Skip to main content
Log in

Secondary dispersal of forest herb seeds from raccoon dung: contrasting service by multiple vectors

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Secondary movement of seeds deposited in dung potentially improves their chances of seedling establishment but has rarely been documented in temperate-zone deciduous forest. We followed mayapple (Podophyllum peltatum) seeds after deposition in raccoon (Procyon lotor) dung to test for secondary dispersal in a long-established deciduous forest in southeastern Ohio, USA. Marked seeds were incorporated into raccoon dung, placed in natural forest sites, and observed at regular intervals until the subsequent Spring. Abiotic seed movement was monitored during natural and simulated rain events. To identify animal vectors and describe their interaction with seeds, motion-triggered wildlife cameras were trained on dung with embedded mayapple seeds. Seed movement was initially limited by adhesion in the viscid dung matrix, but 15% of seeds eventually moved >20 cm from the point of placement, a minimal estimate of a shoot’s competitive neighborhood (maximum movement distance = 130 cm). Significantly greater movement occurred on slopes and in the absence of leaf litter. Rainfall moved seeds as far as 51 cm. White-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) and chipmunks (Tamias striatus) began removing seeds within 24 h of dung placement, presumably caching a portion of them outside the 1.5-m radius of observation. At least four other animal species interacted with dung in ways unrelated to seed presence, which nevertheless resulted in seed movement on a scale of centimeters. Thus, multiple secondary processes caused seed movement, each resulting in a distinctive seed distribution. The forest herb potentially benefits through reduction in seed density and distribution to a variety of microsites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott HG, Quink TF (1970) Ecology of eastern white pine seed caches made by small forest mammals. Ecology 51:271–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen E, Levey DJ (2004) Effects of dung and seed size on secondary dispersal, seed predation, and seedling establishment of rain forest trees. Oecologia 139:45–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo-Rodriguez V, Andresen E, Bravo SP, Stevenson PR (2015) Seed dispersal by howler monkeys: current knowledge, conservation implications, and future directions. In: Barrett L (ed) Howler monkeys: developments in primatology: progress and prospects. Springer Press, New York, pp 111–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Barga SC, Vander Wall SB (2013) Dispersal of an herbaceous perennial, Paeonia brownii, by scatter-hoarding rodents. Ecoscience 20:172–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barja I, List R (2006) Faecal marking behaviour in ringtails (Bassariscus astutus) during the non-breeding period: spatial characteristics of latrines and single faeces. Chemoecology 16:219–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaune D, Bollache L, Bretagnolle F, Fruth B (2012) Dung beetles are critical in preventing post-dispersal seed removal by rodents in Congo rain forest. J Trop Ecol 28:507–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierzychudek P (1982) Life histories and demography of shade-tolerant temperate forest herbs: a review. New Phytol 90:757–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borchert M, Tyler CM (2010) Desiccation sensitivity and heat tolerance of Prunus ilicifolia seeds dispersed by American black bears (Ursus americanus). West N Am Nat 70:457–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun EL (1950) Deciduous forests of Eastern North America. Blackburn Press, Caldwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers JC, MacMahon JA (1994) A day in the life of a seed: movements and fates of seeds and their implications for natural and managed systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25:263–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cinkova I, Policht R (2015) Discrimination of familiarity and sex from chemical cues in the dung by wild southern white rhinoceros. Anim Cogn 18:385–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen D (1966) Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment. J Theor Biol 12:119–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cypher BL, Cypher EA (1999) Germination rates of tree seeds ingested by coyotes and raccoons. Am Midl Nat 142:71–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmerson L, Facelli JM, Chesson P, Possingham H (2010) Secondary seed dispersal of Erodiophyllum elderi, a patchily distributed short-lived perennial in the arid lands of Australia. Aust Ecol 35:906–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders MS, Vander Wall SB (2012) Black bears Ursus americanus are effective seed dispersers, with a little help from their friends. Oikos 121:589–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feer F, Forget PM (2002) Spatio-temporal variations in post-dispersal seed fate. Biotropica 34:555–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Forget PM, Milleron T (1991) Evidence for secondary seed dispersal by rodents in Panama. Oecologia 87:596–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forget PM, Milleron T, Feer F (1998) Patterns in post-dispersal seed removal by neotropical rodents and seed fate in relation to seed size. In: Prins HH, Brown ND, Newberry DM (eds) Dynamics of Tropical Communities. British Ecological Society, London, pp 25–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Furbish DJ, Hamner KK, Schmeeckle M, Borosund MN, Mudd SM (2007) Rain splash of dry sand revealed by high-speed imaging and sticky paper splash targets. J Geophys Res 112:F1–F19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Fayos P, Cerda A (1997) Seed losses by surface wash in degraded Mediterranean environments. CATENA 29:73–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghert SD (2003) Raccoons (Procyon lotor and allies). In: Feldhamer GA, Thompson BC, Chapman JA (eds) Wild mammals of North America: biology, management, and conservation. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 661–734

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrelson SM, Cantino PD (2006) The terrestrial vascular flora of Strouds Run State Park, Athens County, Ohio. Rhodora 108:142–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch BT, Prange S, Hauver SA, Gehrt SD (2014) Patterns of latrine use by raccoons (Procyon lotor) and implication for Baylisascaris procyonis transmission. J Wildl Dis 50:243–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme PE (1994) Post-dispersal seed predation in grassland: its magnitude and sources of variation. J Ecol 82:645–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH (1982) Removal of seeds from horse dung by tropical rodents: influence of habitat and amount of dung. Ecology 63:1887–1900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordano P (1983) Fig-seed predation and dispersal by birds. Biotropica 15:38–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantak GE (1983) Behavioral seed preference and habitat selection experiments with two sympatric Peromyscus species. Am Midl Nat 109(2):246–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi T, Watanabe M (1986) An analysis of snake-scent application behavior in Siberian chipmunks (Eutamias sibiricus asiaticus). Ethology 72:40–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koike S, Morimoto H, Kozakai C, Arimoto I, Soga M, Yamazaki K, Koganezawa M (2012) The role of dung beetles as a secondary seed disperser after dispersal by frugivore mammals in a temperate deciduous forest. Acta Oecol 41:74–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger K, Flauger B (2011) Olfactory recognition of individual competitors by means of faeces in horse (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 14:245–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert JE (2002) Exploring the link between animal frugivory and plant strategies: the case of primate fruit-processing and post-dispersal seed fate. In: Levey DJ, Silva WR, Galetti M (eds) Seed dispersal and frugivory: ecology, evolution and conservation. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 365–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Legout C, Leguédois S, Le Bissonnais Y, Malam Issa O (2005) Splash distance and size distributions for various soils. Geoderma 124:279–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston TR, Gipson PS, Ballard WB, Sanchez DM, Krausman PR (2005) Scat removal: a source of bias in dung-related studies. Wildl Soc Bull 33:172–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LoGiudice K, Ostfeld RS (2002) Interactions between mammals and trees: predation on mammal-dispersed seeds and the effect of ambient food. Oecologia 130:420–425

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • López-Bao JV, González-Varo JP (2011) Frugivory and spatial patterns of seed deposition by carnivorous mammals in anthropogenic landscapes: a multi-scale approach. PLOS. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014569

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzano P, Azcárate FM, Peco B, Malo JE (2010) Are ecologists blind to small things? The missed stories on non-tropical seed predation on dung. Oikos 119:1537–1545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall JM, Buckley DS (2008) Influence of litter removal and mineral soil disturbance on the spread of an invasive grass in a Central Hardwood forest. Biol Invasions 10:531–538

  • Matlack GR (1994) Plant species migration in a mixed-history forest landscape in eastern North America. Ecology 75:1491–1502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matlack GR (1997) Four centuries of forest clearance and regeneration in the hinterland of a large city. J Biogeogr 24:297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matlack GR (2005) Slow plants in a fast forest: local dispersal as a predictor of species frequencies in a dynamic landscape. J Ecol 93:50–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matlack GR, Monde J (2004) Consequences of low mobility in spatially and temporally heterogeneous ecosystems. J Ecol 92:1025–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midwestern Regional Climate Center (2016) http://mrcc.isws.illinois.edu/cliwatch/watch.htm#curMonths

  • Miller NP, Matlack GR (2010) Population expansion in an invasive grass, Microstegium vimineum: a test of the channeled diffusion model. Divers Distrib 16:816–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore JE, McEuen AB, Swihart RK, Contreras TA, Steele MA (2007) Determinants of seed removal distance by scatter-hoarding rodents in deciduous forests. Ecology 88:2529–2540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols E, Spector S, Louzada J, Larsen T, Amezquita S, Favila ME (2008) Ecological functions and ecosystem services provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles. Biol Cons 141:1461–1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niederhauser EC, Matlack GR (2015) All frugivores are not equal: exploitation competition determines seed survival and germination in a fleshy-fruited forest herb. Plant Ecol 216:1203–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niederhauser EC, Matlack GR (2017) Do deer and raccoons defecate in the right place? Fitness consequences of vertebrate seed dispersal for a deciduous forest herb. Oecologia 183:727–737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ough WD (1982) Scent marking by captive raccoons. J Mammal 63:318–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page LK, Swihart RK, Kazacos KR (1998) Raccoons latrine structure and its potential role in transmission of Baylisascaris procyonis to vertebrates. Am Midl Nat 140:180–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson KM, Theimer TC (2004) Seed-caching responses to substrate and rock cover by two Peromyscus species: implications for pinyon pine establishment. Oecologia 141:76–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/

  • Reichman OJ (1984) Spatial and temporal variation of seed distributions in Sonoran Desert soils. J Biogeogr 11:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roper TJ, Conradt L, Butler J, Christian SE, Ostler J, Schmid TK (1993) Territorial marking with faeces in badgers (Meles meles): a comparison of boundary and hinterland latrine use. Behaviour 127:289–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth JK, Vander Wall SB (2005) Primary and secondary seed dispersal of bush chinquapin (Fagaceae) by scatterhoarding rodents. Ecology 86:2428–2439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusch UD, Midgely JJ, Anderson B (2013) Rodent consumption and caching behavior selects for specific seed traits. South Afr J Bot 84:83–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust RW, Roth RR (1981) Seed production and seedling establishment in the mayapple, Podophyllum peltatum L. Am Midl Nat 105:51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez JC, Reichman OJ (1987) The effects of conspecifics on caching behavior of Peromyscus leucopus. J Mammal 68:695–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith WP, Borden DL, Endres KM (1994) Scent-station visits as an index to abundance of raccoons: an experimental manipulation. J Mammal 75:637–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel O, Nathan R (2010) Incorporating density dependence into the directed-dispersal hypothesis. Ecology 91:1538–1548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart GW, Edwards PJ (2006) Concepts about forests and water. North J Appl For 23:11–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Traveset A (1990) Post-dispersal predation of Acacia farnesiana seeds by Stator vachelliae (Bruchidae) in Central America. Oecologia 84(4):506–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turkowski FJ, Mech LD (1968) Radio-tracking the movements of a young male raccoon. J Minn Acad Sci 35:33–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Pijl L (1982) Principles of dispersal in higher plants. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Wall SB (1990) Food hording in animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Vander Wall SB, Longland WS (2004) Diplochory: are two seed dispersers better than one? Trends Ecol Evol 19:155–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Wall SB, Kuhn KM, Beck MJ (2005) Seed removal, seed predation, and secondary dispersal. Ecology 86:801–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vellend M, Myers JA, Gardescu S, Marks PL (2003) Dispersal of Trillium seeds by deer: implications for long-distance migration of forest herbs. Ecology 84:1067–1072

  • Wenny DG (1999) Two-stage dispersal of Guarea glabra and G. kunthiana (Meliaceae) in Monteverde, Costa Rica. J Trop Ecol 15:481–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whigham DF (2004) Ecology of woodland herbs in temperate deciduous forests. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:583–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney GG (1994) From coastal wilderness to fruited plain. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Young OP (2015) Predation on Dung Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): a literature review. Trans Am Entomol Soc 141:111–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Sue Shibley of Forever-Wild Wildlife Rehabilitation Center, Somerset OH USA, who generously collected the raccoon dung.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glenn R. Matlack.

Additional information

Communicated by Harmony J. Dalgleish.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niederhauser, E.C., Matlack, G.R. Secondary dispersal of forest herb seeds from raccoon dung: contrasting service by multiple vectors. Plant Ecol 218, 1135–1147 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-017-0748-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-017-0748-4

Keywords

Navigation