological beliefs and their relationship to the knowledge developed by students engaged in a reorganized programme of training for secondary school teachers in Quebec. They examine two contexts for initial training: the training in their discipline that university students follow, and the practical training students undertake in the school environment. Qualitative data were obtained through critical exploration (Piagetian) interviews with twelve pre-service teachers. These results made it possible to outline multiple epistemological postures, and to describe the tensions between the subject-related and practical aspects of initial training. In particular, based on an analysis of their epistemological beliefs and their relationship to knowledge, it would appear that pre-service teachers develop a less refined approach through practical training than they attain at university. Finally, the authors raise some issues concerning teacher training.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albe, V. (2009). Enseigner des controverses [Teaching controversial issues]. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
Bader, B., & Therriault, G. (2008). À propos des dimensions sociales des sciences et de leur pertinence pour renouveler l’enseignement des sciences: une illustration à l’école primaire [On the social dimensions of the sciences and their relevance for the renewal of science teaching: An illustration in primary school]. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 34(1), 163–184.
Bardin, L. (2003). L’analyse de contenu [Content analysis]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1987). The affective dimension of learning: Faculty-student relationships that enhance intellectual development. College Student Journal, 21, 46–58.
Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
Bendixen, L. D., & Feucht, F. C. (2010). Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brownlee, J., Schraw, G., & Berthelsen, D. (2011). Personal epistemology and teacher education. New York/London: Routledge.
Brownlee, J., Walker, S., Lennox, S., Exley, B., & Pearce, S. (2009). The first year university experience: Using personal epistemology to understand effective learning and teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 58(5), 599–618. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9212-2.
Buty, C., & Plantin, C. (2008). Argumenter en classe de sciences. Du débat à l’apprentissage [Discussion in science classes: From debate to learning]. Lyon: Institut national de recherche pédagogique (INRP).
Chai, C. S., Teo, T., & Lee, C. B. (2010). Modeling the relationships among beliefs about learning, knowledge, and teaching of pre-service teachers in Singapore. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(1), 25–42.
Chan, K.-W., & Elliot, R. G. (2004). Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 817–831.
Charlot, B. (1997). Du rapport au savoir. Éléments pour une théorie [On the relationship to knowledge: Elements for a theory]. Paris: Anthropos.
Crahay, M., & Fagnant, A. (2007). À propos de l’épistémologie personnelle: un état des recherches anglo-saxonnes [On personal epistemology: A review of English-language research]. Revue française de pédagogie, 161, 79–117.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research (pp. 1–34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science Education, 85, 554–567.
Flores, M. A. (2001). Person and context in becoming a new teacher. Journal of Education for Teaching, 27(2), 135–148.
Fourez, G., Maingain, A., & Dufour, B. (2002). Approches didactiques de l’interdisciplinarité [Pedagogical approaches to interdisciplinary learning]. Brussels: De Boeck.
Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378–405.
Hofer, B. K. (2004a). Exploring the dimensions of personal epistemology in differing classroom contexts: Student interpretations during the first year of college. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(1), 129–163.
Hofer, B. K. (2004b). Introduction: Paradigmatic approaches to personal epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 1–3.
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 1–34.
Huberman, A. M., & Miles, B. M. (2003). Analyse des données qualitatives [Analysis of qualitative data]. Brussels: De Boeck.
Jellab, A. (2006). Débuter dans l’enseignement secondaire. Quel rapport aux savoirs chez les professeurs stagiaires? [Starting out in secondary teaching: The relationship with knowledge among trainee teachers]. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Jellab, A. (2008). Le rapport aux savoirs chez les professeurs stagiaires du secondaire: une nouvelle problématique en éducation. [The relationship with knowledge among trainee secondary teachers: A new issue in education]. L’Homme et la société, 167–168–169, 295–319.
Jonnaert, P., Masciotra, D., Barrette, J., Morel, D., & Mane, Y. (2007). From competence in the curriculum to competence in action. Prospects, 37(2), 187–203.
Jonnaert, P., & Vander Borght, C. (2009). Créer des conditions d’apprentissage. Un cadre de référence socioconstructiviste pour une formation didactique des enseignants [Creating the conditions for learning: A socio-constructivist reference framework for teacher training] (3rd ed.). Brussels: De Boeck Université.
Kaddouri, M., & Vandroz, D. (2008). Formation professionnelle en alternance: quelques tensions d’ordre pédagogique et identitaire [Vocational training sandwich courses: Some tensions related to pedagogy and identity]. In E. Correa Molina, C. Gervais, & S. Rittershaussen (Eds.), Vers une conceptualisation de la situation de stage: Explorations internationales (pp. 23–42). Sherbrooke, Québec: Éditions du CRP.
Khine, M. S. (2008). Knowing, knowledge and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse cultures. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Larochelle, M., & Désautels, J. (2006). L’éducation aux sciences et le croisement des expertises [Science education and cross-cutting expertise]. In A. Legardez & L. Simonneaux (Eds.), L’école à l’épreuve de l’actualité. Enseigner les questions vives (pp. 61–77). Paris: ESF.
Lebrun, J., & Lenoir, Y. (2001). Planification en sciences humaines chez de futures enseignantes et les modèles d’intervention éducative sous-jacents [Planning in human sciences among pre-service teachers and the underlying models of educational intervention]. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 27(3), 569–594.
Legardez, A., & Simonneaux, L. (Eds.) (2006). L’école à l’épreuve de l’actualité. Enseigner les questions socialement vives [The school confronted with topical issues: Teaching hot social questions]. Paris: ESF.
Legardez, A., & Simonneaux, L. (Eds.) (2011). Questions socialement vives dans l’enseignement et la formation [Topical social issues in teaching and training]. Dijon: Educagri éditions.
Legendre, M.-F. (2004). Approches constructivistes et nouvelles orientations curriculaires: d’un curriculum fondé sur l’approche par objectifs à un curriculum axé sur le développement de compétences [Constructivist approaches and new curricular orientations: From a curriculum following an outcomes-based pedagogy to a curriculum focussing on developing competencies]. In P. Jonnaert & D. Masciotra (Eds.), Constructivisme: Choix contemporains. Hommage à Ernst von Glasersfeld (pp. 51–92). Sainte-Foy, Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
Lemberger, J., Hewson, P. W., & Park, H. (1999). Relationships between prospective secondary teachers’ classroom practice and their conceptions of biology and of teaching science. Science Education, 83(3), 347–371.
Maury, S., & Caillot, M. (2003). Rapport au savoir et didactiques [Relationship to knowledge and pedagogical approaches]. Paris: Fabert.
Mellado, V. (1997). Preservice teachers’ classroom practice and their conceptions of the nature of science. Science & Education, 6, 331–354.
MELS [Ministère de l’Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport, Gouvernement du Québec] (2007). Programme de formation de l’école québécoise. Version approuvée. Enseignement secondaire, deuxième cycle [Training programme for schools in Quebec: Approved version: Secondary teaching, second cycle]. Québec: MELS.
MEQ [Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec] (2001). La formation à l’enseignement. Les orientations. Les compétences professionnelles [Teacher training: Orientations: Professional competencies]. Québec: MEQ.
Mujawamariya, D. (2000). De la nature du savoir scientifique à l’enseignement des sciences: l’urgence d’une approche constructiviste dans la formation des enseignants de sciences [From the nature of scientific knowledge to science teaching: The urgency of a constructivist approach in training science teachers]. Éducation et francophonie, 28(2), 1–11. http://www.acelf.ca/revue.
Paillé, P. (1996). De l’analyse qualitative en général et de l’analyse thématique en particulier [From quantitative analysis in general to thematic analysis in particular]. Revue de l’association pour la recherche qualitative, 15, 179–194.
Paillé, P., & Muchielli, A. (2008). L’analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales [Quantitative analysis in human and social sciences]. Paris: Armand Collin.
Palmer, B., & Marra, R. M. (2004). College students’ epistemological perspectives across knowledge domains: A proposed grounded theory. Higher Education, 47, 311–335.
Perraudeau, M. (1998). Échanger pour apprendre. L’entretien critique [Learning through exchanges: Critical interviewing]. Paris: Armand Colin.
Perraudeau, M. (2002). L’entretien cognitif à visée d’apprentissage [Cognitive interviews with a view to learning]. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Piaget, J. (1977). La naissance de l’intelligence chez l’enfant [The origins of intelligence in children]. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.
Pouliot, C., Bader, B., & Therriault, G. (2010). The notion of the relationship to knowledge: A theoretical tool for research in science education. Journal in Environmental and Science Education, 5(3), 239–264.
Ruel, F. (1997). Quelques illustrations discursives d’une représentation sociale à l’égard de l’apprentissage et de l’enseignement—le cas d’un futur enseignant de sciences [Some discursive illustrations of social representation in relation to learning and teaching: The case of a pre-service science teacher]. Éducation et francophonie, 25(1), 1–11. http://www.acelf.ca/revue.
Schommer, M. (1994). An emerging conceptualization of epistemological beliefs and their role in learning. In R. Garner & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Beliefs about text and instruction with text (pp. 25–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schommer, M., & Walker, K. (1995). Are epistemological beliefs similar across domains? Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 424–431.
Slekar, T. D. (1998). Epistemological entanglements: Preservice elementary school teachers “apprenticeship of observation” and the teaching of history. Theory and Research in Social Education, 26(4), 485–507.
Therriault, G. (2008). Postures épistémologiques que développent des étudiants des profils sciences et technologies et univers social au cours de leur formation initiale à l’enseignement secondaire: une analyse de leurs croyances et de leurs rapports aux savoirs [The epistemological postures developed by science and technology and social universe students during their initial training for secondary school teaching: An analysis of their beliefs and their relationship to knowledge]. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Université du Québec à Rimouski and Université du Québec à Montréal.
Therriault, G., & Bader, B. (2009). Démarche d’enseignement interdisciplinaire en sciences au secondaire. Un débat sur les changements climatiques pour une éducation citoyenne [The interdisciplinary approach to science teaching in secondary school: A discussion on climate change for citizenship education]. Nouvelle CSQ—Bulletin du CRIRES. http://www.csq.qc.net/publications/nouvelles-csq.html.
Therriault, G., & Harvey, L. (2011). Postures épistémologiques que développent de futurs enseignants de sciences et de sciences humaines lors des cours de formation disciplinaire et pratique: l’apport d’une recherche mixte [The epistemological postures developed by pre-service science and human science teachers during their training in their subjects and teaching practice: The findings of joint research]. Recherches qualitatives, 30(2), 71–95.
Therriault, G., Harvey, L., & Jonnaert, P. (2010). Croyances épistémologiques de futurs enseignants du secondaire: des différences entre les profils et une évolution en cours de formation [The epistemological beliefs of pre-service secondary teachers: Differences by profile and changes during training]. Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 33(1), 1–30.
Van der Maren, J.-M. (2003). La recherche appliquée en pédagogie [Applied research in pedagogy]. Brussels: De Boeck Université.
Venturini, P. (2007). L’envie d’apprendre les sciences. Motivation, attitudes, rapport aux savoirs scientifiques [The desire to study sciences: Motivation, attitude, relationship with scientific knowledge]. Paris: Fabert.
Virta, A. (2002). Becoming a history teacher: Observations on the beliefs and growth of student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 687–698.
Yeager, E., & Davis, O. L. (1995). Between campus and classroom: Secondary student-teachers’ thinking about historical texts. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 29(1), 1–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported financially by the Fonds québécois de recherche sur la société et la culture (FQRSC) and the Fonds institutionnel de recherche de l’Université du Québec à Rimouski (FIR). It is part of a doctoral thesis (Therriault 2008) in education, in the context of a joint programme undertaken by the Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM) and the Université du Québec à Rimouski (UQAR), under the supervision of Léon Harvey and Philippe Jonnaert. We thank the twelve pre-service teachers who participated in the research interviews.
About this article
Cite this article
Therriault, G., Harvey, L. Epistemological beliefs and their relationship to the knowledge of preservice secondary school teachers. Prospects 43, 441–459 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-013-9288-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-013-9288-4