Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does ranking stimulate government performance? Evidence from China’s key environmental protection cities

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the air quality ranking of China’s Ministry of Ecology and Environment as a case, this paper examines whether the public ranking could stimulate the ranked cities to improve performance. The results show that the horizontal ranking, i.e., the relative position among the cities, significantly stimulates the cities to improve air quality. The stimulating effect is significant for all the three type of cities, i.e., cities with good, medium and poor air quality, and is the strongest for the cities with good air quality. However, the stimulating effect for air quality improvement is not enough to alter the air quality comparison among the cities. Compared to other cities, if a city is ranked relatively low in the last year, the air quality in the current year is still relatively poor. The inertia is particularly significant for the cities with poor air quality. The vertical ranking, i.e., if the rank of a city progresses or retrogresses, does not affect the air quality and air quality change of the city. Overall, public ranking is argued to stimulate performance improvement by seducing the competition among local governments, although the actual effect is still subject to the perception of local governments and their capacity to respond to the ranking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. E. (2012). State tax rankings: what do they and don’t they tell us? Natl Tax J, 65(4), 985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. E., Buntaine, M. T., Liu, M., & Zhang, B. (2019). Non-Governmental monitoring of local governments increases compliance with central mandates: a national-scale field experiment in China. Am J Polit Sci, 63(3), 626–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azmat, G., & Iriberri, N. (2010). The importance of relative performance feedback information: evidence from a natural experiment using high school students. J Public Econ, 94(7–8), 435–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N., & Deegan, C. (1998). The public disclosure of environmental performance information—a dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory. Account Buss Res, 29(1), 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji, A. K., & Toffel, M. W. (2010). How firms respond to being rated. Strateg Manag J, 31(9), 917–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Wang, J.-N., Ma, G.-X., & Zhang, Y.-S. (2013). China tackles the health effects of air pollution. The Lancet, 382(9909), 1959–1960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: the legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures. Account Audit Account J, 15(3), 282–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. J Manag Stud, 42(2), 329–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, C., Huang, G., Cai, Y., & Liu, Y. (2012). An inexact optimization modeling approach for supporting energy systems planning and air pollution mitigation in Beijing city. Energy Policy, 37(1), 673–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: social values and organizational behavior. Pac Sociol Rev, 18(1), 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, W., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Xu, L., Chen, J., Deng, J., Hong, Y., & Xiao, H. (2017). Chemical characterization and source apportionment of PM2.5 during spring and winter in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 17(9), 2165–2180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, K. D., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Members' responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the business week rankings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 442–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, T., Poulsen, A., & Villeval, M. C. (2009). Feedback and incentives: experimental evidence. Labour Econ, 16(6), 679–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: how public measures recreate social worlds. Am J Sociol, 113(1), 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Hum Relat, 7(2), 117–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. J., & Van Riel, C. B. (2004). Fame and fortune: how successful companies build winning reputations. Corpor Reput Rev, 6(4), 390–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., & Meijers, E. (2007). City-ranking of European medium-sized cities. Retrieved from http://www.smartcity-ranking.eu/download/city_ranking_final.pdf

  • Giffinger, R., & Gudrun, H. (2010). Smart cities ranking: an effective instrument for the positioning of the cities? ACE Archit City Environ, 4(12), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Z., & Zhang, X. (2017). Assessment of urban air pollution and spatial spillover effects in China: cases of 113 key environmental protection cities. J Res Ecol, 8(6), 584–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic-growth and the environment. Q J Econ, 110(2), 353–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, R. L., Krishnan, R., & Newman, A. H. (2008). The effects of disseminating relative performance feedback in tournament and individual performance compensation plans. Account Rev, 83(4), 893–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janhäll, S. (2015). Review on urban vegetation and particle air pollution–deposition and dispersion. Atmos Environ, 105, 130–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, J. R., Reis, E., & Venkateswaran, A. (2009). Rank-order tournaments and incentive alignment: the effect on firm performance. J Financ, 64(3), 1479–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D. M., Milgrom, P., Roberts, J., & Wilson, R. (1982). Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners’ dilemma. J Econ Theory, 27(2), 245–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Han, Y., Tang, X., Zhu, J., & Zhu, T. (2016). Estimating adult mortality attributable to PM2.5 exposure in China with assimilated PM2.5 concentrations based on a ground monitoring network. Science of the Total Environment, 568, 1253–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luoma-aho, V. (2007). Neutral reputation and public sector organizations. Corpor Rep Rev, 10(2), 124–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luoma-aho, V. (2008). Sector reputation and public organisations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(5), 446–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, C., Rees, W., & Rodionova, T. (2013). Do responsible investment indices improve corporate social responsibility? FTSE4Good’s impact on environmental management. Corpor Gov Int Rev, 21(5), 495–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, J. F., & Wartick, S. L. (2003). Dealing with stakeholders: how reputation, credibility and framing influence the game. Corp Reput Rev, 6(1), 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, A. (2014). In good standing: The public value of reputation management. PhD thesis, Waterford Institute of Technology.

  • Meijer, A. J. (2007). Publishing public performance results on the Internet: do stakeholders use the Internet to hold Dutch public service organizations to account? Gov Inf Q, 24(1), 165–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Njiru, S. M., Nyaga, M. N., & Karuku, S. (2019). Effects of performance ranking in mathematics on students’ and teachers’ identity development. Int J Second Educ, 7(1), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pu, Z., & Fu, J. (2018). Economic growth, environmental sustainability and China mayors’ promotion. J Clean Prod, 172, 454–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiao, K., Zhou, L.-A., & Liu, C. (2014). Interim rank, promotion incentives and current performance: evidence from the dynamic tournament among chinese local officials. China J Econ, 1, 84–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A., & Kim, B.-Y. (2011). Policy responsiveness in post-communist Europe: public preferences and economic reforms. Br J Polit Sci, 41(4), 819–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauder, M., & Espeland, W. N. (2009). The discipline of rankings: tight coupling and organizational change. Am Sociol Rev, 74(1), 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searcy, C., & Elkhawas, D. (2012). Corporate sustainability ratings: an investigation into how corporations use the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. J Clean Prod, 35, 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng, N., & Tang, U. W. (2016). The first official city ranking by air quality in China—a review and analysis. Cities, 51, 139–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wæraas, A., & Byrkjeflot, H. (2012). Public sector organizations and reputation management: five problems. Int Public Manag J, 15(2), 186–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. T., Wei, Z., Yang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, F. F., Su, J., Meng, C., & Zhang, Q. (2014). The 2013 severe haze over the southern Hebei China model evaluation source apportionment and policy implications. Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics Discussions, 14, 3151–3173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B., Chen, X., & Guo, H. (2018a). Does central supervision enhance local environmental enforcement? Quasi-experimental evidence from China. J Public Econ, 164, 70–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S., Li, Y., Hao, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2018b). Does public opinion affect air quality? Evidence based on the monthly data of 109 prefecture-level cities in China. Energy Policy, 116, 299–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Shi, M., Li, Y., Pang, R., & Xiang, N. (2018c). Correlating PM2.5 concentrations with air pollutant emissions: A longitudinal study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, G., Duan, F., Su, H., Ma, Y., Cheng, Y., Zheng, B., Zhang, Q., Huang, T., Kimoto, T., & Chang, D. (2015). Exploring the severe winter haze in Beijing: the impact of synoptic weather, regional transport and heterogeneous reactions. Atmos Chem Phys, 15(6), 2969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, S., Kahn, M. E., Sun, W., & Luo, D. (2014). Incentives for China’s urban mayors to mitigate pollution externalities: the role of the central government and public environmentalism. Reg Sci Urban Econ, 47, 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, L., & Wang, T. (2014). Social media: a new vehicle for city marketing in China. Cities, 37, 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 71704126).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, L., Yang, Z. & Song, S. Does ranking stimulate government performance? Evidence from China’s key environmental protection cities. Soc Indic Res 158, 699–725 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02722-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02722-7

Keywords

Navigation