Skip to main content
Log in

Prevalence of Rape Myths in Headlines and Their Effects on Attitudes Toward Rape

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present research investigated the prevalence and effects of rape myths in newspaper headlines. In study 1, a content analysis of online news headlines from US media (N = 555) surrounding the 2003–2004 Kobe Bryant sexual assault case showed that 10% endorsed a rape myth. In study 2, students at a mid-sized university in the mid-western USA (N = 154) read headlines endorsing or not endorsing rape myths. Male participants exposed to myth-endorsing headlines were (a) less likely to think Bryant was guilty than those exposed to non-myth headlines, (b) more likely to hold rape-supportive attitudes than those exposed to non-myth headlines, and (c) more likely to hold rape-supportive attitudes than were female participants exposed to myth-endorsing headlines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acierno, R., Resnick, H. S., & Kilpatrick, D. G. (1997). Health impact of interpersonal violence: I. Prevalence rates, case identification, and risk factors for sexual assault, physical assault, and domestic violence in men and women. Behavioral Medicine, 23, 53–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alexa (2007). Top sites United States. Retrieved from http://www.alexa.com/site/ds/top_sites?cc=US&ts_mode=country&lang=none on February 5, 2007.

  • Benedict, J. R. (1998). Athletes and acquaintance rape. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohner, G. (2001). Writing about rape: Use of the passive voice and other distancing features as an expression of perceived responsibility of the victim. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 515–529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bohner, G., Jarvis, C. I., Eyssel, F., & Siebler, F. (2005). The causal impact of rape myth acceptance on men’s rape proclivity: Comparing sexually coercive and noncoercive men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 819–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohner, G., Reinhard, M.-A., Rutz, S., Sturm, S., Kerschbaum, B., & Effler, D. (1998). Rape myths as neutralizing cognitions: Evidence for a causal impact of anti-victim attitudes on men’s self-reported likelihood of raping. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinson, S. L. (1992). The use and opposition of rape myths in prime-time television dramas. Sex Roles, 27, 359–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant’s defense goes on offensive. (2003 October 15). Retrieved June 16, 2004 from http://msnbc.com/news/980367.asp?0cv=CA01&cp1=1.

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report (1999). Women offenders. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics (2006). Crime and victim statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and support for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caringella-MacDonald, S. (1998). The relative visibility of rape cases in national popular magazines. Violence Against Women, 4, 62–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmody, D. C., & Washington, L. M. (2001). Rape myth acceptance among college women: The impact of race and prior victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 424–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, G., & Curtis, S. R. (1994). Predictors of rape occurrence and victim blame in the William Kennedy Smith Case. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuklanz, L. M. (1996). Rape on trial: How the mass media construct legal reform and social change. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuklanz, L. M. (2000). Rape on prime time: Television, masculinity, and sexual behavior. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnerstein, E., & Malamuth, N. M. (1997). Pornography: Its consequences on the observer. In L. B. Schlesinger, & E. Revitch (Eds.) Sexual dynamics of anti-social behavior ((pp. 30–49)2nd ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dor, D. (2003). On newspaper headlines as relevance optimizers. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 695–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J., & Langenbaum, S. (1994). The criminal justice and community response to rape. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrich, S. (1987). Real rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franiuk, R., Seefelt, J. L., Cepress, S. L., & Vandello, J. A. (2008) Prevalence and effects of rape myths in the media: The Kobe Bryant case. Violence Against Women, 14, 287–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frese, B., Moya, M., & Megías, J. L. (2004). Social perception of rape: How rape myth acceptance modulates the influence of situational factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 143–161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, D. (1993). You can lead readers to a story but it’s the writing that makes them drink it in. ASNE Bulletin, 10–12, May.

  • Gavey, N., & Gow, V. (2001). ‘Cry Wolf’, Cried the wolf: Constructing the issue of false rape allegations in New Zealand media texts. Feminism and Psychology, 11, 341–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchilds, J. D., Zellman, G. L., Johnson, P. B., & Giarrusso, R. (1988). Adolescents and their perceptions of sexual interactions. In A. W. Burgess (Ed.) Rape and sexual assault (vol. II, (pp. 245–270)). New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinck, S. S., & Thomas, R. W. (1999). Rape myth acceptance in college students: How far have we come? Sex Roles, 40, 815–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoiberg, B. C., & Stires, L. K. (1973). The effect of several types of pretrial publicity on the guilt attributions of simulated jurors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 267–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez, J. A., & Abreu, J. M. (2003). Race and sex effects on attitudinal perceptions of acquaintance rape. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 252–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, A. S., Jackson, J., Kully, C., Badger, K., & Halvorsen, J. (2003). Calling it rape: Differences in experiences of women who do or do not label their sexual assault as rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaltman, S., Krupnick, J., Stockton, P., Hooper, L., & Green, B. L. (2005). Psychological impact of types of sexual trauma among college women. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 18, 547–555.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (2004). She’s Kobe Bryant’s alleged victim, not his “accuser.” Retrieved July 28, 2006 from www.ncdsv.org/images/SheKobeBryantAllegedVictim.pdf.

  • Kerr, N. L., Hymes, R. W., Anderson, A. B., & Weathers, J. E. (1995). Defendant-juror similarity and mock juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 545–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobe’s accuser had recent overdose.(2003 July). Retrieved August 3, 2004 from http://www.click2houston.com/print/2346020/detail.html?use=print.

  • Korn, A., & Efrat, S. (2004). The coverage of rape in the Israeli popular press. Violence Against Women, 10, 1056–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., & Dinero, T. E. (1989). Discriminant analysis of risk factors for sexual victimization among a national sample of college women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 242–250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., Leonard, K. E., Beezley, D. A., & Oros, C. J. (1985). Nonstranger sexual aggression: A discriminant analysis of the psychological characteristics of undetected offenders. Sex Roles, 12, 981–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanier, C. A. (2001). Rape-accepting attitudes: Precursors to or consequences of forced sex. Violence Against Women, 7, 876–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, D. G., Donnerstein, E., & Adams, S. M. (1989). Physiological desensitization and judgments about female victims of violence. Human Communication Research, 15, 509–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsher, S., & Caldwell, A. (2004 October 9). Kobe’s accuser admits lies. Retrieved April 9, 2005 from www.denverpost.com.

  • Locke, B. D., & Mahalik, J. R. (2005). Examining masculinity norms, problem drinking, and athletic involvement as predictors of sexual aggression in college men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 279–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Los, M., & Chamard, S. E. (1997). Selling newspapers or educating the public? Sexual violence in the media. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 39, 293–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, A. (2005). Pressure mounts as newspapers get set to prove themselves. Media Asia, 1C, 14, June 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaul, K. D., Veltum, L. G., Boyechko, V., & Crawford, J. J. (1990). Understanding attributions of victim blame for rape: Sex, violence, and foreseeability. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenhard, C. L., & MacNaughton, J. S. (1988). Women’s beliefs about women who “lead men on”. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7, 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullin, C., Imrich, D. J., & Linz, D. (1996). The impact of acquaintance rape stories and case-specific pretrial publicity on juror decision making. Communication Research, 23, 100–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noack, D. (1999). Web news use is mainstream. Editor and Publisher, 26, January 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J., & Cubbins, L. A. (1992). Dating, drinking, and rape: Effects of victim’s and assailant’s alcohol consumption on judgments of their behavior and traits. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasternak, S. (1987). Headlines and libel: Is the ‘unit’ approach the most effective? Newspaper Research Journal, 8, 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2004). Was it rape? The function of women’s rape myth acceptance and definitions of sex on labeling their own experiences. Sex Roles, 51, 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfau, M. R. (1995). Covering urban unrest: The headlines say it all. Journal of Urban Affairs, 17, 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, V. L., & Schwartz, M. D. (1997). Self-blame in hidden rape cases. In M. D. Schwartz (Ed.) Researching sexual violence against women: Methodological and personal perspectives (pp. 65–70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. G., Pinciaro, P. J., & Jessell, J. K. (1998). Effects of coercion and verbal consent on university students’ perception of date rape. American Journal of Health Behavior, 22, 46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, H. C., & Bourne, L. E. (1998). Cycle of blame or just world: Effects of legal verdicts on gender patterns in rape-myth acceptance and victim empathy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 575–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, J. (2000). Economics 101 of Internet news. Nieman Reports, 54(4), Winter.

  • Smith, E. J., & Fowler, G. L. (1982). How comprehensible are newspaper headlines? Journalism Quarterly, 59, 305–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women (NCJ 183781). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varelas, N., & Foley, L. A. (1998). Blacks’ and Whites’ perceptions of interracial and intraracial date rape. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 392–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vicary, J. R., Klingaman, L. R., & Harkness, W. L. (1995). Risk factors associated with date rape and sexual assault of adolescent girls. Journal of Adolescence, 18, 289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesson, D. A. (1989). Headline length as a factor in magazine ad readership. Journalism Quarterly, 66, 466–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyer, R. S., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Gorman, T. F. (1985). Cognitive mediators of reactions to rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 324–338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was supported in part by a Faculty Advisor Research grant from Psi Chi. We are grateful for help with data collection from Taran Shepard, Alicia Hill, and Vanessa Nuñez.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renae Franiuk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franiuk, R., Seefelt, J.L. & Vandello, J.A. Prevalence of Rape Myths in Headlines and Their Effects on Attitudes Toward Rape. Sex Roles 58, 790–801 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9372-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9372-4

Keywords

Navigation