Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Examining the Nature of Practical Work in School Science Textbooks: Coverage of the Diversity of Scientific Methods

  • Article
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Practical work is a distinctive feature of school science and has close associations with scientific experiment and scientific methods as well. In this study, the nature of practical work was examined in the view of the diversity of scientific methods. Based on an analytical framework derived from Brandon’s matrix consisting of four categories of scientific methods, this study was purported to understand how the diversity of scientific methods is represented in practical work in science textbooks. The targets of analysis were various kinds of practical work compiled in nine textbooks of biology, chemistry, and physics used in the stage of junior high school (Grades 7–9) in China. A major finding is that the four categories of scientific methods are distributed discrepantly within each of the three subject-based science textbooks. Another important finding is that non-manipulative parameter measurement (NPM) is the predominant scientific method, whether in physics, chemistry, or biology textbooks. Except for this shared feature, the percentages of the other three are varied across the three science subjects. The results of this study have provided implications for the design of practical work in science textbooks. It is suggested that further studies can be conducted to display the change of the nature of practical work over a period of time and compare the nature of practical work in science textbooks used in different regions and countries in the view of the diversity of scientific methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A. P. (2008). Representations of nature of science in secondary school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 835–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldahmash, A. H., Mansour, N. S., Alshamrani, S. M., & Almohi, S. (2016). An analysis of activities in Saudi Arabian middle school science textbooks and workbooks for the inclusion of essential features of inquiry. Research in Science Education, 46(6), 879–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, H. (1994). Scientific literacy and the myth of the scientific methods. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binns, I. C., & Bell, R. L. (2015). Representation of scientific methodology in secondary science textbooks. Science & Education, 24(7), 913–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blachowicz, J. (2009). How science textbooks treat scientific methods: A philosopher’s perspective. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60(2), 303–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, R. (1994). Theory and experiment in evolutionary biology. Synthese, 99, 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W., & Ben-Zvi, N. (1998). Science curriculum: Transforming goals to practices. In B. J. Fraser & K. J. Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 487–498). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, C. (2001). Historical science, experimental science, and the scientific methods. Geology, 29, 987–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, C. (2013). Common cause explanation and the search for smoking gun. In V. R. Baker (Ed.), Rethinking the fabric of geology: Geologic Society of America Special Paper 502 (pp. 1–9). Geologic Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, A., Erduran, S., & Wooding, S. J. (2019). Investigating the diversity of scientific methods in high-stakes chemistry examinations in England. International Journal of Science Education, 41(16), 2201–2217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debus, A. G. (1978). Man and nature in the renaissance. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker, T., Summers, G., & Barrow, L. (2007). The treatment of geological time and the history of life on earth in high school biology textbooks. The American Biology Teacher, 69, 401–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Z. (2007). Knowing the subject matter of a secondary - school science subject. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(5), 503–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dodick, J., Argamon, S., & Chase, P. (2009). Understanding scientific methodology in the historical and experimental sciences via language analysis. Science & Education, 18(8), 985–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8 (Vol. 500). National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Masri, Y. H., Erduran, S., & Ioannidou, O. (2021). Designing practical science assessments in England: Students’ engagement and perceptions. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–21.

  • Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: Scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gericke, N. M., & Hagberg, M. (2010). Conceptual incoherence as a result of the use of multiple historical models in school textbooks. Research in Science Education, 40(4), 605–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, I. F., & Marsh, C. J. (1996). Studying school subjects: A guide (pp. 69–83). Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. (2014). The Distinction between experimental and historical sciences as a framework for improving classroom Inquiry. Science Education, 98(2), 327–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, M. (2021). The People Education Press and me: 65 years. Curriculum, Teaching Materials & Teaching Methods, 41(2), 4–5. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1988). Experiment in science and science teaching. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 20(2), 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1993). Re-thinking old ways: Towards a more critical approach to practical work in school science. Studies in Science Education, 22, 85–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1996). Laboratory work as scientific methods: Three decades of confusion and distortion. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(2), 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534–2553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., Kipnis, M., & Abrahams, I. Z. (2013). How to learn in and from the chemistry laboratory. In A. Hofstein & I. Eilks (Eds.), Teaching chemistry – A studybook (pp. 153–182). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidou, O., & Erduran, S. (2021). Beyond hypothesis testing: investigating the diversity of scientific methods in science teachers’ understanding. Science & Education, 30(2), 345-364.

  • Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2014). New directions for nature of science research. In M. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 999–1021). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. E., Gott, R., & Jarman, R. (2000). Investigations as part of the key stage 4 science curriculum in Northern Ireland. Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y., Wang, T., Wang, J., Chen, A. L. R., & Yan, X. (2019). A comparative study on scientific inquiry activities of Chinese science textbooks in high schools. Research in Science Education, 1–21.

  • Matthews, M. R. (2014). Science teaching: The contribution of history and philosophy of science. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. (1998). The principle elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science and science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 53–70). Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A science framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core Ideas. The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M., & Maza, A. (2011). Nature of science in general chemistry textbooks Nature of science in general chemistry textbooks (pp. 1–37). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. (2015). Practical work in science: Misunderstood and badly used? School Science Review, 96, 16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, J. L. (2005). Epistemology for the masses: The origins of ‘“the scientific methods”’ in American schools. History of Education Quarterly, 45, 341–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17), 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiberghien, A., Veillard, L., Le Maréchal, J. F., Buty, C., & Millar, R. (2001). An analysis of labwork tasks used in science teaching at upper secondary school and university levels in several European countries. Science Education, 85(5), 483–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, D. (2013). Historical geology: Methodology and metaphysics. In V. R. Baker (Ed.), Rethinking the fabric of geology: Geological Society of America special paper 502 (pp. 11–18). Geological Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, B. (2012). Chemistry curriculum reform in China: Policy and practice. In H. Yin & Lee, C. J. (Eds.), Curriculum reform in China: Changes and challenges (pp. 95–109). Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

  • Wei, B., & Chen, Y. (2020). The meaning of ‘experiment’ in the intended chemistry curriculum in China: The changes over the period from 1952 to 2018. International Journal of Science Education, 42, 656–674.

  • Wivagg, D., & Allchin, D. (2002). The dogma of ‘the’ scientific methods. The American Biology Teacher, 69(9), 645–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, B. A. (2014). “The scientific methods” as myth and ideal. Science & Education, 23, 2069–2093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, University of Macau, Macau, Taipa, China

    Bing Wei & Zhimeng Jiang

  2. School of Elementary Education, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China

    Lichun Gai

Authors
  1. Bing Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhimeng Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lichun Gai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bing Wei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, B., Jiang, Z. & Gai, L. Examining the Nature of Practical Work in School Science Textbooks: Coverage of the Diversity of Scientific Methods. Sci & Educ 31, 943–960 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00294-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00294-z

Search

Navigation