Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An Examination of the Influence of Decreases in State Appropriations on Online Enrollment at Public Universities

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

State support for public higher education has been a primary concern for decades. Online education has been identified previously as an alternative revenue source that can offer financial relief to colleges and universities. This study uses IPEDS data and a fixed effects regression approach to examine whether public universities increase their reliance on online education in response to decreases in state appropriations. Consistent with resource dependence theory, we found a negative relationship between state appropriations and online enrollment at public 4-year institutions. Our findings indicate that public universities, particularly public doctoral institutions, appear to be responding to declines in state appropriations by engaging in revenue diversification and increasing their commitment to online education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Economies of scale are defined as cost advantages obtained after increases in size or “scale” allow for fixed costs to be spread out over more units of output (Morris 2008).

  2. Due in part to decreasing public support, net tuition revenue as a percent of total revenue in public higher education has increased from 23% in 2003–04 to 28% in 2011–12 (Jaquette and Curs 2015).

  3. In 1995, only 9% of American adults accessed the internet. By 2010, roughly 77% of all Americans had internet access in their homes (Moore and Kearsley 2012).

  4. The extent to which enrollment increases in online courses affect the quality of teaching and learning remains unclear. See Lack’s (2013) extensive review of empirical studies on the quality of online education.

  5. Although “online” education and “distance” education are often used interchangeably, we solely use “online” education for two reasons: 1. Clarity. 2. The overwhelming majority of distance learners use the internet in lieu of other technologies (Ortagus 2017).

  6. For example, State University of New York (SUNY) chancellor, Nancy Zimpher, announced that SUNY would increase its enrollment from 465,000 to 565,000 students and would be doing so exclusively through increasing their commitment to online programs (Bakeman 2014).

References

  • Allen, E. & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States. The Sloan Consortium.

  • Allison, P. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alpert, W., Couch, K., & Harmon, O. (2016). A randomized assessment of online learning. American Economic Review, 106(5), 378–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appana, S. (2008). A review of benefits and limitations of online learning in the contest of the student, the instructor, and the tenured faculty. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(1), 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibald, R. B., & Feldman, D. H. (2011). Why does college cost so much? New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakeman, J. (2014). SUNY wants to add 100,000 students—all online. Politico. Retrieved http://www.politico.com/states/new-york/albany/story/2014/01/suny-wants-to-add-100000-studentsall-online-010442.

  • Bettinger, E., Fox, L., Loeb, S., & Taylor, E. S. (2017). Virtual classrooms: How online college courses affect student success. American Economic Review, 107(9), 2855–2875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W. (2013). Higher education in the digital age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W., Chingos, M., Lack, K., & Nygren, T. (2012). Interactive learning online at public universities: Evidence from randomized trials. New York, NY: Ithaka S + R.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., Lack, K. A., & Nygren, T. I. (2014). Interactive learning online at public universities: Evidence from a six-campus randomized trial. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(1), 94–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cheslock, J., & Gianneschi, M. (2008). Replacing state appropriations with alternative revenue sources: The case of voluntary support. Journal of Higher Education, 79(2), 208–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheslock, J., Ortagus, J., Umbricht, M., & Wymore, J. (2016). The cost of producing higher education: An exploration of theory, evidence, and institutional policy. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 31). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., & Eyring, H. J. (2011). The innovative university: Changing the DNA of higher education from the inside out. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, T., & Tabarrok, A. (2014). The industrial organization of online education. American Economic Review, 104(5), 519–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, J. A., & Doyle, W. R. (2011). State spending on higher education: Testing the balance wheel over time. Journal of Education Finance, 36(4), 343–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming, D. J., Goldin, C., Katz, L. F., & Yuchtman, N. (2015). Can online learning bend the higher education cost curve? American Economic Review, 105(5), 496–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers, D. M., & Wellman, J. V. (2011). Trends in college spending, 1999–2009. A report of the delta cost project. Washington, DC: Delta project on postsecondary education costs, productivity, and accountability.

  • Ehrenberg, R. G. (2006). The perfect storm and the privatization of public higher education. Change, 38(1), 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R. G. (2012). American higher education in transition. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(1), 193–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figlio, D., Rush, M., & Lu, Y. (2013). Is it live or is it internet? Experimental estimates of the effects of online instruction on student learning. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(4), 763–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froelich, K. A. (1999). Diversification of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 246–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemelt, S. W., & Marcotte, D. E. (2011). The impact of tuition increases on enrollment at public colleges and universities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 435–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaquette, O., & Curs, B. (2015). Creating the out-of-state university: Do public universities increase nonresident freshman enrollment in response to declining state appropriations? Research in Higher Education, 56(6), 535–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koshal, R. K., & Koshal, M. (2000). State appropriations and higher education tuition: What is the relationship? Education Economics, 8(1), 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lack, K. (2013). Current status of research on online learning in postsecondary education. Ithaka S-R.

  • LeBlanc, P. (2013). Disruptive technologies and higher education: Toward the next generation of delivery models. In Stretching the higher education dollar: How innovation can improve access, equity, and affordability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

  • McLendon, M. K., Hearn, J. C., & Mokher, C. G. (2009). Partisans, professionals, and power: The role of political factors in state higher education funding. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(6), 686–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115, 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mettler, S. (2014). Degrees of inequality: How the politics of higher education sabotaged the American dream. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. A. (2006). Cost-efficiencies of online learning. ASHE Higher Education Report Series, 32(1). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  • Miller, B. (2010). The course of innovation: Using technology to transform higher education. Education Sector.

  • Miller, G., Benke, M., Chaloux, B., Ragan, L. C., Schroeder, R., Smutz, W., et al. (2014). Leading the e-learning transformation of higher education: Meeting the challenges of technology and distance education. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. C., & Eckel, P. D. (2009). Privatizing the public university: Perspectives from across the academy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. (2008). Economies of scale and scope in e-learning. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olugbenga, O.D., Rotimi, O., & Olakulehin, F.K. (2006). Attitudes and perceptions of students to open and distance learning in Nigeria. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 9(2).

  • Ortagus, J. (2017). From the periphery to prominence: An examination of the changing profile of online students in American higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, M. J., & Ehrenberg, R. G. (2004). Resident and nonresident tuition and enrollment at flagship state universities. In C. M. Hoxby (Ed.), The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusk, J. J., & Leslie, L. L. (1978). The setting of tuition in public higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 49(6), 531–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman, S., Vignare, K., & Geith, C. (2007). Why do higher education institutions pursue online education? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J. H., & Finkelstein, M. J. (2006). The American faculty: The restructuring of academic work and careers. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hokins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sener, J. (2012). The seven futures of American education: Improving learning and teaching in a screen-captured world. North Charleston, SC: CreateSpace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2014). Does online learning impede degree completion? A national study of community college students. Computers & Education, 75, 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. (2011). Does course delivery format matter? Evaluating the effects of online learning in a state community college system using instrumental variable approach. Community College Research Center. Teachers College, Columbia University.

  • Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. (2013). Adaptability to online learning: Differences across types of students and academic subject areas. Community College Research Center. Teachers College, Columbia University.

  • Zhang, L. (2007). Nonresident enrollment demand in public higher education: An analysis at national, state, and institutional levels. The Review of Higher Education, 31(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

    Justin C. Ortagus

  2. Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA

    Lijing Yang

Authors
  1. Justin C. Ortagus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lijing Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin C. Ortagus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ortagus, J.C., Yang, L. An Examination of the Influence of Decreases in State Appropriations on Online Enrollment at Public Universities. Res High Educ 59, 847–865 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9490-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9490-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation