Skip to main content
Log in

Stellan Ohlsson: Deep Learning: How the Mind Overrides Experience

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2011, ISBN: 978-0-521-83568-8, 540 pp, price: $120

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J. (2008a). Creative model construction in scientists and students: The role of imagery, analogy, and mental simulation. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J. (2008b). The role of explanatory models in teaching for conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 417–452). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. (2008). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and teaching. Science Education, 92, 404–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, M., & Beeth, M. (1993). Students’ reflective thoughts about science content: A relationship to conceptual change learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA. (pp. 1–32).

  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limon, L. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11, 357–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, E., & Laurence, S. (1999). Concepts: Core readings. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Millman, A., & Smith, C. (1997). Darwin’s use of analogical reasoning in theory construction. Metaphor and Symbol, 12(3), 159–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minstrell, J., & Kraus, P. (2005). Guided Inquiry in the Science Classroom. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: Science in the classroom (pp. 475–511). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, F. (2011) The Role of Learning Progressions in Standards based Education Reform, CPRE Policy Briefs, pp. 1–14.

  • National Research Council (2007). Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8. Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten Through Eighth Grade. R. Duschl, H. Schweingruber, and A. Shouse (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  • Nersessian, N. (2008). Creating scientific concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlsson, S. (2011). Deep learning: How the mind overrides experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., Maclin, D., Houghton, C., & Hennessey, M. G. (2000). Sixth grade students’ epistemologies of science: The impact of school science on epistemological development. Cognition and Instruction, 18(3), 349–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., Wiser, M., Anderson, C., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Implications of research on children’s learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic-molecular theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 4(1 & 2), 1–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiser, M., Smith, C., & Doubler, S. Learning progressions as tool for curriculum development: Lessons from the inquiry project. In A. Alonzo & A. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in sciences. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishing (in press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol L. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, C.L. Stellan Ohlsson: Deep Learning: How the Mind Overrides Experience . Sci & Educ 21, 1381–1392 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9449-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9449-5

Navigation