Abstract
The aim of this paper is to explore an explicit use of the concept of sustainability within transport planning. This paper analyses the concept of sustainability based on a practical approach for a sustainable development of Nordhavn, an area of Copenhagen, exemplifying a complex planning problem. An exploration of the application of the concept of sustainability is carried out using elements of Soft Systems Methodology (SSM). This approach indicates a need to separate the use of sustainability considerations regarding the transport planning ‘process’ from the transport planning ‘results’. The two approaches are related to the planning levels presented by Ulrich (Syst Prac 1(4):415–428, 1988). It was chosen to focus on the understanding of a sustainable transport planning process. This focus is addressed by four stakeholder groups interviewed based on the ‘ought to’ mode of Critical Systems Heuristics (CSH). Finally an outline of some of the factors of a sustainable transport planning process is proposed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banister D (2008) The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transp Policy 15:73–80
Checkland P (1993/1999) Systems thinking, systems practice, includes a 30-year retrospective. Wiley, Chichester
Checkland P, Poulter J (2006) Learning for action, a short definitive account of soft systems methodology and its use for practitioners, teachers and students. Wiley, Chichester
CPH City and Port Development (CPH) (2008a) Nordhavnen, brief, open international ideas competition, Cophenhagen, May 2008. CPH City and Port Development, Copenhagen
CPH City and Port Development (CPH) (2008b) Nordhavnen, Jury report, open international ideas competition, Copenhagen, December 2008. CPH City and Port Development, Copenhagen
Jackson MC (2000) Systems approach to management. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York
Jackson MC (2003) Systems thinking, creative holism for managers. Wiley, Chichester
Jeppesen SL (2009a) Decision simulation technique (DST) as a scanning tool for exploring and explicating sustainability issues in transport decision making. In: Proceedings of the international conference ISSS 2009, 12–17 July 2009, Brisbane, Australia
Jeppesen SL (2009b) Sustainable transport planning—a multi-methodology approach to decision making. Forthcoming PhD thesis. Department of Transport, Technical University of Denmark (submitted 30-11-09)
Jeppesen SL (2010, Spring) Use of short decision conferences (DC) in systemic intervention. In: The international conference UKSS 2009, Anne’s College, Oxford University, UK, 1–2 Sept 2009, Oxford, UK, Anniversary Edition (Systemist 32(1):47–70, UK Systems Society)
Jeppesen SL, Paucar-Caceres A (2008) Critical Soft Systems Framework (CSSF): a Systemic Framework Combining Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) and Critical Systems Heuristics (CSH), presented at the international conference UKSS 2008. St Anne’s College, Oxford University, UK, 1–3 Sept 2008 (Systemist 30(2):173–195, UK Systems Society)
Jeppesen SL, Barfod MB, Leleur S (2008) Strategic location planning: a ‘hard’ approach supported by ‘semi-soft’ methods. J Inf Sci Technol, JIST 5(3):24–42
Kane L, Del Mistro R (2003) Changes in transport planning policy: changes in transport planning methodology. Transportation 30:113–131
Khisty J, Leleur S (1997) Citizen participation through communicative action: towards a new framework and synthesis. J Adv Transp 31(2): 119–137
Københavns Kommune (KK) (2009) Bæredygtighedsværktøj, Københavns Kommune (printed 19-10-09). www.kk.dk/bdv. (in Danish)
Phillips LD (2006) Decision conferencing, Chap 19. A Working Paper LSEOR 06.85. Operational Research Group, Department of Management, London School of Economics & Political Science, London
Tippett J (2005) The value of combining a systems view of sustainability with a participatory protocol for ecological informed design in river basins. Env Model Softw 20(2):119–139
Ulrich W (1983) Critical heuristics of social planning. A new approach to practical philosophy. Wiley, Chichester
Ulrich W (1988) Churchman’s “process of unfolding”—its significance for policy analysis and evaluation. Syst Prac 1(4):415–428
Ulrich W (2000) Reflective practice in the civil society: the contribution of critically systemic thinking. Reflect Prac 1(2):247–268
Ulrich W (2005) A brief introduction to critical systems heuristics (CSH). Web site of the ECOSENSUS project, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK, 14 Oct 2005
United Nations (UN) (1987) Development and international economic co-operation: environment. Report of the World commission on Environment and development “our common future”—note by the secretary-general. Forty-second session, item 83 (e) of the provisional agenda. General Assembly, United Nations
Acknowledgments
The participation of stakeholders in the interviews has been of great value for the work with the paper and for the PHD study and thesis of which it is part. Furthermore, the two anonymous reviewers have contributed with many valuable comments which have helped to bring the paper into its current form. For this I am thankful.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The paper was written, submitted and revised the first time while the author was a PhD student at the Department of Transport, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark. The author has following changed job and is now employed by Københavns Kommune, Center for Trafik, and only minor linguistic and grammatical related changes have been made in the second revision completed afterwards.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jeppesen, S.L. Exploring an Explicit Use of the Concept of Sustainability in Transport Planning. Syst Pract Action Res 24, 133–146 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-010-9180-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-010-9180-6