Skip to main content
Log in

Are Happier Nations More Responsible? Examining the Link Between Happiness and Sustainability

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 15 June 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

The paper uses aggregate data from 152 countries to analyze the association between happiness and sustainability. Our paper provides new evidence on happiness and sustainability. Taking a psychological approach, happiness is linked to hedonism and reflects individual perceptions of quality of life and life satisfaction. Sustainability reflects the extent of meeting the UN Sustainable Development Goals which includes responsible consumption. In order to elucidate the link, the analysis examines separately the association between happiness, consumption, sustainability and responsible behavior. The results document a positive and significant association between them, which remains broadly robust subject to various controls, sensitivity and endogeneity tests. The results contribute to the elucidation of the role of happiness and hedonism for sustainability and stress the complementarity between happy life and good life. While associated with higher consumption, happiness could also lead to more responsible behavior and higher adherence of sustainability considerations. Thus, happy nations may consume more but they also appear to be more responsible towards the society and the environment. Our results challenge the traditional notion that happiness and sustainability go separate ways. These findings signal a number of potential social and political implications including pointing on the importance of happiness to responsible behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Notes

  1. The terms “green consumption”, “responsible consumption” and “sustainable consumption” are often used loosely and interchangeably in the literature and practice (Kotler & Armstrong, 2004).

References

  • Abbas, J., Aman, J., Nurunnabi, M., & Bano, S. (2019). The impact of social media on learning behavior for sustainable education: Evidence of students from selected universities in Pakistan. Sustainability, 11(6), 1683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbas, J., Aqeel, M., Ling, J., Ziapour, A., Raza, M. A., & Rehna, T. (2020b). Exploring the relationship between intimate partner abuses, resilience, psychological, and physical health problems in Pakistani married couples: a perspective from the collectivistic culture. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 1–30.

  • Abbas, J., Zhang, Q., Hussain, I., Akram, S., Afaq, A., & Shad, M. A. (2020). Sustainable innovation in small medium enterprises: The impact of knowledge management on organizational innovation through a mediation analysis by using SEM approach. Sustainability, 12(6), 2407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aidt, T. S. (2010). Corruption and sustainable development. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1061, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge

  • Aertsens, J., Verbeke, W., Mondelaers, K., & Huylenbroeck, G. V. (2009). Personal determinants of organic food consumption: A review. British Food Journal, 111(10), 1140–1167. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700910992961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2), 155–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aman, J., Abbas, J., Nurunnabi, M., & Bano, S. (2019). The relationship of religiosity and marital satisfaction: The role of religious commitment and practices on marital satisfaction among Pakistani respondents. Behavioral Sciences, 9(3), 30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricists companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Apaiwongse, T. (1991). Factors affecting attitudes among buying-center members toward adoption of an ecologically-related regulatory alternative: A new application of organizational theory to a public policy issue. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10, 145–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asiedu, E., Freeman, J. A., & Nti-Addae, A. (2012). Access to credit by small businesses: How relevant are race, ethnicity, and gender? American Economic Review, 102(3), 532–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audette, A. P., Lam, S., O’Connor, H., & Radclif, B. (2019). (E)Quality of life: A cross-national analysis of the effect of gender equality on life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20, 2173–2188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banicki, K. (2014). Positive psychology on character strengths and virtues. A disquieting suggestion. New Ideas in Psychology, 33, 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbaro, N., & Pickett, S. M. (2016). Mindfully green: Examining the effect of connectedness to nature on the association between mindfulness and engagement in pro-environmental behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1997). Fragments: Cool memories III, 1990–1995. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. S. (1992). Blood and identity. The Sociological Review, 40(4), 675–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, R., & Corral-Verdugo, V. (2010). Happiness and sustainable behavior. In V. Corral-Verdugo, C. García, & M. Frías (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

  • Biswas, T., Wang, W.-H., & Krishnamurti, R. (2008). Integrating sustainable building rating systems with building information models. CAADRIA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, L., Zhao, B., & Yinger, J. (2008). Do lenders discriminate against minority and woman entrepreneurs? Journal of Urban Economics, 63(2), 467–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, C., & MacKenzie, S. A. (2014). Informing the electorate? How party cues and policy information affect public opinion about initiatives. American Journal of Political Science, 58(1), 48–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Trans, R. N. (1984). A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brekke, K. A., Kverndokk, S., & Nyborg, K. (2003). An economic model of moral motivation. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 1967–1983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briguglio, M., Delaneyc, L., & Wood, A. (2016). Voluntary recycling despite disincentives. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2015.1086323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. M., & Cameron, L. D. (2000). What can be done to reduce overconsumption? Ecological Economics, 32(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00093-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldara, D., Iacoviello, M. (2018). Measuring geopolitical risk. International finance papers. http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/.

  • Carius, A., Ivleva, D., Pohl, B., Rüttinger, B., Schaller, S., Tänzler, D., & Vivekananda, J. (2018). A foreign policy perspective on the SDGs. Adelphi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catlin, J., & Wang, Y. (2013). Recycling gone bad: when the option to recycle increases resource consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23, 122–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chancellor, J., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2011). Happiness and thrift: When (spending) less is (hedonically) more. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(2), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauenhauer. N. J. (2017). On front line of climate change as Maldives fights rising seas. New Scientist

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2006). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLeire, T., & Kalil, A. (2010). Does consumption buy happiness? Evidence from the United States. International Review of Economics, 57(2), 163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont, D. P., & Bateman, I. J. (2012). Political affiliation and willingness to pay: An examination of the nature of benefits and means of provision. Ecological Economics, 75, 43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Massah, S. (2018). Industrial symbiosis within eco-industrial parks: Sustainable development for Borg El-Arab in Egypt. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27, 884–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Massah, S., & Omran, G. (2014). Would climate change affect the imports of cereals? The case of Egypt. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R. (1994). Exploring the symbolic meaning of brands. British Journal of Management, 5, S13–S19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faber, R. J., & Christenson, G. A. (1996). In the mood to buy: Differences in the mood states experienced by compulsive buyers and other consumers. Psychology and Marketing, 13(8), 803–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabio, A. D., & Kenny, M. E. (2018). Connectedness to nature, personality traits and empathy from a sustainability perspective. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0031-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbrother, M. (2017). Environmental attitudes and the politics of distrust. Sociology Compass Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.

  • Frank, R. H. (1985). The demand for unobservable and other no-positional goods. The American Economic Review, 75(1), 101–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Y., & Lang, T. (1995). The unmanageable consumer. Contemporary consumption and its fragmentation. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesinger, J. (2012). Kant’s account of moral education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(7), 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00754.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. (2006). Stumbling on happiness. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granzin, K. L., & Olsen, J. E. (1991). Characterizing participants in activities protecting the environment: A focus on donating, recycling, and conservation behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10, 1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. (2012). Econometric analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillen-Royo, M. (2008). Consumption and subjective wellbeing: exploring basic needs, social comparison, social integration and hedonism in Peru. Social Indicators Research, 89(3), 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9248-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güney, T. (2014). Corruption, prosperity and sustainable development: Some new evidence. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 9(3), 181–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guven, C. (2012). Reversing the question: Does happiness affect consumption and savings behavior? Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(4), 701–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, M. R., & Veenhoven, R. (2003). Wealth and happiness revisited- growing national income does go with greater happiness. Social Indicators Research, 64, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024790530822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammar, H., Jagers, S. C., & Nordblom, K. (2009). Perceived tax evasion and the importance of trust. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(2), 238–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2008.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, H. (2015). Purpose as a moral virtue for flourishing. Journal of Moral Education, 44(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2015.10403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harring, N. (2013). Understanding the effects of corruption and political trust on willingness to make economic sacrifices for environmental protection in a cross-national perspective. Social Science Quarterly., 94(3), 660–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetrick, W. (1989). The ideology of consumerism: A critique. AMA Winter Educators’ Conference: Marketing Theory and Practice. American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffiani, M. (2019). The nexus between corruption, sustainable development and rule of law. Örebro University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis-Walker, L. H., Colosimo, K. (2011). Mindfulness, self-compassion, and happiness in non-meditators: A theoretical and empirical examination Personality and Individual differences 50(2), 222–227.

  • Huang, M.-H., & Rust, T. (2011). Sustainability and consumption. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 40–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huneke, M. E. (2005). The face of the un-consumer: An empirical examination of the practice of voluntary simplicity in the United States. Psychology and Marketing, 22(7), 527–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2013). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(6), 1425–1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, N., Evangelinos, K., Halvadakis, C. P., Iosifides, T., & Sophoulis, C. M. (2010). Social factors influencing perceptions and willingness to pay for a market-based policy aiming on solid waste management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling., 54(9), 533–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabene, S., Baadel, S., Jiwani, Z., & Lobo, V. (2017). Women in political positions and countries’ level of happiness. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 18(4), 209–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, M. E. (2007). Do Greens drive hummers or hybrids? Environmental ideology as a determinant of consumer choice. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 54(2), 129–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kangun, N., Carlson, L., & Grove, S. J. (1991). Environmental advertising claims: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(2), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569101000203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: The costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760802303044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. & Armstrong, G. (2004). Principles of marketing, 10th edition. New Jersey.

  • Leiserowitz, A. A., Kates, R. W., & Parris, T. M. (2006). Sustainability values, attitudes, and behaviors: A review of multinational and global trends. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, 413–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2007). Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00499.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meppem, T., & Gill, R. (1998). Planning for sustainability as a learning concept. Ecological Economics, 26(2), 121–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, C., & Kirby, J. (2014). Income inequality is a sustainability issue. Harvard Business Review, January 28.

  • Michael, C., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C. H., Lindberg, S. I., Teorell, J., Altman, D., Bernhard, M., Fish, M. S., Glynn, A., Hicken, A., Lührmann, A., Marquardt, K.L., McMann, K., Paxton, P., Pemstein, D., Seim, B., Sigman, R., Skaaning, S. E., Staton, J., Wilson, S., Cornell, A., Gastaldi, L., Gjerløw, H., Ilchenko, N., Krusell, J., Maxwell, L., Mechkova, V., Medzihorsky, J., Pernes, J., von Römer, J., Stepanova, N., Sundström, A., Tzelgov, E., Wang, Y., Wig, T., & Ziblatt, D. (2019). V-Dem [Country-Year/Country-Date] Dataset v9. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemcy19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, G. R., Iyer, E. S., & Gooding-Williams, S. (1996). Environmental organization alliance associations within and across nonprofit, business, and government sectors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 15(2), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569601500203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, H. C., Noorman, K. J., Kok, R., Engström, R., Throne-Holst, H., & Clark, C. (2008). Pursuing more sustainable consumption by analyzing household metabolism in European countries and cities. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(1–2), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1162/1088198054084662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulton, B. R. (1990). An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro units. Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 334–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, F., & Harring, N. (2017). The large-scale collective action dilemma of recycling: exploring the role of trust. Working Paper. The Quality of Government Institute Department of Political Science: University of Gothenburg.

  • Nixon, H., & Saphores, J. D. M. (2009). Information and the decision to recycle: Results from a survey of US households. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52(2), 257–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, A., & Bünger, B. (2012). Balancing ‘full life’: An economic approach to the route to happiness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(1), 58–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prothero, A. (1996). Environmental decision making: research issues in the cosmetics and toiletries industry. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 14(2), 19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development Our Common Future Brundtland Report 1987. Retrieved from https://www.are.admin.ch/are/en/home/sustainable-development/international-cooperation/2030agenda/un-_-milestones-in-sustainable-development/1987--brundtland-report.html.

  • Samuel, A. (2016). Psychographics are just as important for marketers as demographics. Retrieved on 4 May from Harvard Business Review: https://hbr.org/2016/03/psychographics-are-just-as-important-for-marketers-as-demographics.

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. Advances in experimental social psychology. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 221–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwepker, C. H. & Cornwell, T. B. (1991). An examination of ecologically concerned consumers and their intention to purchase ecologically packaged products. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 77–101.

  • SDG- Sustainable development goals report. Retrieved from https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2018.

  • Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 5–14.

  • Seroczynski, A. D. (2015). Virtues and vices in positive psychology: A philosophical critique. Journal of Moral Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2014.969886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J. H., & Yogo, M. (2005). Asymptotic distributions of instrumental variables statistics with many weak instruments. Chapter 6 in this volume

  • Tännsjö, T. (2007). Narrow hedonism. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(1), 79–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank’s consumption data reference: Excel file of World’s Final Consumption Expenditure Levels. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.CON.TOTL.CD.

  • The World Happiness Report (WHP) 2019. Retrieved from http://worldhappiness.report/ed/2019/.

  • Valle, D. P. O., Rebelo, E., Reis, E., & Menezes, J. (2005). Combining behavioral theories to predict recycling involvement. Environment and Behavior, 37(3), 364–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (1996). Ecological economics and sustainable development: Theory, methods and applications. Methods and Applications: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Brande, K., Happaerts, S., & Bruyninckx, H. (2008). The role of the subnational level of government in decision-making for sustainable development—A multi-level governance perspective; Steunpunt Duurzame Ontwikkeling—Katholieke Universiteit. Leuven: Leuven, Belgium:

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2003). Hedonism and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4(4), 437–457. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:johs.0000005719.56211.fd

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2004). Sustainable consumption and happiness. MPRA.

  • Veenhoven, R. (2018). Happiness in nations. Erasmus University Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdugo, V. C. (2012). The positive psychology of sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14(5), 651–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. C. (2019). Materialism: Temporal balance, mindfulness and savoring. Personality and Individual Differences, 146, 93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, K., & Simpson, B. (2013). When do (and don’t) normative appeals influence sustainable consumer behaviors? Journal of Marketing, 77(2), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.11.0278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, K., Simpson, B., & Argo, J. J. (2014). The motivating role of dissociative out-groups in encouraging positive consumer behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.12.0335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Marketing in the 21st century customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(3), 256–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070397253006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y., & Zhu, J. (2015). When are people unhappy? Corruption experience, environment, and life, satisfaction in mainland China. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 1125–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zidanšek, A. (2007). Sustainable development and happiness in nations. Energy, 32(6), 891–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.09.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yomna M. Sameer.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Definition of variables

Appendix: Definition of variables

Variable code

Definition and source

SDGI

The SDG general index, ranging from 0 to 100, from the UN Sustainable Development Report

CONSCAP

The level of consumption per capita (log), from the World Development Indicators, from the World Bank

RECYCLE

The recycling rate, from the What A Waste Global Database, World Bank. It measures the percent of waste annually generated that is recycled in a country

HAPPINESS

The index of life ladder (happiness), from the UN World Happiness Report

HAPPINESS1

The life satisfaction index, from R. Veenhoven (2018) Happiness in Nations, World Database of Happiness, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands

GDPCAP

The level of gross domestic product per capita (log), from the World Development Indicators, World Bank. It is considered a measure of economic development of countries

CREDIT

The level of domestic credit to the private sector (% GDP), from the World Development Indicators, World Bank. It is considered a measure of financial development of countries

GINI

The Gini coefficient, from the World Development Indicators, World Bank. It is considered a measure of income inequality of countries

HEALTHEXP

The index of health expectancy at birth (years), from the Health Indicators, World Health Organization. It reflects the overall mortality level of the population of countries

SOCSUP

The index of social support, from the UN World Happiness Report

ETHNFRAC

The measure of ethnic fractionalization in society, ranging from 0 to 1, from Alesina et al. (2003). It reflects the likelihood that two randomly selected persons from a given country will not share the same ethnic origin (ethnic heterogeneity). A higher index reflects a lower probability of common sharing

GEOPOL

The measure of global geopolitical risk, from Caldara and Iacoviello (2018). It is based on the counting of the occurrence of words related to geopolitical tensions in 11 leading international newspapers

DEMQUAL

The index of the quality of democracy, from the UN World Happiness Report

CONTRCORR

The index of control of corruption, from the Worldwide Governance Indicators, World Bank. It measures the effectiveness of policies in combatting corruption

GENDER

The meaure of women’s political empowerment, from the V-Dem dataset, from Michael et al. (2019). Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project, version 9. At: https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemcy19

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sameer, Y.M., Elmassah, S., Mertzanis, C. et al. Are Happier Nations More Responsible? Examining the Link Between Happiness and Sustainability. Soc Indic Res 158, 267–295 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02698-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02698-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation