Skip to main content
Log in

Wants, Needs and Satisfaction: A Comparative Study in Thailand and Bangladesh

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within international development greater income is assumed to lead to greater need fulfilment, which increases subjective wellbeing. The Wellbeing in Developing Countries ESRC Research Group’s dataset provides an opportunity to test these relationships using measures of income, expenditure, perceived and ‘objective’ need satisfaction and subjective wellbeing collected in Bangladesh and Thailand. The paper demonstrates that firstly, location and socio-economic status are related to both what people say they need, and the extent to which they feel they have satisfied these needs; secondly, there is a close correlation between objective and subjective need satisfaction, indicating that people’s perceptions of need satisfaction are accurate; and thirdly, there is a significant positive relationship between expenditure on basic need fulfilment and subjective and objective need satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Graham and Pettinatto (2002), Fafchamps and Forhad (2003), and Kingdon and Knight (2004) for examples from developing countries.

  2. http://www.bath.ac.uk/econ-dev/wellbeing/research/methods-toobox/qol-toolbox.htm.

  3. http://www.bath.ac.uk/econ-dev/wellbeing/research/methods-toobox/ies-toolbox.htm.

  4. Ryan and Deci’s group have tested their ‘Self-determination Theory’ using quantitative methods in North America, Europe, the former Eastern bloc and South-east Asia (see http://www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT/index.html).

  5. ‘Living conditions’ comprise ‘quality of life’ and ‘living standards’ (Allardt 1975).

  6. See Taylor and Brown (1988) and Gilbert et al. (1998) for psychological explanations of this process.

  7. A second paper using the same sample (Guillen-Royo et al. 2009) found equally robust results from a single composite indicator of needs deprivation (INDI).

  8. ‘Do not have’ was included as a further response option but this was not included in calculating mean scores or weighting.

  9. Basic House and Home has the same items as House and Home, but omits the four items that form part of the Luxuries factor.

References

  • Allardt, E. (1975). Dimensions of welfare in a comparative scandinavian study, research report 9. Helsinki: Research Group for Comparative Sociology, University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angner, E. (2009). The philosophical foundations of subjective measures of well-being. In B. Luigino & L. P. Pier (Eds.), Happiness and capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press. in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2001). Making the best of a bad situation: Satisfaction in the slums of Calcutta. Social Indicators Research, 55, 329–352. doi:10.1023/A:1010905029386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2006). The subjective well-being of the homeless, and lessons for happiness. Social Indicators Research, 76, 185–205. doi:10.1007/s11205-005-8671-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D., & Oswald, A. (1999) ‘Well-being’ insecurity and the decline of American job satisfaction’, Working paper, University of Warwick.

  • Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, M. B., Fredell, K. A., & Frideres, J. S. (1997). Basic minimum needs, quality of life and selected correlates: Explorations in villages in northern India. Social Indicators Research, 42, 245–281. doi:10.1023/A:1006834830518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, K. (1999). It’s not only wealth that matters—it’s peace of mind too. A review of participatory work on poverty and illbeing’. Paper for the Global synthesis workshop, Consultations with the poor. (World Bank: Washington, DC).

  • Camfield, L., Choudhury, K., & Devine, J. (2009). Well-being, happiness and why relationships matter: Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(1), 71–91. doi:10.1007/s10902-007-9062-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camfield, L., & McGregor, J. A. (2005). Resilience and wellbeing in developing countries. In M. Ungar (Ed.), Handbook for working with children and youth: Pathways to resilience across cultures and contexts. California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. A., & Qizilbash, M. (2005). ‘Core poverty, basic capabilities and vagueness: An application to the South African context’, GPRG Working Paper 26. Universities of Manchester and Oxford: UK.

  • Devine, J. (2007). WeD country report: The social and cultural construction of wellbeing in contemporary Bangladesh. UK: Wellbeing in Developing Countries ESRC Research Group, University of Bath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine, J., Camfield, L., & Gough, I. (2007). Autonomy or dependence—or both? perspectives from Bangladesh. Journal of Happiness Studies, 91, 105–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 397–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Diener, M., & Diener, C. (1995). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 851–864. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 491, 71–75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2000). Explaining differences in societal levels of happiness: Relative standards need fulfilment, culture, and evaluation theory. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 41–78. doi:10.1023/A:1010076127199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Money and happiness: Income and subjective wellbeing across nations. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Subjective well-being across cultures (pp. 185–218). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A theory of human need. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. (1995). ‘Will raising the income of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 271, 35–47. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(95)00003-B.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. The Economic Journal, 111, 465–484. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1983). Sour grapes: Studies in the subversion of rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fafchamps, M., & Forhad, S. (2003). ‘Subjective wellbeing, isolation and rivalry’, mimeo, CSAE, Department of Economics. Oxford: University of Oxford. October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, G. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. P. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 617–638. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitmez, A., & Morcol, G. (1994). Socio-economic status and life satisfaction in Turkey. Social Indicators Research, 31, 77–98. doi:10.1007/BF01086515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D., Nandy, S., Pantazis, C., Pemberton, S., & Townsend, P. (2003). Child poverty in the developing world. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, I., McGregor, J. A., & Camfield, L. (2007). Introduction: Conceiving wellbeing in development contexts. In I. Gough & J. A. McGregor (Eds.), Wellbeing in developing countries: New approaches and research strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C., & Pettinato, S. (2002). Happiness and hardship: Opportunity and insecurity in new market economies. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillén Royo, M., & Velazco, J. (2006). ‘Exploring the relationship between happiness, objective and subjective well-being: Evidence from rural Thailand’. WeD Working Paper 16. Bath: Wellbeing in developing countries WeD Research Group, University of Bath.

  • Guillen-Royo, M., Velazco, J., & Camfield, L. (2009). Basic needs and happiness. In Thailand: Exploring the linkages between objective and subjective wellbeing, In: Brassard C., & Kusago T. (Eds.) Development paths and happiness: Alternative frameworks. Asia (in press).

  • Hagerty, M. (1999). Testing Maslow’s hierarchical of needs: National quality of life across time. Social Indicators Research, 46, 249–271. doi:10.1023/A:1006921107298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, M. R. (2000). Social comparisons of income in one’s community: Evidence from national surveys of income and happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 784, 746–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, M. R., & Veenhoven, R. (2003). Wealth and happiness revisited—growing national income does go with greater happiness. Social Indicators Research, 64, 1–27. doi:10.1023/A:1024790530822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20, 331–360. doi:10.1016/S0264-9993(02)00057-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Klingemann, H.-D. (2000). Genes, culture, democracy, and happiness. In E. Diener & E. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 165–184). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkeles, A. (1993). Industralization, modernization, and the quality of life. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 311, 1–23. doi:10.1177/002071529303400101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jongudomkarn, D., & Camfield, L. (2006). Exploring the quality of life of people in north eastern and southern Thailand. Social Indicators Research, 78, 489–530. doi:10.1007/s11205-005-1947-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T. (2002). The high price of materialism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Reed Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, G., & Knight, J. (2004). Community, comparisons and subjective wellbeing in a divided society’, presented at Northeast Universities Development Consortium conference, HEC Montréal, October 1–3, 2004.

  • Lelkes, O. (2006). Knowing what is good for you: Empirical analysis of personal preferences and the “objective good”. Journal of Socio-Economics, 352, 285–307. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., & McGregor, J. A. (1992). Change and impoverishment in Albania. Occasional paper. Bath: Centre for development studies. UK: University of Bath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396. doi:10.1037/h0054346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Max-Neef, M. (1991). Human-scale development—conception, application and further reflection. Apex Press: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, J. A., & Kebede, B. (2003) Resource profiles and the social and cultural construction of wellbeing, paper presented at the inaugural workshop of the ESRC research group on wellbeing in developing countries, University of Bath, 13–17 January 2003.

  • McGregor, J. A., Camfield, L., Masae, A., & Promphaking, B. (2007a). WeD country report: Development and wellbeing in contemporary Thailand. UK: Wellbeing in Developing Countries WeD Research Group, University of Bath.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, J. A., McKay, A., & Velazco, J. (2007b). Needs and resources in the investigation of well-being in developing countries: Illustrative evidence from Bangladesh and Peru. Journal of Economic Methodology, 141, 107–131. doi:10.1080/13501780601170115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nargish, N. (2004) Purchasing symbolic capital: middle classes and education in Bangladesh. Postgraduate thesis, Department of Economics and International Development. University of Bath.

  • Parducci, A. (1995). Happiness pleasure and judgment: The contextual theory and its applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M. (2005). A conceptual-referent theory of happiness: Heterogeneity and its consequences. Social Indicators Research, 742, 261–294. doi:10.1007/s11205-004-4643-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaemonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 141–166. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1977). Rational fools: A critique of the behavioural foundations of economic theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 64, 317–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (2002). Health: Perception versus observation. British Medical Journal, 324, 860–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and wellbeing: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 1032, 193–210. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN MDG. (2000). Millennium development goals. United Nations Millennium Goals, World Bank. URL: http://www.developmentgoals.org/index.html.

  • Veenhoven, R. (1989). National Wealth and individual happiness. In K. G. Grumert & F. Olander (Eds.), Understanding economic behavior (pp. 9–32). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1991). Is happiness relative? Social Indicators Research, 241, 1–34. doi:10.1007/BF00292648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1993) Happiness in nations: Subjective appreciation of life in 56 nations 1946–1992, RISBO, Studies in Sociale en Culturele Verandering, nr. 2, Erasmus University Rotterdam.

  • Veenhoven, R. (2000). The four qualities of life. Ordering concepts and measures of the good life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 1–39. doi:10.1023/A:1010072010360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R., & Ehrhardt, J. (1995). The cross-national pattern of happiness: Test of predictions implied in three theories of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 341, 33–68. doi:10.1007/BF01078967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WeD. (2007). Well-being in developing countries, ESRC Research Group. http://www.welldev.org.uk/research/aims.htm.

  • Wicker, F. W., Brown, G., Wiehe, J. A., Hagen, A. S., & Reed, J. L. (1993). On reconsidering Maslow: An examination of the deprivation/domination proposition. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 118–133. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1993.1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, A. (2007). Validation of WeDQoL-goals-Bangladesh: Goal necessity and goal satisfaction scales and individualised quality of life scores, Internal document. Bath: wellbeing in developing countries WeD research group, University of Bath.

  • Woodcock, A., Camfield, L., McGregor, J. A., Martin, F. (2008). Validation of WeDQoL-goals-Thailand measure: Culture-specific individualised quality of life, Social Indicators Research, in press, online as dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9357-x.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the intellectual contribution of Alison Woodcock who developed the WeDQoL measure in conjunction with the WeD team. The support of the UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) is gratefully acknowledged. The work was part of the programme of the ESRC Research Group on Wellbeing in Developing Countries.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Camfield.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 3.

Table 3 Correlations between objective and subjective need fulfillment indicators in RANQ, SWLS and WeDQoL

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Camfield, L., Guillen-Royo, M. Wants, Needs and Satisfaction: A Comparative Study in Thailand and Bangladesh. Soc Indic Res 96, 183–203 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9477-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9477-y

Keywords

Navigation