Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two types of historical problem-solving instruction with advanced urban high school students’ (N = 231) ability to reason with and contextualize historical evidence. Contextualization is a critical heuristic in the process of disciplinary thinking among historians. Yet, prior research shows students face significant challenges when contextualizing information (Reisman and Wineburg in Soc Stud 99:202–207, 2008; van Boxtel and van Drie in Cognit Instr 30:113–145, 2012). Seven teachers who collectively taught 14 sections of social studies were randomly assigned to explicit instruction in sourcing, contextualization and corroboration (a) that emphasized the role of individual cognition or (b) the same explicit instruction plus small group and whole class discussion. Students were administered pretests on relevant content knowledge and a historical writing task. After a one-week intervention, students completed a parallel writing task and a second reasoning task that required short written responses. After controlling for teacher and pretest scores, the findings indicated that students who were taught the cognitive approach scored higher on historical writing (ES = 0.33). Further analysis revealed they included greater contextualized thinking (ES = 0.44) and use of evidence (ES = 0.32) in post-intervention essays; in contrast, sourcing scores were comparable. Students in both groups performed equally well on the second reasoning task. Findings highlight the importance of teaching writing explicitly as part of history instruction and the role of cognition to enhance learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For an exception, consider the National History Day competition, in which students conduct their own research.
We refer to online resources throughout this manuscript to afford readers greater understanding of the unit.
Nokes (2013) introduces related concepts of “macro- “and “micro-contexts” to distinguish between broad and immediate factors involved in contextualizing.
References
Blackwell, F., photographer. (1963, May 28). Salter, trumpauer, and moody at lunch counter sit-in, Jackson, Mississippi. https://www.wisconsinhistory.org/Records/Image/IM121998.
Baron, C. (2016). Using embedded visual coding to support contextualization of historical texts. American Educational Research Journal, 53, 516–540. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216637347
Barton, K., & Levstik, L. (1996). “Back when God was around and everything”: Elementary children’s understanding of historical time. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 419–454. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033002419
Cameron, C., Van Meter, P., & Long, V. A. (2017). The effects of instruction on students’ generation of self-questions when reading multiple documents. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85, 334–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1182884
Carr, E. (1961). What is history? Random House.
Conley, M. W. (2008). Cognitive strategy instruction for adolescents: What we know about the promise, what we don’t know about the potential. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 84–106. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.j612282134673638
Cuban, L. (2016). Teaching history then and now. Harvard Education Press.
De La Paz, S. (2005). Effects of Historical Reasoning Instruction and Writing Strategy Mastery in Culturally and Academically Diverse Middle School Classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 137–156.
De La Paz, S., & Felton, M. (2010). Reading and writing from multiple source documents in history: Effects of strategy instruction with low to average high school writers. Journal of Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 174–192.
De La Paz, S., Monte-Sano, C., Felton, M., Croninger, R., Jackson, C., & Worland, K. (2017). A historical writing apprenticeship for adolescents: Integrating disciplinary learning with cognitive strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(1), 31–52.
De La Paz, S., Felton, M., Monte-Sano, C., Croninger, B., Jackson, C., Deogracias, J., et al. (2014). Developing historical reading and writing with struggling adolescent readers: implementation and learning outcomes. Theory and Research in Social Education, 42, 228–274.
De La Paz, S., Gross, M., Wissinger, D., & Butler, C. (2019). Placing knowledge in context: Exploring high school students’ reasoning about the Civil Rights Movement. Paper presented at the Annual College & University Faculty Assembly (CUFA) annual conference, San Antonio.
Gross, M. H. (2014). Struggling to deal with the difficult past: Polish students confront the Holocaust. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(4), 441–463.
Hammill, D. D., & Larson, S. C. (2009). Written Language Observation Scale (4th ed.). Hammill Institute on Disabilities.
Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2014). Quantitative methodology series: Multilevel and longitudinal modeling with IBM SPSS (2nd ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Historical Thinking Matters. (n.d.). Why did the boycott of Montgomery’s buses succeed? http://historicalthinkingmatters.org/rosaparks/.
Hudson, B., photographer. (1963, May 4). The New York Times. p. 1. https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2013/06/18/193128475/how-the-civil-rights-movement-was-covered-in-birmingham.
Huijgen, T., van Boxtel, C., van de Grift, W., & Holthuis, P. (2016). Toward historical perspective taking: Students’ reasoning when contextualizing the actions of people in the past. Theory and Research in Social Education, 45, 110–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1208597
Huijgen, T., Holthuis, P., van Boxtel, C., & van de Grift, W. (2019). Promoting historical contextualization in classrooms: An observational study. Educational Studies, 45, 456–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1509771
Kohl, H., Brown, C., & Edelman, M. (2007). She would not be moved: How we tell the story of Rosa Parks and the Montgomery bus boycott. The New Press.
Kucan, L., Cho, B.-Y., & Han, H. (2017). Introducing the historical thinking practice of contextualizing to middle school students. The Social Studies, 108, 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2017.1359483
Martin Luther King, Jr. Paper’s Project. (n.d.). Featured documents. https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/king-papers/documents.
Monte-Sano, C. (2010). Disciplinary literacy in history: An exploration of the historical nature of adolescents’ writing. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 539–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2010.481014
Monte-Sano, C., & De La Paz, S. (2012). Using writing tasks to elicit adolescents’ historical reasoning. Journal of Literacy Research, 44, 273–299.
National Assessment Governing Board. (2018). U.S. history assessmentframework for the 2018 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.nagb.gov/content/nagb/assets/documents/publications/frameworks/history/2018-historyframework.pdf.
National Council for the Social Studies. (2013). College, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards. Author.
Nokes, J. D. (2013). Building students’ historical literacies: Learning to read and reason with historical texts and evidence. Routledge.
Nokes, J., & De La Paz, S. (2018). Writing and Argumentation in History Education. In S. A. Metzger & L. McArthur Harris (Eds.), International Handbook of History Teaching and Learning. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
Nokes, J. D., Dole, J. A., & Hacker, D. J. (2007). Teaching high school students to use heuristics while writing historical texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 492–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.492
Nokes, J. D., & Kesler-Lund, A. (2019). Historians’ social literacies: How historians collaborate and write. History Teacher, 52, 369–410.
Reisman, A. (2012). The ‘document-based lesson’: Bringing disciplinary inquiry into high school history classrooms with adolescent struggling readers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44, 233–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2011.591436
Reisman, A., & Wineburg, S. (2008). Teaching the skill of contextualizing in history. The Social Studies, 99, 202–207. https://doi.org/10.3200/tsss.99.5.202-207
Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R. C., McNurlen, B., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Archodidou, A., & Kim, S. (2001). Influence of oral discussion on written argument. Discourse Processes, 32, 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2001.9651596
Rouet, J. F., Favart, M., Britt, M. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1501_3
Ruscio, J. (2008). A probability-based measure of effect size: Robustness to base rates and other factors. Psychological Methods, 13, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.13.1.19
Stanford History Education Group. (n.d.). Lunchroom fight. https://sheg.stanford.edu/history-lessons/lunchroom-fight-i.
Stanford History Education Group. (2018). Reading like a historian. https://sheg.stanford.edu/history-lessons?f%5B0%5D=topic%3A7#main-content#main-content#main-content#main-content.
Thacker, E. S., Lee, J. K., & Friedman, A. M. (2016). Teaching with the C3 Framework: Surveying teachers’ beliefs and practices. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 41, 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2016.08.001
van Boxtel, C., & van Drie, J. (2012). “That’s in the time of the Romans!” Knowledge and strategies students use to contextualize historical images and documents. Cognition and Instruction, 30, 113–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2012.661813
van Boxtel, C., & van Drie, J. (2018). Historical reasoning: Conceptualizations and educational applications. In S. A. Metzger & L. McArthur Harris (Eds.), International handbook of history teaching and learning. Wiley-Blackwell.
VanSledright, B. (2002). In search of America’s past: Learning to read history in elementary school. Teachers College Press.
Wineburg, S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73
Wineburg, S., Mosborg, S., Porat, D., & Duncan, A. (2007). Common belief and the cultural curriculum: An intergenerational study of historical consciousness. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 40–76. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831206298677
Wissinger, D. R., & De La Paz, S. (2016). Effects of critical discussions on middle school students’ written historical arguments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(1), 43–59.
Wissinger, D. R., De La Paz, S., & Jackson, C. (2021). The effects of historical reading and writing strategy instruction with fourth-through sixth-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000463.
Young, K. M., & Leinhardt, G. (1998). Writing from primary documents: A way of knowing in history. Written Communication, 15, 25–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088398015001002
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Magdalena Gross (change in affiliation: Adobe Education).
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De La Paz, S., Wissinger, D.R., Gross, M. et al. Strategies that promote historical reasoning and contextualization: a pilot intervention with urban high school students. Read Writ 35, 353–376 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10183-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10183-0