References
Archambault, É., & Larivière, V. (2009). History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences. Scientometrics, 79(3), 635–649.
Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 286–291. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.12.003.
Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. (2015a). Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(10), 2003–2019. doi:10.1002/asi.23309.
Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. (2015b). The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media: Large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(3), 260–288. doi:10.1108/Ajim-12-2014-0173.
Cress, P. E. (2014). Using altmetrics and social media to supplement impact factor: Maximizing your article’s academic and societal impact. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 34(7), 1123–1126.
Eysenbach, G. (2011). Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research. doi:10.2196/jmir.2012.
Fausto, S., Machado, F. A., Bento, L. F. J., Iamarino, A., Nahas, T. R., & Munger, D. S. (2012). Research blogging: Indexing and registering the change in science 2.0. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e50109. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050109.
Haustein, S., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. (2015). Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: The effect of document properties and collaboration patterns. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0120495.
Li, X., Thelwall, M., & Giustini, D. (2012). Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement. Scientometrics, 91(2), 461–471.
Lozano, G. A., Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2012). The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers’ citations in the digital age. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(11), 2140–2145.
National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2015). China statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
Quan, W., Chen, B., & Shu, F. (2017). Publish or impoverish: An investigation of the monetary reward system of science in China (1999–2016). Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69(5), 1–18.
Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 314(7079), 498.
Shu, F. (2017). M-score: An indicator quantifying individual’s scientific research output. Paper presented at the 16th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Wuhan, China.
Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2017). Does China need to rethink its metrics- and citation-based research rewards policies? Scientometrics, 112(3), 1853–1857. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2430-y.
Thelwall, M. (2013). Assessing non-standard article impact using F1000 labels. Scientometrics, 97(2), 383–395.
Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS ONE, 8(5), e64841.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shu, F. Comment to: Does China need to rethink its metrics- and citation-based research rewards policies?. Scientometrics 113, 1229–1231 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2504-x
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2504-x