Abstract
In the present study, we examined the effects of feedback that corrects and contrasts a student’s own erroneous solutions with the canonical, correct one (CEC&C feedback) on learning in a conceptual change task. Sixty undergraduate students received expository instruction about natural selection, which presented the canonical, scientifically accepted account in detail. Two-third of these received CEC&C feedback on their self-generated solutions to open-ended test items. Students either received this feedback on their pretest solutions (prior to instruction), or on their immediate posttest solutions (following instruction). Students in the control condition only received the correct canonical answers to the immediate post-test items and compared these with their own solutions autonomously. Conceptual understanding on transfer items was assessed after 1 week. Results showed that students in the CEC&C feedback conditions outperformed control students. Timing of feedback did not affect learning, however. These findings add to accumulating evidence from different lines of research on the importance of instructional support that explicitly compares and contrasts between erroneous student models and canonical models in conceptual change tasks.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames, G. J., & Murray, F. B. (1982). When two wrongs make a right: Promoting cognitive development through cognitive conflict. Developmental Psychology, 18(6), 894–897. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.6.894.
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2007). The effects of monological and dialogical argumentation on concept learning in evolutionary theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 626–639.
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2009). The role of argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: Indications from protocol analyses of peer-to-peer dialogue. Cognitive Science, 33, 373–399.
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2016). Argumentation for learning: Well-trodden paths and unexplored territories. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 164–187.
Asterhan, C. S. C., Schwarz, B. B., & Cohen-Eliyahu, N. (2014). Outcome feedback during collaborative learning: Contingencies between feedback and dyad composition. Learning and Instruction, 34(4), 1–10.
Babai, R., Sekal, R., & Stavy, R. (2010). Persistence of the intuitive conception of living things in adolescence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9174-2.
Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of research in education, 24(1), 61–100.
Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2007). The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13(4), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/e527352012-769.
Chan, C., Burtis, J., & Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1501_1.
Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Eds.), Handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0605-8_20.
Chi, M. T. H., Roscoe, R., Slotta, J., Roy, M., & Chase, M. (2012). Misconceived causal explanations for “emergent” processes. Cognitive Science, 36, 1–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01207.x.
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170558.
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1998). An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 623–654. http://chilab.asu.edu/papers/Chi_concpetualchangechapter.pdf.
Diakidoy, I. A. N., Kendeou, P., & Ioannides, C. (2003). Reading about energy: the effects of text structure in science learning and conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 335–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00039-5.
Diakidoy, I. A. N., Mouskounti, T., Fella, A., & Ioannides, C. (2016). Comprehension processes and outcomes with refutation and expository texts and their contribution to learning. Learning and Instruction, 41, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.10.002.
Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1978). Individual and collective conflicts of centration in cognitive development. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9(1), 245–247. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420090110.
Dunbar, K., Fugelsang, J., & Stein, C. (2007). Do naïve theories ever go away? Using brain and behavior to understand changes in concepts. Thinking with data. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740810865085.
Durkin, K., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2012). The effectiveness of using incorrect examples to support learning about decimal magnitude. Learning and Instruction, 22(3), 206–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.11.001.
Fugelsang, J., & Dunbar, K. (2005). Brain-based mechanisms underlying complex causal thinking. Neuropsychologia, 48, 1204–1213.
Gadgil, S., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Chi, M. T. (2012). Effectiveness of holistic mental model confrontation in driving conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 22(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.06.002.
Große, C. S., & Renkl, A. (2007). Finding and fixing errors in worked examples: Can this foster learning outcomes? Learning and Instruction, 17, 612–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.008.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.
Hill, H., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Education Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002371.
Howe, C., Tolmie, A., Duchak-Tanner, V., & Rattay, C. (2000). Hypothesis-testing in science: Group consensus and the acquisition of conceptual and procedural knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10(4), 361–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00004-9.
Jensen, M. S., & Finley, F. N. (1996). Changes in students’ understanding of evolution resulting from different curricular and instructional strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 879–900. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199610)33:8<879:aid-tea4>3.0.co;2-t.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (1992). Thinking about theories or thinking with theories?: A classroom study with natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 14(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069920140106.
Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2011). Classroom-based experiments in productive failure. In L. Carlson, C. Holscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2812–2817). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/iecon.2007.4459876.
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254.
Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170349.
Light, P., & Glachan, M. (1985). Facilitation of individual problem solving through peer interaction. Educational Psychology, 5, 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443418500503.
Limon, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11, 357–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4752(00)00037-2.
Loibl, K., & Rummel, N. (2014). Knowing what you don’t know makes failure productive. Learning and Instruction, 34, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.08.004.
Masson, S., Potvin, P., Riopel, M., & Foisy, L. M. B. (2014). Differences in brain activation between novices and experts in science during a task involving a common misconception in electricity. Mind, Brain, and Education, 8(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12043.
Ohlsson, S. (2002). Generating and understanding qualitative explanations. In J. Otero, J. A. Leon, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 91–128). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Opfer, J. E., & Siegler, R. S. (2004). Revisiting preschoolers’ living things concept: A microgenetic analysis of conceptual change in basic biology. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 301–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.01.002.
Özdemir, G., & Clark, D. (2007). An overview of conceptual change theories. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3, 351–361.
Potvin, P., Masson, S., Lafortune, S., & Cyr, G. (2015a). Persistence of the intuitive conception that heavier objects sink more: A reaction time study with different levels of interference. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9520-6.
Potvin, P., Sauriol, É., & Riopel, M. (2015b). Experimental evidence of the superiority of the prevalence model of conceptual change over the classical models and traditional teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(8), 1082–1108. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21235.
Ramsburg, J. T., & Ohlsson, S. (2016). Category change in the absence of cognitive conflict. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000050.
Richland, L. E., Kornell, N., & Kao, L. S. (2009). The pretesting effect: Do unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15(3), 243. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016496.
Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Coyle, H. P., Cook-Smith, N., & Miller, J. L. (2013). The influence of teachers’ knowledge on student learning in middle school physical science classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1020–1049. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213477680.
Schnotz, W., & Preuss, A. (1999). Task-dependent construction of mental models as a basis for conceptual change. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 193–222). Amsterdam: Pergamon Press.
Schwarz, B. B., & Linchevski, L. (2007). The role of task design and argumentation in cognitive development during peer interaction: The case of proportional reasoning. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 510–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.009.
Schwarz, B. B., Neuman, Y., & Biezuner, S. (2000). Two wrongs may make a right… If they argue together! Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 461–494. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1804_2.
Shtulman, A. (2006). Qualitative differences between naïve and scientific theories of evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 170–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.001.
Shtulman, A., & Valcarcel, J. (2012). Scientific knowledge suppresses but does not supplant earlier intuitions. Cognition, 124(2), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.005.
Sinatra, G. M., & Broughton, S. H. (2011). Bridging reading comprehension and conceptual change in science education: The promise of refutation text. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(4), 374–393.
Tippett, C. D. (2010). Refutation text in science education: A review of two decades of research. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 951–970.
Van Loon, M. H., Dunlosky, J., Van Gog, T., Van Merriënboer, J. J., & De Bruin, A. B. (2015). Refutations in science texts lead to hypercorrection of misconceptions held with high confidence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.04.003.
Vosniadou, S. (Ed.). (2009). International handbook of research on conceptual change. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203154472.ch1.
Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1994). Mental models of the day/nightcycle. Cognitive Science, 18, 123–183.
Vosniadou, S., & Mason, L. (2013). Conceptual change induced by instruction: A complex interplay of multiple factors. In S. Graham, J. Royer, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors, Vol 2 of the APA Educational Psychology Handbook Series (pp. 221–246). APA Publications. https://doi.org/10.1037/13274-000.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by Israeli Science Foundation Award 1044/13. We thank Maya Resnick, Roni Segal, Noa Ettinger and Morag Pitaro for their assistance in data collection and coding efforts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Asterhan, C.S.C., Dotan, A. Feedback that corrects and contrasts students’ erroneous solutions with expert ones improves expository instruction for conceptual change. Instr Sci 46, 337–355 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9441-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9441-1