Skip to main content
Log in

Two bandits or more? The case of Viking Age England

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The Olsonian distinction between roving and stationary bandits outlines the rationale behind the transition from anarchy to the emergence of the predatory state. This two-bandit model may, however, be expanded to include more bandit types. In the case of Viking Age England, local English kings were unable to monopolize violence and defend their realms against competing Viking raiders. As the Vikings’ time horizon grew, so did the accumulated value of more formal taxation, and bandit types evolved in four steps. The first step is the Olsonian roving bandit, who executed Viking hit-and-run attacks and plunders during the second half of the tenth century. The second step is the gafol bandit; gafol is payment for leaving, paid to, among others, Swein Forkbeard. The third step is the heregeld bandit; heregeld is a tax to support an army for hire; most notably Thorkell the Tall’s. The fourth step is the Olsonian stationary bandit, i.e. the strongest military leader among the Vikings, Cnut the Great, settled down as the new king. Overall, the Olsonian two-bandit model can be expanded to a four-bandit staircase model, in which the new gafol and heregeld bandit types explain the steps from anarchy and short-run raiding to long-run formal taxation in a predatory state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASC. (1961). The Anglo-Saxon chronicle. A revised translation, D. Whitelock (Ed.). Norwich: Jarrold & Sons Ltd.

  • Baker, M. J., & Bulte, E. H. (2010). Kings and Vikings: on the dynamics of competitive agglomeration. Economics of Governance,11, 207–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baug, I., Skre, D., Heldal, T., & Jansen, Ø. (2018). The beginning of the Viking Age in the West. Journal of Maritime Archaeology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11457-018-9221-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bill, J. (2008). Viking ships and the sea. In S. Brink & N. Price (Eds.), The Viking world. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bill, J. (2010). Viking Age ships and seafaring in the west. In I. S. Klæsøe (Ed.), Viking trade and settlement in continental western Europe. Denmark: Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnskov, C., & Svendsen, G. T. (2013). Does social trust determine the size of the welfare state? Evidence using historical identification. Public Choice,157, 269–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, M. A. S. (2014). Coinage. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, J. (2014). Markets and fairs. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (1986). Observations on English government from the tenth to the twelfth century. In J. Campbell (Ed.), Essays in Anglo-Saxon history. London: Hambledon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congleton, R. D. (2015). The logic of collective action and beyond. Public Choice,164, 217–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith, R. (2014a). Feorm. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith, R. (2014b). Hide. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith, R. (2014c). Peasants. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, H. W. L. (1944). Sine Ira et Studio. The Classical Journal,39, 297–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garmonsway, G. N. (1965). The Anglo-Saxon chronicle. London: Everyman’s Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham, J. (1989). The most precious jewel in the English Crown: Levels of danegeld and heregeld in the early eleventh century. The English Historical Review,104, 373–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundlach, E., & Svendsen, G. T. (2019). How do high and low levels of social trust affect the long-run performance of poor economies? Journal of International Development,31(1), 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson, J. R., Salter, A. W., & Albrecht, B. C. (2018). Preventing plunder: Military technology, capital accumulation, and economic growth. Journal of Macroeconomics,58, 154–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. L. (2019). Public finance and public policy: Responsibilities and limitations of government (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1651) [1985]. Leviathan. London: Penguin Classics.

  • Keynes, S. (1986). A tale of two kings: Alfred the Great and Æthelred the Unready. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society,36, 195–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, S. (2014). Heregeld. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, K., & Skaperdios, S. (2012). The market for protection and the origins of the state. Economic Theory,50, 417–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurrild-Klitgaard, P., & Svendsen, G. T. (2003). Rational bandits: plunder, public goods, and the Vikings. Public Choice,117(3/4), 255–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, T. (2017). Law and order in Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, M. K. (1984). The collection of danegeld and heregeld in the reigns of Aethelred II and Cnut. English Historical Review,99(393), 721–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, M. K. (2014). Taxation. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, P. T. (2007). Efficient anarchy. Public Choice,130(1–2), 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. (2014a). Hundreds. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. (2014b). Æthelred the Unready. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostert, M. (2014). Frisians. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naismith, R. (2012). Money and power in Anglo-Saxon England: The Southern English kingdoms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1993). Dictatorship, democracy, and development. American Political Science Review,87, 567–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (2000). Power and prosperity: Outgrowing communist and capitalist dictatorships. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormrod, M. (2000). The English State and the Plantagenet Empire. In J. R. Maddicott & D. M. Palliser (Eds.), The medieval state: Essays presented to James Campbell. London: The Hambledon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., & Ahn, T. K. (2009). The meaning of social capital and its link to collective action. In G. T. Svendsen & G. L. H. Svendsen (Eds.), Handbook of social capital: The troika of sociology, political science and economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palliser, D. M. (2000). Towns and the English State. In J. R. Maddicott & D. M. Palliser (Eds.), The medieval state: Essays presented to James Campbell (pp. 1066–1500). London: The Hambledon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelteret, D. A. E. (2014a). Roads. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelteret, D. A. E. (2014b). Transport and communication. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piano, E. E. (2019). State capacity and public choice: A critical survey. Public Choice,178(1), 289–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, B., & Stringham, E. (2009). Public choice and the economic analysis of anarchy: A survey. Public Choice,140(3/4), 503–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roesdahl, E. (2012). The Vikings. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, A. (2015). Rights to the realm: Reconsidering Western political development. American Political Science Review,109(4), 725–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sindbæk, S. M. (2005). Ruter og rutinisering: vikingetidens fjernhandel i Nordeuropa. [Routes and routinization: Trade over distance in Viking Age Northern Europe]. Multivers, Copenhagen.

  • Sindbæk, S. M. (2007). Networks and nodal points: The emergence of towns in early Viking Age Scandinavia. Antiquity,81, 119–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spejlborg, M. B. (2016). There and back again: English connections in early medieval Denmark, c. 991-1086. PhD Thesis, Aarhus University, Denmark.

  • Svendsen, G. L. H., & Svendsen, G. T. (2016). How did trade norms evolve in Scandinavia? Long-distance trade and social trust in the Viking Age. Economic Systems,40(2), 198–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahabi, M. (2011). Appropriation, violent enforcement, and transaction costs: A critical survey. Public Choice,147, 227–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahabi, M. (2016a). The political economy of predation: Manhunting and the economics of escape. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahabi, M. (2016b). A positive theory of the predatory state. Public Choice,168(3), 153–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wareham, A. (2012). Fiscal policies and the institution of a tax state in Anglo-Saxon England within a comparative context. Economic History Review,65(3), 910–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitelock, D. (2007a). Cnut’s letter to the people of England. In English Historical Documents (Vol I: c. 500-1042, pp. 476–478). London: Routledge.

  • Whitelock, D. (2007b). The Laws of Ine. In English Historical Documents (Vol I: c. 500-1042, pp. 398–407). London: Routledge.

  • Yorke, B. A. E. (2014a). Ine. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorke, B. A. E. (2014b). Alfred. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorke, B. A. E. (2014c). Kings and kingship. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. T. (2016). What does it take for a roving bandit to settle down? Theory and an illustrative history of the Visigoths. Public Choice,168, 75–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. T. (2018). When roving bandits settle down: Club theory and the emergence of government. SSRN paper https://ssrn.com/abstract=3200023 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3200023. Accessed 17 June 2019.

Download references

Acknowledgements

First, a warm note of thanks to the editor and the reviewers for helpful comments. Second, an earlier version of this paper was presented at the International Symposium on the Predatory State in May 2019, Sorbonne University, Paris. I am deeply grateful to the organizers, the discussant, and the other participants for their stimulating and constructive inputs. Third, but not least, a huge thanks to my colleagues, in particular Marie Bønløkke Missuno, who would have been co-author if not for her modesty. Her assistance in providing empirical material has been invaluable. Furthermore, Peter Nannestad has played a crucial part in stimulating the theoretical ideas during our lively discussions. Finally, I am indebted to Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard—as our previous joint work paved the way for this paper—Else Roesdahl, Søren Sindbæk, Gunnar L. H. Svendsen, Urs Steiner Brandt, Christian Bjørnskov, Martin Paldam, Erich Gundlach, Toke Aidt, Annette B. Andersen and Natasha E. Perera.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gert Tinggaard Svendsen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Svendsen, G.T. Two bandits or more? The case of Viking Age England. Public Choice 182, 443–457 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00707-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00707-2

Keywords

Navigation