Abstract
The Olsonian distinction between roving and stationary bandits outlines the rationale behind the transition from anarchy to the emergence of the predatory state. This two-bandit model may, however, be expanded to include more bandit types. In the case of Viking Age England, local English kings were unable to monopolize violence and defend their realms against competing Viking raiders. As the Vikings’ time horizon grew, so did the accumulated value of more formal taxation, and bandit types evolved in four steps. The first step is the Olsonian roving bandit, who executed Viking hit-and-run attacks and plunders during the second half of the tenth century. The second step is the gafol bandit; gafol is payment for leaving, paid to, among others, Swein Forkbeard. The third step is the heregeld bandit; heregeld is a tax to support an army for hire; most notably Thorkell the Tall’s. The fourth step is the Olsonian stationary bandit, i.e. the strongest military leader among the Vikings, Cnut the Great, settled down as the new king. Overall, the Olsonian two-bandit model can be expanded to a four-bandit staircase model, in which the new gafol and heregeld bandit types explain the steps from anarchy and short-run raiding to long-run formal taxation in a predatory state.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ASC. (1961). The Anglo-Saxon chronicle. A revised translation, D. Whitelock (Ed.). Norwich: Jarrold & Sons Ltd.
Baker, M. J., & Bulte, E. H. (2010). Kings and Vikings: on the dynamics of competitive agglomeration. Economics of Governance,11, 207–227.
Baug, I., Skre, D., Heldal, T., & Jansen, Ø. (2018). The beginning of the Viking Age in the West. Journal of Maritime Archaeology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11457-018-9221-3.
Bill, J. (2008). Viking ships and the sea. In S. Brink & N. Price (Eds.), The Viking world. London: Taylor & Francis.
Bill, J. (2010). Viking Age ships and seafaring in the west. In I. S. Klæsøe (Ed.), Viking trade and settlement in continental western Europe. Denmark: Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen.
Bjørnskov, C., & Svendsen, G. T. (2013). Does social trust determine the size of the welfare state? Evidence using historical identification. Public Choice,157, 269–286.
Blackburn, M. A. S. (2014). Coinage. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.
Blair, J. (2014). Markets and fairs. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.
Campbell, J. (1986). Observations on English government from the tenth to the twelfth century. In J. Campbell (Ed.), Essays in Anglo-Saxon history. London: Hambledon Press.
Congleton, R. D. (2015). The logic of collective action and beyond. Public Choice,164, 217–234.
Faith, R. (2014a). Feorm. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.
Faith, R. (2014b). Hide. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.
Faith, R. (2014c). Peasants. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.
Freudenthal, H. W. L. (1944). Sine Ira et Studio. The Classical Journal,39, 297–298.
Garmonsway, G. N. (1965). The Anglo-Saxon chronicle. London: Everyman’s Library.
Gillingham, J. (1989). The most precious jewel in the English Crown: Levels of danegeld and heregeld in the early eleventh century. The English Historical Review,104, 373–384.
Gundlach, E., & Svendsen, G. T. (2019). How do high and low levels of social trust affect the long-run performance of poor economies? Journal of International Development,31(1), 3–21.
Hendrickson, J. R., Salter, A. W., & Albrecht, B. C. (2018). Preventing plunder: Military technology, capital accumulation, and economic growth. Journal of Macroeconomics,58, 154–173.
Hillman, A. L. (2019). Public finance and public policy: Responsibilities and limitations of government (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hobbes, T. (1651) [1985]. Leviathan. London: Penguin Classics.
Keynes, S. (1986). A tale of two kings: Alfred the Great and Æthelred the Unready. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society,36, 195–217.
Keynes, S. (2014). Heregeld. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.
Konrad, K., & Skaperdios, S. (2012). The market for protection and the origins of the state. Economic Theory,50, 417–443.
Kurrild-Klitgaard, P., & Svendsen, G. T. (2003). Rational bandits: plunder, public goods, and the Vikings. Public Choice,117(3/4), 255–272.
Lambert, T. (2017). Law and order in Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lawson, M. K. (1984). The collection of danegeld and heregeld in the reigns of Aethelred II and Cnut. English Historical Review,99(393), 721–738.
Lawson, M. K. (2014). Taxation. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.
Leeson, P. T. (2007). Efficient anarchy. Public Choice,130(1–2), 41–53.
Miller, S. (2014a). Hundreds. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.
Miller, S. (2014b). Æthelred the Unready. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mostert, M. (2014). Frisians. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.
Naismith, R. (2012). Money and power in Anglo-Saxon England: The Southern English kingdoms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Olson, M. (1993). Dictatorship, democracy, and development. American Political Science Review,87, 567–576.
Olson, M. (2000). Power and prosperity: Outgrowing communist and capitalist dictatorships. New York: Basic Books.
Ormrod, M. (2000). The English State and the Plantagenet Empire. In J. R. Maddicott & D. M. Palliser (Eds.), The medieval state: Essays presented to James Campbell. London: The Hambledon Press.
Ostrom, E., & Ahn, T. K. (2009). The meaning of social capital and its link to collective action. In G. T. Svendsen & G. L. H. Svendsen (Eds.), Handbook of social capital: The troika of sociology, political science and economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Palliser, D. M. (2000). Towns and the English State. In J. R. Maddicott & D. M. Palliser (Eds.), The medieval state: Essays presented to James Campbell (pp. 1066–1500). London: The Hambledon Press.
Pelteret, D. A. E. (2014a). Roads. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pelteret, D. A. E. (2014b). Transport and communication. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.
Piano, E. E. (2019). State capacity and public choice: A critical survey. Public Choice,178(1), 289–309.
Powell, B., & Stringham, E. (2009). Public choice and the economic analysis of anarchy: A survey. Public Choice,140(3/4), 503–538.
Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Roesdahl, E. (2012). The Vikings. London: Penguin.
Salter, A. (2015). Rights to the realm: Reconsidering Western political development. American Political Science Review,109(4), 725–734.
Sindbæk, S. M. (2005). Ruter og rutinisering: vikingetidens fjernhandel i Nordeuropa. [Routes and routinization: Trade over distance in Viking Age Northern Europe]. Multivers, Copenhagen.
Sindbæk, S. M. (2007). Networks and nodal points: The emergence of towns in early Viking Age Scandinavia. Antiquity,81, 119–132.
Spejlborg, M. B. (2016). There and back again: English connections in early medieval Denmark, c. 991-1086. PhD Thesis, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Svendsen, G. L. H., & Svendsen, G. T. (2016). How did trade norms evolve in Scandinavia? Long-distance trade and social trust in the Viking Age. Economic Systems,40(2), 198–205.
Vahabi, M. (2011). Appropriation, violent enforcement, and transaction costs: A critical survey. Public Choice,147, 227–253.
Vahabi, M. (2016a). The political economy of predation: Manhunting and the economics of escape. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Vahabi, M. (2016b). A positive theory of the predatory state. Public Choice,168(3), 153–175.
Wareham, A. (2012). Fiscal policies and the institution of a tax state in Anglo-Saxon England within a comparative context. Economic History Review,65(3), 910–931.
Whitelock, D. (2007a). Cnut’s letter to the people of England. In English Historical Documents (Vol I: c. 500-1042, pp. 476–478). London: Routledge.
Whitelock, D. (2007b). The Laws of Ine. In English Historical Documents (Vol I: c. 500-1042, pp. 398–407). London: Routledge.
Yorke, B. A. E. (2014a). Ine. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.
Yorke, B. A. E. (2014b). Alfred. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.
Yorke, B. A. E. (2014c). Kings and kingship. In M. Lapidge, et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford: Blackwell.
Young, A. T. (2016). What does it take for a roving bandit to settle down? Theory and an illustrative history of the Visigoths. Public Choice,168, 75–102.
Young, A. T. (2018). When roving bandits settle down: Club theory and the emergence of government. SSRN paper https://ssrn.com/abstract=3200023 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3200023. Accessed 17 June 2019.
Acknowledgements
First, a warm note of thanks to the editor and the reviewers for helpful comments. Second, an earlier version of this paper was presented at the International Symposium on the Predatory State in May 2019, Sorbonne University, Paris. I am deeply grateful to the organizers, the discussant, and the other participants for their stimulating and constructive inputs. Third, but not least, a huge thanks to my colleagues, in particular Marie Bønløkke Missuno, who would have been co-author if not for her modesty. Her assistance in providing empirical material has been invaluable. Furthermore, Peter Nannestad has played a crucial part in stimulating the theoretical ideas during our lively discussions. Finally, I am indebted to Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard—as our previous joint work paved the way for this paper—Else Roesdahl, Søren Sindbæk, Gunnar L. H. Svendsen, Urs Steiner Brandt, Christian Bjørnskov, Martin Paldam, Erich Gundlach, Toke Aidt, Annette B. Andersen and Natasha E. Perera.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Svendsen, G.T. Two bandits or more? The case of Viking Age England. Public Choice 182, 443–457 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00707-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00707-2