Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Feasibility of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach for Prioritization of Sensitive Area at Risk of Water Erosion

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Morphometric analysis is not only important for a hydrological analysis, but also necessary in the management and development of a basin. In this study, we attempted to prioritize twenty sub-watersheds of Bamhani watershed considering the linear, aerial and relief aspects of the watershed that will be further used in the multi-criterion decision making (MCDM) analysis. ELECTRE, Vlsekriterijumskaoptimizacija I kompromisno resenje (VIKOR), and aggregate method. Remote sensing and GIS approach were employed in the morphometric analysis. Percentage of changes and intensity of change indices were used in the MCDM model validation. Based on the range of Borda/Copland model values, the sub-watershed 11 took place at the first rank, while the Compound Factor (CF) model placed in the second rank, implying to be the most susceptible sub-watersheds for erosion. Vulnerability of sub-watersheds to soil loss (erosion), the VIKOR models showed four vulnerability classifications as very high, high, moderate and low. In conclusion, our results of the morphometric studies appeared to be effective in estimating the erosion status and prioritization of the watershed concerned for the purpose of easy and early development and management of natural resources. A high reductive accuracy was observed by VIKOR in comparison to CF and ELECTRE models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdolazimi A, Momeni M, Montazeri M (2015) Comparing ELECTRE and linear assignment methods in zoning Shahroud-Bastam watershed for artificial recharge of groundwater with GIS technique. Mod Appl Sci 9(1):68–82. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v9n1p68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amani M, Safaviyan A (2015) Sub-basins prioritization using morphometric analysis-remote sensing technique and GIS-Golestan-Iran. Int Lett Nat Sci 38:56–65. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILNS.38.56

  • Badri SA (2003) Models of rural planning. Pamphlets Practical Lesson in Geography and Rural Planning. Payame Noor University, p. 126

  • Biswas S, Sudhakar S, Desai VR (2002) Remote sensing and geographic information system based approach for watershed conservation. J Surv Eng 128(3):108–124. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2002)128:3(108)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CL, Hsu CH (2009) Multi-criteria analysis via the VIKOR method for prioritizing land-use restraint strategies in the Tseng-wen reservoir watershed. J Environ Manag 90:3226–3230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.04.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CL, Lin YT (2014) Using the VIKOR method to evaluate the design of a water quality monitoring network in a watershed. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11:303–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0195-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahmardeh Ghaleno MR, Meshram SG, Alvandi E (2020) Pragmatic approach for prioritization of flood and sedimentation hazard potential of watersheds. Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04899-4

  • Durbude DC, Purandara BK, Sharma A (2001) Estimation surface run-off potential of a watershed in semi-arid environment- a case study. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 29(1–2):47–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02989914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gajbhiye S, Mishra SK, Pandey A (2014) Prioritizing erosion-prone area through morphometric analysis: an RS and GIS perspective. Appl Water Sci 4:51–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-013-0129-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gajbhiye S, Sharma SK, Tignath S, Mishra SK (2015a) Development of a geomorphological Erosion index for Shakkar watershed. Geol Soc India 86(3):361–370

  • Gajbhiye S, Mishra SK, Pandey A (2015b) Simplified sediment yield index model incorporating parameter CN. Arab J Geosci 8(4):1993–2004

  • Gajbhiye S, Sharma SK (2017) Prioritization of watershed through morphometric parameters: a PCA based approach. Appl Water Sci 7:1505–1519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-015-0332-9

  • Gioti E, Riga C, Kalogeropoulos K, Chalkias C (2013) A GIS-based flash flood runoff model using high resolution DEM and meteorological data. EARSeLe Proc 12:33–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang JJ, Tzeng GH, Liu HH (2009) A revised VIKOR model for multiple criteria decision making - the perspective of regret theory. In Cutting-Edge Research Topics on Multiple Criteria Decision Making 35, pp. 761–768

  • Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Bull Geol Soc Am 56(275–3):70

  • Ishizaka A, Nemery P (2013) Multi-criteria decision analysis methods and software, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2013

  • Khadse GK, Vijay R, Labhasetwar PK (2015) Prioritization of catchments based on soil erosion using remote sensing and GIS. Environ Monit Assess 187(6):333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4545-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobryń A, Prystrom J (2015) A data pre-processing model for the Topsis method. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia 16:219–235. https://doi.org/10.1515/foli-2016-0036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langbein WB (1947) Topographic characteristic of drainage basins. USGS, WSP 968-C:127–157

  • Liou JJH, Tzeng GH (2012) Comments on "multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview". Technol Econ Dev Econ 18:672–695. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.753489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Frazier P, Kumar L, Macgregor C, Blake N (2006) Catchment-wide wetland assessment and prioritization using the multi-criteria decision-making method TOPSIS. Environ Manag 38:316–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0151-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood SA, Yameen M, Sheikh R, Rafique AHM, Almas AS (2012) DEM and GIS based hypsometric analysis to investigate Neotectonic influence on Hazara Kashmir Syntaxis. Pak J Sci 64(3):209–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Malekian A, Azarniv A (2016) Application of integrated Shannon’s entropy and VIKOR techniques in prioritization of flood risk in the Shemshak watershed, Iran. Water Resour Manag 30:409–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1169-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meshram SG, Alvandi E, Meshram C, Kahya E, Al-Quraishi AMD (2020) Application of SAW and TOPSIS in prioritizing watersheds. Water Resour Manag 34:715–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02470-x

  • Meshram SG, Alvandi E, Singh VP, Meshram C (2019) Comparison of AHP and fuzzy AHP models for prioritization of watersheds. Soft Comput 23(24):13615–13625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-03900-z

  • Meshram SG, Powar PL, Singh VP (2017) Modelling soil erosion from a watershed using cubic splines. Arab J Geosci 10:155–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-2908-1

  • Meshram SG, Powar PL, Meshram C (2018a) Comparasion of cubic, quadratic and Quintic splines for soil Erosion modelling. Appl Water Sci 8:173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0807-6

  • Meshram SG, Powar PL, Singh VP, Meshram C (2018b) Application of cubic spline in soil erosion modelling from Narmada watersheds, India. Arab J Geosci 11:362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3699-8

  • Meshram SG, Sharma SK (2017) Prioritization of watershed through morphometric parameters: a PCA-based approach. Appl Water Sci 7(3):1505–1519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-015-0332-9

  • Miller VC (1953) A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the clinch mountain area, Virginia and Tennesses. Department of Navy, Office of Naval Res., Technical Report 3, Project NR 389–042, Washington DC

  • Ministry of Agriculture (1985) Statistics on soil and water conservation water management. Land resources and land reclamation in India (Ninth ed.). Ministry of Agriculture and co-operation, Soil and Water Conservation Division, Govt. of India, New Delhi

  • Mira MA, Ghazvinei PT, Sulaiman NMN, Basri NEA, Saheri S, Mahmood NZ, Jahan A, Begum RA, Aghamohammadi N (2016) Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model. J Environ Manag 166:109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Gessler PE, Nielsen GAE, Peterson GA (1993) Soil attribute prediction using terrain analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1993.572NPb

  • Mulliner E, Malys N, Maliene V (2016) Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability. Omega 59:146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nautiyal MD (1994) Morphometric analysis of a drainage basin using arial photographs: a case study of Khairkuli basin, district Deharadun. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 22(4):251–262

  • NookaRatnam K, Srivastava YK, Venkateshwara Rao V, Amminedu E, Murthy KSR (2005) Check dam positioning by prioritization of micro-watersheds using SYI model and morphometric analysis—remote sensing and GIS perspective. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 33:25–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02989988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 156:444–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel DP, Srivastava PK, Gajjar CA (2012) Prioritization of Malesari mini-watersheds through morphometric analysis: a remote sensing and GIS perspective. Environ Earth Sci 69(8):2643–2656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-2086-0

  • Raju KS, Kumar DN, Jalali A (2017) Prioritization of sub-catchments of a river basin using DEM and fuzzy VIKOR. H2 Open Journal https://doi.org/10.2166/H2oj.2017.001

  • Ren J, Manzardo A, Mazzi A, Zuliani F, Scipioni A (2015) Prioritization of bioethanol production pathways in China based on life cycle sustainability assessment and multi-criteria decision making. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:842–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0877-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15:59–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salehi A, Izadikhah M (2014) A novel method to extend SAW for decision-making problems with interval data. Decis Sci Lett 3:225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanayei A, Mousavi SF, Yazdankhah A (2010) Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 37:24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.04.063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumm SA (1956) The evolution of drainage systems and slopes in bad lands at Perth, Amboi, New Jersey. Geol Soc Ame Bull 67(5):597–646

  • Shih HS, Shyur HJ, Lee ES (2007) An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Math Comput Model 45:801–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2006.03.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shojaie AB, Babaie S, Sayah E, Mohammaditabar D (2017) Analysis and prioritization of green health suppliers using fuzzy ELECTRE method with a case study. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 19:39–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-017-0168-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1964) Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. Section 4-II. In: Chow VT (ed) Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill, PP, pp 4–39

  • Thakker AK, Dhiman SD (2007) Morphometric analysis and prioritization of mini-watersheds in Mohr watershed, Gujarat using remote sensing and GIS techniques. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 35(4):313–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02990787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (1997) World atlas of desertification. 2nd edition Arnold London. 77

  • Yu X, Zhang S, Liao X, Qi X (2017) ELECTRE methods in prioritized MCDM environment. Inf Sci 424:301–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.09.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanakis SH, Solomon A, Wishart N, Dublish S (1998) Multi-attribute decision making: a simulation comparison of select methods. European journal of. Oper Res 107:507–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Kildienė S (2014) State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM. Technol Econ Dev Econ 20:165–179. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.892037

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department for Management of Science and Technology Development, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Sarita Gajbhiye Meshram

  2. Faculty of Environment and Labour Safety, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Sarita Gajbhiye Meshram

  3. Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M, University, College Station, TX, 77843-2117, USA

    Vijay P. Singh

  4. Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2117, USA

    Vijay P. Singh

  5. Civil Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University (ITU), 34469, İstanbul, Türkiye

    Ercan Kahya

  6. Department of Watershed Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

    Ehsan Alvandi

  7. Department of Post Graduate Studies and Research in Mathematics, Jayawanti Haksar, Government Post Graduation College, College of Barkatullah Vishwavidyalaya, Betul, M.P., India

    Chandrashekhar Meshram

  8. Department of Soil & Water Engineering, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya Jabalpur, Jabalpur, India

    Shailesh Kumar Sharma

Authors
  1. Sarita Gajbhiye Meshram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vijay P. Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ercan Kahya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ehsan Alvandi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chandrashekhar Meshram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shailesh Kumar Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarita Gajbhiye Meshram.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meshram, S.G., Singh, V.P., Kahya, E. et al. The Feasibility of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach for Prioritization of Sensitive Area at Risk of Water Erosion. Water Resour Manage 34, 4665–4685 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02681-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02681-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation