Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Academic Conference as a Chilly Climate for Women: Effects of Gender Representation on Experiences of Sexism, Coping Responses, and Career Intentions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Across many disciplines, women are underrepresented in faculty positions relative to men. The present research focuses on the academic conference as a setting because it is a gateway to an academic career and a context in which women might experience sexism. We surveyed 329 presenters (63% women) from three U.S. national academic conferences, which differed in women-to-men ratios, about their perceptions of the conference climate, their coping tactics (e.g., gender performance, silence, or voice), and their intentions to exit the conference or academia. The greater the representation of women at the conference relative to men, the less likely were women to perceive sexism and to feel they had to behave in a masculine manner in that setting. In contrast, women who perceived the conference as sexist and felt silenced also expressed increased intentions to exit from academic careers. Men’s perceptions of sexism predicted increased intentions to exit from that particular conference, but not from academia. Because conferences signal the norms of a discipline, it is important to explore their climates as they relate to gender. Perhaps especially for new and aspiring female academics, they may signal devalued status and lack of fit and as such play an inadvertent role in the “leaky pipeline.” We discuss strategies that conference organizers could implement to mitigate sexist climates, including broader inclusion of women in speaking and leadership roles and explicit attention to cues that women belong.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2005). The perils of political correctness: Men’s and women’s responses to old-fashioned and modern sexist views. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 75–88. doi:10.1177/019027250506800106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J. C., & Swim, J. K. (2012). Reducing endorsement of benevolent and modern sexist beliefs: Differential effects of addressing harm versus pervasiveness of benevolent sexism. Social Psychology, 43(3), 127–137. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benokraitis, N. V. (1997). Sex discrimination in the 21st century. In N. V. Benokraitis (Ed.), Subtle sexism: Current practice and prospects for change (pp. 5–33). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biernat, M., & Hawley, P. (2017). Sexualized images in professional contexts: Effects on anticipated experiences and perceived climate for women and men. Manuscript under review.

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, D., & Borgida, E. (1999). Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 665–692. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.5.3.665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. J., & McKeen, C. A. (1996). Do women at the top make a difference? Gender proportions and the experiences of managerial and professional women. Human Relations, 49, 1093–1104. doi:10.1177/001872679604900804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caza, B. B., & Cortina, L. M. (2007). From insult to injury: Explaining the impact of incivility. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 335–350. doi:10.1080/01973530701665108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 3157–3162. doi:10.1073/pnas.1014871108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., Sumner, R. A., & DeFraine, W. C. (2011). Do subtle cues about belongingness constrain women’s career choices? Psychological Inquiry, 22(4), 255–258. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2011.619112.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S., & Williams, W. M. (2014). Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15(3), 75–141. doi:10.1177/1529100614541236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheryan, S., & Plaut, V. C. (2010). Explaining underrepresentation: A theory of precluded interest. Sex Roles, 63, 475–488. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9835-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1045–1060. doi:10.1037/a0016239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C., Hong, Y., Lam, I. C., Fu, J. H., Tong, J. Y., & Lee, V. S. (1998). Stereotyping and self-presentation: Effects of gender stereotype activation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1, 81–96. doi:10.1177/1368430298011007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, R. L. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 821–836. doi:10.1177/00131640021970934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, L. M. (2008). Unseen injustice: Incivility as modern discrimination in organizations. The Academy of Management Review: Special Topic Forum on Stigma and Stigmatization, 33, 55–75. doi:10.2307/20159376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 64–80. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.6.1.64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. J., Iyer, A., Clayton, S., & Downing, R. A. (2003). Affirmative action: Psychological data and the policy debates. American Psychologist, 58, 93–115. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.2.93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, N. (2011). Ingroup experts and peers as social vaccines who inoculate the self-concept: The stereotype inoculation model. Psychological Inquiry, 22(4), 231–246. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2011.607313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An integrative model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–398. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drury, B. J., Siy, J. O., & Cheryan, S. (2011). When do female role models benefit women? The importance of differentiating recruitment from retention in STEM. Psychological Inquiry, 22(4), 265–269. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2011.620935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egri, C. P. (1992). Academic conferences as ceremonials: Opportunities for organizational integration and socialization. Journal of Management Education, 16, 90–115. doi:10.1177/105256299201600107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, D. (1983). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect as responses to job dissatisfaction: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 496–607. doi:10.2307/255909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galinsky, A. D., Hall, E. V., & Cuddy, A. J. (2013). Gendered races: Implications for interracial marriage, leadership selection, and athletic participation. Psychological Science, 24(4), 498–506. doi:10.1177/0956797612457783.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, D. M., Reser, A. H., Amo, R. B., Redersdorff, S., & Branscombe, N. R. (2005). Perceivers’ responses to in-group and out-group members who blame a negative outcome on discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 769–780. doi:10.1177/0146167204271584.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (1994). The gender we think, the gender we do in our everyday organizational lives. Human Relations, 47, 591–611. doi:10.1177/001872679404700602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, C. D., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 700–717. doi:10.1037/a002665.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goulden, M., Mason, M. A., & Frasch, K. (2011). Keeping women in the science pipeline. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 638(1), 141–162. doi:10.1177/0002716211416925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. M., & Sandler, B. R. (1982). The classroom climate: A chilly one for women? The project on the status and education of women. Washington, DC: The Association of American Colleges http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED215628.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657–674. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416–427. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1987). Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 325–340. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1987.tb00795.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janz, T. A., & Pyke, S. W. (2000). A scale to assess student perceptions of academic climates. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 30, 89–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, C. R., & Miller, C. T. (2001). Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 254–263. doi:10.1177/0146167201272010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katila, S., & Meriläinen, S. (1999). A serious researcher or just another nice girl? Doing gender in a male-dominated scientific community. Gender, Work and Organization, 6, 163–173. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kehn, A., & Ruthig, J. C. (2013). Perceptions of gender discrimination across six decades: The moderating roles of gender and age. Sex Roles, 69(5–6), 289–296. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0303-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D., & Richards, W. (2003). Sex discrimination in UK academia. Gender, Work & Organization, 10, 213–238. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.t01-1-00012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriwy, P., Gross, C., & Gottburgsen, A. (2013). Look who’s talking: Compositional effects of gender and status on verbal contributions at sociology conferences. Gender, Work and Organization, 20(5), 545–560. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2012.00603.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (2002). Group reactions to loyalty and disloyalty. In S. Thye & E. Lawler (Eds.), Group cohesion, trust, and solidarity (pp. 203–228). New York: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S., Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2008). Personal and workgroup incivility: Impact on work and health outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 95–107. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lun, J., Sinclair, S., & Cogburn, C. (2009). Cultural stereotypes and the self: A closer examination of implicit self-stereotyping. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31, 117–127. doi:10.1080/01973530902880340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., Gramzow, R. H., McCoy, S. K., Levin, S., Schmader, T., & Sidanius, J. (2002). Perceiving personal discrimination: The role of group status and legitimizing ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 269–282. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, K. R., & Chiu, W. F. (2010). Gender equality in the academy: The pipeline problem. Political Science & Politics, 43, 303–308. doi:10.1017/S104909651000017X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Rudman, L. A. (2010). When men break the gender rules: Status incongruity and backlash against modest men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 11, 140–151. doi:10.1037/a0018093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2010). Survey of doctorate recipients. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics.

  • Powell, A., Bagilhole, B., & Dainty, A. (2009). How women engineers do and undo gender: Consequences for gender equality. Gender, Work and Organization, 16, 411–428. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00406.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priola, V. (2007). Being female and doing gender: Narratives of women in education management. Gender and Education, 19, 21–40. doi:10.1080/09540250601087728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riger, S., Stokes, J., Raja, S., & Sullivan, M. (1997). Measuring perceptions of the work environment for female faculty. The Review of Higher Education, 21, 63–78. doi:10.1353/rhe.1997.0015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, S., Frith, H., Archer, L., & Veseley, L. (2006). Institutional sexism in academia. The Psychologist, 19, 94–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M. P. (1990). Barriers to equality: The power of subtle discrimination to maintain unequal opportunity. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 3, 153–163. doi:10.1007/BF01388340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629–645. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthig, J. C., Kehn, A., Gamblin, B. W., Vanderzanden, K., & Jones, K. (2017). When women’s gains equal men’s losses: Predicting a zero-sum perspective of gender status. Sex Roles, 76, 17–26. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0651-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Autonomy is no illusion: Self-determination theory and the empirical study of authenticity, awareness, and will. In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 449–479). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sam, D. L., & Berry, J. W. (2010). Acculturation: When individuals and groups of different cultural backgrounds meet. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 472–481. doi:10.1177/1745691610373075.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M. T., Ellemers, N., & Branscombe, N. R. (2003). Perceiving and responding to gender discrimination in organizations. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 277–292). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settles, I. H., & O’Connor, R. C. (2014). Incivility at academic conferences: Gender differences and the mediating role of climate. Sex Roles, 71, 71–82. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0355-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Settles, I. H., Cortina, L. M., Malley, J., & Stewart, A. J. (2006). The climate for women in academic science: The good, the bad, and the changeable. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 47–58. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00261.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Settles, I. H., Cortina, L. M., Stewart, A. J., & Malley, J. (2007). Voice matters: Buffering the impact of a negative climate for women in science. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 270–281. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00370.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Settles, I. H., Cortina, L. M., Buchanan, N. T., & Miner, K. N. (2013). Derogation, discrimination, and (dis)satisfaction with jobs in science: A gendered analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 197–191. doi:10.1177/0361684312468727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, A. K., & Stanton, D. E. (2012). Leaks in the pipeline: Separating demographic inertia from ongoing gender differences in academia. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 279, 3736–3741. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.0822.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sheltzer, J. M., & Smith, J. C. (2014). Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(28), 10107–10112. doi:10.1073/pnas.1403334111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stangor, C., Swim, J. K., Van Allen, K. L., & Sechrist, G. B. (2002). Reporting discrimination in public and private contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 69–74. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steffens, M. C., Jelenec, P., & Noack, P. (2010). On the leaky math pipeline: Comparing implicit math-gender stereotypes and math withdrawal in female and male children and adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 947–963. doi:10.1037/a0019920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 255–270. doi:10.1037/a0021385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K., & Hyers, L. L. (1999). Excuse me—What did you just say? Women’s public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68–88. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K., & Hyers, L. L. (2009). Sexism. In T. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 407–430). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K., Mallett, R., & Stangor, C. (2004). Understanding subtle sexism: Detection and use of sexist language. Sex Roles, 51(3–4), 117–128. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000037757.73192.06.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K., Eyssell, K. M., Murdoch, E. Q., & Ferguson, M. J. (2010). Self-silencing to sexism. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 493–507. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01658.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1975). The exit of social mobility and the voice of social change: Notes on the social psychology of intergroup relations. Social Science Information, 14, 101–118. doi:10.1177/053901847501400204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toren, N. (1990). Would more women make a difference? In S. Stiver Lie & V. E. O'Leary (Eds.), Storming the tower: Women in the academic world (pp. 74–85). London: Kogan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. S., & Gutek, B. A. (1999). Demographic differences in organizations: Current research and future directions. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Anders, S. M. (2004). Why the academic pipeline leaks: Fewer men than women perceive barriers to becoming professors. Sex Roles, 5, 511–521. doi:10.1007/s11199-004-5461-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1989). Femininity as performance. Oxford Review of Education, 15, 267–279. doi:10.1080/0305498890150307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Z., Marks, G., Noone, L., & Hamilton-McKenzie, J. (2010). Retaining a foothold on the slippery paths of academia: University women, indirect discrimination, and the academic marketplace. Gender and Education, 22, 535–545. doi:10.1080/09540250903354404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, J. D. (1991). Rethinking tokenism: Looking beyond numbers. Gender and Society, 5, 178–192. doi:10.1177/089124391005002003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, J. D. (1994). Looking beyond numbers: The effects of gender status, job prestige, and occupational gender-typing on tokenism processes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 150–159. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2786708.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present manuscript is based on data from the first author’s doctoral dissertation.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jacklyn Biggs

    Present address: Center for Public Partnerships and Research, University of Kansas, 1617 St. Andrews Dr., Lawrence, KS, 66047, USA

  2. Patricia H. Hawley

    Present address: College of Education, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA

    Jacklyn Biggs, Patricia H. Hawley & Monica Biernat

Authors
  1. Jacklyn Biggs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patricia H. Hawley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Monica Biernat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacklyn Biggs.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Biggs, J., Hawley, P.H. & Biernat, M. The Academic Conference as a Chilly Climate for Women: Effects of Gender Representation on Experiences of Sexism, Coping Responses, and Career Intentions. Sex Roles 78, 394–408 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0800-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0800-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation