Skip to main content
Log in

Living until proven dead: addressing mortality in acoustic telemetry research

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neglecting to account for the mortality of study animals in ecological research has the potential to lead to biased interpretation of behaviour. Considering the widespread use of acoustic telemetry to track the presence and movements of aquatic animals, if mortality is not appropriately addressed, conservation or management decisions affecting important resources may be distorted. Although mortality can be difficult to identify, it is unclear how frequent mortality is considered or incorporated in acoustic telemetry research, particularly studies relating to the behaviour of tagged animals. The main objective of this review was to characterize if and how mortality was incorporated in recent acoustic telemetry articles published during 2015–2019. For the 640 articles reviewed, criteria used to address mortality were summarized across study and animal types, providing a comprehensive view of ‘mortality consideration’. Also, we discuss the common approaches that have been used in previous studies to incorporate mortality, as well as emerging tools, major concerns, and advice to help guide its inclusion in future work. We found that 50% of ecology/behaviour articles tracking the movements of elasmobranchs, bony fishes, and other aquatic animals did not communicate that mortality was either contemplated, investigated, or integrated into the study. For the studies that did incorporate mortality, 75% identified mortality events equating to an average of ~ 11% of animals tagged in each study. The criteria used to assess mortality varied among study types with horizontal movement, movements between adjacent receiver stations, and direct observation of fate as the most common for ecology/behaviour, mortality/survival, and tagging effects articles, respectively. We conclude that reporting of and methods to assess mortality should be more widespread in acoustic telemetry research, especially since movement ecology is increasingly being used to inform management decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Review data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors recognize and thank A. Fisk, S. Ivanova, S. Larocque, G. Raby, and A. Weinz for initial discussions regarding the topic of this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JKM and NVK conceived the ideas and designed methodology, collected the data, analyzed the data, and led the writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordan K. Matley.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Both authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klinard, N.V., Matley, J.K. Living until proven dead: addressing mortality in acoustic telemetry research. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 30, 485–499 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-020-09613-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-020-09613-z

Keywords

Navigation