Abstract
This study extends the literature on the component skills involved in oral reading fluency. Dominance analysis was applied to assess the relative importance of seven reading-related component skills in the prediction of the oral reading fluency of 272 adult literacy learners. The best predictors of oral reading fluency when text difficulty was fixed at a single reading level was word reading efficiency. When text difficulty varied based on readers’ comprehension levels, word reading efficiency was also the best predictor with vocabulary and auditory working memory emerging as important predictors as well. Our findings suggest the merit of investigations into whether adults with low literacy may need vocabulary and auditory working memory strategy interventions to improve their reading fluency.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adolf, S., Catts, H., & Little, T. (2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 933–958.
Allington, R. (1983). Fluency: The neglected reading goal. The Reading Teacher, 36, 556–561.
Azen, R., & Budescu, D. V. (2003). The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Methods, 8, 129–148.
Baer, J., Kutner, M., Sabatini, J., & White, S. (2009). Basic reading skills and the literacy of America’s least literate adults. Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL) supplemental studies (Report No. NCES 2009–481). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Barth, A., Catts, H., & Anthony, J. (2009). Component skills underlying reading fluency in adolescent readers: A latent variable analysis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 567–590.
Bell, L., & Perfetti, C. (1994). Reading skill: Some adult comparisons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 244–255.
Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Billingsley, F., & Nagy, W. (2001). Processes underlying timing and fluency of reading: Efficiency, automaticity, coordination, and morphological awareness. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 383–414). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Budescu, D. V. (1993). Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 542–551.
Comprehensive Adult Student Assessment System (CASAS). (2001). CASAS technical manual. San Diego, CA: CASAS.
Dowhower, S. (1991). Speaking of prosody: Fluency’s unattended bedfellow. Theory into Practice, 30, 165–175.
Ehri, L. (1995). Stages of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 116–125.
Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27–48.
Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M., & Jenkins, J. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256.
Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 20–29.
Hasbrouck, J. E., & Tindal, G. (1992). Curriculum-based oral reading fluency norms for students in grades 2 through 5. Teaching Exceptional Children, 24, 41–44.
Jenkins, J., Fuchs, L., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. (2003a). Accuracy and fluency in list and context reading of skilled and RD groups: Absolute and relative performance levels. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18(4), 237–245.
Jenkins, J., Fuchs, L., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. (2003b). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 719–729.
Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21, 85–97.
Kame’enui, E., & Simmons, D. (2001). Introduction to this special issue: The DNA of reading fluency. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 203–210.
Katzir, T., Kim, Y., Wolf, M., O’Brien, B., Kennedy, B., Lovett, M., et al. (2006). Reading fluency: The whole is more than the parts. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 51–82.
Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., & Baer, J. (2005). National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL): A first look at the literacy of America’s adults in the 21st century (Report No. NCES 2006–470). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., Jin, Y., Boyle, B., Hsu, Y., & Dunleavy, E. (2007). Literacy in everyday life: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (Report No. NCES 2007–480). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. (2001). Qualitative reading inventory-3. New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Mather, N., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001). Examiner’s manual. Woodcock Johnson-III test of cognitive abilities. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing Company.
Mellard, D., Fall, E., & Mark, C. (2009). Reading profiles for adults with low-literacy: Cluster analysis with power and speeded measures. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 975–992.
Mellard, D., Woods, K., & Fall, E. (2011). Assessment and instruction of oral reading fluency among adults with low literacy. Adult Basic Education and Literacy Journal, 5, 3–14.
Nathan, R., & Stanovich, K. (1991). The causes and consequences of differences in reading fluency. Theory into Practice, 30, 176–184.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Patterson, M. B. (2008). Learning disability prevalence and adult education program characteristics. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 23, 50–59.
Pikulski, J., & Chard, D. (2005). Fluency: Bridge between decoding and reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58, 510–519.
Pinnell, G., Pikulski, J., Wixon, K., Campbell, J., Gough, P., & Beatty, A. (1995). Listening to children read aloud. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
Rasinski, T. (2010). Assessing reading fluency. Educational service material, Product # ES0414. Honolulu, HI: Pacific resources for educational and learning. Retrieved from http://www.prel.org/products/re_/assessing-fluency.htm.
Sabatini, J. (2002). Efficiency in word reading of adults: Ability group comparisons. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 267–298.
Samuels, S. J., & Farstrup, A. (Eds.). (2006). What research has to say about fluency instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Schreiber, P. (1991). Understanding prosody’s role in reading acquisition. Theory into Practice, 30, 158–164.
Scruggs, T., & Mastropieri, M. (2000). The effectiveness of mnemonic instruction for students with learning and behavior problems: An update and research synthesis. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 163–173.
Torgesen, J., Rashotte, C., & Alexander, A. (2001). Principles of fluency instruction in reading: Relationships with established empirical outcomes. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 335–355). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Torgesen, J., Wagner, R., & Rashotte, C. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency (TOWRE). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. (2007). On the division of short-term and working memory: An examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1038–1066.
U.S. Department of Education. Office of Adult and Vocational Education. Division of Adult Education and Literacy. (2001). Measures and methods for the National Reporting System for adult education: Implementation guidelines. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education. (2006). Enrollment and participation in the State-Administered Adult Education Program 2004–2005 tables. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/AdultEd/aedatatables.html.
Wagner, R., Torgesen, J., & Rashotte, C. (1999). The comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
Wechsler, D. (1997). Manual for the wechsler adult intelligence scale (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Wiederholt, J., & Bryant, B. (2001). Gray oral reading test-fourth edition (GORT-4). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. (1999). The “Double-Deficit Hypothesis” for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415–438.
Wolf, M., Bowers, P., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387–407.
Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211–239.
Woodcock, R. (1998). Woodcock reading mastery tests—Revised: Examiner’s manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, Inc.
Acknowledgments
This paper reports findings from a study funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institute for Literacy, and the U.S. Department of Education Office of Vocational and Adult Education (Award # RO 1 HD 43775).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mellard, D.F., Anthony, J.L. & Woods, K.L. Understanding oral reading fluency among adults with low literacy: dominance analysis of contributing component skills. Read Writ 25, 1345–1364 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9322-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9322-y